LBRYCommunity/lbcd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 17 Pull requests 4 Projects Releases 28 Packages Wiki Activity
lbcd/opcode_test.go

4447 lines
165 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

Add 2014 to copyright dates.
2014-01-09 06:47:23 +01:00
// Copyright (c) 2013-2014 Conformal Systems LLC.
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
// Use of this source code is governed by an ISC
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package btcscript_test
import (
"bytes"
goimports -w .
2014-07-03 02:37:49 +02:00
"testing"
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
"github.com/conformal/btcscript"
"github.com/conformal/btcwire"
"github.com/davecgh/go-spew/spew"
)
// test scripts to test as many opcodes as possible.
// All run on a fake tx with a single in, single out.
type opcodeTest struct {
script []byte
Add flag bitmask to NewScript for canonical sig checks. This removes the bip16 bool from NewScript and adds it to flags (with the constant ScriptBip16), and also adds a new flag, ScriptCanonicalSignatures, which will call btcec.ParseDERSignature parsing a signature during an Execute. This is needed to emulate bitcoind behavior, as bitcoind performs canonical signature validation (DER format) in some places (like mempool acceptance) but not others (like block validation). Updated tests and test coverage file to reflect changes.
2013-10-24 16:13:58 +02:00
canonical bool
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
shouldPass bool
shouldFail error
}
var opcodeTests = []opcodeTest{
// does nothing, but doesn't put a true on the stack, should fail
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_NOP}, shouldPass: false},
// should just put true on the stack, thus passes.
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE}, shouldPass: true},
// should just put false on the stack, thus fails.
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE}, shouldPass: false},
// tests OP_VERIFY (true). true is needed since else stack is empty.
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_VERIFY,
btcscript.OP_TRUE}, shouldPass: true},
// tests OP_VERIFY (false), will error out.
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_VERIFY,
btcscript.OP_TRUE}, shouldPass: false},
// tests OP_VERIFY with empty stack (errors)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_VERIFY}, shouldPass: false},
// test OP_RETURN immediately fails the script (empty stack)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_RETURN}, shouldPass: false},
// test OP_RETURN immediately fails the script (full stack)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_RETURN},
shouldPass: false},
// tests numequal with a trivial example (passing)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_NUMEQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
// tests numequal with a trivial example (failing)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_NUMEQUAL}, shouldPass: false},
// tests numequal with insufficient arguments (1/2)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_NUMEQUAL},
shouldPass: false},
// tests numequal with insufficient arguments (0/2)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_NUMEQUAL}, shouldPass: false},
// tests numnotequal with a trivial example (passing)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_NUMNOTEQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
// tests numnotequal with a trivial example (failing)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_NUMNOTEQUAL}, shouldPass: false},
// tests numnotequal with insufficient arguments (1/2)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_NUMNOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: false},
// tests numnotequal with insufficient arguments (0/2)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_NUMNOTEQUAL}, shouldPass: false},
// test numequal_verify with a trivial example (passing)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_NUMEQUALVERIFY, btcscript.OP_TRUE},
shouldPass: true},
// test numequal_verify with a trivial example (failing)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_NUMEQUALVERIFY, btcscript.OP_TRUE},
shouldPass: false},
// test OP_1ADD by adding 1 to 0
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_1ADD},
shouldPass: true},
// test OP_1ADD without args (should error)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1ADD}, shouldPass: false},
// test OP_1NEGATE by adding 1 to -1
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1NEGATE, btcscript.OP_1ADD},
shouldPass: false},
// test OP_1NEGATE by adding negating -1
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1NEGATE, btcscript.OP_NEGATE},
shouldPass: true},
// test OP_NEGATE by adding 1 to -1
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_NEGATE,
btcscript.OP_1ADD}, shouldPass: false},
// test OP_NEGATE with no args
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_NEGATE}, shouldPass: false},
// test OP_1SUB -> 1 - 1 = 0
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_1SUB},
shouldPass: false},
// test OP_1SUB -> negate(0 -1) = 1
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_1SUB,
btcscript.OP_NEGATE}, shouldPass: true},
// test OP_1SUB with empty stack
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1SUB}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_DEPTH with empty stack, means 0 on stack at end
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DEPTH}, shouldPass: false},
// 1 +1 -1 = 1. tests depth + add
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_DEPTH, btcscript.OP_ADD,
btcscript.OP_1SUB}, shouldPass: true},
// 1 +1 -1 = 0 . tests dept + add
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_DEPTH,
btcscript.OP_ADD, btcscript.OP_1SUB, btcscript.OP_1SUB},
shouldPass: false},
// OP_ADD with only one thing on stack should error
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ADD},
shouldPass: false},
// OP_ADD with nothing on stack should error
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ADD}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_SUB: 1-1=0
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_SUB}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_SUB: 1+1-1=1
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_ADD, btcscript.OP_SUB}, shouldPass: true},
// OP_SUB with only one thing on stack should error
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_SUB},
shouldPass: false},
// OP_SUB with nothing on stack should error
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SUB}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_LESSTHAN 1 < 1 == false
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_LESSTHAN}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_LESSTHAN 1 < 0 == false
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_LESSTHAN}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_LESSTHAN 0 < 1 == true
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_LESSTHAN}, shouldPass: true},
// OP_LESSTHAN only one arg
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_LESSTHAN},
shouldPass: false},
// OP_LESSTHAN no args
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_LESSTHAN}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_LESSTHANOREQUAL 1 <= 1 == true
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_LESSTHANOREQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
// OP_LESSTHANOREQUAL 1 <= 0 == false
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_LESSTHANOREQUAL}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_LESSTHANOREQUAL 0 <= 1 == true
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_LESSTHANOREQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
// OP_LESSTHANOREQUAL only one arg
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_LESSTHANOREQUAL},
shouldPass: false},
// OP_LESSTHANOREQUAL no args
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_LESSTHANOREQUAL}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_GREATERTHAN 1 > 1 == false
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_GREATERTHAN}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_GREATERTHAN 1 > 0 == true
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_GREATERTHAN}, shouldPass: true},
// OP_GREATERTHAN 0 > 1 == false
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_GREATERTHAN}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_GREATERTHAN only one arg
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_GREATERTHAN},
shouldPass: false},
// OP_GREATERTHAN no args
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_GREATERTHAN}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_GREATERTHANOREQUAL 1 >= 1 == true
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_GREATERTHANOREQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
// OP_GREATERTHANOREQUAL 1 >= 0 == false
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_GREATERTHANOREQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
// OP_GREATERTHANOREQUAL 0 >= 1 == true
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_GREATERTHANOREQUAL}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_GREATERTHANOREQUAL only one arg
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_GREATERTHANOREQUAL},
shouldPass: false},
// OP_GREATERTHANOREQUAL no args
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_GREATERTHANOREQUAL}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_MIN basic functionality -> min(0,1) = 0 = min(1,0)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_MIN}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_MIN}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_MIN -> 1 arg errors
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_MIN},
shouldPass: false},
// OP_MIN -> 0 arg errors
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_MIN}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_MAX basic functionality -> max(0,1) = 1 = max(1,0)
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_MAX}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_MAX}, shouldPass: true},
// OP_MAX -> 1 arg errors
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_MAX},
shouldPass: false},
// OP_MAX -> 0 arg errors
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_MAX}, shouldPass: false},
// By this point we know a number of operations appear to be working
// correctly. we can use them to test the other number pushing
// operations
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_2,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_3,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_3, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_4,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_4, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_5,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_5, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_6,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_6, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_7,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_7, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_8,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_8, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_9,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_9, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_10,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_10, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_11,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_11, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_12,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_12, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_13,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_13, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_14,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_14, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_15,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_15, btcscript.OP_1ADD, btcscript.OP_16,
btcscript.OP_EQUAL}, shouldPass: true},
// Test OP_WITHIN x, min, max
// 0 <= 1 < 2
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_2,
btcscript.OP_WITHIN}, shouldPass: true},
// 1 <= 0 < 2 FAIL
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_2,
btcscript.OP_WITHIN}, shouldPass: false},
// 1 <= 1 < 2
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_2,
btcscript.OP_WITHIN}, shouldPass: true},
// 1 <= 2 < 2 FAIL
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_2,
btcscript.OP_WITHIN}, shouldPass: false},
// only two arguments
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_WITHIN}, shouldPass: false},
// only one argument
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_WITHIN},
shouldPass: false},
// no arguments
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_WITHIN}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_BOOLAND
// 1 && 1 == 1
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_BOOLAND}, shouldPass: true},
// 1 && 0 == 0
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_BOOLAND}, shouldPass: false},
// 0 && 1 == 0
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_BOOLAND}, shouldPass: false},
// 0 && 0 == 0
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_BOOLAND}, shouldPass: false},
// 0 && <nothing> - boom
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_BOOLAND},
shouldPass: false},
// <nothing> && <nothing> - boom
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_BOOLAND}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_BOOLOR
// 1 || 1 == 1
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_BOOLOR}, shouldPass: true},
// 1 || 0 == 1
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_BOOLOR}, shouldPass: true},
// 0 || 1 == 1
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE,
btcscript.OP_BOOLOR}, shouldPass: true},
// 0 || 0 == 0
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_FALSE,
btcscript.OP_BOOLOR}, shouldPass: false},
// 0 && <nothing> - boom
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_BOOLOR},
shouldPass: false},
// <nothing> && <nothing> - boom
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_BOOLOR}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_0NOTEQUAL
// 1 with input != 0 XXX check output is actually 1.
