lbry-android/p4a/pythonforandroid/graph.py
g1tman fe01f50c65 Perf: Use of sort and sorted functions optimized (#748)
* Update mixer.py
* Update graph.py
* Update mixer.py
* Update mixer.py
* Update bdistapk.py
* Update toolchain.py
* Update build.py
* Update build.py
2019-11-25 11:28:16 +01:00

340 lines
12 KiB
Python

from copy import deepcopy
from itertools import product
from pythonforandroid.logger import info
from pythonforandroid.recipe import Recipe
from pythonforandroid.bootstrap import Bootstrap
from pythonforandroid.util import BuildInterruptingException
def fix_deplist(deps):
""" Turn a dependency list into lowercase, and make sure all entries
that are just a string become a tuple of strings
"""
deps = [
((dep.lower(),)
if not isinstance(dep, (list, tuple))
else tuple([dep_entry.lower()
for dep_entry in dep
]))
for dep in deps
]
return deps
class RecipeOrder(dict):
def __init__(self, ctx):
self.ctx = ctx
def conflicts(self):
for name in self.keys():
try:
recipe = Recipe.get_recipe(name, self.ctx)
conflicts = [dep.lower() for dep in recipe.conflicts]
except ValueError:
conflicts = []
if any([c in self for c in conflicts]):
return True
return False
def get_dependency_tuple_list_for_recipe(recipe, blacklist=None):
""" Get the dependencies of a recipe with filtered out blacklist, and
turned into tuples with fix_deplist()
"""
if blacklist is None:
blacklist = set()
assert(type(blacklist) == set)
if recipe.depends is None:
dependencies = []
else:
# Turn all dependencies into tuples so that product will work
dependencies = fix_deplist(recipe.depends)
# Filter out blacklisted items and turn lowercase:
dependencies = [
tuple(set(deptuple) - blacklist)
for deptuple in dependencies
if tuple(set(deptuple) - blacklist)
]
return dependencies
def recursively_collect_orders(
name, ctx, all_inputs, orders=None, blacklist=None
):
'''For each possible recipe ordering, try to add the new recipe name
to that order. Recursively do the same thing with all the
dependencies of each recipe.
'''
name = name.lower()
if orders is None:
orders = []
if blacklist is None:
blacklist = set()
try:
recipe = Recipe.get_recipe(name, ctx)
dependencies = get_dependency_tuple_list_for_recipe(
recipe, blacklist=blacklist
)
# handle opt_depends: these impose requirements on the build
# order only if already present in the list of recipes to build
dependencies.extend(fix_deplist(
[[d] for d in recipe.get_opt_depends_in_list(all_inputs)
if d.lower() not in blacklist]
))
if recipe.conflicts is None:
conflicts = []
else:
conflicts = [dep.lower() for dep in recipe.conflicts]
except ValueError:
# The recipe does not exist, so we assume it can be installed
# via pip with no extra dependencies
dependencies = []
conflicts = []
new_orders = []
# for each existing recipe order, see if we can add the new recipe name
for order in orders:
if name in order:
new_orders.append(deepcopy(order))
continue
if order.conflicts():
continue
if any([conflict in order for conflict in conflicts]):
continue
for dependency_set in product(*dependencies):
new_order = deepcopy(order)
new_order[name] = set(dependency_set)
dependency_new_orders = [new_order]
for dependency in dependency_set:
dependency_new_orders = recursively_collect_orders(
dependency, ctx, all_inputs, dependency_new_orders,
blacklist=blacklist
)
new_orders.extend(dependency_new_orders)
return new_orders
def find_order(graph):
'''
Do a topological sort on the dependency graph dict.
'''
while graph:
# Find all items without a parent
leftmost = [l for l, s in graph.items() if not s]
if not leftmost:
raise ValueError('Dependency cycle detected! %s' % graph)
# If there is more than one, sort them for predictable order
leftmost.sort()
for result in leftmost:
# Yield and remove them from the graph
yield result
graph.pop(result)
for bset in graph.values():
bset.discard(result)
def obvious_conflict_checker(ctx, name_tuples, blacklist=None):
""" This is a pre-flight check function that will completely ignore
recipe order or choosing an actual value in any of the multiple
choice tuples/dependencies, and just do a very basic obvious
conflict check.
"""
deps_were_added_by = dict()
deps = set()
if blacklist is None:
blacklist = set()
# Add dependencies for all recipes:
to_be_added = [(name_tuple, None) for name_tuple in name_tuples]
while len(to_be_added) > 0:
current_to_be_added = list(to_be_added)
to_be_added = []
for (added_tuple, adding_recipe) in current_to_be_added:
assert(type(added_tuple) == tuple)
if len(added_tuple) > 1:
# No obvious commitment in what to add, don't check it itself
# but throw it into deps for later comparing against
# (Remember this function only catches obvious issues)
deps.add(added_tuple)
continue
name = added_tuple[0]
recipe_conflicts = set()
recipe_dependencies = []
try:
# Get recipe to add and who's ultimately adding it:
recipe = Recipe.get_recipe(name, ctx)
recipe_conflicts = {c.lower() for c in recipe.conflicts}
recipe_dependencies = get_dependency_tuple_list_for_recipe(
recipe, blacklist=blacklist
)
except ValueError:
pass
adder_first_recipe_name = adding_recipe or name
# Collect the conflicts:
triggered_conflicts = []
for dep_tuple_list in deps:
# See if the new deps conflict with things added before:
if set(dep_tuple_list).intersection(
recipe_conflicts) == set(dep_tuple_list):
triggered_conflicts.append(dep_tuple_list)
continue
# See if what was added before conflicts with the new deps:
if len(dep_tuple_list) > 1:
