fix bug with resolve and conflicting claim_id segments
This commit is contained in:
parent
a7f8febed7
commit
bb8a2bfff7
3 changed files with 12 additions and 53 deletions
|
@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ def resolve_url(raw_url):
|
|||
if set(query) == {'name'}:
|
||||
query['is_controlling'] = True
|
||||
else:
|
||||
query['order_by'] = ['^height']
|
||||
query['order_by'] = ['^creation_height']
|
||||
matches = _search(**query, limit=1)
|
||||
if matches:
|
||||
channel = matches[0]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -259,58 +259,6 @@ class ResolveCommand(BaseResolveTestCase):
|
|||
'@olds/bad_example': {'error': '@olds/bad_example did not resolve to a claim'}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
async def _test_resolve_abc_foo(self):
|
||||
response = await self.resolve('lbry://@abc/foo')
|
||||
claim = response['lbry://@abc/foo']
|
||||
self.assertIn('signing_channel', claim)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(claim['name'], 'foo')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(claim['signing_channel']['name'], '@abc')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(claim['meta']['claims_in_channel'], 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
claim['timestamp'],
|
||||
self.ledger.headers[claim['height']]['timestamp']
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
claim['signing_channel']['timestamp'],
|
||||
self.ledger.headers[claim['signing_channel']['height']]['timestamp']
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@skip('this test does not work with new resolve')
|
||||
async def test_resolve_lru_cache_doesnt_persist_errors(self):
|
||||
original_get_transaction = self.daemon.wallet_manager.ledger.network.get_transaction
|
||||
|
||||
async def timeout_get_transaction(txid):
|
||||
fut = self.loop.create_future()
|
||||
|
||||
def delayed_raise_cancelled_error():
|
||||
fut.set_exception(asyncio.CancelledError())
|
||||
|
||||
self.loop.call_soon(delayed_raise_cancelled_error)
|
||||
return await fut
|
||||
|
||||
tx = await self.channel_create('@abc', '0.01')
|
||||
channel_id = self.get_claim_id(tx)
|
||||
await self.stream_create('foo', '0.01', channel_id=channel_id)
|
||||
|
||||
# raise a cancelled error from get_transaction
|
||||
self.daemon.wallet_manager.ledger.network.get_transaction = timeout_get_transaction
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(KeyError):
|
||||
await self._test_resolve_abc_foo()
|
||||
|
||||
# restore the real get_transaction that doesn't cancel, it should be called and the result cached
|
||||
self.daemon.wallet_manager.ledger.network.get_transaction = original_get_transaction
|
||||
await self._test_resolve_abc_foo()
|
||||
called_again = asyncio.Event(loop=self.loop)
|
||||
|
||||
def check_result_cached(txid):
|
||||
called_again.set()
|
||||
return original_get_transaction(txid)
|
||||
|
||||
# check that the result was cached
|
||||
self.daemon.wallet_manager.ledger.network.get_transaction = check_result_cached
|
||||
await self._test_resolve_abc_foo()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(called_again.is_set())
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ResolveAfterReorg(BaseResolveTestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ class TestClaimtrie(TestSQLDB):
|
|||
tx_chan_a = self.get_channel_with_claim_id_prefix('a', 1, key=b'c')
|
||||
tx_chan_ab = self.get_channel_with_claim_id_prefix('ab', 72, key=b'c')
|
||||
txo_chan_a = tx_chan_a[0].tx.outputs[0]
|
||||
txo_chan_ab = tx_chan_ab[0].tx.outputs[0]
|
||||
advance(1, [tx_chan_a])
|
||||
advance(2, [tx_chan_ab])
|
||||
r_ab, r_a = reader._search(order_by=['creation_height'], limit=2)
|
||||
|
@ -379,6 +380,12 @@ class TestClaimtrie(TestSQLDB):
|
|||
self.assertEqual("@foo#a/foo#ab", r_ab2['canonical_url'])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(2, reader._search(claim_id=txo_chan_a.claim_id, limit=1)[0]['claims_in_channel'])
|
||||
|
||||
# pick correct claim in case of claims with conflicting claim id segments
|
||||
# make sure that activation_height is used instead of height (issue #2448)
|
||||
# after updating chan "a" check this again
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reader.resolve_url("@foo#a")['claim_hash'], txo_chan_a.claim_hash)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reader.resolve_url("@foo#ab")['claim_hash'], txo_chan_ab.claim_hash)
|
||||
|
||||
# change channel public key, invaliding stream claim signatures
|
||||
advance(8, [self.get_channel_update(txo_chan_a, COIN, key=b'a')])
|
||||
r_ab2, r_a2 = reader._search(order_by=['creation_height'], limit=2)
|
||||
|
@ -398,6 +405,10 @@ class TestClaimtrie(TestSQLDB):
|
|||
self.assertEqual("@foo#a/foo#ab", r_ab2['canonical_url'])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(2, reader._search(claim_id=txo_chan_a.claim_id, limit=1)[0]['claims_in_channel'])
|
||||
|
||||
# check chan "a" is still resolved (issue #2448)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reader.resolve_url("@foo#a")['claim_hash'], txo_chan_a.claim_hash)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reader.resolve_url("@foo#ab")['claim_hash'], txo_chan_ab.claim_hash)
|
||||
|
||||
# claim abandon updates claims_in_channel
|
||||
advance(10, [self.get_abandon(tx_ab2)])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(1, reader._search(claim_id=txo_chan_a.claim_id, limit=1)[0]['claims_in_channel'])
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue