Currently, wallet rescans start from its known tip of the chain. Since
we no longer store blocks all the way from genesis to the tip of the
chain, performing a rescan would cause us to scan blocks all the way
from genesis, which we want to avoid. To prevent this, we set the
wallet's tip to be the current reorg safe height. This ensures that
we're unable to scan any blocks before it, and that we maintain
MaxReorgDepth blocks stored.
This commit serves as another building point to allow the wallet to not
store blocks all the way from genesis to the tip of chain. We modify the
wallet's recovery logic to now start from either its birthday block, or
the current reorg safe height if it's before the birthday, to ensure the
wallet properly only stores MaxReorgDepth blocks.
We also refactor things a bit in hopes of making the logic a bit more
readable.
We do this as the wallet will no longer store blocks all the way from
genesis to the tip of the chain. Instead, in order to find a reasonable
birthday block, we resort to performing a binary search for a block
timestamp that's within +/-2 hours of the birthday timestamp.
This serves as groundwork for only storing up to MaxReorgDepth blocks
upon initial sync. To do so, we want to make sure the chain backend
considers itself current so that we can only fetch the latest
MaxReorgDepth blocks from it.
This ensures the wallet can properly do an initial sync, a recovery, or
detect if it's on a stale branch before attempting to process new blocks
at tip.
Since the rescan will be triggered synchronously as well, we'll need to
catch the wallet's quit chan when handling rescan batches in order to
allow for clean shutdowns.
This unifies the logic of receiving an error when broadcasting a
confirmed transaction through btcd's/bitcoind's RPC interface. The btcd
dependency update is required in order for it to match bitcoind's
behavior. For older nodes that have yet to update, the confirmed
transaction will still be caught by the "transaction already exists"
case. This is not needed for bitcoind however, because its been sending
the same RPC error code for several major releases now.
In this commit, we address an issue with chains that are not current,
like in the often case of regtest and simnet chains. Syncing the wallet
would fail due to the chain not being current and not finding a suitable
birthday block. We fix this by just using the last synced block as the
birthday block to ensure we can properly sync to the chain.
In this commit, we fix a regression in the wallet when attempting to
sync new developer test chains such as regtest and simnet. The wallet
would block syncing until a block was mined, but in order to mine a
block, an address must be generated by the wallet first. This address
generation would block as the syncing logic was already holding the
database's mutex.
In this commit, we fix an issue with the wallet's initial sync logic
where we'd miss processing all of the blocks in the chain. This can
happen if the backend is considered current while we're still catching
up. To address this, we make sure we update our best height to process
those missed blocks.
Co-authored-by: Roei Erez <roeierez@gmail.com>
By doing this, we defer all error string-matching to happen within
publishTransaction, which allows us to simplify some of the existing
logic and maintain consistency.
In this commit, we rework how publishTransaction works in order to
correctly handle removing invalid transactions from the wallet's
unconfirmed transaction store. This is crucial as otherwise, invalid
transactions can remain within the wallet and be used for further
transactions, causing a chain of inaccurate transactions.
publishTransaction will now only return an error if the transaction
fails to be broadcast and it has not been previously seen in the
mempool/chain. This is intended in order to provide an easier API to
callers. Any other errors when broadcasting the transaction will cause
it to be removed from the wallet's unconfirmed transaction store to
ensure it maintains an accurate view of the chain.
We do this in order to be able to reuse the new publishTransaction
method within other parts of the wallet in order to consolidate all
error string-matching within one place.
This is done to avoid the birthday rescan to fail if the chain backend
reports a bestheight of 0.
Earlier it could happen that we attempted to sync to the birthday, but
since only the genesis block was available, which would be rejected as
birthday block because of the timestamp, it would fail to find a block
and the sync would fail.
In this commit, we consolidate the existing rollback logic to carry out
its duties under one database transaction.
Co-authored-by: Roei Erez <roeierez@gmail.com>
In this commit, we refactor the wallet's syncing logic with
syncWithChain to use the newer, simpler methods: syncToBirthday and
recovery. Along the way, we also fix a bug within the wallet where it
was possible to sync past the birthday, but not sync to tip completely
and restart, which would lead to us starting a rescan from the latest
synced height, rather than from the birthday stamp.
