LBRYCommunity/lbrycrd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 29 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 32 Packages Wiki Activity
lbrycrd/src/test/util_tests.cpp

570 lines
26 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Increment MIT Licence copyright header year on files modified in 2016 Edited via: $ contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update .
2016-12-31 19:01:21 +01:00
// Copyright (c) 2011-2016 The Bitcoin Core developers
Remove references to X11 licence
2014-12-13 05:09:33 +01:00
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
Add licenses for tests and test data - Add license headers to source files (years based on commit dates) in `src/test` as well as `qa` - Add `README.md` to `src/test/data` specifying MIT license Fixes #3848
2014-03-18 10:11:00 +01:00
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
Cleanup code using forward declarations. Use misc methods of avoiding unnecesary header includes. Replace int typedefs with int##_t from stdint.h. Replace PRI64[xdu] with PRI[xdu]64 from inttypes.h. Normalize QT_VERSION ifs where possible. Resolve some indirect dependencies as direct ones. Remove extern declarations from .cpp files.
2013-04-13 07:13:08 +02:00
#include "util.h"
Separate protocol versioning from clientversion
2014-10-29 02:33:23 +01:00
#include "clientversion.h"
MOVEONLY: core/ -> primitives/
2014-11-18 22:03:02 +01:00
#include "primitives/transaction.h"
Cleanup code using forward declarations. Use misc methods of avoiding unnecesary header includes. Replace int typedefs with int##_t from stdint.h. Replace PRI64[xdu] with PRI[xdu]64 from inttypes.h. Normalize QT_VERSION ifs where possible. Resolve some indirect dependencies as direct ones. Remove extern declarations from .cpp files.
2013-04-13 07:13:08 +02:00
#include "sync.h"
Split up util.cpp/h Split up util.cpp/h into: - string utilities (hex, base32, base64): no internal dependencies, no dependency on boost (apart from foreach) - money utilities (parsesmoney, formatmoney) - time utilities (gettime*, sleep, format date): - and the rest (logging, argument parsing, config file parsing) The latter is basically the environment and OS handling, and is stripped of all utility functions, so we may want to rename it to something else than util.cpp/h for clarity (Matt suggested osinterface). Breaks dependency of sha256.cpp on all the things pulled in by util.
2014-08-21 16:11:09 +02:00
#include "utilstrencodings.h"
#include "utilmoneystr.h"
tests: add a BasicTestingSetup and apply to all tests Make sure that chainparams and logging is properly initialized. Doing this for every test may be overkill, but this initialization is so simple that that does not matter. This should fix the travis issues.
2015-03-12 09:34:42 +01:00
#include "test/test_bitcoin.h"
test: Fix test_random includes
2016-11-07 15:04:57 +01:00
#include "test/test_random.h"
Cleanup code using forward declarations. Use misc methods of avoiding unnecesary header includes. Replace int typedefs with int##_t from stdint.h. Replace PRI64[xdu] with PRI[xdu]64 from inttypes.h. Normalize QT_VERSION ifs where possible. Resolve some indirect dependencies as direct ones. Remove extern declarations from .cpp files.
2013-04-13 07:13:08 +02:00
#include <stdint.h>
use median filter for peer-reported reported number of blocks - fixes problem that one misconfigured or malicious node can mess up progress bar - implementation in src/util.h - testcase in src/test/util_tests.cpp
2011-09-28 21:35:58 +02:00
#include <vector>
Cleanup code using forward declarations. Use misc methods of avoiding unnecesary header includes. Replace int typedefs with int##_t from stdint.h. Replace PRI64[xdu] with PRI[xdu]64 from inttypes.h. Normalize QT_VERSION ifs where possible. Resolve some indirect dependencies as direct ones. Remove extern declarations from .cpp files.
2013-04-13 07:13:08 +02:00
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
use median filter for peer-reported reported number of blocks - fixes problem that one misconfigured or malicious node can mess up progress bar - implementation in src/util.h - testcase in src/test/util_tests.cpp
2011-09-28 21:35:58 +02:00
Refactoring: Removed using namespace <xxx> from bench/ and test/ source files.
2016-12-05 08:03:53 +01:00
extern std::map<std::string, std::string> mapArgs;
Un-expose mapArgs from utils.h
2016-11-30 03:45:24 +01:00
tests: add a BasicTestingSetup and apply to all tests Make sure that chainparams and logging is properly initialized. Doing this for every test may be overkill, but this initialization is so simple that that does not matter. This should fix the travis issues.
2015-03-12 09:34:42 +01:00
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(util_tests, BasicTestingSetup)
use median filter for peer-reported reported number of blocks - fixes problem that one misconfigured or malicious node can mess up progress bar - implementation in src/util.h - testcase in src/test/util_tests.cpp
2011-09-28 21:35:58 +02:00
Added simple critical section test cases.