# Not an obvious commitment to a specific recipe/dep
# to be added, so we won't check.
# (remember this function only catches obvious issues)
continue
try:
dep_recipe = Recipe.get_recipe(dep_tuple_list[0], ctx)
except ValueError:
continue
conflicts = [c.lower() for c in dep_recipe.conflicts]
if name in conflicts:
triggered_conflicts.append(dep_tuple_list)
# Throw error on conflict:
if triggered_conflicts:
# Get first conflict and see who added that one:
adder_second_recipe_name = "'||'".join(triggered_conflicts[0])
second_recipe_original_adder = deps_were_added_by.get(
(adder_second_recipe_name,), None
)
if second_recipe_original_adder:
adder_second_recipe_name = second_recipe_original_adder
# Prompt error:
raise BuildInterruptingException(
"Conflict detected: '{}'"
" inducing dependencies {}, and '{}'"
" inducing conflicting dependencies {}".format(
adder_first_recipe_name,
(recipe.name,),
adder_second_recipe_name,
triggered_conflicts[0]
))
# Actually add it to our list:
deps.add(added_tuple)
deps_were_added_by[added_tuple] = adding_recipe
# Schedule dependencies to be added
to_be_added += [
(dep, adder_first_recipe_name or name)
for dep in recipe_dependencies
if dep not in deps
]
# If we came here, then there were no obvious conflicts.
return None
def get_recipe_order_and_bootstrap(ctx, names, bs=None, blacklist=None):
# Get set of recipe/dependency names, clean up and add bootstrap deps:
names = set(names)
if bs is not None and bs.recipe_depends:
names = names.union(set(bs.recipe_depends))
names = fix_deplist([
([name] if not isinstance(name, (list, tuple)) else name)
for name in names
])
if blacklist is None:
blacklist = set()
blacklist = {bitem.lower() for bitem in blacklist}
# Remove all values that are in the blacklist:
names_before_blacklist = list(names)
names = []
for name in names_before_blacklist:
cleaned_up_tuple = tuple([
item for item in name if item not in blacklist
])
if cleaned_up_tuple:
names.append(cleaned_up_tuple)
# Do check for obvious conflicts (that would trigger in any order, and
# without comitting to any specific choice in a multi-choice tuple of
# dependencies):
obvious_conflict_checker(ctx, names, blacklist=blacklist)
# If we get here, no obvious conflicts!
# get all possible order graphs, as names may include tuples/lists
# of alternative dependencies
possible_orders = []
for name_set in product(*names):
new_possible_orders = [RecipeOrder(ctx)]
for name in name_set:
new_possible_orders = recursively_collect_orders(
name, ctx, name_set, orders=new_possible_orders,
blacklist=blacklist
)
possible_orders.extend(new_possible_orders)
# turn each order graph into a linear list if possible
orders = []
for possible_order in possible_orders:
try:
order = find_order(possible_order)
except ValueError: # a circular dependency was found
info('Circular dependency found in graph {}, skipping it.'.format(
possible_order))
continue
orders.append(list(order))
# prefer python3 and SDL2 if available
orders.sort(key=lambda order: -('python3' in order) - ('sdl2' in order))
if not orders:
raise BuildInterruptingException(
'Didn\'t find any valid dependency graphs. '
'This means that some of your '
'requirements pull in conflicting dependencies.')
# It would be better to check against possible orders other
# than the first one, but in practice clashes will be rare,
# and can be resolved by specifying more parameters
chosen_order = orders[0]
if len(orders) > 1:
info('Found multiple valid dependency orders:')
for order in orders:
info(' {}'.format(order))
info('Using the first of these: {}'.format(chosen_order))
else:
info('Found a single valid recipe set: {}'.format(chosen_order))
if bs is None:
bs = Bootstrap.get_bootstrap_from_recipes(chosen_order, ctx)
if bs is None:
# Note: don't remove this without thought, causes infinite loop
raise BuildInterruptingException(
"Could not find any compatible bootstrap!"
)
recipes, python_modules, bs = get_recipe_order_and_bootstrap(
ctx, chosen_order, bs=bs, blacklist=blacklist
)
else:
# check if each requirement has a recipe
recipes = []
python_modules = []
for name in chosen_order:
try:
recipe = Recipe.get_recipe(name, ctx)
python_modules += recipe.python_depends
except ValueError:
python_modules.append(name)
else:
recipes.append(name)
python_modules = list(set(python_modules))
return recipes, python_modules, bs