333317ce6b test: Test that low difficulty chain fork is rejected (MarcoFalke)
fa31dc1bf4 test: Pass down correct chain name in tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To prevent OOM, Bitcoin Core will reject chain forks at low difficulty by default. This is the only use-case of checkpoints, so add a test for it to make sure the feature works as expected. If it didn't work, checkpoints would have no use-case and we might as well remove them
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Thanks for adding the node 1 example. Code review ACK 333317c
Tree-SHA512: 90dffa540d0904f3cffb61d2382b1a26f84fe9560b7013e4461546383add31a8757b350616a6d43217c59ef7b8b2a1b62bb3bab582c679cbb2c660a782ce7be1
1d524c62ea tests: rename 'test_getnetworkinginfo' in 'test_getnetworkinfo' (darosior)
07a8f65031 tests: add a test for the 'servicesnames' RPC field (darosior)
Pull request description:
As per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16787#issuecomment-529801457, fixes#16844.
This adds a test for both commands in the first commit and renames the test for `getnetworkinfo` in the second commit.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 1d524c62ea
Tree-SHA512: 8267dce4d54356debab75014e6f9ba885b892da605ed32f26a5446c232992fcae761861bb678adbdb942815d4706f3768c70deee6afec68f219b23605475be01
Recent questions have come up regarding dynamic service registration
(see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16442#discussion_r308702676
and the assumeutxo project, which needs to dynamically flip NODE_NETWORK).
While investigating how dynamic service registration might work, I was
confused about how we convey local services to peers. This adds some
documentation that hopefully clarifies this process.
1619684322 Added libbitcoin_qt and bitcoin-qt to the msbuild configuration. (Aaron Clauson)
Pull request description:
This PR has ~~90%~~ all of the work done to allow the bitcoin Qt programs to be built with msvc and the appveyor script.
Outstanding issues:
- ~~There are ~~3~~ ~~6~~ 5 code tweaks required for the bitcoin Qt components to be built without warnings with msvc. They seem minor~~,
- Building Qt as a static library for Windows is painful and time consuming. I doubt it will ever be possible to build Qt from source as part of an appveyor job (and it would probably take over an hour even if it was). My tentative solution is to build locally and upload the binaries as a [github release](https://github.com/sipsorcery/qt_win_binary/releases). The msvc build is only for testing and tinkering but even so this doesn't feel like the ideal solution. Open to suggestions?
- ~~There is still an issue to sort out with the payment request URL handling. Building Qt with openssl is an extra headache. I will continue to work on getting this working.~~
The big benefit of this PR is the ability to run bitcoin-qt within a Visual Studio debugging session which could expedite tracking down issues on Windows.
On a side note the test-bitcoin-qt tests fail very early, probably due to *nix specific tests. I haven't dug into them at this point.
**Update 28 Jun 2019**: The ENABLE_BIP70 option is now off (it's flagged for removal as per #15584). With it disabled msbuild does not require any code changes to build the Bitcoin Core Qt applications.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
re-ACK 1619684322 - AppVeyor looks ok now.
Tree-SHA512: c0d3fd53b3ff99096b2505d519ed5ca6791bc4bce77addf9c520dc042eec5980a51a1fb9f0aa72e9cc53773085c43218793ca7a915a47806a3a1ffb84d9409f9
ec4c79326b signrawtransaction*: improve error for partial signing (Anthony Towns)
3c481f8921 signrawtransactionwithkey: better error messages for bad redeemScript/witnessScript (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Two fixes for `signrawtransactionwith{key,wallet}` (in addition to #16250): one that checks redeemScript/witnessScript matches scriptPubKey (and if both are provided that they match each other sanely), and the other changes the warning when some-but-not-all the signatures for a CHECKMULTISIG are provided to something that suggests more signatures may be all that's required.
Fixes: #13218Fixes: #14823
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK ec4c79326b
achow101:
Code Review ACK ec4c79326b
meshcollider:
utACK ec4c79326b
Tree-SHA512: 0c95c91d498e85b834662b9e5c83f336ed5fd306be7701ce1dbfa0836fbeb448a267a796585512f7496e820be668b07c2a0a2f45e52dc23f09ee7d9c87e42b35
0c6054fc9f depends: Bump QT to LTS release 5.9.8 (THETCR)
Pull request description:
This update is only a minor version but in contrary to 5.9.7 it's a LTS release.