2011-11-02 23:10:41 +01:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_criticalsection)
{
CCriticalSection cs;
do {
Use scoped locks instead of CRITICAL_BLOCK
2012-04-06 18:39:12 +02:00
LOCK(cs);
break;
Added simple critical section test cases.
2011-11-02 23:10:41 +01:00
BOOST_ERROR("break was swallowed!");
} while(0);
do {
Use scoped locks instead of CRITICAL_BLOCK
2012-04-06 18:39:12 +02:00
TRY_LOCK(cs, lockTest);
if (lockTest)
Added simple critical section test cases.
2011-11-02 23:10:41 +01:00
break;
BOOST_ERROR("break was swallowed!");
} while(0);
}
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
static const unsigned char ParseHex_expected[65] = {
remove GetBoolArg() fDefault parameter defaulting to false - explicitly set the default of all GetBoolArg() calls - rework getarg_test.cpp and util_tests.cpp to cover this change - some indentation fixes - move macdockiconhandler.h include in bitcoin.cpp to the "our headers" section
2013-04-28 17:37:50 +02:00
0x04, 0x67, 0x8a, 0xfd, 0xb0, 0xfe, 0x55, 0x48, 0x27, 0x19, 0x67, 0xf1, 0xa6, 0x71, 0x30, 0xb7,
0x10, 0x5c, 0xd6, 0xa8, 0x28, 0xe0, 0x39, 0x09, 0xa6, 0x79, 0x62, 0xe0, 0xea, 0x1f, 0x61, 0xde,
0xb6, 0x49, 0xf6, 0xbc, 0x3f, 0x4c, 0xef, 0x38, 0xc4, 0xf3, 0x55, 0x04, 0xe5, 0x1e, 0xc1, 0x12,
0xde, 0x5c, 0x38, 0x4d, 0xf7, 0xba, 0x0b, 0x8d, 0x57, 0x8a, 0x4c, 0x70, 0x2b, 0x6b, 0xf1, 0x1d,
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
0x5f
};
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_ParseHex)
{
std::vector<unsigned char> result;
std::vector<unsigned char> expected(ParseHex_expected, ParseHex_expected + sizeof(ParseHex_expected));
// Basic test vector
result = ParseHex("04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL_COLLECTIONS(result.begin(), result.end(), expected.begin(), expected.end());
// Spaces between bytes must be supported
result = ParseHex("12 34 56 78");
BOOST_CHECK(result.size() == 4 && result[0] == 0x12 && result[1] == 0x34 && result[2] == 0x56 && result[3] == 0x78);
test: test leading space for ParseHex BerkeleyDB dump files have key and value lines indented. The salvage code passes these to ParseHex as-is. Check this in the tests (should just pass with current code).
2016-02-15 15:50:28 +01:00
// Leading space must be supported (used in CDBEnv::Salvage)
result = ParseHex(" 89 34 56 78");
BOOST_CHECK(result.size() == 4 && result[0] == 0x89 && result[1] == 0x34 && result[2] == 0x56 && result[3] == 0x78);
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
// Stop parsing at invalid value
result = ParseHex("1234 invalid 1234");
BOOST_CHECK(result.size() == 2 && result[0] == 0x12 && result[1] == 0x34);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_HexStr)
{
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(
HexStr(ParseHex_expected, ParseHex_expected + sizeof(ParseHex_expected)),
"04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(
HexStr(ParseHex_expected, ParseHex_expected + 5, true),
"04 67 8a fd b0");
Integrate @JoelKatz's optimized ToHex (#562) into current HexStr function
2012-04-21 20:15:25 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(
HexStr(ParseHex_expected, ParseHex_expected, true),
"");
std::vector<unsigned char> ParseHex_vec(ParseHex_expected, ParseHex_expected + 5);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(
HexStr(ParseHex_vec, true),
"04 67 8a fd b0");
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
}
Integrate @JoelKatz's optimized ToHex (#562) into current HexStr function
2012-04-21 20:15:25 +02:00
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_DateTimeStrFormat)
{
test/util_tests.cpp: one more DateTimeStrFormat 'T' removal
2013-01-02 01:48:28 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(DateTimeStrFormat("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", 0), "1970-01-01 00:00:00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(DateTimeStrFormat("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", 0x7FFFFFFF), "2038-01-19 03:14:07");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(DateTimeStrFormat("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", 1317425777), "2011-09-30 23:36:17");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(DateTimeStrFormat("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M", 1317425777), "2011-09-30 23:36");
Replace non-threadsafe gmtime and setlocale Make DateTimeStrFormat use boost::posix_time. Also re-enable the util_DateTimeStrFormat tests, as they are no longer platform specific.