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_3, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_4, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_5, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_6, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_7, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_8, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_9, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_10, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_11, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_12, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_13, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_14, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_15, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_16, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL},
shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL}, shouldPass: false},
// No arguments also blows up
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_0NOTEQUAL}, shouldPass: false},
// OP_NOT: 1 i input is 0, else 0
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_3, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_4, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_5, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_6, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_7, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_8, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_9, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_10, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_11, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_12, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_13, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_14, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_15, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_16, btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
// check negative numbers too
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_NEGATE,
btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_NOT},
shouldPass: true},
// No arguments also blows up
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_NOT}, shouldPass: false},
// Conditional Execution
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_2, btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_2, btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_NOTIF, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_2, btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_NOTIF, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_2, btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_2}, shouldFail: btcscript.StackErrMissingEndif},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_NOTIF, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_2}, shouldFail: btcscript.StackErrMissingEndif},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ENDIF, btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ENDIF, btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldFail: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ENDIF, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_NOTIF, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ENDIF, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldPass: true},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_NOTIF, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldFail: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_0, btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldFail: btcscript.StackErrNoIf},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ENDIF}, shouldFail: btcscript.StackErrNoIf},
/* up here because error from sig parsing is undefined. */
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b, 0x13,
0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7, 0x15, 0x9b,
0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d, 0x71, 0x30, 0x2f,
0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3, 0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54,
0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c, 0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b,
0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1, 0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70,
0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c, 0xd8, 0x4c,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
Add flag bitmask to NewScript for canonical sig checks. This removes the bip16 bool from NewScript and adds it to flags (with the constant ScriptBip16), and also adds a new flag, ScriptCanonicalSignatures, which will call btcec.ParseDERSignature parsing a signature during an Execute. This is needed to emulate bitcoind behavior, as bitcoind performs canonical signature validation (DER format) in some places (like mempool acceptance) but not others (like block validation). Updated tests and test coverage file to reflect changes.
2013-10-24 16:13:58 +02:00
canonical: false,
shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b, 0x13,
0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7, 0x15, 0x9b,
0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d, 0x71, 0x30, 0x2f,
0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3, 0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54,
0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c, 0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b,
0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1, 0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70,
0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c, 0xd8, 0x4c,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
Add flag bitmask to NewScript for canonical sig checks. This removes the bip16 bool from NewScript and adds it to flags (with the constant ScriptBip16), and also adds a new flag, ScriptCanonicalSignatures, which will call btcec.ParseDERSignature parsing a signature during an Execute. This is needed to emulate bitcoind behavior, as bitcoind performs canonical signature validation (DER format) in some places (like mempool acceptance) but not others (like block validation). Updated tests and test coverage file to reflect changes.
2013-10-24 16:13:58 +02:00
canonical: true,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
shouldPass: false},
/* up here because no defined error case. */
{script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b, 0x13,
0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7, 0x15, 0x9b,
0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d, 0x71, 0x30, 0x2f,
0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3, 0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54,
0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c, 0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b,
0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1, 0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70,
0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c, 0xd8, 0x4c,
btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY},
shouldPass: false},
// Invalid Opcodes
{script: []byte{186}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{187}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{188}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{189}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{190}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{191}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{192}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{193}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{194}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{195}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{195}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{196}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{197}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{198}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{199}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{200}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{201}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{202}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{203}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{204}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{205}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{206}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{207}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{208}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{209}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{210}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{211}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{212}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{213}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{214}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{215}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{216}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{217}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{218}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{219}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{220}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{221}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{222}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{223}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{224}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{225}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{226}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{227}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{228}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{229}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{230}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{231}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{232}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{233}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{234}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{235}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{236}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{237}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{238}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{239}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{240}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{241}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{242}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{243}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{244}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{245}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{246}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{247}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{248}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{249}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{250}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{251}, shouldPass: false},
{script: []byte{252}, shouldPass: false},
}
Add flag bitmask to NewScript for canonical sig checks. This removes the bip16 bool from NewScript and adds it to flags (with the constant ScriptBip16), and also adds a new flag, ScriptCanonicalSignatures, which will call btcec.ParseDERSignature parsing a signature during an Execute. This is needed to emulate bitcoind behavior, as bitcoind performs canonical signature validation (DER format) in some places (like mempool acceptance) but not others (like block validation). Updated tests and test coverage file to reflect changes.
2013-10-24 16:13:58 +02:00
func testScript(t *testing.T, script []byte, canonical bool) (err error) {
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
// mock up fake tx.
tx := &btcwire.MsgTx{
Version: 1,
TxIn: []*btcwire.TxIn{
gofmt
2014-02-04 22:18:37 +01:00
{
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
PreviousOutpoint: btcwire.OutPoint{
Hash: btcwire.ShaHash{},
Index: 0xffffffff,
},
SignatureScript: []byte{btcscript.OP_NOP},
Sequence: 0xffffffff,
},
},
TxOut: []*btcwire.TxOut{
gofmt
2014-02-04 22:18:37 +01:00
{
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
Value: 0x12a05f200,
PkScript: []byte{},
},
},
LockTime: 0,
}
tx.TxOut[0].PkScript = script
Add flag bitmask to NewScript for canonical sig checks. This removes the bip16 bool from NewScript and adds it to flags (with the constant ScriptBip16), and also adds a new flag, ScriptCanonicalSignatures, which will call btcec.ParseDERSignature parsing a signature during an Execute. This is needed to emulate bitcoind behavior, as bitcoind performs canonical signature validation (DER format) in some places (like mempool acceptance) but not others (like block validation). Updated tests and test coverage file to reflect changes.
2013-10-24 16:13:58 +02:00
var flags btcscript.ScriptFlags
if canonical {
flags = btcscript.ScriptCanonicalSignatures
}
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
engine, err := btcscript.NewScript(tx.TxIn[0].SignatureScript,
Add flag bitmask to NewScript for canonical sig checks. This removes the bip16 bool from NewScript and adds it to flags (with the constant ScriptBip16), and also adds a new flag, ScriptCanonicalSignatures, which will call btcec.ParseDERSignature parsing a signature during an Execute. This is needed to emulate bitcoind behavior, as bitcoind performs canonical signature validation (DER format) in some places (like mempool acceptance) but not others (like block validation). Updated tests and test coverage file to reflect changes.
2013-10-24 16:13:58 +02:00
tx.TxOut[0].PkScript, 0, tx, flags)
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
if err != nil {
return err
}
return engine.Execute()
}
func TestScripts(t *testing.T) {
// for each entry in the list
for i := range opcodeTests {
shouldPass := opcodeTests[i].shouldPass
shouldFail := opcodeTests[i].shouldFail
Add flag bitmask to NewScript for canonical sig checks. This removes the bip16 bool from NewScript and adds it to flags (with the constant ScriptBip16), and also adds a new flag, ScriptCanonicalSignatures, which will call btcec.ParseDERSignature parsing a signature during an Execute. This is needed to emulate bitcoind behavior, as bitcoind performs canonical signature validation (DER format) in some places (like mempool acceptance) but not others (like block validation). Updated tests and test coverage file to reflect changes.
