Better OG image #274

Closed
opened 2019-04-15 21:30:33 +02:00 by tzarebczan · 7 comments
tzarebczan commented 2019-04-15 21:30:33 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Per @kauffj, we can improve on the OG image.

Per @kauffj, we can improve on the OG image.
NetOpWibby commented 2019-04-15 22:33:50 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Would be nice to have specifics but I can come up with something.

Would be nice to have specifics but I can come up with something.
kauffj commented 2019-04-15 23:40:54 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Audit the OG images of similar sites

Audit the OG images of similar sites
NetOpWibby commented 2019-04-15 23:42:08 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

They aren't good. Consensys and Lisk are terrible.

They aren't good. Consensys and Lisk are terrible.
kauffj commented 2019-04-15 23:50:23 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

And that's why we don't copy from blockchain companies 😛

Although I did a quick check of Dart and ReactJS homepages, both just use their logos.

And that's why we don't copy from blockchain companies :stuck_out_tongue: Although I did a quick check of Dart and ReactJS homepages, both just use their logos.
NetOpWibby commented 2019-04-15 23:52:46 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I'm confused as to what I'd be auditing then. Here are some screenshots:

og-1
og-2
og-3

I'm confused as to what I'd be auditing then. Here are some screenshots: ![og-1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1288356/56167817-d684a700-5f9e-11e9-93a5-585009ec28a3.png) ![og-2](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1288356/56167822-da182e00-5f9e-11e9-80ce-858587395b19.png) ![og-3](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1288356/56167827-de444b80-5f9e-11e9-8a22-799447733117.png)
kauffj commented 2019-04-15 23:57:46 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Well, we should audit like to like.

For lbry.tech, that's looking at sites that introduce technologies: languages, frameworks, etc. For these, it appears to be a lot of logos, which does make me wonder if we can do better by adding some text or additional info.

For lbry.com, that'd be looking at sites that host downloadable client software with similar user demos (Steam, Discord, uTorrent, etc.).

Well, we should audit like to like. For lbry.tech, that's looking at sites that introduce technologies: languages, frameworks, etc. For these, it appears to be a lot of logos, which does make me wonder if we can do better by adding some text or additional info. For lbry.com, that'd be looking at sites that host downloadable client software with similar user demos (Steam, Discord, uTorrent, etc.).
kauffj commented 2019-04-16 16:37:21 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

LGTM

LGTM
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: LBRYCommunity/lbry.tech#274
No description provided.