2014-05-08 18:01:10 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(DateTimeStrFormat("%a, %d %b %Y %H:%M:%S +0000", 1317425777), "Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:36:17 +0000");
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_ParseParameters)
{
const char *argv_test[] = {"-ignored", "-a", "-b", "-ccc=argument", "-ccc=multiple", "f", "-d=e"};
ParseParameters(0, (char**)argv_test);
BOOST_CHECK(mapArgs.empty() && mapMultiArgs.empty());
ParseParameters(1, (char**)argv_test);
BOOST_CHECK(mapArgs.empty() && mapMultiArgs.empty());
ParseParameters(5, (char**)argv_test);
remove GetBoolArg() fDefault parameter defaulting to false - explicitly set the default of all GetBoolArg() calls - rework getarg_test.cpp and util_tests.cpp to cover this change - some indentation fixes - move macdockiconhandler.h include in bitcoin.cpp to the "our headers" section
2013-04-28 17:37:50 +02:00
// expectation: -ignored is ignored (program name argument),
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
// -a, -b and -ccc end up in map, -d ignored because it is after
// a non-option argument (non-GNU option parsing)
BOOST_CHECK(mapArgs.size() == 3 && mapMultiArgs.size() == 3);
Introduce (and use) an IsArgSet accessor method
2016-11-30 02:51:30 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK(IsArgSet("-a") && IsArgSet("-b") && IsArgSet("-ccc")
&& !IsArgSet("f") && !IsArgSet("-d"));
remove GetBoolArg() fDefault parameter defaulting to false - explicitly set the default of all GetBoolArg() calls - rework getarg_test.cpp and util_tests.cpp to cover this change - some indentation fixes - move macdockiconhandler.h include in bitcoin.cpp to the "our headers" section
2013-04-28 17:37:50 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(mapMultiArgs.count("-a") && mapMultiArgs.count("-b") && mapMultiArgs.count("-ccc")
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
&& !mapMultiArgs.count("f") && !mapMultiArgs.count("-d"));
BOOST_CHECK(mapArgs["-a"] == "" && mapArgs["-ccc"] == "multiple");
Fix non-const mapMultiArgs[] access after init. Swap mapMultiArgs for a const-reference to a _mapMultiArgs which is only accessed in util.cpp
2016-11-30 01:50:49 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK(mapMultiArgs.at("-ccc").size() == 2);
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_GetArg)
{
mapArgs.clear();
mapArgs["strtest1"] = "string...";
// strtest2 undefined on purpose
mapArgs["inttest1"] = "12345";
mapArgs["inttest2"] = "81985529216486895";
// inttest3 undefined on purpose
mapArgs["booltest1"] = "";
// booltest2 undefined on purpose
mapArgs["booltest3"] = "0";
mapArgs["booltest4"] = "1";
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(GetArg("strtest1", "default"), "string...");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(GetArg("strtest2", "default"), "default");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(GetArg("inttest1", -1), 12345);
Declare integer constant LL
2011-10-03 19:10:31 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(GetArg("inttest2", -1), 81985529216486895LL);
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(GetArg("inttest3", -1), -1);
remove GetBoolArg() fDefault parameter defaulting to false - explicitly set the default of all GetBoolArg() calls - rework getarg_test.cpp and util_tests.cpp to cover this change - some indentation fixes - move macdockiconhandler.h include in bitcoin.cpp to the "our headers" section
2013-04-28 17:37:50 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(GetBoolArg("booltest1", false), true);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(GetBoolArg("booltest2", false), false);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(GetBoolArg("booltest3", false), false);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(GetBoolArg("booltest4", false), true);
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_FormatMoney)
{
Get rid of fPlus argument to FormatMoney It's never used with any other value than false, the default.
2015-06-04 14:43:02 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(0), "0.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney((COIN/10000)*123456789), "12345.6789");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(-COIN), "-1.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN*100000000), "100000000.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN*10000000), "10000000.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN*1000000), "1000000.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN*100000), "100000.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN*10000), "10000.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN*1000), "1000.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN*100), "100.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN*10), "10.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN), "1.00");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN/10), "0.10");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN/100), "0.01");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN/1000), "0.001");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN/10000), "0.0001");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN/100000), "0.00001");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN/1000000), "0.000001");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN/10000000), "0.0000001");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatMoney(COIN/100000000), "0.00000001");
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_ParseMoney)
{
Use a typedef for monetary values
2014-04-23 00:46:19 +02:00
CAmount ret = 0;
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("0.0", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, 0);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("12345.6789", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, (COIN/10000)*123456789);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("100000000.00", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN*100000000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("10000000.00", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN*10000000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("1000000.00", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN*1000000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("100000.00", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN*100000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("10000.00", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN*10000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("1000.00", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN*1000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("100.00", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN*100);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("10.00", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN*10);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("1.00", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN);
[tests] Extend util_ParseMoney test case
2016-01-19 17:47:55 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("1", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN);
remove possibility of 63 bit overflow in ParseMoney - also, add unit tests for various functions in util.cpp/util.h
2011-10-01 02:47:47 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("0.1", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN/10);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("0.01", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN/100);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("0.001", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN/1000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("0.0001", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN/10000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("0.00001", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN/100000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("0.000001", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN/1000000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("0.0000001", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN/10000000);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseMoney("0.00000001", ret));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, COIN/100000000);
// Attempted 63 bit overflow should fail
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseMoney("92233720368.54775808", ret));
[tests] Extend util_ParseMoney test case
2016-01-19 17:47:55 +01:00
// Parsing negative amounts must fail
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseMoney("-1", ret));
use median filter for peer-reported reported number of blocks - fixes problem that one misconfigured or malicious node can mess up progress bar - implementation in src/util.h - testcase in src/test/util_tests.cpp
2011-09-28 21:35:58 +02:00
}
Replace OP_EVAL (BIP 12) with Pay-to-script-hash (BIP 16).