It doesn't add any new functionality to Qt but fixes multiple security issues and bugs.
Including some race conditions and annoying bugs on macOS.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 0c6054fc9f. Lightly tested on macOS 10.14.6. Not really sure what difference would matter on macOS.
Tree-SHA512: f01d947cc0db6d761e32551071fa00fe8014fb7b2ce707271a159bb61c6d60e062ac8f4da5f36bd8fc4736e1e852368a1353ea3f994f61f1d0c76cc7d1664938
3bf9d8cac0 Testchains: Qt: Simplify network/chain styles (Jorge Timón)
052c54ecb0 Testchains: Generic selection with -chain=<str> in addition of -testnet and -regtest (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
Separated from #8994 as suggested by MarcoFalke and Sjors in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8994#issuecomment-522555390
You can't really test the qt changes on their own, so to test them, use #8994 .
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3bf9d8cac0
Tree-SHA512: 5b5e6083ebc0a44505a507fac633e7af18037c85e5e73f5d1e6f7e730575d3297ba8a31d1c2441df623b273f061c32d8fa324f4aa6bead01d23e88582029b568
66740f460a doc: add a release note for the new field in 'getpeerinfo' and 'getnetworkinfo' (darosior)
6564f58c87 rpc/net: decode the services flags in a new entry (darosior)
Pull request description:
This is a reopen of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15511#issuecomment-527087370 since there have been concept ACKs from sdaftuar and Sjors.
This adds a new entry to `getpeerinfo` and `getnetworkinfo` which decodes the network services flags.
Here is a truncated output of `getpeerinfo`:
```
"services": "000000000000040d",
"servicesnames": "NODE_NETWORK | NODE_BLOOM | NODE_WITNESS | NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED",
"relaytxes": true,
```
And one of `getnetworkinfo`:
```
"localservices": "0000000000000409",
"localservicesnames": "NODE_NETWORK | NODE_WITNESS | NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED",
"localrelay": true,
```
Fixes#16780.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
unsigned ACK 66740f460a
laanwj:
ACK 66740f460a
Tree-SHA512: 0acc37134b283f56004a41243903d7790cb01591ddf0342489bd05f3a2c780563075373ba5fd55180fa15632e8968ffa11a979b8afece75a6a2e891342601440
This adds checks to ensure the redeemScript/witnessScript actually
correspond to the provided scriptPubKey, and, if both are provided,
that they are sensibly related to each other.
Thanks to github user passionofvc for raising this issue.
6d803494b5 Don't show addresses or P2PK in decoderawtransaction (nicolas.dorier)
Pull request description:
I spent significant amount of time explaining to people that satoshi did not had any "bitcoin address", because bitcoin address was not existing at the time.
Then I need to explain them that all blockchain explorer are wrong. Then I understood that the source of this widespread mistake come from Bitcoin Core itself.
For:
```
bitcoin-cli -regtest decoderawtransaction 01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffff4d04ffff001d0104455468652054696d65732030332f4a616e2f32303039204368616e63656c6c6f72206f6e206272696e6b206f66207365636f6e64206261696c6f757420666f722062616e6b73ffffffff0100f2052a01000000434104678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5fac00000000
```
Before:
```json
{
"txid": "4a5e1e4baab89f3a32518a88c31bc87f618f76673e2cc77ab2127b7afdeda33b",
"hash": "4a5e1e4baab89f3a32518a88c31bc87f618f76673e2cc77ab2127b7afdeda33b",
"version": 1,
"size": 204,
"vsize": 204,
"weight": 816,
"locktime": 0,
"vin": [
{
"coinbase": "04ffff001d0104455468652054696d65732030332f4a616e2f32303039204368616e63656c6c6f72206f6e206272696e6b206f66207365636f6e64206261696c6f757420666f722062616e6b73",
"sequence": 4294967295
}
],
"vout": [
{
"value": 50.00000000,
"n": 0,
"scriptPubKey": {
"asm": "04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex": "4104678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5fac",
"reqSigs": 1,
"type": "pubkey",
"addresses": [
"mpXwg4jMtRhuSpVq4xS3HFHmCmWp9NyGKt"
]
}
}
]
}
```
After
```json
{
"txid": "4a5e1e4baab89f3a32518a88c31bc87f618f76673e2cc77ab2127b7afdeda33b",
"hash": "4a5e1e4baab89f3a32518a88c31bc87f618f76673e2cc77ab2127b7afdeda33b",
"version": 1,
"size": 204,
"vsize": 204,
"weight": 816,
"locktime": 0,
"vin": [
{
"coinbase": "04ffff001d0104455468652054696d65732030332f4a616e2f32303039204368616e63656c6c6f72206f6e206272696e6b206f66207365636f6e64206261696c6f757420666f722062616e6b73",
"sequence": 4294967295
}
],
"vout": [
{
"value": 50.00000000,
"n": 0,
"scriptPubKey": {
"asm": "04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex": "4104678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5fac",
"reqSigs": 1,
"type": "pubkey",
"addresses": [
]
}
}
]
}
```
This mistake is having widespread impact, as developer thinks P2PK are addresses, they start running into issues when somebody send a P2PK payment to them and then they don't understand why they can't sign it like a P2PKH.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK 6d80349.