2013-10-24 16:13:58 +02:00
err := testScript(t, opcodeTests[i].script, opcodeTests[i].canonical)
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
if shouldFail != nil {
if err == nil {
t.Errorf("test %d passed should fail with %v", i, err)
} else if shouldFail != err {
t.Errorf("test %d failed with wrong error [%v], expected [%v]", i, err, shouldFail)
}
}
if shouldPass && err != nil {
t.Errorf("test %d failed: %v", i, err)
} else if !shouldPass && err == nil {
t.Errorf("test %d passed, should fail", i)
}
}
}
// Detailed tests for opcodes, we inspect machine state before and after the
// opcode and check that it has the effect on the state that we expect.
type detailedTest struct {
name string
before [][]byte
altbefore [][]byte
script []byte
expectedReturn error
after [][]byte
altafter [][]byte
disassembly string
disassemblyerr error
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps int // should have same return as disassembly error
nPreciseSigOps int // should have same return as disassembly error
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
}
var detailedTests = []detailedTest{
{
name: "noop",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {5}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_NOP},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {5}},
disassembly: "OP_NOP",
},
{
name: "dup",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DUP},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {1}},
disassembly: "OP_DUP",
},
{
name: "dup2",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2DUP},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {1}, {2}},
disassembly: "OP_2DUP",
},
{
name: "dup3",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_3DUP},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {1}, {2}, {3}},
disassembly: "OP_3DUP",
},
{
name: "dup too much",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DUP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "OP_DUP",
},
{
name: "2dup too much",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2DUP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "OP_2DUP",
},
{
name: "2dup way too much",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2DUP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "OP_2DUP",
},
{
name: "3dup too much",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_3DUP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "OP_3DUP",
},
{
name: "3dup kinda too much",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_3DUP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "OP_3DUP",
},
{
name: "3dup way too much",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_3DUP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "OP_3DUP",
},
{
name: "Nip",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_NIP},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {3}},
disassembly: "OP_NIP",
},
{
name: "Nip too much",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_NIP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{{2}, {3}},
disassembly: "OP_NIP",
},
{
name: "keep on tucking",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TUCK},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {3}, {2}, {3}},
disassembly: "OP_TUCK",
},
{
name: "a little tucked up",
before: [][]byte{{1}}, // too few arguments for tuck
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TUCK},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "OP_TUCK",
},
{
name: "all tucked up",
before: [][]byte{}, // too few arguments for tuck
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TUCK},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_TUCK",
},
{
name: "drop 1",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DROP},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}},
disassembly: "OP_DROP",
},
{
name: "drop 2",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2DROP},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}},
disassembly: "OP_2DROP",
},
{
name: "drop too much",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DROP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_DROP",
},
{
name: "2drop too much",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2DROP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_2DROP",
},
{
name: "2drop far too much",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2DROP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_2DROP",
},
{
name: "Rot1",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ROT},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {3}, {4}, {2}},
disassembly: "OP_ROT",
},
{
name: "Rot2",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {5}, {6}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2ROT},
after: [][]byte{{3}, {4}, {5}, {6}, {1}, {2}},
disassembly: "OP_2ROT",
},
{
name: "Rot too little",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ROT},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_ROT",
},
{
name: "Swap1",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SWAP},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {4}, {3}},
disassembly: "OP_SWAP",
},
{
name: "Swap2",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2SWAP},
after: [][]byte{{3}, {4}, {1}, {2}},
disassembly: "OP_2SWAP",
},
{
name: "Swap too little",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SWAP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_SWAP",
},
{
name: "Over1",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_OVER},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {3}},
disassembly: "OP_OVER",
},
{
name: "Over2",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2OVER},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {1}, {2}},
disassembly: "OP_2OVER",
},
{
name: "Over too little",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_OVER},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_OVER",
},
{
name: "Pick1",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PICK},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {3}},
disassembly: "OP_PICK",
},
{
name: "Pick2",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {2}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PICK},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {2}},
disassembly: "OP_PICK",
},
{
name: "Pick too little",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PICK},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_PICK",
},
{
name: "Pick nothing",
before: [][]byte{{}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PICK},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_PICK",
},
{
name: "Pick no args",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PICK},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_PICK",
},
{
name: "Pick stupid numbers",
before: [][]byte{{0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PICK},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrNumberTooBig,
disassembly: "OP_PICK",
},
{
name: "Roll1",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ROLL},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {4}, {3}},
disassembly: "OP_ROLL",
},
{
name: "Roll2",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {2}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ROLL},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {3}, {4}, {2}},
disassembly: "OP_ROLL",
},
{
name: "Roll too little",
before: [][]byte{{1}, {1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ROLL},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_ROLL",
},
{
name: "Roll nothing ",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ROLL},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_ROLL",
},
{
name: "Roll no args ",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ROLL},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_ROLL",
},
{
name: "Roll stupid numbers",
before: [][]byte{{0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ROLL},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrNumberTooBig,
disassembly: "OP_ROLL",
},
{
name: "ifdup (positive)",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_IFDUP},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {1}},
disassembly: "OP_IFDUP",
},
{
name: "ifdup (negative)",
before: [][]byte{{0}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_IFDUP},
after: [][]byte{{0}},
disassembly: "OP_IFDUP",
},
{
name: "ifdup (empty)",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_IFDUP},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{{0}},
disassembly: "OP_IFDUP",
},
{
PopInt now guarantees that number will be 32 bit. So remove later checks that need this.
2014-03-14 18:51:17 +01:00
// alt stack is purged at the end of execution
name: "toaltstack",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
before: [][]byte{{1}},
altbefore: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TOALTSTACK},
after: [][]byte{},
PopInt now guarantees that number will be 32 bit. So remove later checks that need this.
2014-03-14 18:51:17 +01:00
altafter: [][]byte{},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_TOALTSTACK",
},
{
name: "toaltastack (empty)",
before: [][]byte{},
altbefore: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_TOALTSTACK},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_TOALTSTACK",
},
{
name: "fromaltastack",
before: [][]byte{},
altbefore: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FROMALTSTACK},
after: [][]byte{{1}},
altafter: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "OP_FROMALTSTACK",
},
{
name: "fromaltastack (empty)",
before: [][]byte{},
altbefore: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FROMALTSTACK},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_FROMALTSTACK",
},
{
name: "op_size (1)",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SIZE},
after: [][]byte{{1}, {1}},
disassembly: "OP_SIZE",
},
{
name: "op_size (5)",
before: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SIZE},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, {5}},
disassembly: "OP_SIZE",
},
{
name: "op_size (0)",
before: [][]byte{{}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SIZE},
// pushInt(0) actually gives an empty array, still counts as 0
after: [][]byte{{}, {}},
disassembly: "OP_SIZE",
},
{
name: "op_size (invalid)",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SIZE},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_SIZE",
},
{
name: "OP_EQUAL (valid)",
before: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4}, {1, 2, 3, 4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_EQUAL},
after: [][]byte{{1}},
disassembly: "OP_EQUAL",
},
{
name: "OP_EQUAL (invalid)",
before: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4}, {1, 2, 3, 3}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_EQUAL},
after: [][]byte{{0}},
disassembly: "OP_EQUAL",
},
{
name: "OP_EQUAL (one arg)",
before: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_EQUAL},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{{0}},
disassembly: "OP_EQUAL",
},
{
name: "OP_EQUAL (no arg)",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_EQUAL},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
after: [][]byte{{0}},
disassembly: "OP_EQUAL",
},
{
name: "OP_EQUALVERIFY (valid)",
before: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4}, {1, 2, 3, 4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_EQUALVERIFY},
after: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "OP_EQUALVERIFY",
},
{
name: "OP_EQUALVERIFY (invalid)",
before: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4}, {1, 2, 3, 3}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_EQUALVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrVerifyFailed,
after: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "OP_EQUALVERIFY",
},
{
name: "OP_EQUALVERIFY (one arg)",
before: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_EQUALVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_EQUALVERIFY",
},
{
name: "OP_EQUALVERIFY (no arg)",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_EQUALVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_EQUALVERIFY",
},
{
name: "OP_1NEGATE",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1NEGATE},
after: [][]byte{{0x81}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "-1",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "add one to minus one",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1NEGATE, btcscript.OP_1ADD},
after: [][]byte{{}}, // 0
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "-1 OP_1ADD",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "OP_ABS (positive)",
before: [][]byte{{1}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ABS},
after: [][]byte{{1}},
disassembly: "OP_ABS",
},
{
name: "OP_ABS (negative)",
before: [][]byte{{0x81}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ABS},
after: [][]byte{{1}},
disassembly: "OP_ABS",
},
{
name: "OP_ABS (empty)",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_ABS},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_ABS",
},
{
name: "op_data_1",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_1, 1},
after: [][]byte{{1}},
disassembly: "01",
},
{
name: "op_data_2",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_2, 1, 2},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2}},
disassembly: "0102",
},
{
name: "op_data_3",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_3, 1, 2, 3},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3}},
disassembly: "010203",
},
{
name: "op_data_4",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_4, 1, 2, 3, 4},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4}},
disassembly: "01020304",
},
{
name: "op_data_5",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}},
disassembly: "0102030405",
},
{
name: "op_data_6",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_6, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}},
disassembly: "010203040506",
},
{
name: "op_data_7",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_7, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}},
disassembly: "01020304050607",
},
{
name: "op_data_8",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_8, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708",
},
{
name: "op_data_9",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_9, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}},
disassembly: "010203040506070809",
},
{
name: "op_data_10",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_10, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a",
},
{
name: "op_data_11",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_11, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b",
},
{
name: "op_data_12",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_12, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c",
},
{
name: "op_data_13",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_13, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d",
},
{
name: "op_data_14",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_14, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e",
},
{
name: "op_data_15",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_15, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f",
},
{
name: "op_data_16",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_16, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10",
},
{
name: "op_data_17",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_17, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f1011",
},
{
name: "op_data_18",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_18, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112",
},
{
name: "op_data_19",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_19, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10111213",
},
{
name: "op_data_20",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_20, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f1011121314",
},
{
name: "op_data_21",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_21, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415",
},
{
name: "op_data_22",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_22, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10111213141516",
},
{
name: "op_data_23",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_23, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f1011121314151617",
},
{
name: "op_data_24",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_24, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718",
},
{
name: "op_data_25",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_25, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10111213141516171819",
},
{
name: "op_data_26",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_26, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a",
},
{
name: "op_data_27",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_27, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b",
},
{
name: "op_data_28",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_28, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c",
},
{
name: "op_data_29",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_29, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d",
},
{
name: "op_data_30",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_30, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e",
},
{
name: "op_data_31",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_31, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f",
},
{
name: "op_data_32",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_32, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f20",
},
{
name: "op_data_33",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_33, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f2021",
},
{
name: "op_data_34",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_34, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122",
},
{
name: "op_data_35",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_35, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f20212223",
},
{
name: "op_data_36",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_36, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f2021222324",
},
{
name: "op_data_37",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_37, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425",
},
{
name: "op_data_38",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_38, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f20212223242526",
},
{
name: "op_data_39",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_39, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f2021222324252627",
},
{
name: "op_data_40",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_40, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728",
},
{
name: "op_data_41",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_41, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f20212223242526272829",
},
{
name: "op_data_42",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_42, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a",
},
{
name: "op_data_43",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_43, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b",
},
{
name: "op_data_44",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_44, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c",
},
{
name: "op_data_45",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_45, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d",
},
{
name: "op_data_46",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_46, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e",
},
{
name: "op_data_47",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_47, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f",
},
{
name: "op_data_48",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_48, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f30",
},
{
name: "op_data_49",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_49, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f3031",
},
{
name: "op_data_50",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_50, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132",
},
{
name: "op_data_51",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_51, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f30313233",
},
{
name: "op_data_52",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_52, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f3031323334",
},
{
name: "op_data_53",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_53, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435",
},
{
name: "op_data_54",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_54, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f30313233343536",
},
{
name: "op_data_55",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_55, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f3031323334353637",
},
{
name: "op_data_56",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_56, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738",
},
{
name: "op_data_57",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_57, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f30313233343536373839",
},
{
name: "op_data_58",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_58, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a",
},
{
name: "op_data_59",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_59, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b",
},
{
name: "op_data_60",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_60, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c",
},
{
name: "op_data_61",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_61, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d",
},
{
name: "op_data_62",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_62, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e",
},
{
name: "op_data_63",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_63, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f",
},
{
name: "op_data_64",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_64, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f40",
},
{
name: "op_data_65",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_65, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f4041",
},
{
name: "op_data_66",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_66, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f404142",
},
{
name: "op_data_67",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_67, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f40414243",
},
{
name: "op_data_68",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_68, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f4041424344",
},
{
name: "op_data_69",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_69, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f404142434445",
},
{
name: "op_data_70",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_70, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69,
70},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f40414243444546",
},
{
name: "op_data_71",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_71, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69,
70, 71},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f4041424344454647",
},
{
name: "op_data_72",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_72, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69,
70, 71, 72},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f404142434445464748",
},
{
name: "op_data_73",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_73, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69,
70, 71, 72, 73},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f40414243444546474849",
},
{
name: "op_data_74",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_74, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69,
70, 71, 72, 73, 74},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74,
}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f404142434445464748494a",
},
{
name: "op_data_75",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69,
70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75},
after: [][]byte{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74,
75}},
disassembly: "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f404142434445464748494a4b",
},
{
name: "op_data too short",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_2, 1},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrShortScript,
disassemblyerr: btcscript.StackErrShortScript,
},
{
name: "op_pushdata_1",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA1, 1, 2},
after: [][]byte{{2}},
disassembly: "02",
},
{
name: "op_pushdata_1 too short",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA1, 1},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrShortScript,
disassemblyerr: btcscript.StackErrShortScript,
},
{
name: "op_pushdata_2",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA2, 2, 0, 2, 4},
after: [][]byte{{2, 4}},
disassembly: "0204",
},
{
name: "op_pushdata_2 too short",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA2, 2, 0},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrShortScript,
disassemblyerr: btcscript.StackErrShortScript,
},
{
name: "op_pushdata_4",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA4, 4, 0, 0, 0, 2, 4, 8, 16},
after: [][]byte{{2, 4, 8, 16}},
disassembly: "02040810",
},
{
name: "op_pushdata_4 too short",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA4, 4, 0, 0, 0},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrShortScript,
disassemblyerr: btcscript.StackErrShortScript,
},
// XXX also pushdata cases where the pushed data isn't long enough,
// no real error type defined for that as of yet.
{
name: "OP_SHA1 no args",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SHA1},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_SHA1",
},
add basic test for OP_SHA1 yup, it produces the sha of the data.
2013-06-27 17:15:32 +02:00
{
name: "OP_SHA1",
before: [][]byte{{0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SHA1},
after: [][]byte{{0x5d, 0x21, 0x1b, 0xad, 0x8f, 0x4e,
0xe7, 0x0e, 0x16, 0xc7, 0xd3, 0x43, 0xa8, 0x38, 0xfc,
0x34, 0x4a, 0x1e, 0xd9, 0x61}},
disassembly: "OP_SHA1",
},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
{
name: "OP_SHA256 no args",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SHA256},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_SHA256",
},
{
name: "OP_RIPEMD160 no args",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_RIPEMD160},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_RIPEMD160",
},
// data taken from transaction
// 4cbb6924e5f9788d7fcf0a1ce8c175bf9befa43eb5e23386b69bc4dce49da71c
// in block 103307
// First do it in component parts to make sure the sha256 and ripemd160
// opcodes work
{
name: "op_hash160 the hard way",
before: [][]byte{{0x04, 0x0f, 0xa4, 0x92, 0xe3, 0x59, 0xde, 0xe8, 0x4b,
0x53, 0xfe, 0xc5, 0xe9, 0x18, 0xb7, 0xfd, 0x62, 0x1e,
0xb7, 0xe5, 0x63, 0x38, 0xc5, 0xfb, 0xff, 0x71, 0xd9,
0x1d, 0x17, 0x22, 0xda, 0x58, 0xf1, 0x0f, 0x9e, 0x8f,
0x41, 0x2f, 0x39, 0x9c, 0xb3, 0x06, 0x70, 0xa7, 0x27,
0xe9, 0x91, 0x94, 0xaa, 0x69, 0x27, 0xaf, 0xf2, 0x54,
0x16, 0xec, 0x48, 0x9d, 0x45, 0x3a, 0x80, 0x7e, 0x03,
0xc0, 0x83}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SHA256, btcscript.OP_RIPEMD160},
after: [][]byte{{0x8b, 0xfa, 0x5c, 0x1f, 0x68, 0x5f, 0x13, 0x86, 0x3e,
0x74, 0x2e, 0x1b, 0xaf, 0x15, 0xf1, 0x71, 0xad, 0x49,
0x8b, 0x8f}},
disassembly: "OP_SHA256 OP_RIPEMD160",
},
// Then test it the ``normal'' way.