2012-01-05 03:40:52 +01:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_IsHex)
{
BOOST_CHECK(IsHex("00"));
BOOST_CHECK(IsHex("00112233445566778899aabbccddeeffAABBCCDDEEFF"));
BOOST_CHECK(IsHex("ff"));
BOOST_CHECK(IsHex("FF"));
BOOST_CHECK(!IsHex(""));
BOOST_CHECK(!IsHex("0"));
BOOST_CHECK(!IsHex("a"));
BOOST_CHECK(!IsHex("eleven"));
BOOST_CHECK(!IsHex("00xx00"));
BOOST_CHECK(!IsHex("0x0000"));
}
Internal RNG for approximateBestSubset to prevent degenerate behavior. This fixes test_bitcoin failures on openbsd reported by dhill on IRC. On some systems rand() is a simple LCG over 2^31 and so it produces an even-odd sequence. ApproximateBestSubset was only using the least significant bit and so every run of the iterative solver would be the same for some inputs, resulting in some pretty dumb decisions. Using something other than the least significant bit would paper over the issue but who knows what other way a system's rand() might get us here. Instead we use an internal RNG with a period of something like 2^60 which is well behaved. This also makes it possible to make the selection deterministic for the tests, if we wanted to implement that.
2013-02-16 00:27:57 +01:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_seed_insecure_rand)
{
Make the rand tests determinstic. (fixes #2714) This avoids spurious errors with the old tests but still tests enough that if the rng is replaced with a totally broken one it should still fail.
2013-06-25 21:06:43 +02:00
seed_insecure_rand(true);
Internal RNG for approximateBestSubset to prevent degenerate behavior. This fixes test_bitcoin failures on openbsd reported by dhill on IRC. On some systems rand() is a simple LCG over 2^31 and so it produces an even-odd sequence. ApproximateBestSubset was only using the least significant bit and so every run of the iterative solver would be the same for some inputs, resulting in some pretty dumb decisions. Using something other than the least significant bit would paper over the issue but who knows what other way a system's rand() might get us here. Instead we use an internal RNG with a period of something like 2^60 which is well behaved. This also makes it possible to make the selection deterministic for the tests, if we wanted to implement that.
2013-02-16 00:27:57 +01:00
for (int mod=2;mod<11;mod++)
{
int mask = 1;
[trivial] Fix typos in comments
2017-03-21 19:49:08 +01:00
// Really rough binomial confidence approximation.
Internal RNG for approximateBestSubset to prevent degenerate behavior. This fixes test_bitcoin failures on openbsd reported by dhill on IRC. On some systems rand() is a simple LCG over 2^31 and so it produces an even-odd sequence. ApproximateBestSubset was only using the least significant bit and so every run of the iterative solver would be the same for some inputs, resulting in some pretty dumb decisions. Using something other than the least significant bit would paper over the issue but who knows what other way a system's rand() might get us here. Instead we use an internal RNG with a period of something like 2^60 which is well behaved. This also makes it possible to make the selection deterministic for the tests, if we wanted to implement that.
2013-02-16 00:27:57 +01:00
int err = 30*10000./mod*sqrt((1./mod*(1-1./mod))/10000.);
//mask is 2^ceil(log2(mod))-1
while(mask<mod-1)mask=(mask<<1)+1;
[test] Remove unused code
2016-08-24 17:05:12 +02:00
int count = 0;
Internal RNG for approximateBestSubset to prevent degenerate behavior. This fixes test_bitcoin failures on openbsd reported by dhill on IRC. On some systems rand() is a simple LCG over 2^31 and so it produces an even-odd sequence. ApproximateBestSubset was only using the least significant bit and so every run of the iterative solver would be the same for some inputs, resulting in some pretty dumb decisions. Using something other than the least significant bit would paper over the issue but who knows what other way a system's rand() might get us here. Instead we use an internal RNG with a period of something like 2^60 which is well behaved. This also makes it possible to make the selection deterministic for the tests, if we wanted to implement that.
