e56771365b Do not use uppercase characters in source code filenames (practicalswift)
419a1983ca docs: Add a note about the source code filename naming convention (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add a note about the source code filename naming convention.
Tree-SHA512: 8d329bd9e19bcd26e74b0862fb0bc2369b46095dbd3e69d34859908632763abd7c3d00ccc44ee059772ad4bae4460c2bcc1c0e22fd9d8876d57e5fcd346cea4b
16e3cd380a Clarify include recommendation (practicalswift)
6d10f43738 Enforce the use of bracket syntax includes ("#include <foo.h>") (practicalswift)
906bee8e5f Use bracket syntax includes ("#include <foo.h>") (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
When analysing includes in the project it is often assumed that the preferred bracket include syntax (`#include <foo.h>`) mentioned in `developer-docs.md` is used consistently. @sipa:s excellent circular dependencies script [`circular-dependencies.py`](50c69b7801/contrib/devtools/circular-dependencies.py) (#13228) is an example of a script making this reasonable assumption.
This PR enables automatic Travis checking of the include syntax making sure that the bracket syntax includes (`#include <foo.h>`) is used consistently.
Tree-SHA512: a414921aabe8e487ebed42f3f1cbd02fecd1add385065c1f2244cd602c31889e61fea5a801507ec501ef9bd309b05d3c999f915cec1c2b44f085bb0d2835c182
67e0e04140 [wallet] [docs] Update release notes for removing `getlabeladdress` (John Newbery)
81608178cf [wallet] [rpc] Remove getlabeladdress RPC (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
labels are associated with addresses (rather than addresses being
associated with labels, as was the case with accounts). The
getlabeladdress does not make sense in this model, so remove it.
getaccountaddress is still supported for one release as the accounts
API is deprecated.
Tree-SHA512: 7f45d0456248ebcc4e54dd34e2578a09a8ea8e4fceda75238ccea9d731dc99a3f3c0519b18a9739de17d2e6e59c9c2259ba67c9ae2e3cb2a40ddb14b9193fe29
cbede7dbfd [qt] OptionsDialog: add prune setting (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
The default suggested value is 2 GB. Minimum is 1 GB (550 MB rounded up).
When the user toggles this setting, a strong warning appears that undoing requires re-downloading the chain:
<img width="478" alt="schermafbeelding 2018-05-15 om 12 35 24" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/40051858-7939cc20-583c-11e8-9120-327a75376732.png">
Tooltip points out that actual disk usage can be higher. It's a bit vague on the "advanced features", because I'm assuming anyone who needs to use `-rescan` and `-txindex` will read the documentation, and a more detailed text would needlessly confuse everyone else.
<img width="450" alt="schermafbeelding 2018-05-15 om 12 33 51" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/40051791-49d6156a-583c-11e8-97b9-7de6dfd8c481.png">
The UI uses gigabytes for readability and easy of use. There is also no manual pruning UI (`prune=1`). The user will have to use `bitcoin.conf` for those things.
Fixes#6461. When combined with #13029 the user, after pruning their node, can safely reset settings and/or use bitcoind without having to edit `bitcoin.conf`. However I don't think that's an essential prerequisite.
Tree-SHA512: e17aff276d7235fbd40796adb6431d430620788a753ee13bc064abd35d2edc4280a3d3cddc18e42b4e00edff13ed18fd4f2a966c6f0b43b689afd13673e0c4bf
2b30ccc30a [docs] update transifex doc link (Cristian Mircea Messel)
Pull request description:
The old link is no longer working.
#13364
Tree-SHA512: 5729b9eabbdf8e05cb60be1bedc7e21a2052bb2921dca8322d8348c3ea0f7ee33f2e2e32a19f21bbe2b93b48ed221cfcb020592d0e6b118b77ca34e14bb30b89
docs: Linked to the 'Building on FreeBSD' section of the Unix guide where it lists BSD specific guides.
Created a FreeBSD build guide (doc/build-freebsd.md).
Added in warning about the version of 'gdb' installed by default.
Removed the FreeBSD build instructions now that they have their own guide (doc/build-freebsd.md).
Updated the sentence to refer to the BSD guides in the 'doc' directory for more specific BSD build instructions.
Minor grammatical fix.
fa3c910bfe test: Move linters to test/lint, add readme (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This moves the checks and linters from `devtools` to a subfolder in `test`. (Motivated by my opinion that the dev tools are mostly for generating code and updating the repo whereas the linters are read-only checks.)
Also, adds a readme to clarify that checks and linters are only meant to prevent bugs and user facing issues, not merely stylistic preference or inconsistencies. (This is motivated by the diversity in developers and work flows as well as existing code styles. It would be too disruptive to change all existing code to a single style or too burdensome to force all developers to adhere to a single style. Also note that our style guide is changing, so locking in at the wrong style "too early" would only waste resources.)