MarcoFalke:
ACK 6d803494b5
meshcollider:
utACK 6d803494b5
kristapsk:
ACK 6d803494b5 (applied changes except test, ran tests, then applied changes to test also)
Tree-SHA512: 6e4990164a6b8df6675f09b2b189b7197fad43f1918fc1a4530ebd98ce71c3c94d9ec54e1b4624210fd7c5200d4f04825ca37f4e42f5fe9b8a9c0f38c50591ef
fa734603b7 wallet: Fix segmentation fault in CreateWalletFromFile (MarcoFalke)
fab3c34412 test: Print both messages on failure in assert_raises_message (MarcoFalke)
faa13539d5 wallet: Fix documentation around WalletParameterInteraction (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Comes with a test to aid review. The test should fail without the fix to bitcoind
The following `CreateWalletFromFile` issues are fixed:
* `walletFile` refers to freed memory and will thus corrupt the debug.log and/or crash the node if read
* `WalletParameterInteraction` was moved to `CreateWalletFromFile` and `WalletInit::ParameterInteraction` without updating the documentation
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK fa734603b7.
darosior:
ACK fa734603b7
meshcollider:
LGTM, code-read ACK fa734603b7
Tree-SHA512: 2aceb63a3f25b90a840cfa08d37f5874aad4eb3df8c2ebf94e2ed18b55809b185e6920bdb345b988bff1fcea5e68a214fe06c361f7da2c01a3cc29e0cc421cb4
fabca7756d doc: Add issue templates for bug and feature request (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes#16627
Can be tested via https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin/issues
ACKs for top commit:
jb55:
ACK fabca7756d
fanquake:
ACK fabca7756d
Tree-SHA512: 1ebe58f9c0110a9332adf1d80001cd9ed6fe60208e387c93b8564dc66821f753e34b23cb6f4cae45168024862ee884913976e132820b7a4759fa6391b0d1127c
UI improvements:
- update remaining GUI wallet labels and tooltips from passwords to passphrases
- improve grammar of labels in askpassphrase dialog and WalletController::closeWallet
ad52f054f6 Escape ampersands (&) in wallet names in Open Wallet menu (Andrew Chow)
2c530ea2ad HTML escape address labels in more dialogs and notifications (Andrew Chow)
1770a972d4 HTML escape the wallet name in more dialogs and notifications (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Fixes some places where wallet names and address labels which contain valid html or other interpreted characters are displayed incorrectly.
In the send coins dialog, if the wallet name or the address label contains valid html, then the html would be shown rather than the literal string for the wallet name or label. This PR fixes that so the true name or label is shown.
The Open Wallet menu would incorrectly show wallet names with ampersands (`&`). For some reason, Qt removes the first ampersand in a string. So by replacing the first ampersand with 2 ampersands, the correct number of ampersands will be shown.
Fixes the HTML escaping issues in #16820
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Untested ACK, thanks for adding proper escaping, ad52f054f6
fanquake:
ACK ad52f054f6
Tree-SHA512: 264bef28a8061c7f43cc30c3e04b361c614ea78b9915e8763c44553c8967131b066db500977fa6130de1f8874b9bba59e630486c58e1e3c5c165555105a6c254
bdd6a4fd5d qa: Check scantxoutset result against gettxoutsetinfo (João Barbosa)
fc0c410d6e rpc: Improve scantxoutset response and help message (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
The new response keys `height` and `bestblock` allow the client to know at what point the scan took place.