2013-02-16 00:27:57 +01:00
//How often does it get a zero from the uniform range [0,mod)?
[test] Remove unused code
2016-08-24 17:05:12 +02:00
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
Internal RNG for approximateBestSubset to prevent degenerate behavior. This fixes test_bitcoin failures on openbsd reported by dhill on IRC. On some systems rand() is a simple LCG over 2^31 and so it produces an even-odd sequence. ApproximateBestSubset was only using the least significant bit and so every run of the iterative solver would be the same for some inputs, resulting in some pretty dumb decisions. Using something other than the least significant bit would paper over the issue but who knows what other way a system's rand() might get us here. Instead we use an internal RNG with a period of something like 2^60 which is well behaved. This also makes it possible to make the selection deterministic for the tests, if we wanted to implement that.
2013-02-16 00:27:57 +01:00
uint32_t rval;
do{
rval=insecure_rand()&mask;
}while(rval>=(uint32_t)mod);
count += rval==0;
}
BOOST_CHECK(count<=10000/mod+err);
BOOST_CHECK(count>=10000/mod-err);
}
}
Make RPC password resistant to timing attacks Fixes issue#2838; this is a tweaked version of pull#2845 that should not leak the length of the password and is more generic, in case we run into other situations where we need timing-attack-resistant comparisons.
2013-08-08 11:58:57 +02:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_TimingResistantEqual)
{
BOOST_CHECK(TimingResistantEqual(std::string(""), std::string("")));
BOOST_CHECK(!TimingResistantEqual(std::string("abc"), std::string("")));
BOOST_CHECK(!TimingResistantEqual(std::string(""), std::string("abc")));
BOOST_CHECK(!TimingResistantEqual(std::string("a"), std::string("aa")));
BOOST_CHECK(!TimingResistantEqual(std::string("aa"), std::string("a")));
BOOST_CHECK(TimingResistantEqual(std::string("abc"), std::string("abc")));
BOOST_CHECK(!TimingResistantEqual(std::string("abc"), std::string("aba")));
}
tests: add testcases for strprintf
2013-11-13 12:18:16 +01:00
/* Test strprintf formatting directives.
* Put a string before and after to ensure sanity of element sizes on stack. */
#define B "check_prefix"
#define E "check_postfix"
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(strprintf_numbers)
{
int64_t s64t = -9223372036854775807LL; /* signed 64 bit test value */
uint64_t u64t = 18446744073709551615ULL; /* unsigned 64 bit test value */
c++11: These look like user-defined literals. Add a space to keep the compiler happy
2014-12-19 02:43:48 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK(strprintf("%s %d %s", B, s64t, E) == B" -9223372036854775807 " E);
BOOST_CHECK(strprintf("%s %u %s", B, u64t, E) == B" 18446744073709551615 " E);
BOOST_CHECK(strprintf("%s %x %s", B, u64t, E) == B" ffffffffffffffff " E);
tests: add testcases for strprintf
2013-11-13 12:18:16 +01:00
size_t st = 12345678; /* unsigned size_t test value */
ssize_t sst = -12345678; /* signed size_t test value */
c++11: These look like user-defined literals. Add a space to keep the compiler happy
2014-12-19 02:43:48 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK(strprintf("%s %d %s", B, sst, E) == B" -12345678 " E);
BOOST_CHECK(strprintf("%s %u %s", B, st, E) == B" 12345678 " E);
BOOST_CHECK(strprintf("%s %x %s", B, st, E) == B" bc614e " E);
tests: add testcases for strprintf
2013-11-13 12:18:16 +01:00
ptrdiff_t pt = 87654321; /* positive ptrdiff_t test value */
ptrdiff_t spt = -87654321; /* negative ptrdiff_t test value */
c++11: These look like user-defined literals. Add a space to keep the compiler happy
2014-12-19 02:43:48 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK(strprintf("%s %d %s", B, spt, E) == B" -87654321 " E);
BOOST_CHECK(strprintf("%s %u %s", B, pt, E) == B" 87654321 " E);
BOOST_CHECK(strprintf("%s %x %s", B, pt, E) == B" 5397fb1 " E);
tests: add testcases for strprintf
2013-11-13 12:18:16 +01:00
}
#undef B
#undef E
Add test for GetTime() Test for mingw/wine issue #3494, where the upper word of time(NULL) return value gets clobbered.
2014-01-09 11:35:38 +01:00
/* Check for mingw/wine issue #3494
* Remove this test before time.ctime(0xffffffff) == 'Sun Feb 7 07:28:15 2106'
*/
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(gettime)
{
BOOST_CHECK((GetTime() & ~0xFFFFFFFFLL) == 0);
}
util: add parseint32 function with strict error reporting None of the current integer parsing functions in util check whether the result is valid and fits in the range of the type. This is required for less sloppy error reporting.
