Assert on probable deadlocks if the second lock isnt try_lock
This commit is contained in:
parent
6d6b11e793
commit
0fcc4e1e04
1 changed files with 39 additions and 10 deletions
49
src/sync.cpp
49
src/sync.cpp
|
@ -33,20 +33,22 @@ void PrintLockContention(const char* pszName, const char* pszFile, int nLine)
|
|||
//
|
||||
|
||||
struct CLockLocation {
|
||||
CLockLocation(const char* pszName, const char* pszFile, int nLine)
|
||||
CLockLocation(const char* pszName, const char* pszFile, int nLine, bool fTryIn)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mutexName = pszName;
|
||||
sourceFile = pszFile;
|
||||
sourceLine = nLine;
|
||||
fTry = fTryIn;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::string ToString() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return mutexName + " " + sourceFile + ":" + itostr(sourceLine);
|
||||
return mutexName + " " + sourceFile + ":" + itostr(sourceLine) + (fTry ? " (TRY)" : "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::string MutexName() const { return mutexName; }
|
||||
|
||||
bool fTry;
|
||||
private:
|
||||
std::string mutexName;
|
||||
std::string sourceFile;
|
||||
|
@ -62,23 +64,52 @@ static boost::thread_specific_ptr<LockStack> lockstack;
|
|||
|
||||
static void potential_deadlock_detected(const std::pair<void*, void*>& mismatch, const LockStack& s1, const LockStack& s2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// We attempt to not assert on probably-not deadlocks by assuming that
|
||||
// a try lock will immediately have otherwise bailed if it had
|
||||
// failed to get the lock
|
||||
// We do this by, for the locks which triggered the potential deadlock,
|
||||
// in either lockorder, checking that the second of the two which is locked
|
||||
// is only a TRY_LOCK, ignoring locks if they are reentrant.
|
||||
bool firstLocked = false;
|
||||
bool secondLocked = false;
|
||||
bool onlyMaybeDeadlock = false;
|
||||
|
||||
LogPrintf("POTENTIAL DEADLOCK DETECTED\n");
|
||||
LogPrintf("Previous lock order was:\n");
|
||||
BOOST_FOREACH (const PAIRTYPE(void*, CLockLocation) & i, s2) {
|
||||
if (i.first == mismatch.first)
|
||||
if (i.first == mismatch.first) {
|
||||
LogPrintf(" (1)");
|
||||
if (i.first == mismatch.second)
|
||||
if (!firstLocked && secondLocked && i.second.fTry)
|
||||
onlyMaybeDeadlock = true;
|
||||
firstLocked = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (i.first == mismatch.second) {
|
||||
LogPrintf(" (2)");
|
||||
if (!secondLocked && firstLocked && i.second.fTry)
|
||||
onlyMaybeDeadlock = true;
|
||||
secondLocked = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
LogPrintf(" %s\n", i.second.ToString());
|
||||
}
|
||||
firstLocked = false;
|
||||
secondLocked = false;
|
||||
LogPrintf("Current lock order is:\n");
|
||||
BOOST_FOREACH (const PAIRTYPE(void*, CLockLocation) & i, s1) {
|
||||
if (i.first == mismatch.first)
|
||||
if (i.first == mismatch.first) {
|
||||
LogPrintf(" (1)");
|
||||
if (i.first == mismatch.second)
|
||||
if (!firstLocked && secondLocked && i.second.fTry)
|
||||
onlyMaybeDeadlock = true;
|
||||
firstLocked = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (i.first == mismatch.second) {
|
||||
LogPrintf(" (2)");
|
||||
if (!secondLocked && firstLocked && i.second.fTry)
|
||||
onlyMaybeDeadlock = true;
|
||||
secondLocked = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
LogPrintf(" %s\n", i.second.ToString());
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert(onlyMaybeDeadlock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void push_lock(void* c, const CLockLocation& locklocation, bool fTry)
|
||||
|
@ -101,10 +132,8 @@ static void push_lock(void* c, const CLockLocation& locklocation, bool fTry)
|
|||
lockorders[p1] = (*lockstack);
|
||||
|
||||
std::pair<void*, void*> p2 = std::make_pair(c, i.first);
|
||||
if (lockorders.count(p2)) {
|
||||
if (lockorders.count(p2))
|
||||
potential_deadlock_detected(p1, lockorders[p2], lockorders[p1]);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
dd_mutex.unlock();
|
||||
|
@ -119,7 +148,7 @@ static void pop_lock()
|
|||
|
||||
void EnterCritical(const char* pszName, const char* pszFile, int nLine, void* cs, bool fTry)
|
||||
{
|
||||
push_lock(cs, CLockLocation(pszName, pszFile, nLine), fTry);
|
||||
push_lock(cs, CLockLocation(pszName, pszFile, nLine, fTry), fTry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void LeaveCritical()
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue