6aab7649d3 doc: Fix whitespace errs in .md files, bitcoin.conf, Info.plist.in, and find_bdb48.m4 (Jon Layton)
Pull request description:
Although there is an existing `test/lint/lint-whitespace.sh` linter, it only prevents new errors from being introduced. This commit removes all existing whitespace errors from Core markdown files (skips `src/crypto/ctaes/`, `leveldb/`, and `doc/release-notes/`), `bitcoin.conf`, and `Info.plist.in`.
Further formatting could be done on the markdown documents, but seeing as there several coexisting styles that break a few `markdownlint` rules, a first step would be to define and add a linter to Travis. For now, the small fix is made.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 6aab7649d3 - Thanks for following up. Hopefully we now never have to deal with whitespace again.
Tree-SHA512: 810cc31ae4364b2dedf85783e67315d7b4e11589e4b32c599606e1b1ba8de0663bcae9ddb1bd8c9762a3636a2d65bdcd64ec22d2e90943f374a0c9574b77ca23
fa27eded3a qt: Run "make translate" in ./src (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that the translations for 0.19.0 are frozen (#15940), run a final `make -C src translate`
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa27eded3a - matches what i see locally when running `make translate -C src/`. Done in a Debian container as `make translate` doesn't seem to work completely correctly for me on macOS.
Tree-SHA512: a67270ce022e7e0df3caf79781af3e27ce2e251f50c0746f2b91fffe1392cc66258e60fe34197c9352ad54d5898300320a7c4b9c2a20bfa4e8928874ead6e934
following situations are covered:
- empty block
- one Tx
- Merkle root of a block with odd Txs should not change with repeating
last one
- Merkle root is computed with combining Merkle root of left subtree and right subtree
- block witness is Merkle root of a block when setting first Tx
to zero.
Signed-off-by: soroosh-sdi <soroosh.sardari@gmail.com>
2222c96dee test: Add notes on how to generate data/wallets/high_minversion (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I forgot to do this in #16796
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
ACK 2222c96dee
Tree-SHA512: 5f24ffa641b97eac4febad42ade7228b14fa72335c918a10880c5dec86a3ecc3075a31526f275188e07fea95b8e2c6320c64f716099f604b00e13d5366fcee37
This is in preparation for re-using these validation components for a new
version of AcceptToMemoryPool() that can operate on multiple transactions
("package relay").
fae961de6b test: Establish only one connection between nodes in rpc_invalidateblock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Headers and block sync should eventually converge to the same result, regardless of whether the peers treat each other as "inbound" or "outbound".
`connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.
Thus remove the `connect_nodes_bi` workaround from the rpc_invalidateblock test.
Conveniently, this also closes#16453. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16444#issuecomment-514801708 for rationale
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fae961de6b
Tree-SHA512: b3614c66a205823df73f64d19cacfbec269beb5db52ff79004d746e17d7c0dfb43ab9785fdddc97e2a76fe76286c8c605b34df3dda4a2bf5be035f01169ae89a
82e53f37e1 doc: add comments clarifying how local services are advertised (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Recent questions have come up regarding dynamic service registration
(see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16442#discussion_r308702676
and the assumeutxo project ~~which needs to dynamically flip NODE_NETWORK~~).
While investigating how dynamic service registration might work, I was
confused about how we convey local services to peers. This adds some
documentation that hopefully clarifies this process.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 82e53f37e1
darosior:
ACK 82e53f37e1
Tree-SHA512: a30c1020387d7a75b5b3cdde45f8b7f2ae46293da97e6227b2ee17e290b93deb5b16c0bbc2b1676972300e5c3c2ad74eb8b3910d6b93e028dac1ae2700468ef9
fa912a8ad5 doc: move-only ActivateBestChain doxygen comment to header (MarcoFalke)
fa99efd054 doc: ActivateBestChainStep return value (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It will always return true, unless a system error such as #15305 occurred
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa912a8ad5
Tree-SHA512: d439da844a467f9705014b946d7d987fb62cb63fe6a325b2fdbbb73a6578fc0ade3f60892044f02face43948204fc4e3c9fa70d108233d4ca8eef27984059689
107e030723 build: make protobuf optional in depends (fanquake)
ff6122f32b doc: clarify protobuf build requirements (fanquake)
Pull request description:
As mentioned by dongcarl in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15584#issuecomment-521780972, make building `protobuf` optional in depends. With this change it will only be built if you pass `PROTOBUF=1`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 107e030723
Sjors:
tACK 107e030 on macOS 10.14. When I build depends with `PROTOBUF=1` then `./configure` has `bip70` enabled.