2014-05-03 10:20:58 +02:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_ParseInt32)
{
int32_t n;
// Valid values
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt32("1234", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt32("0", &n) && n == 0);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt32("1234", &n) && n == 1234);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt32("01234", &n) && n == 1234); // no octal
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt32("2147483647", &n) && n == 2147483647);
Fix msvc compiler error C4146 (unary minus operator applied to unsigned type) On msvc14, int literal '-2147483648' is invalid, because '2147483648' is unsigned type and cant't apply minus operator to unsigned type. To define the int literal correctly, use '-2147483647 - 1' formula that is also used to define INT_MIN in limits.h.
2017-03-07 21:19:31 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt32("-2147483648", &n) && n == (-2147483647 - 1)); // (-2147483647 - 1) equals INT_MIN
util: add parseint32 function with strict error reporting None of the current integer parsing functions in util check whether the result is valid and fits in the range of the type. This is required for less sloppy error reporting.
2014-05-03 10:20:58 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt32("-1234", &n) && n == -1234);
// Invalid values
util: Add ParseInt64 and ParseDouble functions Strict parsing functions for other numeric types. - ParseInt64 analogous to ParseInt32, but for 64-bit values. - ParseDouble for doubles. - Make all three Parse* functions more strict (e.g. reject whitespace on the inside) Also add tests.
2015-06-04 12:03:09 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32("", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32(" 1", &n)); // no padding inside
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32("1 ", &n));
util: add parseint32 function with strict error reporting None of the current integer parsing functions in util check whether the result is valid and fits in the range of the type. This is required for less sloppy error reporting.
2014-05-03 10:20:58 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32("1a", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32("aap", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32("0x1", &n)); // no hex
util: Add ParseInt64 and ParseDouble functions Strict parsing functions for other numeric types. - ParseInt64 analogous to ParseInt32, but for 64-bit values. - ParseDouble for doubles. - Make all three Parse* functions more strict (e.g. reject whitespace on the inside) Also add tests.
2015-06-04 12:03:09 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32("0x1", &n)); // no hex
const char test_bytes[] = {'1', 0, '1'};
std::string teststr(test_bytes, sizeof(test_bytes));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32(teststr, &n)); // no embedded NULs
util: add parseint32 function with strict error reporting None of the current integer parsing functions in util check whether the result is valid and fits in the range of the type. This is required for less sloppy error reporting.
2014-05-03 10:20:58 +02:00
// Overflow and underflow
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32("-2147483649", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32("2147483648", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32("-32482348723847471234", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt32("32482348723847471234", NULL));
}
util: Add ParseInt64 and ParseDouble functions Strict parsing functions for other numeric types. - ParseInt64 analogous to ParseInt32, but for 64-bit values. - ParseDouble for doubles. - Make all three Parse* functions more strict (e.g. reject whitespace on the inside) Also add tests.
2015-06-04 12:03:09 +02:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_ParseInt64)
{
int64_t n;
// Valid values
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt64("1234", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt64("0", &n) && n == 0LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt64("1234", &n) && n == 1234LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt64("01234", &n) && n == 1234LL); // no octal
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt64("2147483647", &n) && n == 2147483647LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt64("-2147483648", &n) && n == -2147483648LL);
fix util_tests.cpp clang warnings was introduced with #6121
2015-06-05 17:04:56 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt64("9223372036854775807", &n) && n == (int64_t)9223372036854775807);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt64("-9223372036854775808", &n) && n == (int64_t)-9223372036854775807-1);
util: Add ParseInt64 and ParseDouble functions Strict parsing functions for other numeric types. - ParseInt64 analogous to ParseInt32, but for 64-bit values. - ParseDouble for doubles. - Make all three Parse* functions more strict (e.g. reject whitespace on the inside) Also add tests.
2015-06-04 12:03:09 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(ParseInt64("-1234", &n) && n == -1234LL);
// Invalid values
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64("", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64(" 1", &n)); // no padding inside
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64("1 ", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64("1a", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64("aap", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64("0x1", &n)); // no hex
const char test_bytes[] = {'1', 0, '1'};
std::string teststr(test_bytes, sizeof(test_bytes));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64(teststr, &n)); // no embedded NULs
// Overflow and underflow
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64("-9223372036854775809", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64("9223372036854775808", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64("-32482348723847471234", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseInt64("32482348723847471234", NULL));
}
util: Add ParseUInt32 and ParseUInt64 Add error and range-checking parsers for unsigned 32 and 64 bit numbers. The 32-bit variant is required for parsing sequence numbers from the command line in `bitcoin-tx` (see #8164 for discussion). I've thrown in the 64-bit variant as a bonus, as I'm sure it will be needed at some point. Also adds tests, and updates `developer-notes.md`.