{
name: "op_hash160",
before: [][]byte{{0x04, 0x0f, 0xa4, 0x92, 0xe3, 0x59, 0xde, 0xe8, 0x4b,
0x53, 0xfe, 0xc5, 0xe9, 0x18, 0xb7, 0xfd, 0x62, 0x1e,
0xb7, 0xe5, 0x63, 0x38, 0xc5, 0xfb, 0xff, 0x71, 0xd9,
0x1d, 0x17, 0x22, 0xda, 0x58, 0xf1, 0x0f, 0x9e, 0x8f,
0x41, 0x2f, 0x39, 0x9c, 0xb3, 0x06, 0x70, 0xa7, 0x27,
0xe9, 0x91, 0x94, 0xaa, 0x69, 0x27, 0xaf, 0xf2, 0x54,
0x16, 0xec, 0x48, 0x9d, 0x45, 0x3a, 0x80, 0x7e, 0x03,
0xc0, 0x83}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_HASH160},
after: [][]byte{{0x8b, 0xfa, 0x5c, 0x1f, 0x68, 0x5f, 0x13, 0x86, 0x3e,
0x74, 0x2e, 0x1b, 0xaf, 0x15, 0xf1, 0x71, 0xad, 0x49,
0x8b, 0x8f}},
disassembly: "OP_HASH160",
},
// now with pushing. (mostly to check the disassembly)
{
name: "op_hash160 full script",
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0x0f, 0xa4, 0x92, 0xe3, 0x59, 0xde, 0xe8, 0x4b,
0x53, 0xfe, 0xc5, 0xe9, 0x18, 0xb7, 0xfd, 0x62, 0x1e,
0xb7, 0xe5, 0x63, 0x38, 0xc5, 0xfb, 0xff, 0x71, 0xd9,
0x1d, 0x17, 0x22, 0xda, 0x58, 0xf1, 0x0f, 0x9e, 0x8f,
0x41, 0x2f, 0x39, 0x9c, 0xb3, 0x06, 0x70, 0xa7, 0x27,
0xe9, 0x91, 0x94, 0xaa, 0x69, 0x27, 0xaf, 0xf2, 0x54,
0x16, 0xec, 0x48, 0x9d, 0x45, 0x3a, 0x80, 0x7e, 0x03,
0xc0, 0x83,
btcscript.OP_HASH160, btcscript.OP_DATA_20,
0x8b, 0xfa, 0x5c, 0x1f, 0x68, 0x5f, 0x13, 0x86, 0x3e,
0x74, 0x2e, 0x1b, 0xaf, 0x15, 0xf1, 0x71, 0xad, 0x49,
0x8b, 0x8f,
btcscript.OP_EQUALVERIFY},
after: [][]byte{},
disassembly: "040fa492e359dee84b53fec5e918b7fd621eb7e56338c5fbff71d91d1722da58f10f9e8f412f399cb30670a727e99194aa6927aff25416ec489d453a807e03c083 OP_HASH160 8bfa5c1f685f13863e742e1baf15f171ad498b8f OP_EQUALVERIFY",
},
{
name: "op_hash160 no args",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_HASH160},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_HASH160",
},
// hash256 test taken from spend of:
// 09f691b2263260e71f363d1db51ff3100d285956a40cc0e4f8c8c2c4a80559b1
{
name: "op_hash256",
before: [][]byte{{0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x3b, 0xa3, 0xed, 0xfd, 0x7a, 0x7b, 0x12, 0xb2,
0x7a, 0xc7, 0x2c, 0x3e, 0x67, 0x76, 0x8f, 0x61, 0x7f,
0xc8, 0x1b, 0xc3, 0x88, 0x8a, 0x51, 0x32, 0x3a, 0x9f,
0xb8, 0xaa, 0x4b, 0x1e, 0x5e, 0x4a, 0x29, 0xab, 0x5f,
0x49, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x1d, 0x1d, 0xac, 0x2b, 0x7c}},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_HASH256},
after: [][]byte{{0x6f, 0xe2, 0x8c, 0x0a, 0xb6, 0xf1, 0xb3, 0x72, 0xc1,
0xa6, 0xa2, 0x46, 0xae, 0x63, 0xf7, 0x4f, 0x93, 0x1e,
0x83, 0x65, 0xe1, 0x5a, 0x08, 0x9c, 0x68, 0xd6, 0x19,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00}},
disassembly: "OP_HASH256",
},
{
name: "OP_HASH256 no args",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_HASH256},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_HASH256",
},
// We need a more involved setup to test OP_CHECKSIG and
// OP_CHECKMULTISIG (see script_test.go) but we can test it with
// invalid arguments here quite easily.
{
name: "OP_CHECKSIG one arg",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_CHECKSIG},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 OP_CHECKSIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 1,
Add functions to count the number of signature operations in a script. To be usd for validation. Most of the codepaths teste, a few tests missing for cases needed tests in the validation codepaths too. To be worked on in tree.
2013-06-20 19:07:44 +02:00
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "OP_CHECKSIG no arg",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_CHECKSIG},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_CHECKSIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 1,
Add functions to count the number of signature operations in a script. To be usd for validation. Most of the codepaths teste, a few tests missing for cases needed tests in the validation codepaths too. To be worked on in tree.
2013-06-20 19:07:44 +02:00
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY one arg",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 1,
Add functions to count the number of signature operations in a script. To be usd for validation. Most of the codepaths teste, a few tests missing for cases needed tests in the validation codepaths too. To be worked on in tree.
2013-06-20 19:07:44 +02:00
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY no arg",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 1,
Add functions to count the number of signature operations in a script. To be usd for validation. Most of the codepaths teste, a few tests missing for cases needed tests in the validation codepaths too. To be worked on in tree.
2013-06-20 19:07:44 +02:00
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIG no args",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
disassembly: "OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
Add functions to count the number of signature operations in a script. To be usd for validation. Most of the codepaths teste, a few tests missing for cases needed tests in the validation codepaths too. To be worked on in tree.
2013-06-20 19:07:44 +02:00
nPreciseSigOps: 20,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIG huge number",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA1,
0x9, 0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4, 0x5, 0x6, 0x7, 0x8, 0x9,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrNumberTooBig,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
disassembly: "010203040506070809 OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 20,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIG too many keys",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_1, 21,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrTooManyPubkeys,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
disassembly: "15 OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 20,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIG lying about pubkeys",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
// pubkey comes from blockchain
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIG no sigs",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
script: []byte{
btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b,
0x13, 0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7,
0x15, 0x9b, 0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d,
0x71, 0x30, 0x2f, 0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3,
0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54, 0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c,
0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b, 0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1,
0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70, 0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c,
0xd8, 0x4c,
btcscript.OP_1,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "04ae1a62fe09c5f51b13905f07f06b99a2f7159b2225f374cd378d71302fa28414e7aab37397f554a7df5f142c21c1b7303b8a0626f1baded5c72a704f7e6cd84c 1 OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
// pubkey comes from blockchain
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIG sigs huge no",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
script: []byte{
btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA1,
0x9, 0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4, 0x5, 0x6, 0x7, 0x8, 0x9,
btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b,
0x13, 0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7,
0x15, 0x9b, 0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d,
0x71, 0x30, 0x2f, 0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3,
0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54, 0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c,
0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b, 0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1,
0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70, 0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c,
0xd8, 0x4c,
btcscript.OP_1,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrNumberTooBig,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "010203040506070809 04ae1a62fe09c5f51b13905f07f06b99a2f7159b2225f374cd378d71302fa28414e7aab37397f554a7df5f142c21c1b7303b8a0626f1baded5c72a704f7e6cd84c 1 OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIG too few sigs",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b,
0x13, 0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7,
0x15, 0x9b, 0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d,
0x71, 0x30, 0x2f, 0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3,
0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54, 0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c,
0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b, 0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1,
0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70, 0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c,
0xd8, 0x4c,
btcscript.OP_1,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 04ae1a62fe09c5f51b13905f07f06b99a2f7159b2225f374cd378d71302fa28414e7aab37397f554a7df5f142c21c1b7303b8a0626f1baded5c72a704f7e6cd84c 1 OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
// pubkey and sig comes from blockchain, are unrelated
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIG won't verify",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_DATA_71,
0x30, 0x44, 0x02, 0x20, 0x4e, 0x45, 0xe1, 0x69, 0x32,
0xb8, 0xaf, 0x51, 0x49, 0x61, 0xa1, 0xd3, 0xa1, 0xa2,
0x5f, 0xdf, 0x3f, 0x4f, 0x77, 0x32, 0xe9, 0xd6, 0x24,
0xc6, 0xc6, 0x15, 0x48, 0xab, 0x5f, 0xb8, 0xcd, 0x41,
0x02, 0x20, 0x18, 0x15, 0x22, 0xec, 0x8e, 0xca, 0x07,
0xde, 0x48, 0x60, 0xa4, 0xac, 0xdd, 0x12, 0x90, 0x9d,
0x83, 0x1c, 0xc5, 0x6c, 0xbb, 0xac, 0x46, 0x22, 0x08,
0x22, 0x21, 0xa8, 0x76, 0x8d, 0x1d, 0x09, 0x01,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b,
0x13, 0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7,
0x15, 0x9b, 0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d,
0x71, 0x30, 0x2f, 0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3,
0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54, 0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c,
0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b, 0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1,
0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70, 0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c,
0xd8, 0x4c,
btcscript.OP_1,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
after: [][]byte{{0}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 304402204e45e16932b8af514961a1d3a1a25fdf3f4f7732e9d624c6c61548ab5fb8cd410220181522ec8eca07de4860a4acdd12909d831cc56cbbac4622082221a8768d1d0901 1 04ae1a62fe09c5f51b13905f07f06b99a2f7159b2225f374cd378d71302fa28414e7aab37397f554a7df5f142c21c1b7303b8a0626f1baded5c72a704f7e6cd84c 1 OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
// invalid pubkey means that it fails to validate, not an
// error. There are pubkeys in the blockchain that don't
// parse with any validity.
