2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
2018-07-27 00:36:45 +02:00
|
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2016-2018 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
|
|
|
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
2017-01-18 00:34:40 +01:00
|
|
|
"""Test segwit transactions and blocks on P2P network."""
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
from binascii import hexlify
|
|
|
|
import math
|
|
|
|
import random
|
|
|
|
import struct
|
|
|
|
import time
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-04-17 18:23:44 +02:00
|
|
|
from test_framework.blocktools import create_block, create_coinbase, add_witness_commitment, get_witness_script, WITNESS_COMMITMENT_HEADER
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
from test_framework.key import CECKey, CPubKey
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
from test_framework.messages import (
|
|
|
|
BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER,
|
|
|
|
CBlock,
|
|
|
|
CBlockHeader,
|
|
|
|
CInv,
|
|
|
|
COutPoint,
|
|
|
|
CTransaction,
|
|
|
|
CTxIn,
|
|
|
|
CTxInWitness,
|
|
|
|
CTxOut,
|
|
|
|
CTxWitness,
|
|
|
|
MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE,
|
|
|
|
MSG_WITNESS_FLAG,
|
|
|
|
NODE_NETWORK,
|
|
|
|
NODE_WITNESS,
|
|
|
|
msg_block,
|
|
|
|
msg_getdata,
|
|
|
|
msg_headers,
|
|
|
|
msg_inv,
|
|
|
|
msg_tx,
|
|
|
|
msg_witness_block,
|
|
|
|
msg_witness_tx,
|
|
|
|
ser_uint256,
|
|
|
|
ser_vector,
|
|
|
|
sha256,
|
|
|
|
uint256_from_str,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.mininode import (
|
|
|
|
P2PInterface,
|
|
|
|
mininode_lock,
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
wait_until,
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.script import (
|
|
|
|
CScript,
|
|
|
|
CScriptNum,
|
|
|
|
CScriptOp,
|
2018-07-11 18:17:08 +02:00
|
|
|
MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE,
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
OP_0,
|
|
|
|
OP_1,
|
|
|
|
OP_16,
|
|
|
|
OP_2DROP,
|
|
|
|
OP_CHECKMULTISIG,
|
|
|
|
OP_CHECKSIG,
|
|
|
|
OP_DROP,
|
|
|
|
OP_DUP,
|
|
|
|
OP_ELSE,
|
|
|
|
OP_ENDIF,
|
|
|
|
OP_EQUAL,
|
|
|
|
OP_EQUALVERIFY,
|
|
|
|
OP_HASH160,
|
|
|
|
OP_IF,
|
|
|
|
OP_RETURN,
|
|
|
|
OP_TRUE,
|
|
|
|
SIGHASH_ALL,
|
|
|
|
SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY,
|
|
|
|
SIGHASH_NONE,
|
|
|
|
SIGHASH_SINGLE,
|
|
|
|
SegwitVersion1SignatureHash,
|
|
|
|
SignatureHash,
|
|
|
|
hash160,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.util import (
|
|
|
|
assert_equal,
|
|
|
|
bytes_to_hex_str,
|
|
|
|
connect_nodes,
|
2018-06-13 23:47:43 +02:00
|
|
|
disconnect_nodes,
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
get_bip9_status,
|
|
|
|
hex_str_to_bytes,
|
|
|
|
sync_blocks,
|
|
|
|
sync_mempools,
|
|
|
|
)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The versionbit bit used to signal activation of SegWit
|
|
|
|
VB_WITNESS_BIT = 1
|
|
|
|
VB_PERIOD = 144
|
|
|
|
VB_TOP_BITS = 0x20000000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAX_SIGOP_COST = 80000
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
class UTXO():
|
|
|
|
"""Used to keep track of anyone-can-spend outputs that we can use in the tests."""
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, sha256, n, value):
|
|
|
|
self.sha256 = sha256
|
|
|
|
self.n = n
|
|
|
|
self.nValue = value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_p2pkh_script(pubkeyhash):
|
|
|
|
"""Get the script associated with a P2PKH."""
|
|
|
|
return CScript([CScriptOp(OP_DUP), CScriptOp(OP_HASH160), pubkeyhash, CScriptOp(OP_EQUALVERIFY), CScriptOp(OP_CHECKSIG)])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def sign_p2pk_witness_input(script, tx_to, in_idx, hashtype, value, key):
|
|
|
|
"""Add signature for a P2PK witness program."""
|
|
|
|
tx_hash = SegwitVersion1SignatureHash(script, tx_to, in_idx, hashtype, value)
|
|
|
|
signature = key.sign(tx_hash) + chr(hashtype).encode('latin-1')
|
|
|
|
tx_to.wit.vtxinwit[in_idx].scriptWitness.stack = [signature, script]
|
|
|
|
tx_to.rehash()
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_virtual_size(witness_block):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Calculate the virtual size of a witness block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virtual size is base + witness/4."""
|
2017-12-01 01:49:01 +01:00
|
|
|
base_size = len(witness_block.serialize(with_witness=False))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
total_size = len(witness_block.serialize(with_witness=True))
|
|
|
|
# the "+3" is so we round up
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
vsize = int((3 * base_size + total_size + 3) / 4)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
return vsize
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_transaction_acceptance(rpc, p2p, tx, with_witness, accepted, reason=None):
|
|
|
|
"""Send a transaction to the node and check that it's accepted to the mempool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Submit the transaction over the p2p interface
|
|
|
|
- use the getrawmempool rpc to check for acceptance."""
|
|
|
|
tx_message = msg_tx(tx)
|
|
|
|
if with_witness:
|
|
|
|
tx_message = msg_witness_tx(tx)
|
|
|
|
p2p.send_message(tx_message)
|
|
|
|
p2p.sync_with_ping()
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(tx.hash in rpc.getrawmempool(), accepted)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
if (reason is not None and not accepted):
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
# Check the rejection reason as well.
|
|
|
|
with mininode_lock:
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(p2p.last_message["reject"].reason, reason)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-22 20:34:42 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_witness_block(rpc, p2p, block, accepted, with_witness=True, reason=None):
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Send a block to the node and check that it's accepted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Submit the block over the p2p interface
|
|
|
|
- use the getbestblockhash rpc to check for acceptance."""
|
|
|
|
if with_witness:
|
|
|
|
p2p.send_message(msg_witness_block(block))
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
p2p.send_message(msg_block(block))
|
|
|
|
p2p.sync_with_ping()
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(rpc.getbestblockhash() == block.hash, accepted)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
if (reason is not None and not accepted):
|
2018-01-22 20:34:42 +01:00
|
|
|
# Check the rejection reason as well.
|
|
|
|
with mininode_lock:
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(p2p.last_message["reject"].reason, reason)
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-07 15:22:58 +01:00
|
|
|
class TestP2PConn(P2PInterface):
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
def __init__(self):
|
2017-09-13 15:21:27 +02:00
|
|
|
super().__init__()
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.getdataset = set()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-17 21:01:24 +01:00
|
|
|
def on_getdata(self, message):
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
for inv in message.inv:
|
|
|
|
self.getdataset.add(inv.hash)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-09 21:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
def announce_tx_and_wait_for_getdata(self, tx, timeout=60, success=True):
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
with mininode_lock:
|
2017-03-30 14:38:46 +02:00
|
|
|
self.last_message.pop("getdata", None)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.send_message(msg_inv(inv=[CInv(1, tx.sha256)]))
|
2018-05-09 21:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
if success:
|
|
|
|
self.wait_for_getdata(timeout)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
time.sleep(timeout)
|
|
|
|
assert not self.last_message.get("getdata")
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def announce_block_and_wait_for_getdata(self, block, use_header, timeout=60):
|
|
|
|
with mininode_lock:
|
2017-03-30 14:38:46 +02:00
|
|
|
self.last_message.pop("getdata", None)
|
|
|
|
self.last_message.pop("getheaders", None)
|
2016-10-04 00:30:52 +02:00
|
|
|
msg = msg_headers()
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
msg.headers = [CBlockHeader(block)]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
if use_header:
|
|
|
|
self.send_message(msg)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
self.send_message(msg_inv(inv=[CInv(2, block.sha256)]))
|
2016-10-04 00:30:52 +02:00
|
|
|
self.wait_for_getheaders()
|
|
|
|
self.send_message(msg)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.wait_for_getdata()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def request_block(self, blockhash, inv_type, timeout=60):
|
|
|
|
with mininode_lock:
|
2017-03-30 14:38:46 +02:00
|
|
|
self.last_message.pop("block", None)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.send_message(msg_getdata(inv=[CInv(inv_type, blockhash)]))
|
|
|
|
self.wait_for_block(blockhash, timeout)
|
2017-03-30 14:38:46 +02:00
|
|
|
return self.last_message["block"].block
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class SegWitTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
2017-06-10 00:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
def set_test_params(self):
|
2016-06-30 14:49:59 +02:00
|
|
|
self.setup_clean_chain = True
|
|
|
|
self.num_nodes = 3
|
2017-10-12 05:25:18 +02:00
|
|
|
# This test tests SegWit both pre and post-activation, so use the normal BIP9 activation.
|
|
|
|
self.extra_args = [["-whitelist=127.0.0.1", "-vbparams=segwit:0:999999999999"], ["-whitelist=127.0.0.1", "-acceptnonstdtxn=0", "-vbparams=segwit:0:999999999999"], ["-whitelist=127.0.0.1", "-vbparams=segwit:0:0"]]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def setup_network(self):
|
2017-04-03 15:34:04 +02:00
|
|
|
self.setup_nodes()
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
|
2016-11-19 12:55:25 +01:00
|
|
|
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 2)
|
2017-04-03 15:34:04 +02:00
|
|
|
self.sync_all()
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
# Helper functions
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
def build_next_block(self, version=4):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Build a block on top of node0's tip."""
