Rather than using a channel for notifictions, use a callback instead.
There are several issues that arise with async notifications via a
channel, so use a callback instead. The caller can always make the
notifications async by using channels in the provided callback if
needed.
Rather than having all of the various places that print peer figure out
the direction and form the string, centralize it by implementing the
Stringer interface on the peer.
Chain is not concurrency safe, so we move the chainNotifySink handling
into the main blockmanager goroutine. Due to a possible deadlock if the
buffer is filled this still has to be a single channel that isn't linked
to the other ones. There is a possible starvation issue where the main
msgChan gets selected more often than the notification sink, but until
chain is concurrency safe this is rather unavoidable.
Only log errors for most cases if the peer is persisent (and thus requested).
Only log by default after version exchange, and after losing a peer that had
completed version exchange. Make most other messages debug.
This commit modifies CheckInputTransactions to ensure that not only must a
transaction exist in the transaction store, it must also not have any
errors associated with it or be nil.
We would occasionally hang or a while during server shudown, this is due
to an outbound peer waiting on a connection or a sleep. However, we
don't actually require to wait for the peers to finish at all. So just
let them finish.
Secondly, make peer.disconnnect and server.shutdown atomic varaibles so
that checking them from multiple goroutines isn't race, and clean up
their usage.
Use this information so that we do not request a block per peer we got
an inv for it, makes multi peer much quieter and rather more bandwidth
efficient.
In order to remove a number of possible races we combine blockhandling
an synchandler and use one channel for all messages. This ensures that
all messages from a single peer will be recieved in order. It also
removes the need for a lot of locking between the peer removal code and
the block/inv handlers.
Implement the bucketing by source group and group using essentially the
same algorithm as the address maanger in bitcoind.
Fix up the saving of peer.json to do so in a json format that keeps bucket
metadata.
If we fail to load the some of the data we asssume that we have
incomplete information, so we nuke the existing file and reinitialise so
we have a clean slate.
PayToPubKeyHashScript generates a new pay to pubkey hash script to use
as the pkScript when creating new transactions. If the passed pubkey
hash is an invalid size, StackErrInvalidOpcode will be returned as an
error.
SignatureScript returns the signature script necessary to validate a
single input of a transaction.
This also adds sanity checking for serializing scripts into byte
slices. If the length of a serialized opcode does not equal the
expected length, StackErrInvalidOpcode will be returned when unparsing
a []parsedOpcode.
New internal tests were added to verify checks for valid and invalid
parsed opcodes.
This commit adds an exported function, IsPushOnlyScript, which can be used
to tell whether or not a script only pushes data (only contains opcodes
that push data).
Several of the functions require a map of contextual transaction data to
use as a source for referenced transactions. This commit exports the
underlying TxData type and creates a new type TxStore, which is a map of
points to the under TxData. In addition, this commit exposes a new
function, FetchTransactionStore, which returns a transaction store
(TxStore) containing all of the transactions referenced by the passed
transaction, as well as the existing transaction if it already exists.
This paves the way for subsequent commits which will expose some of the
functions which depend on this transaction store.
Previously a new goroutine was launched for each notification in order to
avoid blocking chain from continuing while the notification is being
processed. This approach had a couple of issues.
First, since goroutines are not guaranteed to execute in any given order,
the notifications were no longer handled in the same order as they were
sent. For the current code, this is not a problem, but upcoming code that
handles a transaction memory pool, the order needs to be correct.
Second, goroutines are relatively cheap, but it's still quite a bit of
overhead to launch 3-4 goroutines per block.
This commit modifies the handling code to have a single sink executing in
a separate goroutine. The main handler then adds the notifications to a
queue which is processed by the sink. This approach retains the
non-blocking behavior of the previous approach, but also keeps the order
correct and, as an additional benefit, is also more efficient.
This removes a horrible case of reach-around from per into the guts of
the blockmaanger to frob the chain. Soon, when we try to deduplicate the
fetching of blocks from multiple peers this will need decisions made in
a central point.
Discussed at length with davec.