This commit slightly changes the wallet's syncing behavior to the
following:
1. Ensure the wallet is synced to its birthday.
2. Perform a recovery if requested.
3. Check for chain reorgs.
4. Dispatch a rescan from the current synced height.
Co-authored-by: Roei Erez <roeierez@gmail.com>
In this commit, we add a new recovery method to the wallet. This method
attempts to recover any unspent outputs which pay to any of the wallet's
addresses. Most of the logic found within it is heavily borrowed from
the existing syncWithChain method. This method is currently unused, but
it will end up replacing some of the existing sync logic in a later
commit.
In this commit, we add a new syncToBirthday method to the wallet. This
method intends to sync the wallet's point of the view of the chain until
finding its birthday. Most of the logic found within it is heavily
borrowed from the existing syncWithChain method. This method is
currently unused, but it will end up replacing some of the existing sync
logic in a later commit.
Co-authored-by: Roei Erez <roeierez@gmail.com>
In this commit, we address an issue that would cause users to be stuck
in an infinite loop by fetching the same candidate birthday block due to
its height not being updated if the sanity check was attempting to fix
an estimate in the future. We fix this by setting the new candidate
height so that new candidate blocks can be fetched and tested.
In this commit, we remove the wallet dependency from the
birthdaySanityCheck function. Every interaction with the wallet is now
backed by two interfaces, birthdayStore and chainConn. These interfaces
will allow us to increase the test coverage of the birthdaySanityCheck
as now we'll only need to mock out only the necessary functionality.
In this commit, we prevent any further sanity check attempts by the
wallet if its correctness has previously been verified. We do this to
ensure we don't unnecessarily attempt to find a new candidate.
In this commit, we address an issue with the wallet where it would
always request a rescan from the birthday block. This is very crucial
for older wallets, as it'll potentially go through thousands of blocks.
To address this, we'll now only request a rescan from our birthday if
we're recovering our wallet from our seed, the birthday block was rolled
back, or if we're performing our initial sync. Otherwise, we'll request
a rescan from tip.
In this commit, we address a slight regression within the wallet
that was introduced in a previous commit. When attempting to send coins
on-chain, we would never ask the chain backend to notify us of the
transaction upon confirmation. This, along with the rebroadcast of
unconfirmed transactions logic, would result in the wallet becoming out
of sync with the chain.
Below is an example of how this could have happened:
1. Send funds on-chain.
2. Wallet doesn't ask to be notified of the confirmation.
3. Since the wallet is not notified of the confirmation, the
transaction remains in the unconfirmed bucket, even though it might
have already confirmed on-chain.
4. Restart and trigger the rebroadcast of unconfirmed transactions.
5. The unconfirmed transaction is removed from the unconfirmed bucket
due to it already existing on-chain, without it being moved to the
confirmed bucket. Moving to the confirmed bucket would require the
block at which it confirmed, which we don't have at this point.
In this commit, we add a sanity check for the wallet's birthday block
before syncing as a result of the migration that populated it for
existing wallets. This is done as the second part to the migration to
ensure we do not miss any relevant events throughout rescans.
The sanity check performs two main checks: whether the birthday block
timestamp reflects a time before the birthday timestamp and whether the
delta between these two timestamps is a reasonable amount. The birthday
block is then found as the first candidate that satisfies both of these
conditions.
ImportPrivateKey
In this commit, we ensure that when an external private key is imported
into the wallet, that we do not overwrite our existing birthday with the
one provided. If this were to happen and we forced a wallet rescan using
the birthday as our starting point, then we'd miss detecting relevant
on-chain events that occurred between them.
In this commit, we modify the wallet to use the new migration logic
provided by the recently introduced migration package. Additionally,
we'll also perform all of our upgrades within the same database
transaction to guarantee fault-tolerance of the wallet.
In this commit, we relax the initial sync detection logic a bit. We do
this as right now, if a user creates an address during the sync point,
if they restart, then we'll fall back to performing a rescan from that
height as we'll detect that we aren't performing the initial sync, so
won't pick up the birthday timestamp.
To fix this, we now declare that if we have no UTXO's, then we're still
performing the initial sync. This solves this issue as when the user
restarts, we'll continue to wait for the backend to sync, and pick up
the proper birthday height before we attempt to scan forward for the
rescan. However, the one tradeoff is that we'll now always start the
rescan from the birthday height until the wallet has gained it's first
UTXO. I don't think this is too bad, as after all, the point of a wallet
is to manage utxos.