Tree-SHA512: 9b10e89f2aeaf0c8a9ae248aa891d74e0abf0569f8e5dfd266446efa8bfaf19f0ea0980abf0b0b22f0d8416ee90d7435d21a9f9285b66df43f370b7979173406
87fe292d89 doc: Mention disabling BIP61 in bips.md (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
fe16dd8226 net: Add option `-enablebip61` to configure sending of BIP61 notifications (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
This commit adds a boolean option `-peersendreject`, defaulting to `1`, that can be used to disable the sending of [BIP61](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0061.mediawiki) `reject` messages. This functionality has been requested for various reasons:
- security (DoS): reject messages can reveal internal state that can be used to target certain resources such as the mempool more easily.
- bandwidth: a typical node sends lots of reject messages; this counts against upstream bandwidth. Also the reject messages tend to be larger than the message that was rejected.
On the other hand, reject messages can be useful while developing client software (I found them indispensable while creating bitcoin-submittx), as well as for our own test cases, so whatever the default becomes on the long run, IMO the functionality should be retained as option. But that's a discussion for later, for now it's simply a node operator decision.
Also adds a RPC test that checks the functionality.
Tree-SHA512: 9488cc53e13cd8e5c6f8eb472a44309572673405c1d1438c3488f627fae622c95e2198bde5ed7d29e56b948e2918bf1920239e9f865889f4c37c097c37a4d7a9
9d4f9421a4 doc: Bump to Ubuntu Bionic 18.04 in build-windows.md (Chun Kuan Lee)
Pull request description:
Windows starts to provide Ubuntu 18.04 WSL, it can be downloaded from Microsoft Store.
Tree-SHA512: a96ed03f36894ad867fd88631c1497eac7fc1cdaee8f59f36f34781df0b0f0b352a1bd8f09eba61002534fb7e0fe460006f223e37d61ad888197a36d17b43178
25b7ab9 doc: Add release notes for -includeconf (Karl-Johan Alm)
0f0badd test: Test includeconf parameter. (Karl-Johan Alm)
629ff8c -includeconf=<path> support in config handler, for including external configuration files (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #10071.
Done:
- adds `-includeconf=<path>`, where `<path>` is relative to `datadir` or to the path of the file being read, if in a file
- protects against circular includes
- updates help docs
~~~Thoughts:~~~
- ~~~I am not sure how to test this in a neat manner. Feedback on this would be nice. Will dig/think though.~~~
Tree-SHA512: cb31f1b2f69fbc0890d264948eb2e501ac05cf12f5e06a5942f9c1539eb15ea8dc3cae817f4073aecb2fcc21d0386747f14f89d990772003a76e2a6d25642553
1e46d8a Get rid of ambiguous OutputType::NONE value (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Based on suggestion by @sipa https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12119#issuecomment-357982763
After #12119, the NONE output type was overloaded to refer to either an output type that couldn't be parsed, or to an automatic change output mode. This change drops the NONE enum and uses a simple bool to indicate parse failure, and a new CHANGE_AUTO enum to refer the change output type.
This change is almost a pure refactoring except it makes RPCs reject empty string ("") address types instead of treating them like they were unset. This simplifies the parsing code a little bit and could prevent RPC usage mistakes. It's noted in the release notes.
Follows up #12408 by @MarcoFalke
Followups for future PRs:
- [ ] Add explicit support for specifying "auto" in `ParseOutputType` as suggested by promag and sipa: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#issuecomment-374799567 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#discussion_r175969481
- [ ] Add wallet `AddressChangeType` method to complement `TransactionChangeType`: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#discussion_r175969618.
Tree-SHA512: 8b08b272bcb177a0a9e556dcd965840a7fe601ef83ca97938b879c9b1a33b5b3f96939e1bceef11ba7c644ac21bfd6c1dbc6ca715cd1da4ace50475240e4ee48
39d2911 [Docs] Add version footnote to tor.md (Damian Williamson)
Pull request description:
[Docs] Add version footnote to tor.md
Added note to section 2, part -edits to `/etc/tor/torrc`- indicating this is only required for Tor version 0.2.7.0 and older, since section 3 states it is valid for Tor version 0.2.7.1 and newer. Added ref link from section 2 version footnote to section 3. Re-styled headings to work on GitHub -alternate heading style markup creation issue with numbered headings and thus headings and automatic heading links are broken-
Ref: [Issue# 12376](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12376)
Signed-off-by: Damian Williamson \<willtech@live.com.au\>
Tree-SHA512: 439f4ccc3e196011af448b220adf26b0e653ac589bf4cfbbc276c1500c9d08f209c9d6101e4d232857779d9f25164cfb222ed30e3d63de116f9121e6ebde31c3
Added note to section 2, part -edits to `/etc/tor/torrc`- indicating this is only required for Tor version 0.2.7.0 and older, since section 3 states it is valid for Tor version 0.2.7.1 and newer. Added ref link from section 2 version footnote to section 3. Re-styled headings to work on GitHub -alternate heading style markup creation issue with numbered headings and thus headings and automatic heading links are broken- Ref: [Issue# 12376](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12376)
Signed-off-by: Damian Williamson <willtech@live.com.au>
7d0f80b Use anonymous namespace instead of static functions (Pieter Wuille)
b61fb71 Mention removal of bare multisig IsMine in release notes (Pieter Wuille)
9c2a8b8 Do not treat bare multisig as IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
08f3228 Optimization: only test for witness scripts at top level (Pieter Wuille)
3619735 Track difference between scriptPubKey and P2SH execution in IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
ac6ec62 Switch to a private version of SigVersion inside IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
19fc973 Do not expose SigVersion argument to IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
fb1dfbb Remove unused IsMine overload (Pieter Wuille)
952d821 Make CScript -> CScriptID conversion explicit (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Currently our wallet code will treat bare multisig outputs (meaning scriptPubKeys with multiple public keys + `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` operator in it) as ours without the user asking for it, as long as all private keys in it are in our wallet.