2016-06-08 10:23:25 +02:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_ParseUInt32)
{
uint32_t n;
// Valid values
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt32("1234", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt32("0", &n) && n == 0);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt32("1234", &n) && n == 1234);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt32("01234", &n) && n == 1234); // no octal
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt32("2147483647", &n) && n == 2147483647);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt32("2147483648", &n) && n == (uint32_t)2147483648);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt32("4294967295", &n) && n == (uint32_t)4294967295);
// Invalid values
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32(" 1", &n)); // no padding inside
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32(" -1", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("1 ", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("1a", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("aap", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("0x1", &n)); // no hex
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("0x1", &n)); // no hex
const char test_bytes[] = {'1', 0, '1'};
std::string teststr(test_bytes, sizeof(test_bytes));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32(teststr, &n)); // no embedded NULs
// Overflow and underflow
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("-2147483648", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("4294967296", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("-1234", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("-32482348723847471234", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt32("32482348723847471234", NULL));
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_ParseUInt64)
{
uint64_t n;
// Valid values
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt64("1234", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt64("0", &n) && n == 0LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt64("1234", &n) && n == 1234LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt64("01234", &n) && n == 1234LL); // no octal
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt64("2147483647", &n) && n == 2147483647LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt64("9223372036854775807", &n) && n == 9223372036854775807ULL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt64("9223372036854775808", &n) && n == 9223372036854775808ULL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseUInt64("18446744073709551615", &n) && n == 18446744073709551615ULL);
// Invalid values
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64(" 1", &n)); // no padding inside
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64(" -1", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("1 ", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("1a", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("aap", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("0x1", &n)); // no hex
const char test_bytes[] = {'1', 0, '1'};
std::string teststr(test_bytes, sizeof(test_bytes));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64(teststr, &n)); // no embedded NULs
// Overflow and underflow
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("-9223372036854775809", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("18446744073709551616", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("-32482348723847471234", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("-2147483648", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("-9223372036854775808", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseUInt64("-1234", &n));
}
util: Add ParseInt64 and ParseDouble functions Strict parsing functions for other numeric types. - ParseInt64 analogous to ParseInt32, but for 64-bit values. - ParseDouble for doubles. - Make all three Parse* functions more strict (e.g. reject whitespace on the inside) Also add tests.
2015-06-04 12:03:09 +02:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_ParseDouble)
{
double n;
// Valid values
BOOST_CHECK(ParseDouble("1234", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(ParseDouble("0", &n) && n == 0.0);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseDouble("1234", &n) && n == 1234.0);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseDouble("01234", &n) && n == 1234.0); // no octal
BOOST_CHECK(ParseDouble("2147483647", &n) && n == 2147483647.0);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseDouble("-2147483648", &n) && n == -2147483648.0);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseDouble("-1234", &n) && n == -1234.0);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseDouble("1e6", &n) && n == 1e6);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseDouble("-1e6", &n) && n == -1e6);
// Invalid values
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseDouble("", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseDouble(" 1", &n)); // no padding inside
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseDouble("1 ", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseDouble("1a", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseDouble("aap", &n));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseDouble("0x1", &n)); // no hex
const char test_bytes[] = {'1', 0, '1'};
std::string teststr(test_bytes, sizeof(test_bytes));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseDouble(teststr, &n)); // no embedded NULs
// Overflow and underflow
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseDouble("-1e10000", NULL));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseDouble("1e10000", NULL));
}
util: Add function FormatParagraph to format paragraph to fixed-width This is to be used for the `-version` and `-help` messages.
2014-06-10 16:02:29 +02:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_FormatParagraph)
{
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("", 79, 0), "");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("test", 79, 0), "test");
Rewrite FormatParagraph to handle newlines within input strings correctly
2016-02-03 06:16:49 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph(" test", 79, 0), " test");
util: Add function FormatParagraph to format paragraph to fixed-width This is to be used for the `-version` and `-help` messages.
2014-06-10 16:02:29 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("test test", 79, 0), "test test");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("test test", 4, 0), "test\ntest");
Rewrite FormatParagraph to handle newlines within input strings correctly
2016-02-03 06:16:49 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("testerde test", 4, 0), "testerde\ntest");
util: Add function FormatParagraph to format paragraph to fixed-width This is to be used for the `-version` and `-help` messages.