Tree-SHA512: 49bc247a6879aaf55b943a3d0b930544ddef1e69a481955a8bebe0b02c9ad0fe168b93025f34168334cef34bb567478eb98eacab62ba909f2f64fb21119c71b8
cad3ab5db8 gui: fix autofocus in CreateWalletActivity::askPassphrase() (Jon Atack)
539d9403af gui: fix passphrase labels/tooltip in createwalletdialog/askpassphrasedialog (Jon Atack)
43aa9b0d79 gui: rename encrypt(), blank(), and askPasshprase() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Closes#16820. The wallet [name escaping issue](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15450#pullrequestreview-282297760) in that issue predates #15450 and is fixed by #16826.
- [x] rename encrypt() to encryptWallet(), and blank() to makeBlankWallet() // EDIT: updated to
isEncryptWalletChecked()
isDisablePrivateKeysChecked()
isMakeBlankWalletChecked()
- [x] fix naming of askPasshprase() to askPassphrase()
- [x] fix passphrase labels and tooltip in createwalletdialog.ui and askpassphrasedialog.ui
- [x] fix grammar of labels in askpassphrase dialog and WalletController::closeWallet
- [x] fix autofocus in CreateWalletActivity::askPassphrase()
Squashed down to three commits.
Reviewers, to test manually: build, launch the gui wallet, and look at labels/tooltips/focus with the create wallet, encrypt wallet, change password, and close wallet commands.
ACKs for top commit:
jb55:
Approach ACK cad3ab5db8
instagibbs:
code review and tACK cad3ab5db8
fanquake:
ACK cad3ab5db8
Tree-SHA512: b441fbf8f8cd370dd692bac24f0d3c1b32fc7d947b6c3a2c9ba7cf0bc175a72b3460440f2f10f7632c0e8e0f8e65fe15615a30c46e2c7763bf258c504b457dd6
b6233a4985 bitcoin-wallet: Add a missing closing parenthesis in the help (darosior)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
utACK b6233a4985
fanquake:
ACK b6233a4985
Tree-SHA512: acf18633fdca4bd73838fcaa0ebe4121dd0b5308daa77c4458ec4c98a9e8aa6d9d6580a48c884147438af14e670b0606c1e76f72d1d7efd221c4da419061beed
1b41c2c8a1 test: improve gettransaction test coverage (Jon Atack)
0f34f54888 rpc: fix regression in gettransaction (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Closes#16872.
PR #16866 renamed the `decode` argument in gettransaction to `verbose` to make it more consistent with other RPC calls like getrawtransaction. However, it inadvertently overloaded the "details" field when `verbose` is passed. The result is that the original "details" field is no longer returned correctly, which seems to be a breaking API change.
This PR:
- takes the simplest path to restoring the "details" field by renaming the decoded one back to "decoded" while leaving the `verbose` argument for API consistency, which was the main intent of #16866,
- addresses [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16185#discussion_r320740413) by mentioning in the RPC help that the new decoded field is equivalent to decoderawtransaction, and
- updates the help, functional test, and release note.
Reviewers, to test this manually, build and run `bitcoin-cli help gettransaction` and `bitcoin-cli gettransaction <wallet txid> false true`, and verify that the command returns both `details` and `decoded` fields.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
tACK 1b41c2c8a1
Tree-SHA512: 287edd5db7ed58fe8b548975aba58628bd45ed708b28f40174f10a35a455d89f796fbf27430aa881fc376f47aabda8803f74d4d100683bd86577a02279091cf3
1153caf78e Qt: advise users not to switch wallets when opening a BIP70 URI. (James Hilliard)
Pull request description:
It would probably be a good idea to have something like this before #15584 is merged.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 1153caf78e
fanquake:
ACK 1153caf78e
Tree-SHA512: 6e682dd280c44eaafb1206c32439df42a20173c33297bf93dd607f0a7a2faec8e2d17fff83c85027083ebd11a71795b443e707992251574370dd1d46b7bff060
- Test gettransaction response without verbose, with verbose=False, and with verbose=True.
- In each case, test presence of expected fields in the output, including absence of the "decoded" field when `verbose` is not passed or false.
- Test that the "details" field contains the expected receive vout in each case.
PR 16866 renamed the 'decode' argument in gettransaction to 'verbose' to make it more consistent with other RPC calls like getrawtransaction.
However, it seems it inadvertently overloaded the 'details' fields when 'verbose' is passed. The result is that the original 'details' fields are no longer returned, which seems to be a breaking API change.
This PR takes the simplest path to restoring the 'details' fields by renaming them from 'details' back to 'decoded', while leaving the 'verbose' argument for API consistency.
It also addresses [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16185#discussion_r320740413) to mention that the 'decoded' field is identical to decoderawtransaction.
Update the RPC help, functional test, and release note.
7dee8f4808 [wallet] Rename 'decode' argument in gettransaction method to 'verbose' (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This makes the RPC method consistent with other RPC methods that have a
'verbose' option.
Change the name of the return object from 'decoded' to details.
Update help text.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 7dee8f4808.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 7dee8f4808
0xB10C:
ACK 7dee8f4808: reviewed code
Tree-SHA512: a3a62265c8e6e914591f3b3b9f9dd4f42240dc8dab9cbac6ed8d8b8319b6cc847db2ad1689d5440c162e0698f31e39fc6b868ed918b2f62879d61b9865cae66b
This makes the RPC method consistent with other RPC methods that have a
'verbose' option.
Change the name of the return object from 'decoded' to details.
Update help text.
e09913f1c4 doc: specify protobuf as optional in build docs (fanquake)
376f4929f8 build: disable BIP70 support by default (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Disable BIP70 support in the GUI by default for `0.19.0` (for eventual removal in `0.20.0`?).
Users who want to compile with BIP70 support enabled can pass `--enable-bip70` to `./configure`.
I've inverted the current `--disable-bip70` test to instead pass `--enable-bip70`.
Tested configurations on `macOS` (`protobuf` installed with `brew`).
Protobuf available and `./configure`:
```
Options used to compile and link:
with wallet = yes
with gui / qt = yes
with bip70 = no
```
Protobuf available and `./configure --enable-bip70`:
```
Options used to compile and link:
with wallet = yes
with gui / qt = yes
with bip70 = yes
```
Protobuf not available (i.e `brew unlink protobuf`) and `./configure`:
```
Options used to compile and link:
with wallet = yes
with gui / qt = yes
with bip70 = no
```
Protobuf not available and `./configure --enable-bip70`:
```
checking whether to build test_bitcoin-qt... yes
checking whether to build BIP70 support... configure: error: protobuf missing
```
TODO:
- [x] Remove `protobuf` from other Travis builds
- [ ] Documentation updates (mention that `protobuf` is now optional)?
- [ ] Could split release notes into GUI and build
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK e09913f1c4
elichai:
ACK e09913f1c4 Read the autotools changes. awesome that this removes the protobuf requirement.
practicalswift:
ACK e09913f1c4 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 7bf87ae8555e24db2da2e89cc4d4e90d09be27499ad386ad65879d05df8f96d9a1384379891ac8963d17728c90e55961560813df97e849e631e2de8c08e210c8
706340150f Elaborate on the need to re-login on Debian-based systems to use tor following usermod (clashicly)
Pull request description:
Starting bitcoind with `-onlynet=onion` immediately after adding bitcoind user to debian-tor group will yield the following notice on debug.log:
"tor: Authentication cookie /run/tor/control.authcookie could not be opened (check permissions)"
Elaborate on the need to re-login to ensure debian-tor group has been applied to bitcoind user after:
sudo usermod -a -G debian-tor username
Verification can be done via `groups` command in shell.
Otherwise operator may not be aware at first launch they are not running a tor enabled node.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 706340150f - Thanks for following up.
Tree-SHA512: 3473966fb43b4f1c86bd8841dd6ea8c2798256c2ca926b10bd08cd655b954a9e77f0278c4fe63160e69cc75e240a3580af00ea46bf960fde2788aa88f03510b2
Starting bitcoind with `-onlynet=onion` immediately after adding bitcoind user to debian-tor group will yield the following notice on debug.log:
"tor: Authentication cookie /run/tor/control.authcookie could not be opened (check permissions)"
Elaborate on the need to re-login to ensure debian-tor group has been applied to bitcoind user after:
sudo usermod -a -G debian-tor username
Verification can be done via `groups` command in shell.
9924bce317 [gui] intro: enable pruning by default unless disk is big (Sjors Provoost)
c8de347a9d [gui] intro: add prune preference (Sjors Provoost)
1bbc49d207 [gui] intro: inform caller if intro was shown (Sjors Provoost)
1957103786 [gui] add explicit prune setter (Sjors Provoost)
1bccf6a52d [node] add forceSetArg to interface (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This adds a checkbox to the intro screen to enable pruning from the get go.
If the user has plenty of space, it's unchecked by default:
<img width="671" alt="big" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/63641289-10339000-c6ac-11e9-98d7-caf64dff0da6.png">
If the user has insufficient space it's checked by default:
<img width="897" alt="low" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/63641276-d4002f80-c6ab-11e9-9f5b-a53472f814ff.png">
When the user has barely enough space and is likely to need pruning in the near future, this is shown in yellow and we also check the prune box:
<img width="662" alt="medium" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/63641294-1c1f5200-c6ac-11e9-8ecb-6b69e42b1ece.png">
The cut-off for this 10 GB above `m_assumed_blockchain_size` (`=240` in `chainparams.cpp`).
If the user launches the first time with `-prune=...` then we disable the check box and display the correct size (rounded to GB):
<img width="658" alt="Schermafbeelding 2019-08-24 om 20 23 14" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/63641351-09594d00-c6ad-11e9-94fe-fe5ed562e109.png">
The 2 GB default matches the settings default. The user can't change it in the intro screen, but can change it later. I'm tempted to increase that default to 10 GB, and then have the intro screen reduce it if space is really tight.
Tips for testing:
* move your existing data dir elsewhere
* wipe data dir at every restart (behavior is different if it exists)
* launch with `bitcoin-qt -resetguisettings -lang=en` (there's some space issues in different languages)
* fake your free space by changing `intro.cpp` line 90: `freeBytesAvailable = 5000000000; // 5 GB`
* try both testnet and mainnet, because settings are seperate. In particular note how step 7 in `GuiMain` switches where `QTSettings settings` points to; this had me thoroughly confused on testnet, because I was setting them too early.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK 9924bce317
ryanofsky:
utACK 9924bce317. The changes are very logical, and implement the feature in a clean that way that doesn't add a lot of complication and shouldn't interfere with future improvements. I looked at Luke's branch too, and I think there's also a lot of great stuff there that seems fully compatible with this change.
Tree-SHA512: 9523961451c53aebd347716976bc3a4a398f989dc21e9bbbd357060bd11a8f46c435f068bd421bb31ccb08e55445ef67bc347d8d19a4fb8fde9d6d3f9a3bcbb0
333317ce6b test: Test that low difficulty chain fork is rejected (MarcoFalke)
fa31dc1bf4 test: Pass down correct chain name in tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To prevent OOM, Bitcoin Core will reject chain forks at low difficulty by default. This is the only use-case of checkpoints, so add a test for it to make sure the feature works as expected. If it didn't work, checkpoints would have no use-case and we might as well remove them
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Thanks for adding the node 1 example. Code review ACK 333317c
Tree-SHA512: 90dffa540d0904f3cffb61d2382b1a26f84fe9560b7013e4461546383add31a8757b350616a6d43217c59ef7b8b2a1b62bb3bab582c679cbb2c660a782ce7be1
1d524c62ea tests: rename 'test_getnetworkinginfo' in 'test_getnetworkinfo' (darosior)
07a8f65031 tests: add a test for the 'servicesnames' RPC field (darosior)
Pull request description:
As per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16787#issuecomment-529801457, fixes#16844.
This adds a test for both commands in the first commit and renames the test for `getnetworkinfo` in the second commit.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 1d524c62ea
Tree-SHA512: 8267dce4d54356debab75014e6f9ba885b892da605ed32f26a5446c232992fcae761861bb678adbdb942815d4706f3768c70deee6afec68f219b23605475be01
Recent questions have come up regarding dynamic service registration
(see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16442#discussion_r308702676
and the assumeutxo project, which needs to dynamically flip NODE_NETWORK).
While investigating how dynamic service registration might work, I was
confused about how we convey local services to peers. This adds some
documentation that hopefully clarifies this process.
1619684322 Added libbitcoin_qt and bitcoin-qt to the msbuild configuration. (Aaron Clauson)
Pull request description:
This PR has ~~90%~~ all of the work done to allow the bitcoin Qt programs to be built with msvc and the appveyor script.
Outstanding issues:
- ~~There are ~~3~~ ~~6~~ 5 code tweaks required for the bitcoin Qt components to be built without warnings with msvc. They seem minor~~,
- Building Qt as a static library for Windows is painful and time consuming. I doubt it will ever be possible to build Qt from source as part of an appveyor job (and it would probably take over an hour even if it was). My tentative solution is to build locally and upload the binaries as a [github release](https://github.com/sipsorcery/qt_win_binary/releases). The msvc build is only for testing and tinkering but even so this doesn't feel like the ideal solution. Open to suggestions?
- ~~There is still an issue to sort out with the payment request URL handling. Building Qt with openssl is an extra headache. I will continue to work on getting this working.~~
The big benefit of this PR is the ability to run bitcoin-qt within a Visual Studio debugging session which could expedite tracking down issues on Windows.
On a side note the test-bitcoin-qt tests fail very early, probably due to *nix specific tests. I haven't dug into them at this point.
**Update 28 Jun 2019**: The ENABLE_BIP70 option is now off (it's flagged for removal as per #15584). With it disabled msbuild does not require any code changes to build the Bitcoin Core Qt applications.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
re-ACK 1619684322 - AppVeyor looks ok now.
Tree-SHA512: c0d3fd53b3ff99096b2505d519ed5ca6791bc4bce77addf9c520dc042eec5980a51a1fb9f0aa72e9cc53773085c43218793ca7a915a47806a3a1ffb84d9409f9