The help message now has all the response keys (`result` and `txouts` were missing) and it's improved a bit. Note that `searched_items` key is renamed to `txouts`, considering `scantxoutset` is marked experimental.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK bdd6a4fd5d
Tree-SHA512: 6bb7c3464b19857b756b8bc491ab7c58b0d948aad8c005b26ed27c55a1278f5639217e11a315bb505b4f44ebe86f413068c1e539c8a5f7a4007735586cc6443c
4be3b7680e refactor: Cleanup walletinitinterface.h (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Forward declarations of `CScheduler` and `CRPCTable` classes are no longer needed after ea961c3d72 (#14437) commit.
Including `<string>` is no longer needed after 4d4185a4f0 (#13190) commit.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 4be3b76
promag:
ACK 4be3b7680e.
kristapsk:
ACK 4be3b7680e (tested that it builds)
Tree-SHA512: 5ed72e3deda3d7c7fb698a1a11db76199727e6c570dfc78422690dbda9a92af32e1913920062dd3c9f618095e7498c219ff9c145a4c151486865ebeaa20a1d3c
Forward declarations of CScheduler and CRPCTable classes are no longer
needed after ea961c3d72 commit.
Including <string> is no longer needed after
4d4185a4f0 commit.
f091dc8180 GUI: Remove unused menu items for Windows and Linux (GChuf)
Pull request description:
Removed "Main Window" and "Restore" menu option for Windows and linux
Keep the options for macOS
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
unsigned ACK f091dc8180
fanquake:
ACK f091dc8180 - tested on macOS, Windows and Linux.
MarcoFalke:
ACK f091dc8180
kristapsk:
ACK f091dc8180 (tested on Linux with Xfce4)
Tree-SHA512: a84a9a8bd3b09224f111cad4712076150524a24d6f09910147194c4149222443c453372db61eed8aa82c3450339b63fd216288196feb4ab637b6ea21b0109830
0ba08020c9 Disconnect peers violating blocks-only mode (Suhas Daftuar)
937eba91e1 doc: improve comments relating to block-relay-only peers (Suhas Daftuar)
430f489027 Don't relay addr messages to block-relay-only peers (Suhas Daftuar)
3a5e885306 Add 2 outbound block-relay-only connections (Suhas Daftuar)
b83f51a4bb Add comment explaining intended use of m_tx_relay (Suhas Daftuar)
e75c39cd42 Check that tx_relay is initialized before access (Suhas Daftuar)
c4aa2ba822 [refactor] Change tx_relay structure to be unique_ptr (Suhas Daftuar)
4de0dbac9b [refactor] Move tx relay state to separate structure (Suhas Daftuar)
26a93bce29 Remove unused variable (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Transaction relay is optimized for a combination of redundancy/robustness as well as bandwidth minimization -- as a result transaction relay leaks information that adversaries can use to infer the network topology.
Network topology is better kept private for (at least) two reasons:
(a) Knowledge of the network graph can make it easier to find the source IP of a given transaction.
(b) Knowledge of the network graph could be used to split a target node or nodes from the honest network (eg by knowing which peers to attack in order to achieve a network split).
We can eliminate the risks of (b) by separating block relay from transaction relay; inferring network connectivity from the relay of blocks/block headers is much more expensive for an adversary.
After this commit, bitcoind will make 2 additional outbound connections that are only used for block relay. (In the future, we might consider rotating our transaction-relay peers to help limit the effects of (a).)
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 0ba08020c9
ajtowns:
ACK 0ba08020c9 -- code review, ran tests. ran it on mainnet for a couple of days with MAX_BLOCKS_ONLY_CONNECTIONS upped from 2 to 16 and didn't observe any unexpected behaviour: it disconnected a couple of peers that tried sending inv's, and it successfully did compact block relay with some block relay peers.