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIG sigs bad pubkey",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_DATA_71,
0x30, 0x44, 0x02, 0x20, 0x4e, 0x45, 0xe1, 0x69, 0x32,
0xb8, 0xaf, 0x51, 0x49, 0x61, 0xa1, 0xd3, 0xa1, 0xa2,
0x5f, 0xdf, 0x3f, 0x4f, 0x77, 0x32, 0xe9, 0xd6, 0x24,
0xc6, 0xc6, 0x15, 0x48, 0xab, 0x5f, 0xb8, 0xcd, 0x41,
0x02, 0x20, 0x18, 0x15, 0x22, 0xec, 0x8e, 0xca, 0x07,
0xde, 0x48, 0x60, 0xa4, 0xac, 0xdd, 0x12, 0x90, 0x9d,
0x83, 0x1c, 0xc5, 0x6c, 0xbb, 0xac, 0x46, 0x22, 0x08,
0x22, 0x21, 0xa8, 0x76, 0x8d, 0x1d, 0x09, 0x01,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_1,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG},
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
after: [][]byte{{0}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 304402204e45e16932b8af514961a1d3a1a25fdf3f4f7732e9d624c6c61548ab5fb8cd410220181522ec8eca07de4860a4acdd12909d831cc56cbbac4622082221a8768d1d0901 1 1 1 OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
// XXX(oga) Test multisig when extra arg is missing. needs valid sig.
// disabled opcodes
{
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY no args",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
disassembly: "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 20,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY huge number",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA1,
0x9, 0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4, 0x5, 0x6, 0x7, 0x8, 0x9,
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrNumberTooBig,
disassembly: "010203040506070809 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 20,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY too many keys",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DATA_1, 21,
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrTooManyPubkeys,
disassembly: "15 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 20,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY lying about pubkeys",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
// pubkey comes from blockchain
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY no sigs",
script: []byte{
btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b,
0x13, 0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7,
0x15, 0x9b, 0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d,
0x71, 0x30, 0x2f, 0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3,
0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54, 0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c,
0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b, 0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1,
0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70, 0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c,
0xd8, 0x4c,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "04ae1a62fe09c5f51b13905f07f06b99a2f7159b2225f374cd378d71302fa28414e7aab37397f554a7df5f142c21c1b7303b8a0626f1baded5c72a704f7e6cd84c 1 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY sigs huge no",
script: []byte{
btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA1,
0x9, 0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4, 0x5, 0x6, 0x7, 0x8, 0x9,
btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b,
0x13, 0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7,
0x15, 0x9b, 0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d,
0x71, 0x30, 0x2f, 0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3,
0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54, 0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c,
0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b, 0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1,
0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70, 0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c,
0xd8, 0x4c,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrNumberTooBig,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "010203040506070809 04ae1a62fe09c5f51b13905f07f06b99a2f7159b2225f374cd378d71302fa28414e7aab37397f554a7df5f142c21c1b7303b8a0626f1baded5c72a704f7e6cd84c 1 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY too few sigs",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b,
0x13, 0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7,
0x15, 0x9b, 0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d,
0x71, 0x30, 0x2f, 0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3,
0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54, 0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c,
0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b, 0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1,
0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70, 0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c,
0xd8, 0x4c,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrUnderflow,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 04ae1a62fe09c5f51b13905f07f06b99a2f7159b2225f374cd378d71302fa28414e7aab37397f554a7df5f142c21c1b7303b8a0626f1baded5c72a704f7e6cd84c 1 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
// pubkey and sig comes from blockchain, are unrelated
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY won't verify",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_DATA_71,
0x30, 0x44, 0x02, 0x20, 0x4e, 0x45, 0xe1, 0x69, 0x32,
0xb8, 0xaf, 0x51, 0x49, 0x61, 0xa1, 0xd3, 0xa1, 0xa2,
0x5f, 0xdf, 0x3f, 0x4f, 0x77, 0x32, 0xe9, 0xd6, 0x24,
0xc6, 0xc6, 0x15, 0x48, 0xab, 0x5f, 0xb8, 0xcd, 0x41,
0x02, 0x20, 0x18, 0x15, 0x22, 0xec, 0x8e, 0xca, 0x07,
0xde, 0x48, 0x60, 0xa4, 0xac, 0xdd, 0x12, 0x90, 0x9d,
0x83, 0x1c, 0xc5, 0x6c, 0xbb, 0xac, 0x46, 0x22, 0x08,
0x22, 0x21, 0xa8, 0x76, 0x8d, 0x1d, 0x09, 0x01,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_DATA_65,
0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b,
0x13, 0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7,
0x15, 0x9b, 0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d,
0x71, 0x30, 0x2f, 0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3,
0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54, 0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c,
0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b, 0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1,
0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70, 0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c,
0xd8, 0x4c,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrVerifyFailed,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 304402204e45e16932b8af514961a1d3a1a25fdf3f4f7732e9d624c6c61548ab5fb8cd410220181522ec8eca07de4860a4acdd12909d831cc56cbbac4622082221a8768d1d0901 1 04ae1a62fe09c5f51b13905f07f06b99a2f7159b2225f374cd378d71302fa28414e7aab37397f554a7df5f142c21c1b7303b8a0626f1baded5c72a704f7e6cd84c 1 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
// invalid pubkey means that it fails to validate, not an
// error. There are pubkeys in the blockchain that don't
// parse with any validity.
name: "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY sigs bad pubkey",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_DATA_71,
0x30, 0x44, 0x02, 0x20, 0x4e, 0x45, 0xe1, 0x69, 0x32,
0xb8, 0xaf, 0x51, 0x49, 0x61, 0xa1, 0xd3, 0xa1, 0xa2,
0x5f, 0xdf, 0x3f, 0x4f, 0x77, 0x32, 0xe9, 0xd6, 0x24,
0xc6, 0xc6, 0x15, 0x48, 0xab, 0x5f, 0xb8, 0xcd, 0x41,
0x02, 0x20, 0x18, 0x15, 0x22, 0xec, 0x8e, 0xca, 0x07,
0xde, 0x48, 0x60, 0xa4, 0xac, 0xdd, 0x12, 0x90, 0x9d,
0x83, 0x1c, 0xc5, 0x6c, 0xbb, 0xac, 0x46, 0x22, 0x08,
0x22, 0x21, 0xa8, 0x76, 0x8d, 0x1d, 0x09, 0x01,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_1, btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrVerifyFailed,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 304402204e45e16932b8af514961a1d3a1a25fdf3f4f7732e9d624c6c61548ab5fb8cd410220181522ec8eca07de4860a4acdd12909d831cc56cbbac4622082221a8768d1d0901 1 1 1 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 1,
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
Fix reversed test bug with the max operations handling We were counting the number of push ops instead of the number of non push ops. Add tests that found this (checking tha the max operations check fires).
2013-06-20 01:30:34 +02:00
{
// 201 operations + one push, should just fit limits
name: "max operations",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
Fix reversed test bug with the max operations handling We were counting the number of push ops instead of the number of non push ops. Add tests that found this (checking tha the max operations check fires).
2013-06-20 01:30:34 +02:00
},
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
after: [][]byte{{1}, {1}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP",
Fix reversed test bug with the max operations handling We were counting the number of push ops instead of the number of non push ops. Add tests that found this (checking tha the max operations check fires).
2013-06-20 01:30:34 +02:00
},
{
// 202 operations + one push
name: "too many operations",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
Fix reversed test bug with the max operations handling We were counting the number of push ops instead of the number of non push ops. Add tests that found this (checking tha the max operations check fires).
2013-06-20 01:30:34 +02:00
},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrTooManyOperations,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP",
Fix reversed test bug with the max operations handling We were counting the number of push ops instead of the number of non push ops. Add tests that found this (checking tha the max operations check fires).
2013-06-20 01:30:34 +02:00
},
check that OP_CHECK_MULTISIG also triggers on too many ops
2013-06-20 02:21:12 +02:00
{
// 202 operations + one push
name: "too many operations multisig",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_1,
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_DUP,
btcscript.OP_DROP,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_1,
btcscript.OP_2,
Change OP_CHECK_MULTISIG -> OP_CHECKMULTISIG. This change was made to match the reference implementation.
2014-01-04 22:13:29 +01:00
btcscript.OP_CHECKMULTISIG,
check that OP_CHECK_MULTISIG also triggers on too many ops
2013-06-20 02:21:12 +02:00
},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrTooManyOperations,
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "1 OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_DROP 1 1 1 1 2 OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
nSigOps: 20,
nPreciseSigOps: 2,
check that OP_CHECK_MULTISIG also triggers on too many ops
2013-06-20 02:21:12 +02:00
},
Test pushing at and beyond the boundary for largest stack item.
