diff --git a/src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp b/src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp
index 62a1676e2..60af773b1 100644
--- a/src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp
+++ b/src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp
@@ -172,8 +172,7 @@ bool Consensus::CheckTxInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState& state, c
 
         // If prev is coinbase, check that it's matured
         if (coin.IsCoinBase() && nSpendHeight - coin.nHeight < COINBASE_MATURITY) {
-            return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MISSING_INPUTS, false,
-                REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase", false,
+            return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MISSING_INPUTS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase", false,
                 strprintf("tried to spend coinbase at depth %d", nSpendHeight - coin.nHeight));
         }
 
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp
index 6aa2941e5..d7595627e 100644
--- a/src/validation.cpp
+++ b/src/validation.cpp
@@ -760,8 +760,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
             const uint256 &hashAncestor = ancestorIt->GetTx().GetHash();
             if (setConflicts.count(hashAncestor))
             {
-                return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false,
-                                 REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx", false,
+                return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx", false,
                                  strprintf("%s spends conflicting transaction %s",
                                            hash.ToString(),
                                            hashAncestor.ToString()));
@@ -803,8 +802,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
                 CFeeRate oldFeeRate(mi->GetModifiedFee(), mi->GetTxSize());
                 if (newFeeRate <= oldFeeRate)
                 {
-                    return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false,
-                            REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
+                    return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
                             strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s",
                                   hash.ToString(),
                                   newFeeRate.ToString(),
@@ -832,8 +830,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
                     nConflictingSize += it->GetTxSize();
                 }
             } else {
-                return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false,
-                        REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements", false,
+                return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements", false,
                         strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n",
                             hash.ToString(),
                             nConflictingCount,
@@ -852,8 +849,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
                     // it's cheaper to just check if the new input refers to a
                     // tx that's in the mempool.
                     if (pool.exists(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash)) {
-                        return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false,
-                                         REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed", false,
+                        return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed", false,
                                          strprintf("replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d",
                                                   hash.ToString(), j));
                     }
@@ -865,8 +861,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
             // transactions would not be paid for.
             if (nModifiedFees < nConflictingFees)
             {
-                return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false,
-                                 REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
+                return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
                                  strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s",
                                           hash.ToString(), FormatMoney(nModifiedFees), FormatMoney(nConflictingFees)));
             }
@@ -876,8 +871,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
             CAmount nDeltaFees = nModifiedFees - nConflictingFees;
             if (nDeltaFees < ::incrementalRelayFee.GetFee(nSize))
             {
-                return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false,
-                        REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
+                return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
                         strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s",
                               hash.ToString(),
                               FormatMoney(nDeltaFees),
@@ -899,7 +893,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
                 !CheckInputs(tx, stateDummy, view, true, scriptVerifyFlags & ~SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK, true, false, txdata)) {
                 // Only the witness is missing, so the transaction itself may be fine.
                 state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED, false,
-                          state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), true, state.GetDebugMessage());
+                        state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), true, state.GetDebugMessage());
             }
             return false; // state filled in by CheckInputs
         }
@@ -1970,7 +1964,7 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl
                     // CheckTxInputs may return MISSING_INPUTS but we can't return that, as
                     // it's not defined for a block, so we reset the reason flag to CONSENSUS here.
                     state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false,
-                              state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), state.CorruptionPossible(), state.GetDebugMessage());
+                            state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), state.CorruptionPossible(), state.GetDebugMessage());
                 }
                 return error("%s: Consensus::CheckTxInputs: %s, %s", __func__, tx.GetHash().ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
             }