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tip = self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash()
|
|
|
|
height = self.nodes[0].getblockcount() + 1
|
|
|
|
block_time = self.nodes[0].getblockheader(tip)["mediantime"] + 1
|
|
|
|
block = create_block(int(tip, 16), create_coinbase(height), block_time)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
block.version = version
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block.rehash()
|
|
|
|
return block
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def update_witness_block_with_transactions(self, block, tx_list, nonce=0):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Add list of transactions to block, adds witness commitment, then solves."""
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block.vtx.extend(tx_list)
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block, nonce)
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def run_test(self):
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Setup the p2p connections
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# self.test_node sets NODE_WITNESS|NODE_NETWORK
|
|
|
|
self.test_node = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(TestP2PConn(), services=NODE_NETWORK | NODE_WITNESS)
|
|
|
|
# self.old_node sets only NODE_NETWORK
|
|
|
|
self.old_node = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(TestP2PConn(), services=NODE_NETWORK)
|
|
|
|
# self.std_node is for testing node1 (fRequireStandard=true)
|
|
|
|
self.std_node = self.nodes[1].add_p2p_connection(TestP2PConn(), services=NODE_NETWORK | NODE_WITNESS)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 22:37:10 +02:00
|
|
|
assert self.test_node.nServices & NODE_WITNESS != 0
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Keep a place to store utxo's that can be used in later tests
|
|
|
|
self.utxo = []
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 23:47:43 +02:00
|
|
|
# Segwit status 'defined'
|
2018-06-13 22:48:04 +02:00
|
|
|
self.segwit_status = 'defined'
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 22:37:10 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_non_witness_transaction()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_unnecessary_witness_before_segwit_activation()
|
|
|
|
self.test_v0_outputs_arent_spendable()
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_block_relay()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
self.advance_to_segwit_started()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 23:47:43 +02:00
|
|
|
# Segwit status 'started'
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 23:47:43 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_getblocktemplate_before_lockin()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
self.advance_to_segwit_lockin()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 23:47:43 +02:00
|
|
|
# Segwit status 'locked_in'
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_unnecessary_witness_before_segwit_activation()
|
|
|
|
self.test_witness_tx_relay_before_segwit_activation()
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_block_relay()
|
|
|
|
self.test_standardness_v0()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
self.advance_to_segwit_active()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 23:47:43 +02:00
|
|
|
# Segwit status 'active'
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_p2sh_witness()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_witness_commitments()
|
|
|
|
self.test_block_malleability()
|
|
|
|
self.test_witness_block_size()
|
|
|
|
self.test_submit_block()
|
|
|
|
self.test_extra_witness_data()
|
|
|
|
self.test_max_witness_push_length()
|
|
|
|
self.test_max_witness_program_length()
|
|
|
|
self.test_witness_input_length()
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_block_relay()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_tx_relay_after_segwit_activation()
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_standardness_v0()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_segwit_versions()
|
|
|
|
self.test_premature_coinbase_witness_spend()
|
|
|
|
self.test_uncompressed_pubkey()
|
|
|
|
self.test_signature_version_1()
|
|
|
|
self.test_non_standard_witness_blinding()
|
|
|
|
self.test_non_standard_witness()
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_upgrade_after_activation()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_witness_sigops()
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
# Individual tests
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
def subtest(func): # noqa: N805
|
|
|
|
"""Wraps the subtests for logging and state assertions."""
|
|
|
|
def func_wrapper(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
2018-06-13 22:48:04 +02:00
|
|
|
self.log.info("Subtest: {} (Segwit status = {})".format(func.__name__, self.segwit_status))
|
|
|
|
# Assert segwit status is as expected
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(get_bip9_status(self.nodes[0], 'segwit')['status'], self.segwit_status)
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
func(self, *args, **kwargs)
|
2018-06-13 22:37:10 +02:00
|
|
|
# Each subtest should leave some utxos for the next subtest
|
|
|
|
assert self.utxo
|
2018-06-13 23:47:43 +02:00
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
2018-06-13 22:48:04 +02:00
|
|
|
# Assert segwit status is as expected at end of subtest
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(get_bip9_status(self.nodes[0], 'segwit')['status'], self.segwit_status)
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return func_wrapper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_non_witness_transaction(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""See if sending a regular transaction works, and create a utxo to use in later tests."""
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Mine a block with an anyone-can-spend coinbase,
|
|
|
|
# let it mature, then try to spend it.
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block(version=1)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
self.test_node.send_message(msg_block(block))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_node.sync_with_ping() # make sure the block was processed
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
txid = block.vtx[0].sha256
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(99) # let the block mature
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Create a transaction that spends the coinbase
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(txid, 0), b""))
|
2018-05-03 22:50:25 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(49 * 100000000, CScript([OP_TRUE, OP_DROP] * 15 + [OP_TRUE])))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.calc_sha256()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Check that serializing it with or without witness is the same
|
|
|
|
# This is a sanity check of our testing framework.
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(msg_tx(tx).serialize(), msg_witness_tx(tx).serialize())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.test_node.send_message(msg_witness_tx(tx))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_node.sync_with_ping() # make sure the tx was processed
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
assert(tx.hash in self.nodes[0].getrawmempool())
|
|
|
|
# Save this transaction for later
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx.sha256, 0, 49 * 100000000))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_unnecessary_witness_before_segwit_activation(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Verify that blocks with witnesses are rejected before activation."""
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [CScript([CScriptNum(1)])]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Verify the hash with witness differs from the txid
|
|
|
|
# (otherwise our testing framework must be broken!)
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
assert(tx.sha256 != tx.calc_sha256(with_witness=True))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Construct a segwit-signaling block that includes the transaction.
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block(version=(VB_TOP_BITS | (1 << VB_WITNESS_BIT)))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
|
|
|
# Sending witness data before activation is not allowed (anti-spam
|
|
|
|
# rule).
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
wait_until(lambda: 'reject' in self.test_node.last_message and self.test_node.last_message["reject"].reason == b"unexpected-witness")
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# But it should not be permanently marked bad...
|
|
|
|
# Resend without witness information.
|
|
|
|
self.test_node.send_message(msg_block(block))
|
2017-03-30 14:38:46 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_node.sync_with_ping()
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), block.hash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Update our utxo list; we spent the first entry.
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
2018-04-30 01:34:57 +02:00
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx.sha256, 0, tx.vout[0].nValue))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_block_relay(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test that block requests to NODE_WITNESS peer are with MSG_WITNESS_FLAG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is true regardless of segwit activation.
|
|
|
|
Also test that we don't ask for blocks from unupgraded peers."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
blocktype = 2 | MSG_WITNESS_FLAG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# test_node has set NODE_WITNESS, so all getdata requests should be for
|
|
|
|
# witness blocks.
|
|
|
|
# Test announcing a block via inv results in a getdata, and that
|
|
|
|
# announcing a version 4 or random VB block with a header results in a getdata
|
|
|
|
block1 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
block1.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.test_node.announce_block_and_wait_for_getdata(block1, use_header=False)
|
|
|
|
assert(self.test_node.last_message["getdata"].inv[0].type == blocktype)
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block1, True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block2 = self.build_next_block(version=4)
|
|
|
|
block2.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.test_node.announce_block_and_wait_for_getdata(block2, use_header=True)
|
|
|
|
assert(self.test_node.last_message["getdata"].inv[0].type == blocktype)
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block2, True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block3 = self.build_next_block(version=(VB_TOP_BITS | (1 << 15)))
|
|
|
|
block3.solve()
|
|
|
|
self.test_node.announce_block_and_wait_for_getdata(block3, use_header=True)
|
|
|
|
assert(self.test_node.last_message["getdata"].inv[0].type == blocktype)
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block3, True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Check that we can getdata for witness blocks or regular blocks,
|
|
|
|
# and the right thing happens.
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
if self.segwit_status != 'active':
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Before activation, we should be able to request old blocks with
|
|
|
|
# or without witness, and they should be the same.
|
|
|
|
chain_height = self.nodes[0].getblockcount()
|
|
|
|
# Pick 10 random blocks on main chain, and verify that getdata's
|
|
|
|
# for MSG_BLOCK, MSG_WITNESS_BLOCK, and rpc getblock() are equal.
|
|
|
|
all_heights = list(range(chain_height + 1))
|
|
|
|
random.shuffle(all_heights)
|
|
|
|
all_heights = all_heights[0:10]
|
|
|
|
for height in all_heights:
|
|
|
|
block_hash = self.nodes[0].getblockhash(height)
|
|
|
|
rpc_block = self.nodes[0].getblock(block_hash, False)
|
|
|
|
block_hash = int(block_hash, 16)
|
|
|
|
block = self.test_node.request_block(block_hash, 2)
|
|
|
|
wit_block = self.test_node.request_block(block_hash, 2 | MSG_WITNESS_FLAG)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(block.serialize(True), wit_block.serialize(True))
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(block.serialize(), hex_str_to_bytes(rpc_block))