TheBlueMatt:
re-utACK 0ba08020c9. Pointed out that stats.fRelayTxes was sometimes uninitialized for blocksonly peers (though its not a big deal and only effects RPC), which has since been fixed here. Otherwise changes are pretty trivial so looks good.
jnewbery:
utACK 0ba08020c9
jamesob:
ACK 0ba08020c9
Tree-SHA512: 4c3629434472c7dd4125253417b1be41967a508c3cfec8af5a34cad685464fbebbb6558f0f8f5c0d4463e3ffa4fa3aabd58247692cb9ab8395f4993078b9bcdf
613de61a04 Add Create Wallet menu action (Andrew Chow)
9b41cbb28f Expose wallet creation to the GUI via WalletController (Andrew Chow)
78863e2900 Add CreateWalletDialog to create wallets from the GUI (Andrew Chow)
60adb21c7a Optionally allow AskPassphraseDialog to output the passphrase (Andrew Chow)
bc6d8a3662 gui: Refactor OpenWalletActivity (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a menu option to create a new wallet. When clicked, a `CreateWalletDialog` will be created and prompt the user to name the wallet and choose whether to disable private keys, make a blank wallet, and encrypt the wallet. If the wallet is encrypted, the wallet will be born encrypted with the wallet first created blank, then encrypted, and then a new HD seed generated and set.
To allow the newly created wallets to be encrypted, some changes to how encrypting a wallet works. Instead of encrypting and locking the wallet, the wallet will be encrypted and then unlocked. This is also an extra belt-and-suspenders check to make sure that encryption worked.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 613de61a04 - re-reviewed on macOS. I'm going to merge this now. It's had a stack of review, and as mentioned multiple times above, lets get this into `master` so it can get more testing pre `v0.19.0`.
Tree-SHA512: 3f22cc20b13703ffc90d366ae9133114832fea77f4f319da7fd85eb454f2f0bd5d7e1e6e20284dea2f370d8574f83b45669dcbbe506b994410d32e8e7a6fa877
5ce822efbe Conservatively accept RBF bumps bumping one tx at the package limits (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Based on #15681, this adds support for some simple cases of RBF inside of large packages. Issue pointed out by sdaftuar in #15681, and this fix (or a broader one) is required ot make #15681 fully useful.
Accept RBF bumps of single transactions (ie which evict exactly one
transaction) even when that transaction is a member of a package
which is currently at the package limit iff the new transaction
does not add any additional mempool dependencies from the original.
This could be made a bit looser in the future and still be safe,
but for now this fixes the case that a transaction which was
accepted by the carve-out rule will not be directly RBF'able
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
re-ACK 5ce822efbe
ajtowns:
ACK 5ce822efbe ; GetSizeWithDescendants is only change and makes sense
sipa:
Code review ACK 5ce822efbe. I haven't thought hard about the effect on potential DoS issues this policy change may have.
Tree-SHA512: 1cee3bc57393940a30206679eb60c3ec8cb4f4825d27d40d1f062c86bd22542dd5944fa5567601c74c8d9fd425333ed3e686195170925cfc68777e861844bd55
39034f1ee6 Refactor rawtransaction_util's SignTransaction to have previous tx parsing be separate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the `SignTransaction` function has to handle both the actual signing and parsing of previous transaction data. This PR splits it so that `SignTransaction` only handles the signing itself and adds a `ParsePrevouts` function which handles parsing the prevtx information.
This allows for `SignTransaction` to just take any `SigningProvider`.
Split from #16341
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 39034f1ee6
instagibbs:
utACK 39034f1ee6
ryanofsky:
utACK 39034f1ee6. No change since previously reviewed b49bbb939be92a67ff77c3f7bca5bb94dd141906, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16341#pullrequestreview-278610269 other than rebase with no conflicts.
Tree-SHA512: 09f7733e90691766bfb5cf0f20e913dbf270bd3b51abdcad966b24d110e562ed85fd3d0d1d7bbea61f903340060052ec73c4817b09aee0dc1f3916d781a9e40c
3109a1f948 refactor: Avoid locking cs_main in ProcessNewBlockHeaders (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Builds on #16774, this change avoids locking `cs_main` in `ProcessNewBlockHeaders` when the tip has changed - in this case the removed lock was necessary to just log a message.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 31be6d319fa122804f72fa813cec5ed041dd7e4aef3c1921124a1f03016925c43cd4d9a272d80093e77fa7600e3506ef47b7bb821afcbffe01e6be9bceb6dc00