This is a pointless feature. As it only works when all private keys are in one place, it's useless compared to single key outputs (P2PK, P2PKH, P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WPKH), and worse in terms of space, cost, UTXO size, and ability to test (due to lack of address format for them).
Furthermore, they are problematic in that producing a list of all `scriptPubKeys` we accept is not tractable (it involves all combinations of all public keys that are ours). In further wallet changes I'd like to move to a model where all scriptPubKeys that are treated as ours are explicit, rather than defined by whatever keys we have. The current behavior of the wallet is very hard to model in such a design, so I'd like to get rid of it.
I think there are two options:
* Remove it entirely (do not ever accept bare multisig outputs as ours, unless watched)
* Only accept bare multisig outputs in situations where the P2SH version of that output would also be acceptable
This PR implements the first option. The second option was explored in #12874.
Tree-SHA512: 917ed45b3cac864cee53e27f9a3e900390c576277fbd6751b1250becea04d692b3b426fa09065a3399931013bd579c4f3dbeeb29d51d19ed0c64da75d430ad9a
7de1de7 Add new fee structure with all sub-fields denominated in BTC (mryandao)
Pull request description:
the denomination for `fee` is current in btc while the other such as `decendentFee` and `ancestorFee` are in satoshis.
Tree-SHA512: e428f6dca1d339f89ab73e38ce5903f5465c46b159069d9bcc3f8b1140fe6657fa49a11abe0088e9f7ba9999f64af72a349a4735bf5eaa61b8e4a185b23543f3
fad2958 [doc] build-windows: Switch to Artful, since Zesty is EOL (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases#End_of_Life, Zesty is EOL, so bump to Artful for now.
Note that Artful is going to be EOL soon as well, so I am not sure how to proceed after that.
Tree-SHA512: 8efc1ade429cf053f4c69e764175aad8790ded71f04bb9963202be171f1cfa1a3de55a207c0b19271d2f536feafa754ed71a6fafc597e3023bdf0e02fa5cd5e5
cead28b [docs] Add release notes for deprecated 'account' API (John Newbery)
72c9575 [wallet] [tests] Add tests for accounts/labels APIs (John Newbery)
109e05d [wallet] [rpc] Deprecate wallet 'account' API (John Newbery)
3576ab1 [wallet] [rpc] Deprecate account RPC methods (John Newbery)
3db1ba0 [tests] Set -deprecatedrpc=accounts in tests (John Newbery)
4e671f0 [tests] Rename rpc_listtransactions.py to wallet_listtransactions.py (John Newbery)
a28b907 [wallet] [rpc] Remove duplicate entries in rpcwallet.cpp's CRPCCommand table (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Deprecate all accounts functionality and make it only accessible by using `-deprecatedrpc=accounts`.
Accounts specific RPCs, account arguments, and account related results all require the `-deprecatedrpc=accunts` startup option now in order to see account things.
Several wallet functional tests use the accounts system. Those tests are unchanged, except to start the nodes with `-deprecatedrpc=accounts`. We can slowly migrate those tests to use the 'label' API instead of the 'account' API before accounts are fully removed.
Tree-SHA512: 89f4ae2fe6de4a1422f1817b0997ae22d63ab5a1a558362ce923a3871f3e42963405d6573c69c27f1764679cdee5b51bf52202cc407f1361bfd8066d652f3f37
9e50c337c Note new weight field in release-notes. (Matt Corallo)
d0d9112b7 Test new weight field in p2p_segwit (Matt Corallo)
2874709a9 Expose a transaction's weight via RPC (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This seems like an obvious oversight.
Tree-SHA512: defd047de34fb06a31f589e1a4eef68fcae85095cc67b7c8fb434237bb40300d7f3f97e852d3e7226330e26b96943846b7baf6da0cfc79db8d56e9c1f7848ad9
c25321f Add config changes to release notes (Anthony Towns)
5e3cbe0 [tests] Unit tests for -testnet/-regtest in [test]/[regtest] sections (Anthony Towns)
005ad26 ArgsManager: special handling for -regtest and -testnet (Anthony Towns)
608415d [tests] Unit tests for network-specific config entries (Anthony Towns)
68797e2 ArgsManager: Warn when ignoring network-specific config setting (Anthony Towns)
d1fc4d9 ArgsManager: limit some options to only apply on mainnet when in default section (Anthony Towns)
8a9817d [tests] Use regtest section in functional tests configs (Anthony Towns)
30f9407 [tests] Unit tests for config file sections (Anthony Towns)
95eb66d ArgsManager: support config file sections (Anthony Towns)
4d34fcc ArgsManager: drop m_negated_args (Anthony Towns)
3673ca3 ArgsManager: keep command line and config file arguments separate (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
The weekly meeting on [2017-12-07](http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2017/bitcoin-core-dev.2017-12-07-19.00.log.html) discussed allowing options to bitcoin to have some sensitivity to what network is in use. @theuni suggested having sections in the config file:
<cfields> an alternative to that would be sections in a config file. and on the
cmdline they'd look like namespaces. so, [testnet] port=5. or -testnet::port=5.
This approach is (more or less) supported by `boost::program_options::detail::config_file_iterator` -- when it sees a `[testnet]` section with `port=5`, it will treat that the same as "testnet.port=5". So `[testnet] port=5` (or `testnet.port=5` without the section header) in bitcoin.conf and `-testnet.port=5` on the command line.
The other aspect to this question is possibly limiting some options so that there is no possibility of accidental cross-contamination across networks. For example, if you're using a particular wallet.dat on mainnet, you may not want to accidentally use the same wallet on testnet and risk reusing keys.
I've set this up so that the `-addnode` and `-wallet` options are `NETWORK_ONLY`, so that if you have a bitcoin.conf:
wallet=/secret/wallet.dat
upnp=1
and you run `bitcoind -testnet` or `bitcoind -regtest`, then the `wallet=` setting will be ignored, and should behave as if your bitcoin.conf had specified:
upnp=1
[main]
wallet=/secret/wallet.dat
For any `NETWORK_ONLY` options, if you're using `-testnet` or `-regtest`, you'll have to add the prefix to any command line options. This was necessary for `multiwallet.py` for instance.
I've left the "default" options as taking precedence over network specific ones, which might be backwards. So if you have:
maxmempool=200
[regtest]
maxmempool=100
your maxmempool will still be 200 on regtest. The advantage of doing it this way is that if you have `[regtest] maxmempool=100` in bitcoin.conf, and then say `bitcoind -regtest -maxmempool=200`, the same result is probably in line with what you expect...
The other thing to note is that I'm using the chain names from `chainparamsbase.cpp` / `ChainNameFromCommandLine`, so the sections are `[main]`, `[test]` and `[regtest]`; not `[mainnet]` or `[testnet]` as might be expected.
Thoughts? Ping @MeshCollider @laanwj @jonasschnelli @morcos
Tree-SHA512: f00b5eb75f006189987e5c15e154a42b66ee251777768c1e185d764279070fcb7c41947d8794092b912a03d985843c82e5189871416995436a6260520fb7a4db
Suggested formatting for namespaces in the developer guide is currently
inconsistent. This commit updates the developer guide and clang-format
configuration to consistently put "namespace" and opening/closing braces
on the same line. Example:
```c++
namespace boost {
namespace signals2 {
class connection;
} // namespace signals2
} // namespace boost
```
Currently the "Source code organization" section has an example like the one
above, but the "Coding style" section example and description put a newline
between the opening "namespace foo" and brace (but oddly no newline between
closing namespace and brace).
Avoiding newlines before namespace opening braces makes nested declarations
less verbose and also avoids asymmetry with closing braces. It's also a
common style used in other codebases:
* https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Namespaces
* https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style#Classes
* https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#namespace-indentation
fad0fc3c9a Refine travis check for duplicate includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Since there is no harm in having "duplicate" includes and it makes it obvious what are the dependencies of each file, without having to do static analysis or jumping between files, I'd suggest to revert the travis check for duplicate includes.
Generally, I think that enforcing minor style preferences should not be done via travis. The cost of maintaining and the burden on other developers is too high. C.f discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10973#discussion_r180142594
Tree-SHA512: 97ab0e769d457ccfb873fff6c99613f8b944cd7ef95bfdccb0e1bbe8f5df1f16548c658fa03af42516f806546e75646d338a061e7b057619490235d311ca21f1