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
# After activation, witness blocks and non-witness blocks should
|
|
|
|
# be different. Verify rpc getblock() returns witness blocks, while
|
|
|
|
# getdata respects the requested type.
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [])
|
|
|
|
# This gives us a witness commitment.
|
|
|
|
assert(len(block.vtx[0].wit.vtxinwit) == 1)
|
|
|
|
assert(len(block.vtx[0].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack) == 1)
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
# Now try to retrieve it...
|
|
|
|
rpc_block = self.nodes[0].getblock(block.hash, False)
|
|
|
|
non_wit_block = self.test_node.request_block(block.sha256, 2)
|
|
|
|
wit_block = self.test_node.request_block(block.sha256, 2 | MSG_WITNESS_FLAG)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(wit_block.serialize(True), hex_str_to_bytes(rpc_block))
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(wit_block.serialize(False), non_wit_block.serialize())
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(wit_block.serialize(True), block.serialize(True))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test size, vsize, weight
|
|
|
|
rpc_details = self.nodes[0].getblock(block.hash, True)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(rpc_details["size"], len(block.serialize(True)))
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(rpc_details["strippedsize"], len(block.serialize(False)))
|
|
|
|
weight = 3 * len(block.serialize(False)) + len(block.serialize(True))
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(rpc_details["weight"], weight)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Upgraded node should not ask for blocks from unupgraded
|
|
|
|
block4 = self.build_next_block(version=4)
|
|
|
|
block4.solve()
|
|
|
|
self.old_node.getdataset = set()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Blocks can be requested via direct-fetch (immediately upon processing the announcement)
|
|
|
|
# or via parallel download (with an indeterminate delay from processing the announcement)
|
|
|
|
# so to test that a block is NOT requested, we could guess a time period to sleep for,
|
|
|
|
# and then check. We can avoid the sleep() by taking advantage of transaction getdata's
|
|
|
|
# being processed after block getdata's, and announce a transaction as well,
|
|
|
|
# and then check to see if that particular getdata has been received.
|
|
|
|
# Since 0.14, inv's will only be responded to with a getheaders, so send a header
|
|
|
|
# to announce this block.
|
|
|
|
msg = msg_headers()
|
|
|
|
msg.headers = [CBlockHeader(block4)]
|
|
|
|
self.old_node.send_message(msg)
|
|
|
|
self.old_node.announce_tx_and_wait_for_getdata(block4.vtx[0])
|
|
|
|
assert(block4.sha256 not in self.old_node.getdataset)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-01-22 20:34:42 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_v0_outputs_arent_spendable(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test that v0 outputs aren't spendable before segwit activation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~6 months after segwit activation, the SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS flag was
|
|
|
|
backdated so that it applies to all blocks, going back to the genesis
|
|
|
|
block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consequently, version 0 witness outputs are never spendable without
|
|
|
|
witness, and so can't be spent before segwit activation (the point at which
|
|
|
|
blocks are permitted to contain witnesses)."""
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 23:47:43 +02:00
|
|
|
# node2 doesn't need to be connected for this test.
|
|
|
|
# (If it's connected, node0 may propogate an invalid block to it over
|
|
|
|
# compact blocks and the nodes would have inconsistent tips.)
|
|
|
|
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 2)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-22 20:34:42 +01:00
|
|
|
# Create two outputs, a p2wsh and p2sh-p2wsh
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
2018-01-22 20:34:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
p2sh_pubkey = hash160(script_pubkey)
|
|
|
|
p2sh_script_pubkey = CScript([OP_HASH160, p2sh_pubkey, OP_EQUAL])
|
2018-01-22 20:34:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value = self.utxo[0].nValue // 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin = [CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b'')]
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout = [CTxOut(value, script_pubkey), CTxOut(value, p2sh_script_pubkey)]
|
2018-01-22 20:34:42 +01:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(value, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
txid = tx.sha256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Add it to a block
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
|
|
|
# Verify that segwit isn't activated. A block serialized with witness
|
|
|
|
# should be rejected prior to activation.
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0], self.test_node, block, accepted=False, with_witness=True, reason=b'unexpected-witness')
|
2018-01-22 20:34:42 +01:00
|
|
|
# Now send the block without witness. It should be accepted
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0], self.test_node, block, accepted=True, with_witness=False)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now try to spend the outputs. This should fail since SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS is always enabled.
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx.vin = [CTxIn(COutPoint(txid, 0), b'')]
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx.vout = [CTxOut(value, CScript([OP_TRUE]))]
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [CScript([OP_TRUE])]
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p2sh_p2wsh_tx = CTransaction()
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
p2sh_p2wsh_tx.vin = [CTxIn(COutPoint(txid, 1), CScript([script_pubkey]))]
|
2018-01-22 20:34:42 +01:00
|
|
|
p2sh_p2wsh_tx.vout = [CTxOut(value, CScript([OP_TRUE]))]
|
|
|
|
p2sh_p2wsh_tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
p2sh_p2wsh_tx.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [CScript([OP_TRUE])]
|
|
|
|
p2sh_p2wsh_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for tx in [p2wsh_tx, p2sh_p2wsh_tx]:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# When the block is serialized with a witness, the block will be rejected because witness
|
|
|
|
# data isn't allowed in blocks that don't commit to witness data.
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0], self.test_node, block, accepted=False, with_witness=True, reason=b'unexpected-witness')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# When the block is serialized without witness, validation fails because the transaction is
|
|
|
|
# invalid (transactions are always validated with SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS so a segwit v0 transaction
|
|
|
|
# without a witness is invalid).
|
|
|
|
# Note: The reject reason for this failure could be
|
|
|
|
# 'block-validation-failed' (if script check threads > 1) or
|
|
|
|
# 'non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Witness program was passed an
|
|
|
|
# empty witness)' (otherwise).
|
|
|
|
# TODO: support multiple acceptable reject reasons.
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0], self.test_node, block, accepted=False, with_witness=False)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 23:47:43 +02:00
|
|
|
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 2)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-22 20:34:42 +01:00
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(txid, 2, value))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def advance_to_segwit_started(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Mine enough blocks for segwit's vb state to be 'started'."""
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
height = self.nodes[0].getblockcount()
|
|
|
|
# Will need to rewrite the tests here if we are past the first period
|
|
|
|
assert(height < VB_PERIOD - 1)
|
|
|
|
# Advance to end of period, status should now be 'started'
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(VB_PERIOD - height - 1)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(get_bip9_status(self.nodes[0], 'segwit')['status'], 'started')
|
2018-06-13 22:48:04 +02:00
|
|
|
self.segwit_status = 'started'
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_getblocktemplate_before_lockin(self):
|
|
|
|
# Node0 is segwit aware, node2 is not.
|
|
|
|
for node in [self.nodes[0], self.nodes[2]]:
|
|
|
|
gbt_results = node.getblocktemplate()
|
|
|
|
block_version = gbt_results['version']
|
|
|
|
# If we're not indicating segwit support, we will still be
|
|
|
|
# signalling for segwit activation.
|
|
|
|
assert_equal((block_version & (1 << VB_WITNESS_BIT) != 0), node == self.nodes[0])
|
|
|
|
# If we don't specify the segwit rule, then we won't get a default
|
|
|
|
# commitment.
|
|
|
|
assert('default_witness_commitment' not in gbt_results)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Workaround:
|
|
|
|
# Can either change the tip, or change the mempool and wait 5 seconds
|
|
|
|
# to trigger a recomputation of getblocktemplate.
|
|
|
|
txid = int(self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 1), 16)
|
|
|
|
# Using mocktime lets us avoid sleep()
|
|
|
|
sync_mempools(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].setmocktime(int(time.time()) + 10)
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[2].setmocktime(int(time.time()) + 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for node in [self.nodes[0], self.nodes[2]]:
|
|
|
|
gbt_results = node.getblocktemplate({"rules": ["segwit"]})
|
|
|
|
block_version = gbt_results['version']
|
|
|
|
if node == self.nodes[2]:
|
|
|
|
# If this is a non-segwit node, we should still not get a witness
|
|
|
|
# commitment, nor a version bit signalling segwit.
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(block_version & (1 << VB_WITNESS_BIT), 0)
|
|
|
|
assert('default_witness_commitment' not in gbt_results)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
# For segwit-aware nodes, check the version bit and the witness
|
|
|
|
# commitment are correct.
|
|
|
|
assert(block_version & (1 << VB_WITNESS_BIT) != 0)
|
|
|
|
assert('default_witness_commitment' in gbt_results)
|
|
|
|
witness_commitment = gbt_results['default_witness_commitment']
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Check that default_witness_commitment is present.
|
|
|
|
witness_root = CBlock.get_merkle_root([ser_uint256(0),
|
|
|
|
ser_uint256(txid)])
|
|
|
|
script = get_witness_script(witness_root, 0)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(witness_commitment, bytes_to_hex_str(script))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# undo mocktime
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].setmocktime(0)
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[2].setmocktime(0)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def advance_to_segwit_lockin(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Mine enough blocks to lock in segwit, but don't activate."""
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
height = self.nodes[0].getblockcount()
|
|
|
|
# Advance to end of period, and verify lock-in happens at the end
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(VB_PERIOD - 1)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
height = self.nodes[0].getblockcount()
|
|
|
|
assert((height % VB_PERIOD) == VB_PERIOD - 2)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(get_bip9_status(self.nodes[0], 'segwit')['status'], 'started')
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(get_bip9_status(self.nodes[0], 'segwit')['status'], 'locked_in')
|
2018-06-13 22:48:04 +02:00
|
|
|
self.segwit_status = 'locked_in'
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_witness_tx_relay_before_segwit_activation(self):
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Generate a transaction that doesn't require a witness, but send it
|
|
|
|
# with a witness. Should be rejected for premature-witness, but should
|
|
|
|
# not be added to recently rejected list.
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE, OP_DROP] * 15 + [OP_TRUE])))
|
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a']
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx_hash = tx.sha256
|
|
|
|
tx_value = tx.vout[0].nValue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Verify that if a peer doesn't set nServices to include NODE_WITNESS,
|
|
|
|
# the getdata is just for the non-witness portion.
|
|
|
|
self.old_node.announce_tx_and_wait_for_getdata(tx)
|
|
|
|
assert(self.old_node.last_message["getdata"].inv[0].type == 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Since we haven't delivered the tx yet, inv'ing the same tx from
|
|
|
|
# a witness transaction ought not result in a getdata.
|
|
|
|
self.test_node.announce_tx_and_wait_for_getdata(tx, timeout=2, success=False)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Delivering this transaction with witness should fail (no matter who
|
|
|
|
# its from)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.old_node, tx, with_witness=True, accepted=False)
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx, with_witness=True, accepted=False)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# But eliminating the witness should fix it
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx, with_witness=False, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Cleanup: mine the first transaction and update utxo
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx_hash, 0, tx_value))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_standardness_v0(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test V0 txout standardness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V0 segwit outputs and inputs are always standard.
|
|
|
|
V0 segwit inputs may only be mined after activation, but not before."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p2sh_pubkey = hash160(witness_program)
|
|
|
|
p2sh_script_pubkey = CScript([OP_HASH160, p2sh_pubkey, OP_EQUAL])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# First prepare a p2sh output (so that spending it will pass standardness)
|
|
|
|
p2sh_tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
p2sh_tx.vin = [CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b"")]
|
|
|
|
p2sh_tx.vout = [CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, p2sh_script_pubkey)]
|
|
|
|
p2sh_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Mine it on test_node to create the confirmed output.
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, p2sh_tx, with_witness=True, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now test standardness of v0 P2WSH outputs.
|
|
|
|
# Start by creating a transaction with two outputs.
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin = [CTxIn(COutPoint(p2sh_tx.sha256, 0), CScript([witness_program]))]
|
|
|
|
tx.vout = [CTxOut(p2sh_tx.vout[0].nValue - 10000, script_pubkey)]
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(8000, script_pubkey)) # Might burn this later
|
|
|
|
tx.vin[0].nSequence = BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER # Just to have the option to bump this tx from the mempool
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This is always accepted, since the mempool policy is to consider segwit as always active
|
|
|
|
# and thus allow segwit outputs
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, tx, with_witness=True, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now create something that looks like a P2PKH output. This won't be spendable.
|
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, hash160(witness_hash)])
|
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
# tx was accepted, so we spend the second output.
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin = [CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 1), b"")]
|
|
|
|
tx2.vout = [CTxOut(7000, script_pubkey)]
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program]
|
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, tx2, with_witness=True, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now update self.utxo for later tests.
|
|
|
|
tx3 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
# tx and tx2 were both accepted. Don't bother trying to reclaim the
|
|
|
|
# P2PKH output; just send tx's first output back to an anyone-can-spend.
|
|
|
|
sync_mempools([self.nodes[0], self.nodes[1]])
|
|
|
|
tx3.vin = [CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 0), b"")]
|
|
|
|
tx3.vout = [CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE, OP_DROP] * 15 + [OP_TRUE]))]
|
|
|
|
tx3.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
tx3.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program]
|
|
|
|
tx3.rehash()
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
if self.segwit_status != 'active':
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Just check mempool acceptance, but don't add the transaction to the mempool, since witness is disallowed
|
|
|
|
# in blocks and the tx is impossible to mine right now.
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].testmempoolaccept([bytes_to_hex_str(tx3.serialize_with_witness())]), [{'txid': tx3.hash, 'allowed': True}])
|
|
|
|
# Create the same output as tx3, but by replacing tx
|
|
|
|
tx3_out = tx3.vout[0]
|
|
|
|
tx3 = tx
|
|
|
|
tx3.vout = [tx3_out]
|
|
|
|
tx3.rehash()
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].testmempoolaccept([bytes_to_hex_str(tx3.serialize_with_witness())]), [{'txid': tx3.hash, 'allowed': True}])
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx3, with_witness=True, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx3.sha256, 0, tx3.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
def advance_to_segwit_active(self):
|
|
|
|
"""Mine enough blocks to activate segwit."""
|
|
|
|
height = self.nodes[0].getblockcount()
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(VB_PERIOD - (height % VB_PERIOD) - 2)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(get_bip9_status(self.nodes[0], 'segwit')['status'], 'locked_in')
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(get_bip9_status(self.nodes[0], 'segwit')['status'], 'active')
|
2018-06-13 22:48:04 +02:00
|
|
|
self.segwit_status = 'active'
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_p2sh_witness(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test P2SH wrapped witness programs."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Prepare the p2sh-wrapped witness output
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_DROP, OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
|
|
|
p2sh_witness_hash = hash160(p2wsh_pubkey)
|
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_HASH160, p2sh_witness_hash, OP_EQUAL])
|
|
|
|
script_sig = CScript([p2wsh_pubkey]) # a push of the redeem script
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Fund the P2SH output
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, script_pubkey))
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Verify mempool acceptance and block validity
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx, with_witness=False, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True, with_witness=True)
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now test attempts to spend the output.
|
|
|
|
spend_tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 0), script_sig))
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.vout.append(CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This transaction should not be accepted into the mempool pre- or
|
|
|
|
# post-segwit. Mempool acceptance will use SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS which
|
|
|
|
# will require a witness to spend a witness program regardless of
|
|
|
|
# segwit activation. Note that older bitcoind's that are not
|
|
|
|
# segwit-aware would also reject this for failing CLEANSTACK.
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, spend_tx, with_witness=False, accepted=False)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Try to put the witness script in the script_sig, should also fail.
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.vin[0].script_sig = CScript([p2wsh_pubkey, b'a'])
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, spend_tx, with_witness=False, accepted=False)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now put the witness script in the witness, should succeed after
|
|
|
|
# segwit activates.
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = script_sig
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a', witness_program]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Verify mempool acceptance
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, spend_tx, with_witness=True, accepted=True)
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [spend_tx])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If we're after activation, then sending this with witnesses should be valid.
|
|
|
|
# This no longer works before activation, because SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS
|
|
|
|
# is always set.
|
|
|
|
# TODO: rewrite this test to make clear that it only works after activation.
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Update self.utxo
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(spend_tx.sha256, 0, spend_tx.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_witness_commitments(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test witness commitments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This test can only be run after segwit has activated."""
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# First try a correct witness commitment.
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block)
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test the test -- witness serialization should be different
|
|
|
|
assert(msg_witness_block(block).serialize() != msg_block(block).serialize())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This empty block should be valid.
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Try to tweak the nonce
|
|
|
|
block_2 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block_2, nonce=28)
|
|
|
|
block_2.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The commitment should have changed!
|
|
|
|
assert(block_2.vtx[0].vout[-1] != block.vtx[0].vout[-1])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This should also be valid.
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block_2, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now test commitments with actual transactions
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Let's construct a witness program
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, script_pubkey))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# tx2 will spend tx1, and send back to a regular anyone-can-spend address
|
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 0), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue - 1000, witness_program))
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program]
|
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block_3 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block_3, [tx, tx2], nonce=1)
|
|
|
|
# Add an extra OP_RETURN output that matches the witness commitment template,
|
|
|
|
# even though it has extra data after the incorrect commitment.
|
|
|
|
# This block should fail.
|
|
|
|
block_3.vtx[0].vout.append(CTxOut(0, CScript([OP_RETURN, WITNESS_COMMITMENT_HEADER + ser_uint256(2), 10])))
|
|
|
|
block_3.vtx[0].rehash()
|
|
|
|
block_3.hashMerkleRoot = block_3.calc_merkle_root()
|
|
|
|
block_3.rehash()
|
|
|
|
block_3.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block_3, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Add a different commitment with different nonce, but in the
|
|
|
|
# right location, and with some funds burned(!).
|
|
|
|
# This should succeed (nValue shouldn't affect finding the
|
|
|
|
# witness commitment).
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block_3, nonce=0)
|
|
|
|
block_3.vtx[0].vout[0].nValue -= 1
|
|
|
|
block_3.vtx[0].vout[-1].nValue += 1
|
|
|
|
block_3.vtx[0].rehash()
|
|
|
|
block_3.hashMerkleRoot = block_3.calc_merkle_root()
|
|
|
|
block_3.rehash()
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
assert(len(block_3.vtx[0].vout) == 4) # 3 OP_returns
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block_3.solve()
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block_3, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Finally test that a block with no witness transactions can
|
|
|
|
# omit the commitment.
|
|
|
|
block_4 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
tx3 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx3.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx2.sha256, 0), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx3.vout.append(CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue - 1000, witness_program))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx3.rehash()
|
|
|
|
block_4.vtx.append(tx3)
|
|
|
|
block_4.hashMerkleRoot = block_4.calc_merkle_root()
|
|
|
|
block_4.solve()
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block_4, with_witness=False, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Update available utxo's for use in later test.
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx3.sha256, 0, tx3.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_block_malleability(self):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Make sure that a block that has too big a virtual size
|
|
|
|
# because of a too-large coinbase witness is not permanently
|
|
|
|
# marked bad.
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block)
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
block.vtx[0].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack.append(b'a' * 5000000)
|
2016-11-21 22:29:22 +01:00
|
|
|
assert(get_virtual_size(block) > MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# We can't send over the p2p network, because this is too big to relay
|
|
|
|
# TODO: repeat this test with a block that can be relayed
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].submitblock(bytes_to_hex_str(block.serialize(True)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash() != block.hash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block.vtx[0].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack.pop()
|
2016-11-21 22:29:22 +01:00
|
|
|
assert(get_virtual_size(block) < MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].submitblock(bytes_to_hex_str(block.serialize(True)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash() == block.hash)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-26 23:24:17 +02:00
|
|
|
# Now make sure that malleating the witness reserved value doesn't
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# result in a block permanently marked bad.
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block)
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Change the nonce -- should not cause the block to be permanently
|
|
|
|
# failed
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
block.vtx[0].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [ser_uint256(1)]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-26 23:24:17 +02:00
|
|
|
# Changing the witness reserved value doesn't change the block hash
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
block.vtx[0].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [ser_uint256(0)]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_witness_block_size(self):
|
|
|
|
# TODO: Test that non-witness carrying blocks can't exceed 1MB
|
|
|
|
# Skipping this test for now; this is covered in p2p-fullblocktest.py
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test that witness-bearing blocks are limited at ceil(base + wit/4) <= 1MB.
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(len(self.utxo) > 0)
|
2018-04-16 11:13:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Create a P2WSH transaction.
|
|
|
|
# The witness program will be a bunch of OP_2DROP's, followed by OP_TRUE.
|
|
|
|
# This should give us plenty of room to tweak the spending tx's
|
|
|
|
# virtual size.
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
NUM_DROPS = 200 # 201 max ops per script!
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
NUM_OUTPUTS = 50
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_2DROP] * NUM_DROPS + [OP_TRUE])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
witness_hash = uint256_from_str(sha256(witness_program))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, ser_uint256(witness_hash)])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prevout = COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n)
|
|
|
|
value = self.utxo[0].nValue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
parent_tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
parent_tx.vin.append(CTxIn(prevout, b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
child_value = int(value / NUM_OUTPUTS)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
for i in range(NUM_OUTPUTS):
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
parent_tx.vout.append(CTxOut(child_value, script_pubkey))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
parent_tx.vout[0].nValue -= 50000
|
|
|
|
assert(parent_tx.vout[0].nValue > 0)
|
|
|
|
parent_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
child_tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
for i in range(NUM_OUTPUTS):
|
|
|
|
child_tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(parent_tx.sha256, i), b""))
|
|
|
|
child_tx.vout = [CTxOut(value - 100000, CScript([OP_TRUE]))]
|
|
|
|
for i in range(NUM_OUTPUTS):
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
child_tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
child_tx.wit.vtxinwit[-1].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a' * 195] * (2 * NUM_DROPS) + [witness_program]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
child_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [parent_tx, child_tx])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vsize = get_virtual_size(block)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
additional_bytes = (MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE - vsize) * 4
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
i = 0
|
|
|
|
while additional_bytes > 0:
|
2016-11-21 22:29:22 +01:00
|
|
|
# Add some more bytes to each input until we hit MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE+1
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
extra_bytes = min(additional_bytes + 1, 55)
|
|
|
|
block.vtx[-1].wit.vtxinwit[int(i / (2 * NUM_DROPS))].scriptWitness.stack[i % (2 * NUM_DROPS)] = b'a' * (195 + extra_bytes)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
additional_bytes -= extra_bytes
|
|
|
|
i += 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block.vtx[0].vout.pop() # Remove old commitment
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block)
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
vsize = get_virtual_size(block)
|
2016-11-21 22:29:22 +01:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(vsize, MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE + 1)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Make sure that our test case would exceed the old max-network-message
|
|
|
|
# limit
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
assert(len(block.serialize(True)) > 2 * 1024 * 1024)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now resize the second transaction to make the block fit.
|
|
|
|
cur_length = len(block.vtx[-1].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack[0])
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
block.vtx[-1].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack[0] = b'a' * (cur_length - 1)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block.vtx[0].vout.pop()
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block)
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
2016-11-21 22:29:22 +01:00
|
|
|
assert(get_virtual_size(block) == MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Update available utxo's
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(block.vtx[-1].sha256, 0, block.vtx[-1].vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_submit_block(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test that submitblock adds the nonce automatically when possible."""
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Try using a custom nonce and then don't supply it.
|
|
|
|
# This shouldn't possibly work.
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block, nonce=1)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
block.vtx[0].wit = CTxWitness() # drop the nonce
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].submitblock(bytes_to_hex_str(block.serialize(True)))
|
|
|
|
assert(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash() != block.hash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now redo commitment with the standard nonce, but let bitcoind fill it in.
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block, nonce=0)
|
|
|
|
block.vtx[0].wit = CTxWitness()
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].submitblock(bytes_to_hex_str(block.serialize(True)))
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), block.hash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This time, add a tx with non-empty witness, but don't supply
|
|
|
|
# the commitment.
|
|
|
|
block_2 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block_2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block_2.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Drop commitment and nonce -- submitblock should not fill in.
|
|
|
|
block_2.vtx[0].vout.pop()
|
|
|
|
block_2.vtx[0].wit = CTxWitness()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].submitblock(bytes_to_hex_str(block_2.serialize(True)))
|
|
|
|
# Tip should not advance!
|
|
|
|
assert(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash() != block_2.hash)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_extra_witness_data(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test extra witness data in a transaction."""
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_DROP, OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# First try extra witness data on a tx that doesn't require a witness
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 2000, script_pubkey))
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(1000, CScript([OP_TRUE]))) # non-witness output
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [CScript([])]
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Extra witness data should not be allowed.
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Try extra signature data. Ok if we're not spending a witness output.
|
|
|
|
block.vtx[1].wit.vtxinwit = []
|
|
|
|
block.vtx[1].vin[0].scriptSig = CScript([OP_0])
|
|
|
|
block.vtx[1].rehash()
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block)
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now try extra witness/signature data on an input that DOES require a
|
|
|
|
# witness
|
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 0), b"")) # witness output
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 1), b"")) # non-witness
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.extend([CTxInWitness(), CTxInWitness()])
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [CScript([CScriptNum(1)]), CScript([CScriptNum(1)]), witness_program]
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[1].scriptWitness.stack = [CScript([OP_TRUE])]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx2])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This has extra witness data, so it should fail.
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now get rid of the extra witness, but add extra scriptSig data
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript([OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin[1].scriptSig = CScript([OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[1].scriptWitness.stack = []
|
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block)
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This has extra signature data for a witness input, so it should fail.
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now get rid of the extra scriptsig on the witness input, and verify
|
|
|
|
# success (even with extra scriptsig data in the non-witness input)
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin[0].scriptSig = b""
|
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block)
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Update utxo for later tests
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx2.sha256, 0, tx2.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_max_witness_push_length(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test that witness stack can only allow up to 520 byte pushes."""
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_DROP, OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, script_pubkey))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 0), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# First try a 521-byte stack element
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a' * (MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE + 1), witness_program]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx, tx2])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now reduce the length of the stack element
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack[0] = b'a' * (MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
add_witness_commitment(block)
|
|
|
|
block.solve()
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Update the utxo for later tests
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop()
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx2.sha256, 0, tx2.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_max_witness_program_length(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test that witness outputs greater than 10kB can't be spent."""
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
MAX_PROGRAM_LENGTH = 10000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This program is 19 max pushes (9937 bytes), then 64 more opcode-bytes.
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
long_witness_program = CScript([b'a' * 520] * 19 + [OP_DROP] * 63 + [OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
assert(len(long_witness_program) == MAX_PROGRAM_LENGTH + 1)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
long_witness_hash = sha256(long_witness_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
long_script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, long_witness_hash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, long_script_pubkey))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 0), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a'] * 44 + [long_witness_program]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx, tx2])
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Try again with one less byte in the witness program
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([b'a' * 520] * 19 + [OP_DROP] * 62 + [OP_TRUE])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
assert(len(witness_program) == MAX_PROGRAM_LENGTH)
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout[0] = CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue, script_pubkey)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin[0].prevout.hash = tx.sha256
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a'] * 43 + [witness_program]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
block.vtx = [block.vtx[0]]
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx, tx2])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop()
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx2.sha256, 0, tx2.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_witness_input_length(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test that vin length must match vtxinwit length."""
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_DROP, OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
2018-04-16 11:13:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Create a transaction that splits our utxo into many outputs
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
value = self.utxo[0].nValue
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
for i in range(10):
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(int(value / 10), script_pubkey))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout[0].nValue -= 1000
|
|
|
|
assert(tx.vout[0].nValue >= 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Try various ways to spend tx that should all break.
|
|
|
|
# This "broken" transaction serializer will not normalize
|
|
|
|
# the length of vtxinwit.
|
|
|
|
class BrokenCTransaction(CTransaction):
|
|
|
|
def serialize_with_witness(self):
|
|
|
|
flags = 0
|
|
|
|
if not self.wit.is_null():
|
|
|
|
flags |= 1
|
|
|
|
r = b""
|
|
|
|
r += struct.pack("<i", self.nVersion)
|
|
|
|
if flags:
|
|
|
|
dummy = []
|
|
|
|
r += ser_vector(dummy)
|
|
|
|
r += struct.pack("<B", flags)
|
|
|
|
r += ser_vector(self.vin)
|
|
|
|
r += ser_vector(self.vout)
|
|
|
|
if flags & 1:
|
|
|
|
r += self.wit.serialize()
|
|
|
|
r += struct.pack("<I", self.nLockTime)
|
|
|
|
return r
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx2 = BrokenCTransaction()
|
|
|
|
for i in range(10):
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, i), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(value - 3000, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# First try using a too long vtxinwit
|
|
|
|
for i in range(11):
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[i].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a', witness_program]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx2])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now try using a too short vtxinwit
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.pop()
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.pop()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block.vtx = [block.vtx[0]]
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx2])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now make one of the intermediate witnesses be incorrect
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[-1].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a', witness_program]
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[5].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block.vtx = [block.vtx[0]]
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx2])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Fix the broken witness and the block should be accepted.
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[5].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a', witness_program]
|
|
|
|
block.vtx = [block.vtx[0]]
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx2])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop()
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx2.sha256, 0, tx2.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_tx_relay_after_segwit_activation(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test transaction relay after segwit activation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After segwit activates, verify that mempool:
|
|
|
|
- rejects transactions with unnecessary/extra witnesses
|
|
|
|
- accepts transactions with valid witnesses
|
|
|
|
and that witness transactions are relayed to non-upgraded peers."""
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Generate a transaction that doesn't require a witness, but send it
|
|
|
|
# with a witness. Should be rejected because we can't use a witness
|
|
|
|
# when spending a non-witness output.
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
2018-05-03 22:50:25 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE, OP_DROP] * 15 + [OP_TRUE])))
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a']
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx_hash = tx.sha256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Verify that unnecessary witnesses are rejected.
|
|
|
|
self.test_node.announce_tx_and_wait_for_getdata(tx)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx, with_witness=True, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Verify that removing the witness succeeds.
|
2016-08-16 20:11:10 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_node.announce_tx_and_wait_for_getdata(tx)
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx, with_witness=False, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now try to add extra witness data to a valid witness tx.
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx_hash, 0), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue - 1000, script_pubkey))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx3 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx3.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx2.sha256, 0), b""))
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx3.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2016-08-18 18:04:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Add too-large for IsStandard witness and check that it does not enter reject filter
|
|
|
|
p2sh_program = CScript([OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
p2sh_pubkey = hash160(p2sh_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
witness_program2 = CScript([b'a' * 400000])
|
|
|
|
tx3.vout.append(CTxOut(tx2.vout[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_HASH160, p2sh_pubkey, OP_EQUAL])))
|
2016-08-18 18:04:33 +02:00
|
|
|
tx3.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program2]
|
|
|
|
tx3.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Node will not be blinded to the transaction
|
|
|
|
self.std_node.announce_tx_and_wait_for_getdata(tx3)
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, tx3, True, False, b'tx-size')
|
2016-08-18 18:04:33 +02:00
|
|
|
self.std_node.announce_tx_and_wait_for_getdata(tx3)
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, tx3, True, False, b'tx-size')
|
2016-08-18 18:04:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Remove witness stuffing, instead add extra witness push on stack
|
2018-05-03 22:50:25 +02:00
|
|
|
tx3.vout[0] = CTxOut(tx2.vout[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE, OP_DROP] * 15 + [OP_TRUE]))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx3.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [CScript([CScriptNum(1)]), witness_program]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx3.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx2, with_witness=True, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx3, with_witness=True, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Get rid of the extra witness, and verify acceptance.
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx3.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Also check that old_node gets a tx announcement, even though this is
|
|
|
|
# a witness transaction.
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
self.old_node.wait_for_inv([CInv(1, tx2.sha256)]) # wait until tx2 was inv'ed
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx3, with_witness=True, accepted=True)
|
2017-05-02 22:34:44 +02:00
|
|
|
self.old_node.wait_for_inv([CInv(1, tx3.sha256)])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test that getrawtransaction returns correct witness information
|
|
|
|
# hash, size, vsize
|
|
|
|
raw_tx = self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(tx3.hash, 1)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(int(raw_tx["hash"], 16), tx3.calc_sha256(True))
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(raw_tx["size"], len(tx3.serialize_with_witness()))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
weight = len(tx3.serialize_with_witness()) + 3 * len(tx3.serialize_without_witness())
|
2018-03-27 23:21:17 +02:00
|
|
|
vsize = math.ceil(weight / 4)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(raw_tx["vsize"], vsize)
|
2018-03-27 23:21:17 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(raw_tx["weight"], weight)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(raw_tx["vin"][0]["txinwitness"]), 1)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(raw_tx["vin"][0]["txinwitness"][0], hexlify(witness_program).decode('ascii'))
|
|
|
|
assert(vsize != raw_tx["size"])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Cleanup: mine the transactions and update utxo for next test
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx3.sha256, 0, tx3.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_segwit_versions(self):
|
|
|
|
"""Test validity of future segwit version transactions.
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
Future segwit version transactions are non-standard, but valid in blocks.
|
|
|
|
Can run this before and after segwit activation."""
|
2018-06-13 20:16:28 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
NUM_SEGWIT_VERSIONS = 17 # will test OP_0, OP1, ..., OP_16
|
|
|
|
if len(self.utxo) < NUM_SEGWIT_VERSIONS:
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
split_value = (self.utxo[0].nValue - 4000) // NUM_SEGWIT_VERSIONS
|
|
|
|
for i in range(NUM_SEGWIT_VERSIONS):
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(split_value, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
for i in range(NUM_SEGWIT_VERSIONS):
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx.sha256, i, split_value))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
temp_utxo = []
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
for version in list(range(OP_1, OP_16 + 1)) + [OP_0]:
|
|
|
|
# First try to spend to a future version segwit script_pubkey.
|
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([CScriptOp(version), witness_hash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vin = [CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b"")]
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout = [CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, script_pubkey)]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, tx, with_witness=True, accepted=False)
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx, with_witness=True, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
temp_utxo.append(UTXO(tx.sha256, 0, tx.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1) # Mine all the transactions
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
assert(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()) == 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Finally, verify that version 0 -> version 1 transactions
|
|
|
|
# are non-standard
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([CScriptOp(OP_1), witness_hash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin = [CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 0), b"")]
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vout = [CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue - 1000, script_pubkey)]
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
# Gets accepted to test_node, because standardness of outputs isn't
|
|
|
|
# checked with fRequireStandard
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx2, with_witness=True, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, tx2, with_witness=True, accepted=False)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
temp_utxo.pop() # last entry in temp_utxo was the output we just spent
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
temp_utxo.append(UTXO(tx2.sha256, 0, tx2.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Spend everything in temp_utxo back to an OP_TRUE output.
|
|
|
|
tx3 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
total_value = 0
|
|
|
|
for i in temp_utxo:
|
|
|
|
tx3.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(i.sha256, i.n), b""))
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx3.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
total_value += i.nValue
|
|
|
|
tx3.wit.vtxinwit[-1].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program]
|
|
|
|
tx3.vout.append(CTxOut(total_value - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
|
|
|
tx3.rehash()
|
|
|
|
# Spending a higher version witness output is not allowed by policy,
|
|
|
|
# even with fRequireStandard=false.
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx3, with_witness=True, accepted=False)
|
2017-03-30 14:38:46 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_node.sync_with_ping()
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
with mininode_lock:
|
2017-03-30 14:38:46 +02:00
|
|
|
assert(b"reserved for soft-fork upgrades" in self.test_node.last_message["reject"].reason)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Building a block with the transaction must be valid, however.
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx2, tx3])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Add utxo to our list
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx3.sha256, 0, tx3.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_premature_coinbase_witness_spend(self):
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
# Change the output of the block to be a witness output.
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
|
|
|
block.vtx[0].vout[0].scriptPubKey = script_pubkey
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# This next line will rehash the coinbase and update the merkle
|
|
|
|
# root, and solve.
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spend_tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.vin = [CTxIn(COutPoint(block.vtx[0].sha256, 0), b"")]
|
|
|
|
spend_tx.vout = [CTxOut(block.vtx[0].vout[0].nValue, witness_program)]
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
spend_tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
spend_tx.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program]
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
spend_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now test a premature spend.
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(98)
|
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
block2 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block2, [spend_tx])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block2, accepted=False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Advancing one more block should allow the spend.
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
block2 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block2, [spend_tx])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block2, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_uncompressed_pubkey(self):
|
|
|
|
"""Test uncompressed pubkey validity in segwit transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncompressed pubkeys are no longer supported in default relay policy,
|
|
|
|
but (for now) are still valid in blocks."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Segwit transactions using uncompressed pubkeys are not accepted
|
|
|
|
# under default policy, but should still pass consensus.
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
key = CECKey()
|
|
|
|
key.set_secretbytes(b"9")
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
key.set_compressed(False)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
pubkey = CPubKey(key.get_pubkey())
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(pubkey), 65) # This should be an uncompressed pubkey
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
utxo = self.utxo.pop(0)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Test 1: P2WPKH
|
|
|
|
# First create a P2WPKH output that uses an uncompressed pubkey
|
|
|
|
pubkeyhash = hash160(pubkey)
|
|
|
|
script_pkh = CScript([OP_0, pubkeyhash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(utxo.sha256, utxo.n), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(utxo.nValue - 1000, script_pkh))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Confirm it in a block.
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Now try to spend it. Send it to a P2WSH output, which we'll
|
|
|
|
# use in the next test.
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([pubkey, CScriptOp(OP_CHECKSIG)])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
|
|
|
script_wsh = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 0), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue - 1000, script_wsh))
|
|
|
|
script = get_p2pkh_script(pubkeyhash)
|
|
|
|
sig_hash = SegwitVersion1SignatureHash(script, tx2, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, tx.vout[0].nValue)
|
|
|
|
signature = key.sign(sig_hash) + b'\x01' # 0x1 is SIGHASH_ALL
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [signature, pubkey]
|
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Should fail policy test.
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx2, True, False, b'non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit)')
|
|
|
|
# But passes consensus.
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx2])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Test 2: P2WSH
|
|
|
|
# Try to spend the P2WSH output created in last test.
|
|
|
|
# Send it to a P2SH(P2WSH) output, which we'll use in the next test.
|
|
|
|
p2sh_witness_hash = hash160(script_wsh)
|
|
|
|
script_p2sh = CScript([OP_HASH160, p2sh_witness_hash, OP_EQUAL])
|
|
|
|
script_sig = CScript([script_wsh])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
tx3 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx3.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx2.sha256, 0), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx3.vout.append(CTxOut(tx2.vout[0].nValue - 1000, script_p2sh))
|
|
|
|
tx3.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
sign_p2pk_witness_input(witness_program, tx3, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, tx2.vout[0].nValue, key)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Should fail policy test.
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx3, True, False, b'non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit)')
|
|
|
|
# But passes consensus.
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx3])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test 3: P2SH(P2WSH)
|
|
|
|
# Try to spend the P2SH output created in the last test.
|
|
|
|
# Send it to a P2PKH output, which we'll use in the next test.
|
|
|
|
script_pubkey = get_p2pkh_script(pubkeyhash)
|
|
|
|
tx4 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx4.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx3.sha256, 0), script_sig))
|
|
|
|
tx4.vout.append(CTxOut(tx3.vout[0].nValue - 1000, script_pubkey))
|
|
|
|
tx4.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
sign_p2pk_witness_input(witness_program, tx4, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, tx3.vout[0].nValue, key)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Should fail policy test.
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx4, True, False, b'non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit)')
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx4])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test 4: Uncompressed pubkeys should still be valid in non-segwit
|
|
|
|
# transactions.
|
|
|
|
tx5 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx5.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx4.sha256, 0), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx5.vout.append(CTxOut(tx4.vout[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
|
|
|
(sig_hash, err) = SignatureHash(script_pubkey, tx5, 0, SIGHASH_ALL)
|
|
|
|
signature = key.sign(sig_hash) + b'\x01' # 0x1 is SIGHASH_ALL
|
|
|
|
tx5.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript([signature, pubkey])
|
|
|
|
tx5.rehash()
|
|
|
|
# Should pass policy and consensus.
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx5, True, True)
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx5])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx5.sha256, 0, tx5.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_signature_version_1(self):
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
key = CECKey()
|
|
|
|
key.set_secretbytes(b"9")
|
|
|
|
pubkey = CPubKey(key.get_pubkey())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([pubkey, CScriptOp(OP_CHECKSIG)])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# First create a witness output for use in the tests.
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, script_pubkey))
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx, with_witness=True, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
# Mine this transaction in preparation for following tests.
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test each hashtype
|
|
|
|
prev_utxo = UTXO(tx.sha256, 0, tx.vout[0].nValue)
|
|
|
|
for sigflag in [0, SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY]:
|
|
|
|
for hashtype in [SIGHASH_ALL, SIGHASH_NONE, SIGHASH_SINGLE]:
|
|
|
|
hashtype |= sigflag
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(prev_utxo.sha256, prev_utxo.n), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(prev_utxo.nValue - 1000, script_pubkey))
|
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
# Too-large input value
|
|
|
|
sign_p2pk_witness_input(witness_program, tx, 0, hashtype, prev_utxo.nValue + 1, key)
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Too-small input value
|
|
|
|
sign_p2pk_witness_input(witness_program, tx, 0, hashtype, prev_utxo.nValue - 1, key)
|
|
|
|
block.vtx.pop() # remove last tx
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now try correct value
|
|
|
|
sign_p2pk_witness_input(witness_program, tx, 0, hashtype, prev_utxo.nValue, key)
|
|
|
|
block.vtx.pop()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prev_utxo = UTXO(tx.sha256, 0, tx.vout[0].nValue)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test combinations of signature hashes.
|
|
|
|
# Split the utxo into a lot of outputs.
|
|
|
|
# Randomly choose up to 10 to spend, sign with different hashtypes, and
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# output to a random number of outputs. Repeat NUM_SIGHASH_TESTS times.
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Ensure that we've tested a situation where we use SIGHASH_SINGLE with
|
|
|
|
# an input index > number of outputs.
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
NUM_SIGHASH_TESTS = 500
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
temp_utxos = []
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(prev_utxo.sha256, prev_utxo.n), b""))
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
split_value = prev_utxo.nValue // NUM_SIGHASH_TESTS
|
|
|
|
for i in range(NUM_SIGHASH_TESTS):
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(split_value, script_pubkey))
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
sign_p2pk_witness_input(witness_program, tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, prev_utxo.nValue, key)
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
for i in range(NUM_SIGHASH_TESTS):
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
temp_utxos.append(UTXO(tx.sha256, i, split_value))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
used_sighash_single_out_of_bounds = False
|
2018-07-10 22:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
for i in range(NUM_SIGHASH_TESTS):
|
2016-09-24 10:26:26 +02:00
|
|
|
# Ping regularly to keep the connection alive
|
|
|
|
if (not i % 100):
|
2017-03-30 14:38:46 +02:00
|
|
|
self.test_node.sync_with_ping()
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Choose random number of inputs to use.
|
|
|
|
num_inputs = random.randint(1, 10)
|
|
|
|
# Create a slight bias for producing more utxos
|
|
|
|
num_outputs = random.randint(1, 11)
|
|
|
|
random.shuffle(temp_utxos)
|
|
|
|
assert(len(temp_utxos) > num_inputs)
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
total_value = 0
|
|
|
|
for i in range(num_inputs):
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(temp_utxos[i].sha256, temp_utxos[i].n), b""))
|
2016-07-07 01:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
total_value += temp_utxos[i].nValue
|
|
|
|
split_value = total_value // num_outputs
|
|
|
|
for i in range(num_outputs):
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(split_value, script_pubkey))
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
for i in range(num_inputs):
|
|
|
|
# Now try to sign each input, using a random hashtype.
|
|
|
|
anyonecanpay = 0
|
|
|
|
if random.randint(0, 1):
|
|
|
|
anyonecanpay = SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY
|
|
|
|
hashtype = random.randint(1, 3) | anyonecanpay
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
sign_p2pk_witness_input(witness_program, tx, i, hashtype, temp_utxos[i].nValue, key)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
if (hashtype == SIGHASH_SINGLE and i >= num_outputs):
|
|
|
|
used_sighash_single_out_of_bounds = True
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
for i in range(num_outputs):
|
|
|
|
temp_utxos.append(UTXO(tx.sha256, i, split_value))
|
|
|
|
temp_utxos = temp_utxos[num_inputs:]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block.vtx.append(tx)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test the block periodically, if we're close to maxblocksize
|
2016-11-21 22:29:22 +01:00
|
|
|
if (get_virtual_size(block) > MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE - 1000):
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (not used_sighash_single_out_of_bounds):
|
2017-03-08 00:46:17 +01:00
|
|
|
self.log.info("WARNING: this test run didn't attempt SIGHASH_SINGLE with out-of-bounds index value")
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
# Test the transactions we've added to the block
|
|
|
|
if (len(block.vtx) > 1):
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now test witness version 0 P2PKH transactions
|
|
|
|
pubkeyhash = hash160(pubkey)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pkh = CScript([OP_0, pubkeyhash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(temp_utxos[0].sha256, temp_utxos[0].n), b""))
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(temp_utxos[0].nValue, script_pkh))
|
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
sign_p2pk_witness_input(witness_program, tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, temp_utxos[0].nValue, key)
|
2016-10-06 19:15:33 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 0), b""))
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script = get_p2pkh_script(pubkeyhash)
|
2016-10-06 19:15:33 +02:00
|
|
|
sig_hash = SegwitVersion1SignatureHash(script, tx2, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, tx.vout[0].nValue)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
signature = key.sign(sig_hash) + b'\x01' # 0x1 is SIGHASH_ALL
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Check that we can't have a scriptSig
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript([signature, pubkey])
|
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx, tx2])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=False)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Move the signature to the witness.
|
|
|
|
block.vtx.pop()
|
2016-10-06 19:15:33 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [signature, pubkey]
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vin[0].scriptSig = b""
|
2016-10-06 19:15:33 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx2])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-10-06 19:15:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
temp_utxos.pop(0)
|
2016-10-06 19:15:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Update self.utxos for later tests by creating two outputs
|
|
|
|
# that consolidate all the coins in temp_utxos.
|
|
|
|
output_value = sum(i.nValue for i in temp_utxos) // 2
|
2016-10-06 19:15:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
index = 0
|
|
|
|
# Just spend to our usual anyone-can-spend output
|
|
|
|
tx.vout = [CTxOut(output_value, CScript([OP_TRUE]))] * 2
|
|
|
|
for i in temp_utxos:
|
|
|
|
# Use SIGHASH_ALL|SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY so we can build up
|
|
|
|
# the signatures as we go.
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(i.sha256, i.n), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
sign_p2pk_witness_input(witness_program, tx, index, SIGHASH_ALL | SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY, i.nValue, key)
|
|
|
|
index += 1
|
2016-10-06 19:15:33 +02:00
|
|
|
block = self.build_next_block()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block, [tx])
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block, accepted=True)
|
2016-10-06 19:15:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
for i in range(len(tx.vout)):
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx.sha256, i, tx.vout[i].nValue))
|
2016-10-06 19:15:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-04-30 01:34:57 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_non_standard_witness_blinding(self):
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test behavior of unnecessary witnesses in transactions does not blind the node for the transaction"""
|
2018-04-30 01:34:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Create a p2sh output -- this is so we can pass the standardness
|
|
|
|
# rules (an anyone-can-spend OP_TRUE would be rejected, if not wrapped
|
|
|
|
# in P2SH).
|
|
|
|
p2sh_program = CScript([OP_TRUE])
|
|
|
|
p2sh_pubkey = hash160(p2sh_program)
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_HASH160, p2sh_pubkey, OP_EQUAL])
|
2018-04-30 01:34:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now check that unnecessary witnesses can't be used to blind a node
|
|
|
|
# to a transaction, eg by violating standardness checks.
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000, script_pubkey))
|
2018-04-30 01:34:57 +02:00
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx, False, True)
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# We'll add an unnecessary witness to this transaction that would cause
|
|
|
|
# it to be non-standard, to test that violating policy with a witness
|
|
|
|
# doesn't blind a node to a transaction. Transactions
|
|
|
|
# rejected for having a witness shouldn't be added
|
|
|
|
# to the rejection cache.
|
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, 0), CScript([p2sh_program])))
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(tx.vout[0].nValue - 1000, script_pubkey))
|
2018-04-30 01:34:57 +02:00
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [b'a' * 400]
|
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
# This will be rejected due to a policy check:
|
|
|
|
# No witness is allowed, since it is not a witness program but a p2sh program
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, tx2, True, False, b'bad-witness-nonstandard')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If we send without witness, it should be accepted.
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, tx2, False, True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now create a new anyone-can-spend utxo for the next test.
|
|
|
|
tx3 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx3.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx2.sha256, 0), CScript([p2sh_program])))
|
|
|
|
tx3.vout.append(CTxOut(tx2.vout[0].nValue - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE, OP_DROP] * 15 + [OP_TRUE])))
|
|
|
|
tx3.rehash()
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx2, False, True)
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx3, False, True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Update our utxo list; we spent the first entry.