2013-06-27 00:57:49 +02:00
{
name: "push largest",
// 521 bytes
before: [][]byte{},
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA2, 0x08, 0x02,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
gofmt
2013-06-27 15:19:43 +02:00
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07},
after: [][]byte{{
Test pushing at and beyond the boundary for largest stack item.
2013-06-27 00:57:49 +02:00
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
gofmt
2013-06-27 15:19:43 +02:00
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07}},
disassembly: "01020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607080901020304050607",
Test pushing at and beyond the boundary for largest stack item.
2013-06-27 00:57:49 +02:00
},
{
name: "push too large",
// 521 bytes
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUSHDATA2, 0x09, 0x02,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09,
gofmt
2013-06-27 15:19:43 +02:00
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08},
Test pushing at and beyond the boundary for largest stack item.
2013-06-27 00:57:49 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrElementTooBig,
// element too big is a parse error.
Perform pushed length checks at exec time, not parse. To match bitcoind behaviour. Fix tests to agree with this direction.
2013-07-29 17:17:11 +02:00
disassembly: "0102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708090102030405060708",
Test pushing at and beyond the boundary for largest stack item.
2013-06-27 00:57:49 +02:00
},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
{
name: "OP_CAT disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_CAT},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_CAT",
},
{
name: "OP_SUBSTR disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_SUBSTR},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_SUBSTR",
},
{
name: "OP_LEFT disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_LEFT},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_LEFT",
},
{
name: "OP_RIGHT disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_RIGHT},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_RIGHT",
},
{
name: "OP_INVERT disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_INVERT},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_INVERT",
},
{
name: "OP_AND disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_AND},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_AND",
},
{
name: "OP_OR disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_OR},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_OR",
},
{
name: "OP_XOR disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_XOR},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_XOR",
},
{
name: "OP_2MUL disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2MUL},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_2MUL",
},
{
name: "OP_2DIV disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2DIV},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_2DIV",
},
{
name: "OP_2DIV disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_2DIV},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_2DIV",
},
{
name: "OP_MUL disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_MUL},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_MUL",
},
{
name: "OP_DIV disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_DIV},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_DIV",
},
{
name: "OP_MOD disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_MOD},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_MOD",
},
{
name: "OP_LSHIFT disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_LSHIFT},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_LSHIFT",
},
{
name: "OP_RSHIFT disabled",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_RSHIFT},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrOpDisabled,
disassembly: "OP_RSHIFT",
},
// Reserved opcodes
{
name: "OP_RESERVED reserved",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_RESERVED},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrReservedOpcode,
disassembly: "OP_RESERVED",
},
{
name: "OP_VER reserved",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_VER},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrReservedOpcode,
disassembly: "OP_VER",
},
{
name: "OP_VERIF reserved",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_VERIF},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrReservedOpcode,
disassembly: "OP_VERIF",
},
{
name: "OP_VERNOTIF reserved",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_VERNOTIF},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrReservedOpcode,
disassembly: "OP_VERNOTIF",
},
{
name: "OP_RESERVED1 reserved",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_RESERVED1},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrReservedOpcode,
disassembly: "OP_RESERVED1",
},
{
name: "OP_RESERVED2 reserved",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_RESERVED2},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrReservedOpcode,
disassembly: "OP_RESERVED2",
},
// Invalid Opcodes
{
name: "invalid opcode 186",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN186},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN186",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 187",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN187},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN187",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 188",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN188},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN188",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 189",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN189},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN189",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 190",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN190},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN190",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 191",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN191},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN191",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 192",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN192},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN192",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 193",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN193},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN193",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 194",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN194},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN194",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 195",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN195},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN195",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 196",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN196},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN196",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 197",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN197},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN197",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 198",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN198},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN198",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 199",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN199},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN199",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 200",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN200},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN200",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 201",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN201},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN201",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 202",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN202},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN202",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 203",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN203},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN203",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 204",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN204},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN204",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 205",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN205},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN205",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 206",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN206},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN206",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 207",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN207},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN207",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 208",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN208},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN208",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 209",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN209},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN209",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 210",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN210},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN210",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 211",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN211},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN211",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 212",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN212},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN212",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 213",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN213},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN213",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 214",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN214},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN214",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 215",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN215},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN215",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 216",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN216},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN216",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 217",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN217},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN217",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 218",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN218},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN218",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 219",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN219},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN219",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 220",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN220},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN220",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 221",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN221},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN221",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 222",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN222},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN222",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 223",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN223},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN223",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 224",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN224},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN224",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 225",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN225},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN225",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 226",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN226},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN226",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 227",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN227},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN227",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 228",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN228},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN228",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 229",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN229},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN229",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 230",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN230},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN230",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 231",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN231},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN231",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 232",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN232},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN232",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 233",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN233},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN233",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 234",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN234},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN234",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 235",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN235},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN235",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 236",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN236},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN236",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 237",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN237},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN237",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 238",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN238},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN238",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 239",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN239},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN239",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 240",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN240},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN240",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 241",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN241},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN241",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 242",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN242},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN242",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 243",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN243},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN243",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 244",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN244},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN244",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 245",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN245},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN245",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 246",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN246},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN246",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 247",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN247},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN247",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 248",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN248},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN248",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 249",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN249},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN249",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 250",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN250},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN250",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 251",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN251},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN251",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 252",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN252},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
disassembly: "OP_UNKNOWN252",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
},
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
{
name: "invalid opcode 186 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN186, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN186 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 187 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN187, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN187 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 188 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN188, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN188 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 189 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN189, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN189 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 190 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN190, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN190 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 191 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN191, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN191 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 192 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN192, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN192 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 193 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN193, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN193 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 194 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN194, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN194 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 195 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN195, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN195 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 196 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN196, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN196 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 197 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN197, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN197 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 198 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN198, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN198 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 199 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN199, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN199 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 200 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN200, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN200 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 201 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN201, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN201 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 202 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN202, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN202 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 203 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN203, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN203 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 204 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN204, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN204 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 205 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN205, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN205 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 206 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN206, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN206 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 207 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN207, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN207 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 208 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN208, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN208 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 209 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN209, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN209 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 210 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN210, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN210 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 211 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN211, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN211 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 212 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN212, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN212 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 213 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN213, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN213 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 214 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN214, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN214 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 215 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN215, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN215 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 216 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN216, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN216 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 217 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN217, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN217 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 218 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN218, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN218 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 219 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN219, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN219 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 220 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN220, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN220 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 221 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN221, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN221 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 222 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN222, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN222 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 223 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN223, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN223 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 224 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN224, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN224 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 225 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN225, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN225 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 226 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN226, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN226 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 227 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN227, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN227 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 228 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN228, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN228 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 229 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN229, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN229 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 230 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN230, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN230 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 231 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN231, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN231 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 232 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN232, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN232 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 233 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN233, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN233 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 234 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN234, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN234 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 235 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN235, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN235 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 236 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN236, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN236 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 237 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN237, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN237 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 238 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN238, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN238 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 239 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN239, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN239 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 240 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN240, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN240 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 241 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN241, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN241 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 242 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN242, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN242 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 243 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN243, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN243 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 244 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN244, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN244 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 245 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN245, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN245 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 246 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN246, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN246 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 247 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN247, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN247 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 248 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN248, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN248 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 249 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN249, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN249 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 250 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN250, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN250 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 251 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN251, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN251 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
{
name: "invalid opcode 252 if noexec",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_FALSE, btcscript.OP_IF, btcscript.OP_UNKNOWN252, btcscript.OP_ELSE, btcscript.OP_TRUE, btcscript.OP_ENDIF},
after: [][]byte{{0x01}},
Make opcode disasm names match reference impl. This commit modifies the names of opcdoes shown in the oneline script disassembly to match the reference implementation. In particular OP_1NEGATE, and OP_0 through OP_16 are changed to the raw numbers they represent when doing oneline disassembly. When doing full disassembly, the full opcode names are still shown. ok @owainga.
2014-01-07 03:43:52 +01:00
disassembly: "0 OP_IF OP_UNKNOWN252 OP_ELSE 1 OP_ENDIF",
bitcoind only fails on invalid (undefined) opcodes when they are executed. So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm that this happens. Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
2013-10-08 00:36:39 +02:00
},
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
{
name: "invalid opcode OP_PUBKEY",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUBKEY},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
disassembly: "OP_PUBKEY",
},
{
name: "invalid opcode OP_PUBKEYHASH",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_PUBKEYHASH},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
disassembly: "OP_PUBKEYHASH",
},
{
name: "invalid opcode OP_INVALIDOPCODE",
script: []byte{btcscript.OP_INVALIDOPCODE},
expectedReturn: btcscript.StackErrInvalidOpcode,
disassembly: "OP_INVALIDOPCODE",
},
}
func stacksEqual(a, b [][]byte) bool {
if len(a) != len(b) {
return false
}
for i := range a {
if !bytes.Equal(a[i], b[i]) {
return false
}
}
return true
}
func testOpcode(t *testing.T, test *detailedTest) {
// mock up fake tx.
tx := &btcwire.MsgTx{
Version: 1,
TxIn: []*btcwire.TxIn{
gofmt
2014-02-04 22:18:37 +01:00
{
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
PreviousOutpoint: btcwire.OutPoint{
Hash: btcwire.ShaHash{},
Index: 0xffffffff,
},
SignatureScript: []byte{},
Sequence: 0xffffffff,
},
},
TxOut: []*btcwire.TxOut{
gofmt
2014-02-04 22:18:37 +01:00
{
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
Value: 0x12a05f200,
PkScript: []byte{},
},
},
LockTime: 0,
}
tx.TxOut[0].PkScript = test.script
engine, err := btcscript.NewScript(tx.TxIn[0].SignatureScript,
Add flag bitmask to NewScript for canonical sig checks. This removes the bip16 bool from NewScript and adds it to flags (with the constant ScriptBip16), and also adds a new flag, ScriptCanonicalSignatures, which will call btcec.ParseDERSignature parsing a signature during an Execute. This is needed to emulate bitcoind behavior, as bitcoind performs canonical signature validation (DER format) in some places (like mempool acceptance) but not others (like block validation). Updated tests and test coverage file to reflect changes.
2013-10-24 16:13:58 +02:00
tx.TxOut[0].PkScript, 0, tx, 0)
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
if err != nil {
if err != test.expectedReturn {
t.Errorf("Error return not expected %s: %v %v",
test.name, test.expectedReturn, err)
return
}
return
}
engine.SetStack(test.before)
engine.SetAltStack(test.altbefore)
// test disassembly engine.
// pc is at start of script 1, so check that DisasmScript matches
// DisasmPc. Only run this if we have a disassembly for the test.
// sine one of them have invalid instruction sequences and won't
// disassemble.
var disScript, disPC string
if test.disassembly != "" {
Test empty scripts and out of bounds for DisasmScript() give disasmscript a defined error return for out of bounds.
2013-06-27 16:07:37 +02:00
dis0, err := engine.DisasmScript(0)
if err != nil {
Fix up some ErrorF strings in tests. One was missing a format directive. the others changed for consistency. Appeases go vet.
2013-08-06 19:00:05 +02:00
t.Errorf("%s: failed to disassemble script0: %v",
Test empty scripts and out of bounds for DisasmScript() give disasmscript a defined error return for out of bounds.
2013-06-27 16:07:37 +02:00
test.name, err)
}
if dis0 != "" {
Fix up some ErrorF strings in tests. One was missing a format directive. the others changed for consistency. Appeases go vet.
2013-08-06 19:00:05 +02:00
t.Errorf("%s: disassembly of empty script gave \"%s\"",
Test empty scripts and out of bounds for DisasmScript() give disasmscript a defined error return for out of bounds.
2013-06-27 16:07:37 +02:00
test.name, dis0)
}
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
disScript, err = engine.DisasmScript(1)
if err != nil {
Fix up some ErrorF strings in tests. One was missing a format directive. the others changed for consistency. Appeases go vet.
2013-08-06 19:00:05 +02:00
t.Errorf("%s: failed to disassemble script: %v",
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
test.name, err)
}
Test empty scripts and out of bounds for DisasmScript() give disasmscript a defined error return for out of bounds.
2013-06-27 16:07:37 +02:00
_, err = engine.DisasmScript(2)
if err != btcscript.StackErrInvalidIndex {
t.Errorf("%s: got unexpected error for invalid "+
"disassembly index: \"%v\"", test.name, err)
}
Initial implementation.
2013-06-12 23:35:27 +02:00
}
done := false
for !done {
if test.disassembly != "" {
disCurPC, err := engine.DisasmPC()
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("failed to disassemble pc for %s: %v",
test.name, err)
}
disPC += disCurPC + "\n"
}
done, err = engine.Step()
if err != nil {
if err != test.expectedReturn {
t.Errorf("Error return not expected %s: %v %v",
test.name, test.expectedReturn, err)
return
}
return
}
}
if err != test.expectedReturn {
t.Errorf("Error return not expected %s: %v %v",
test.name, test.expectedReturn, err)
}
if test.disassembly != "" {
if disScript != disPC {
t.Errorf("script disassembly doesn't match pc "+
"disassembly for %s: pc: \"%s\" script: \"%s\"",
test.name, disScript, disPC)
}
}
after := engine.GetStack()
if !stacksEqual(after, test.after) {
t.Errorf("Stacks not equal after %s:\ngot: %v\n exp: %v",
test.name, spew.Sdump(after), spew.Sdump(test.after))
}
altafter := engine.GetAltStack()
if !stacksEqual(altafter, test.altafter) {
t.Errorf("AltStacks not equal after %s:\n got: %v\nexp: %v",
test.name, spew.Sdump(altafter),
spew.Sdump(test.altafter))
}
}
func TestOpcodes(t *testing.T) {
for i := range detailedTests {
testOpcode(t, &detailedTests[i])
}
}
func testDisasmString(t *testing.T, test *detailedTest) {
// mock up fake tx.
dis, err := btcscript.DisasmString(test.script)
if err != nil {
if err != test.disassemblyerr {
t.Errorf("%s: disassembly got error %v expected %v", test.name,
err, test.disassemblyerr)
}
return
}
if test.disassemblyerr != nil {
t.Errorf("%s: expected error %v, got %s", test.name,
test.disassemblyerr, dis)
return
}
if dis != test.disassembly {
t.Errorf("Disassembly for %s doesn't match expected "+
"got: \"%s\" expected: \"%s\"", test.name, dis,
test.disassembly)
}
}
func TestDisasmStrings(t *testing.T) {
for i := range detailedTests {
testDisasmString(t, &detailedTests[i])
}
}
Add functions to count the number of signature operations in a script. To be usd for validation. Most of the codepaths teste, a few tests missing for cases needed tests in the validation codepaths too. To be worked on in tree.
2013-06-20 19:07:44 +02:00
// A basic test of GetSigOpCount for most opcodes, we do this by
// running the same test for every one of the detailed tests. Since
// disassembly errors are always parse errors, and so are
// sigops count errors we use the same error code.
// While this isn't as precise as using full transaction scripts, this gives
// us coverage over a wider range of opcodes.
func TestSigOps(t *testing.T) {
for _, test := range detailedTests {
Return 0 for bad scripts from sigops code instead of an error. matches how bitcoind behaves.
2013-07-25 15:27:58 +02:00
count := btcscript.GetSigOpCount(test.script)
Add functions to count the number of signature operations in a script. To be usd for validation. Most of the codepaths teste, a few tests missing for cases needed tests in the validation codepaths too. To be worked on in tree.
2013-06-20 19:07:44 +02:00
if count != test.nSigOps {
t.Errorf("%s: expected count of %d, got %d", test.name,
test.nSigOps, count)
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
Add functions to count the number of signature operations in a script. To be usd for validation. Most of the codepaths teste, a few tests missing for cases needed tests in the validation codepaths too. To be worked on in tree.
2013-06-20 19:07:44 +02:00
}
}
}
// A basic test of GetPreciseSigOpCount for most opcodes, we do this by
// running the same test for every one of the detailed tests with a fake
// sigscript. Sicne disassembly errors are always parse errors, and so are
// sigops count errors we use the same error code.
// While this isn't as precise as using full transaction scripts, this gives
// us coverage over a wider range of opcodes. See script_test.go for tests
// using real transactions to provide a bit more coverage.
func TestPreciseSigOps(t *testing.T) {
for _, test := range detailedTests {
Return 0 for bad scripts from sigops code instead of an error. matches how bitcoind behaves.
2013-07-25 15:27:58 +02:00
count := btcscript.GetPreciseSigOpCount(
Add functions to count the number of signature operations in a script. To be usd for validation. Most of the codepaths teste, a few tests missing for cases needed tests in the validation codepaths too. To be worked on in tree.
2013-06-20 19:07:44 +02:00
[]byte{btcscript.OP_1}, test.script, false)
if count != test.nPreciseSigOps {
t.Errorf("%s: expected count of %d, got %d", test.name,
test.nPreciseSigOps, count)
gofmt
2013-06-21 02:33:56 +02:00
Add functions to count the number of signature operations in a script. To be usd for validation. Most of the codepaths teste, a few tests missing for cases needed tests in the validation codepaths too. To be worked on in tree.
2013-06-20 19:07:44 +02:00
}
}
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink