This commit adds two new functions named PayToScriptHashScript and
PayToAddrScript. The first one creates and returns a public-key script
which pays to the provided script hash and conforms to BIP0016.
The second function takes the new btcutil.Address interface type and
returns an appropriate script to pay to the address type in the interface.
It currently works for btcutil.AddressPubKeyHash and
btcutil.AddressScriptHash.
Fixed up bad function comment headers
Added a small set of tests for the ScriptToAddrHashes function to test
functionality of a couple real multisig cases as well as error checking
This commit modifies the code to use the new btcec Signature.Serialize API
instead of the internal sigDER which has now been removed. This closes#3.
ok @owainga
The allows the tests to run without showing warning for malformed bits
(which are intentionally malformed for testing purposes). Also, the
tests would not compile since the new btclog backend was switched out.
This commit resolves that.
This change updates the doc.go documentation file with the correct use
of the new (since 8eead5217d) API used
for passing additional options when creating new script engines.
Spotted by davec@
This removes the bip16 bool from NewScript and adds it to flags (with
the constant ScriptBip16), and also adds a new flag,
ScriptCanonicalSignatures, which will call btcec.ParseDERSignature
parsing a signature during an Execute. This is needed to emulate
bitcoind behavior, as bitcoind performs canonical signature validation
(DER format) in some places (like mempool acceptance) but not others
(like block validation).
Updated tests and test coverage file to reflect changes.
The stack data is normally sliced from the actual script and btcscript is not
supposed to ever change the tx passed into it.
Add a test (and fix the other leading zeros tests) to stop this happening again.
So add entries for them that disassemble and parse ok, but will fail
when executed with the appropriate error. Add a full suite of tests to confirm
that this happens.
Found by a strange transaction in testnet.
PayToPubKeyHashScript generates a new pay to pubkey hash script to use
as the pkScript when creating new transactions. If the passed pubkey
hash is an invalid size, StackErrInvalidOpcode will be returned as an
error.
SignatureScript returns the signature script necessary to validate a
single input of a transaction.
This also adds sanity checking for serializing scripts into byte
slices. If the length of a serialized opcode does not equal the
expected length, StackErrInvalidOpcode will be returned when unparsing
a []parsedOpcode.
New internal tests were added to verify checks for valid and invalid
parsed opcodes.
This commit adds an exported function, IsPushOnlyScript, which can be used
to tell whether or not a script only pushes data (only contains opcodes
that push data).
Removing from the bottom of a stack (nipN(depth)) would leak the first
entry in the array by slicing [1:], leaving array[0] dangling an
inaccessible (but unable to be freed until the whole slice is gone). We
left it like this for a while, but best not to leak the memory. Happens
rarely so the performance hit shouldn't matter that much. Do the same
thing for condstack.
When we do append loops, make an educated guess as to the size and make an array
with that capacity to avoid extra copying.
Doesn't affect the speed of the tests, over 4 runs the difference was lost in
the noise.
This commit modifies the code to no longer require a protocol version. It
does this by making use of the new Serialize function in btcwire.
Unfortuantely this does entail a public API change which I generally don't
like to do, but eliminating the usage of the protocol version throughout
the codebase was important enough to warrant the change.
We do this by allowing the parser to return the list of parsed objects
(it is an internal only api anyway) and then we use this in the sigops
counting and ignore the error. This change due to bitcoind
compatability.
btcscript contains an amount of debug logging that is very useful to
have. We have agreed that testing this isn't realy practical or indeed
really useful and thus is rather unlikely to grow test coverage any time
soon.