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.append(UTXO(tx3.sha256, 0, tx3.vout[0].nValue))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_non_standard_witness(self):
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test detection of non-standard P2WSH witness"""
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
pad = chr(1).encode('latin-1')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Create scripts for tests
|
|
|
|
scripts = []
|
|
|
|
scripts.append(CScript([OP_DROP] * 100))
|
|
|
|
scripts.append(CScript([OP_DROP] * 99))
|
|
|
|
scripts.append(CScript([pad * 59] * 59 + [OP_DROP] * 60))
|
|
|
|
scripts.append(CScript([pad * 59] * 59 + [OP_DROP] * 61))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_scripts = []
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# For each script, generate a pair of P2WSH and P2SH-P2WSH output.
|
|
|
|
outputvalue = (self.utxo[0].nValue - 1000) // (len(scripts) * 2)
|
|
|
|
for i in scripts:
|
|
|
|
p2wsh = CScript([OP_0, sha256(i)])
|
|
|
|
p2sh = hash160(p2wsh)
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_scripts.append(p2wsh)
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(outputvalue, p2wsh))
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(outputvalue, CScript([OP_HASH160, p2sh, OP_EQUAL])))
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
txid = tx.sha256
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, tx, with_witness=False, accepted=True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Creating transactions for tests
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_txs = []
|
|
|
|
p2sh_txs = []
|
|
|
|
for i in range(len(scripts)):
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx = CTransaction()
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(txid, i * 2)))
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx.vout.append(CTxOut(outputvalue - 5000, CScript([OP_0, hash160(hex_str_to_bytes(""))])))
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_txs.append(p2wsh_tx)
|
|
|
|
p2sh_tx = CTransaction()
|
2018-06-13 17:56:20 +02:00
|
|
|
p2sh_tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(txid, i * 2 + 1), CScript([p2wsh_scripts[i]])))
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
p2sh_tx.vout.append(CTxOut(outputvalue - 5000, CScript([OP_0, hash160(hex_str_to_bytes(""))])))
|
|
|
|
p2sh_tx.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
p2sh_tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
p2sh_txs.append(p2sh_tx)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Testing native P2WSH
|
|
|
|
# Witness stack size, excluding witnessScript, over 100 is non-standard
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_txs[0].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [pad] * 101 + [scripts[0]]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, p2wsh_txs[0], True, False, b'bad-witness-nonstandard')
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
# Non-standard nodes should accept
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, p2wsh_txs[0], True, True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Stack element size over 80 bytes is non-standard
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_txs[1].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [pad * 81] * 100 + [scripts[1]]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, p2wsh_txs[1], True, False, b'bad-witness-nonstandard')
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
# Non-standard nodes should accept
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, p2wsh_txs[1], True, True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
# Standard nodes should accept if element size is not over 80 bytes
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_txs[1].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [pad * 80] * 100 + [scripts[1]]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, p2wsh_txs[1], True, True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# witnessScript size at 3600 bytes is standard
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_txs[2].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [pad, pad, scripts[2]]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, p2wsh_txs[2], True, True)
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, p2wsh_txs[2], True, True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# witnessScript size at 3601 bytes is non-standard
|
|
|
|
p2wsh_txs[3].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [pad, pad, pad, scripts[3]]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, p2wsh_txs[3], True, False, b'bad-witness-nonstandard')
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
# Non-standard nodes should accept
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, p2wsh_txs[3], True, True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Repeating the same tests with P2SH-P2WSH
|
|
|
|
p2sh_txs[0].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [pad] * 101 + [scripts[0]]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, p2sh_txs[0], True, False, b'bad-witness-nonstandard')
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, p2sh_txs[0], True, True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
p2sh_txs[1].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [pad * 81] * 100 + [scripts[1]]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, p2sh_txs[1], True, False, b'bad-witness-nonstandard')
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, p2sh_txs[1], True, True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
p2sh_txs[1].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [pad * 80] * 100 + [scripts[1]]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, p2sh_txs[1], True, True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
p2sh_txs[2].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [pad, pad, scripts[2]]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, p2sh_txs[2], True, True)
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, p2sh_txs[2], True, True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
p2sh_txs[3].wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [pad, pad, pad, scripts[3]]
|
2017-10-17 14:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1].rpc, self.std_node, p2sh_txs[3], True, False, b'bad-witness-nonstandard')
|
|
|
|
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, p2sh_txs[3], True, True)
|
2016-10-16 17:53:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1) # Mine and clean up the mempool of non-standard node
|
|
|
|
# Valid but non-standard transactions in a block should be accepted by standard node
|
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.utxo.pop(0)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_upgrade_after_activation(self):
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Test the behavior of starting up a segwit-aware node after the softfork has activated."""
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Restart with the new binary
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
self.stop_node(2)
|
|
|
|
self.start_node(2, extra_args=["-vbparams=segwit:0:999999999999"])
|
|
|
|
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 2)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-19 12:55:25 +01:00
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Make sure that this peer thinks segwit has activated.
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
assert(get_bip9_status(self.nodes[2], 'segwit')['status'] == "active")
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Make sure this peer's blocks match those of node0.
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
height = self.nodes[2].getblockcount()
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
while height >= 0:
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
block_hash = self.nodes[2].getblockhash(height)
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(block_hash, self.nodes[0].getblockhash(height))
|
2018-06-13 23:03:40 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblock(block_hash), self.nodes[2].getblock(block_hash))
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
height -= 1
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 21:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
@subtest
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_witness_sigops(self):
|
|
|
|
"""Test sigop counting is correct inside witnesses."""
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# Keep this under MAX_OPS_PER_SCRIPT (201)
|
|
|
|
witness_program = CScript([OP_TRUE, OP_IF, OP_TRUE, OP_ELSE] + [OP_CHECKMULTISIG] * 5 + [OP_CHECKSIG] * 193 + [OP_ENDIF])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash = sha256(witness_program)
|
|
|
|
script_pubkey = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash])
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
sigops_per_script = 20 * 5 + 193 * 1
|
|
|
|
# We'll produce 2 extra outputs, one with a program that would take us
|
|
|
|
# over max sig ops, and one with a program that would exactly reach max
|
|
|
|
# sig ops
|
|
|
|
outputs = (MAX_SIGOP_COST // sigops_per_script) + 2
|
|
|
|
extra_sigops_available = MAX_SIGOP_COST % sigops_per_script
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# We chose the number of checkmultisigs/checksigs to make this work:
|
|
|
|
assert(extra_sigops_available < 100) # steer clear of MAX_OPS_PER_SCRIPT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This script, when spent with the first
|
|
|
|
# N(=MAX_SIGOP_COST//sigops_per_script) outputs of our transaction,
|
|
|
|
# would push us just over the block sigop limit.
|
|
|
|
witness_program_toomany = CScript([OP_TRUE, OP_IF, OP_TRUE, OP_ELSE] + [OP_CHECKSIG] * (extra_sigops_available + 1) + [OP_ENDIF])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash_toomany = sha256(witness_program_toomany)
|
|
|
|
script_pubkey_toomany = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash_toomany])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If we spend this script instead, we would exactly reach our sigop
|
|
|
|
# limit (for witness sigops).
|
|
|
|
witness_program_justright = CScript([OP_TRUE, OP_IF, OP_TRUE, OP_ELSE] + [OP_CHECKSIG] * (extra_sigops_available) + [OP_ENDIF])
|
|
|
|
witness_hash_justright = sha256(witness_program_justright)
|
|
|
|
script_pubkey_justright = CScript([OP_0, witness_hash_justright])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# First split our available utxo into a bunch of outputs
|
|
|
|
split_value = self.utxo[0].nValue // outputs
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.utxo[0].sha256, self.utxo[0].n), b""))
|
|
|
|
for i in range(outputs):
|
|
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(split_value, script_pubkey))
|
|
|
|
tx.vout[-2].scriptPubKey = script_pubkey_toomany
|
|
|
|
tx.vout[-1].scriptPubKey = script_pubkey_justright
|
|
|
|
tx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block_1 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block_1, [tx])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block_1, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx2 = CTransaction()
|
|
|
|
# If we try to spend the first n-1 outputs from tx, that should be
|
|
|
|
# too many sigops.
|
|
|
|
total_value = 0
|
|
|
|
for i in range(outputs - 1):
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, i), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[-1].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program]
|
|
|
|
total_value += tx.vout[i].nValue
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[-1].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program_toomany]
|
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(total_value, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block_2 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block_2, [tx2])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block_2, accepted=False)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Try dropping the last input in tx2, and add an output that has
|
|
|
|
# too many sigops (contributing to legacy sigop count).
|
|
|
|
checksig_count = (extra_sigops_available // 4) + 1
|
|
|
|
script_pubkey_checksigs = CScript([OP_CHECKSIG] * checksig_count)
|
|
|
|
tx2.vout.append(CTxOut(0, script_pubkey_checksigs))
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.pop()
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.pop()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vout[0].nValue -= tx.vout[-2].nValue
|
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
block_3 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block_3, [tx2])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block_3, accepted=False)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If we drop the last checksig in this output, the tx should succeed.
|
|
|
|
block_4 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vout[-1].scriptPubKey = CScript([OP_CHECKSIG] * (checksig_count - 1))
|
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block_4, [tx2])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block_4, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Reset the tip back down for the next test
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
|
2018-06-13 20:26:25 +02:00
|
|
|
for x in self.nodes:
|
|
|
|
x.invalidateblock(block_4.hash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Try replacing the last input of tx2 to be spending the last
|
|
|
|
# output of tx
|
|
|
|
block_5 = self.build_next_block()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vout.pop()
|
|
|
|
tx2.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(tx.sha256, outputs - 1), b""))
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
|
|
|
tx2.wit.vtxinwit[-1].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program_justright]
|
|
|
|
tx2.rehash()
|
|
|
|
self.update_witness_block_with_transactions(block_5, [tx2])
|
|
|
|
test_witness_block(self.nodes[0].rpc, self.test_node, block_5, accepted=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO: test p2sh sigop counting
|
2016-04-09 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
|
|
SegWitTest().main()
|