2014-06-10 16:02:29 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("test test", 4, 4), "test\n test");
Rewrite FormatParagraph to handle newlines within input strings correctly
2016-02-03 06:16:49 +01:00
// Make sure we don't indent a fully-new line following a too-long line ending
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("test test\nabc", 4, 4), "test\n test\nabc");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("This_is_a_very_long_test_string_without_any_spaces_so_it_should_just_get_returned_as_is_despite_the_length until it gets here", 79), "This_is_a_very_long_test_string_without_any_spaces_so_it_should_just_get_returned_as_is_despite_the_length\nuntil it gets here");
// Test wrap length is exact
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c de f g h i j k l m n o p", 79), "a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c de\nf g h i j k l m n o p");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("x\na b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c de f g h i j k l m n o p", 79), "x\na b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c de\nf g h i j k l m n o p");
// Indent should be included in length of lines
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("x\na b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c de f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e fg h i j k", 79, 4), "x\na b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c de\n f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e fg\n h i j k");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("This is a very long test string. This is a second sentence in the very long test string.", 79), "This is a very long test string. This is a second sentence in the very long\ntest string.");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("This is a very long test string.\nThis is a second sentence in the very long test string. This is a third sentence in the very long test string.", 79), "This is a very long test string.\nThis is a second sentence in the very long test string. This is a third\nsentence in the very long test string.");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("This is a very long test string.\n\nThis is a second sentence in the very long test string. This is a third sentence in the very long test string.", 79), "This is a very long test string.\n\nThis is a second sentence in the very long test string. This is a third\nsentence in the very long test string.");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatParagraph("Testing that normal newlines do not get indented.\nLike here.", 79), "Testing that normal newlines do not get indented.\nLike here.");
util: Add function FormatParagraph to format paragraph to fixed-width This is to be used for the `-version` and `-help` messages.
2014-06-10 16:02:29 +02:00
}
boost: drop boost dependency in version.cpp. Also add a test to verify.
2014-10-13 20:15:19 +02:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_FormatSubVersion)
{
std::vector<std::string> comments;
comments.push_back(std::string("comment1"));
std::vector<std::string> comments2;
comments2.push_back(std::string("comment1"));
SanitizeString: Allow hypen char
2015-09-23 12:06:00 +02:00
comments2.push_back(SanitizeString(std::string("Comment2; .,_?@-; !\"#$%&'()*+/<=>[]\\^`{|}~"), SAFE_CHARS_UA_COMMENT)); // Semicolon is discouraged but not forbidden by BIP-0014
boost: drop boost dependency in version.cpp. Also add a test to verify.
2014-10-13 20:15:19 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatSubVersion("Test", 99900, std::vector<std::string>()),std::string("/Test:0.9.99/"));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatSubVersion("Test", 99900, comments),std::string("/Test:0.9.99(comment1)/"));
SanitizeString: Allow hypen char
2015-09-23 12:06:00 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(FormatSubVersion("Test", 99900, comments2),std::string("/Test:0.9.99(comment1; Comment2; .,_?@-; )/"));
boost: drop boost dependency in version.cpp. Also add a test to verify.
2014-10-13 20:15:19 +02:00
}
rpc: Accept scientific notation for monetary amounts in JSON Add a function `ParseFixedPoint` that parses numbers according to the JSON number specification and returns a 64-bit integer. Then this in `AmountFromValue`, rather than `ParseMoney`. Also add lots of tests (thanks to @jonasschnelli for some of them). Fixes issue #6297.
2015-07-06 10:49:24 +02:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_ParseFixedPoint)
{
int64_t amount = 0;
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("0", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 0LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("1", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 100000000LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("0.0", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 0LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("-0.1", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, -10000000LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("1.1", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 110000000LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("1.10000000000000000", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 110000000LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("1.1e1", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 1100000000LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("1.1e-1", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 11000000LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("1000", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 100000000000LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("-1000", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, -100000000000LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("0.00000001", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 1LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("0.0000000100000000", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 1LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("-0.00000001", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, -1LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("1000000000.00000001", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 100000000000000001LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("9999999999.99999999", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, 999999999999999999LL);
BOOST_CHECK(ParseFixedPoint("-9999999999.99999999", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(amount, -999999999999999999LL);
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("a-1000", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-a1000", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-1000a", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-01000", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("00.1", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint(".1", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("--0.1", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("0.000000001", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-0.000000001", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("0.00000001000000001", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-10000000000.00000000", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("10000000000.00000000", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-10000000000.00000001", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("10000000000.00000001", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-10000000000.00000009", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("10000000000.00000009", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-99999999999.99999999", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("99999909999.09999999", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("92233720368.54775807", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("92233720368.54775808", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-92233720368.54775808", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("-92233720368.54775809", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("1.1e", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("1.1e-", 8, &amount));
BOOST_CHECK(!ParseFixedPoint("1.", 8, &amount));
}
use median filter for peer-reported reported number of blocks - fixes problem that one misconfigured or malicious node can mess up progress bar - implementation in src/util.h - testcase in src/test/util_tests.cpp
2011-09-28 21:35:58 +02:00
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink