rocksdb #29
17
db/db.go
|
@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ func InitTxCounts(db *ReadOnlyDBColumnFamily) error {
|
|||
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
db.TxCounts = db_stack.NewSliceBackedStack(1200000)
|
||||
|
||||
options := NewIterateOptions().WithPrefix([]byte{prefixes.TxCount}).WithCfHandle(handle)
|
||||
options = options.WithIncludeKey(false).WithIncludeValue(true)
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
options = options.WithIncludeKey(false).WithIncludeValue(true).WithIncludeStop(true)
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
|
||||
ch := IterCF(db.DB, options)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -791,13 +791,14 @@ func InitTxCounts(db *ReadOnlyDBColumnFamily) error {
|
|||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
log.Println("len(db.TxCounts), cap(db.TxCounts):", db.TxCounts.Len(), db.TxCounts.Cap())
|
||||
log.Println("Time to get txCounts:", duration)
|
||||
|
||||
// This needs to be len-1 because we start loading with the zero block
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
// and the txcounts start at one.
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
if db.TxCounts.Len() > 0 {
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
db.Height = db.TxCounts.Len() - 1
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
log.Println("db.TxCounts.Len() == 0 ???")
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
// whjy not needs to be len-1 because we start loading with the zero block
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
// and the txcounts start at one???
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
db.Height = db.TxCounts.Len()
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
// if db.TxCounts.Len() > 0 {
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
// db.Height = db.TxCounts.Len() - 1
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
// } else {
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
// log.Println("db.TxCounts.Len() == 0 ???")
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
// }
|
||||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
||||
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|||
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
![]() no need to start these with N no need to start these with N
![]() and many of these are unused and many of these are unused
![]() is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
![]() typo: Famlies -> Families typo: Famlies -> Families
![]() this can be unexported this can be unexported
![]() still need this? still need this?
![]() typo typo
![]() 👀 :eyes:
![]() I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation. I agree the "N" can go. I copied these all over from the Python. where I believe they are similarly unused, because I thought it might be the defacto documentation.
![]()
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this. ```
// Valid returns false only when an Iterator has iterated past either the
// first or the last key in the database.
func (iter *Iterator) Valid() bool {
return C.rocksdb_iter_valid(iter.c) != 0
}
```
If our iterator was to try to go off the end of the db, or the front if we're going backwards, we need to check this.
|
|
@ -100,24 +100,6 @@ type PrefixRowKV struct {
|
|||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
Value interface{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
class DBState(typing.NamedTuple):
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
genesis: bytes
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
height: int
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
tx_count: int
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
tip: bytes
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
utxo_flush_count: int
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
wall_time: int
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
first_sync: bool
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
db_version: int
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
hist_flush_count: int
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
comp_flush_count: int
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
comp_cursor: int
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
es_sync_height: int
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
|
||||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
||||
type DBStateKey struct {
|
||||
Prefix []byte `json:"prefix"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|||
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
![]() why snake case here? why snake case here?
![]() if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25 if this is a fixed size, should it be an array? or even a chainhash.Hash? https://github.com/lbryio/lbcd/blob/master/chaincfg/chainhash/hash.go#L25
![]() i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address. i suggest using lbcd types as much as possible where it makes sense. if something is a Hash, make it a Hash. if its an Address, make it an Address.
|
no need to start these with N
and many of these are unused
is this really no big deal? seems like an error to me but idk rocksdb
typo: Famlies -> Families
this can be unexported
still need this?
typo
👀