New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137.

CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459 are only partially tested for regression.
- CVE-2018-17144 is not tested for the inflation bug.
- CVE-2012-2459 is only tested for the mutated block being rejected, not
for the original block being accepted afterwards.

This commit fixes that limitation.

Also added functional test for CVE-2010-5137.
This commit is contained in:
lucash-dev 2018-11-09 19:31:49 -08:00
parent 38bfca6bb2
commit 0c62e3aa73
2 changed files with 88 additions and 7 deletions

View file

@ -24,7 +24,24 @@ import abc
from test_framework.messages import CTransaction, CTxIn, CTxOut, COutPoint
from test_framework import script as sc
from test_framework.blocktools import create_tx_with_script, MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS
from test_framework.script import (
CScript,
OP_CAT,
OP_SUBSTR,
OP_LEFT,
OP_RIGHT,
OP_INVERT,
OP_AND,
OP_OR,
OP_XOR,
OP_2MUL,
OP_2DIV,
OP_MUL,
OP_DIV,
OP_MOD,
OP_LSHIFT,
OP_RSHIFT
)
basic_p2sh = sc.CScript([sc.OP_HASH160, sc.hash160(sc.CScript([sc.OP_0])), sc.OP_EQUAL])
@ -178,7 +195,44 @@ class TooManySigops(BadTxTemplate):
script_pub_key=lotsa_checksigs,
amount=1)
def getDisabledOpcodeTemplate(opcode):
""" Creates disabled opcode tx template class"""
def get_tx(self):
tx = CTransaction()
vin = self.valid_txin
vin.scriptSig = CScript([opcode])
tx.vin.append(vin)
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(1, basic_p2sh))
tx.calc_sha256()
return tx
return type('DisabledOpcode_' + str(opcode), (BadTxTemplate,), {
'reject_reason': "disabled opcode",
'expect_disconnect': True,
'get_tx': get_tx,
'valid_in_block' : True
})
# Disabled opcode tx templates (CVE-2010-5137)
DisabledOpcodeTemplates = [getDisabledOpcodeTemplate(opcode) for opcode in [
OP_CAT,
OP_SUBSTR,
OP_LEFT,
OP_RIGHT,
OP_INVERT,
OP_AND,
OP_OR,
OP_XOR,
OP_2MUL,
OP_2DIV,
OP_MUL,
OP_DIV,
OP_MOD,
OP_LSHIFT,
OP_RSHIFT]]
def iter_all_templates():
"""Iterate through all bad transaction template types."""
return BadTxTemplate.__subclasses__()

View file

@ -85,12 +85,13 @@ class InvalidBlockRequestTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# Check transactions for duplicate inputs (CVE-2018-17144)
self.log.info("Test duplicate input block.")
block2_orig.vtx[2].vin.append(block2_orig.vtx[2].vin[0])
block2_orig.vtx[2].rehash()
block2_orig.hashMerkleRoot = block2_orig.calc_merkle_root()
block2_orig.rehash()
block2_orig.solve()
node.p2p.send_blocks_and_test([block2_orig], node, success=False, reject_reason='bad-txns-inputs-duplicate')
block2_dup = copy.deepcopy(block2_orig)
block2_dup.vtx[2].vin.append(block2_dup.vtx[2].vin[0])
block2_dup.vtx[2].rehash()
block2_dup.hashMerkleRoot = block2_dup.calc_merkle_root()
block2_dup.rehash()
block2_dup.solve()
node.p2p.send_blocks_and_test([block2_dup], node, success=False, reject_reason='bad-txns-inputs-duplicate')
self.log.info("Test very broken block.")
@ -106,5 +107,31 @@ class InvalidBlockRequestTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
node.p2p.send_blocks_and_test([block3], node, success=False, reject_reason='bad-cb-amount')
# Complete testing of CVE-2012-2459 by sending the original block.
# It should be accepted even though it has the same hash as the mutated one.
self.log.info("Test accepting original block after rejecting its mutated version.")
node.p2p.send_blocks_and_test([block2_orig], node, success=True, timeout=5)
# Update tip info
height += 1
block_time += 1
tip = int(block2_orig.hash, 16)
# Complete testing of CVE-2018-17144, by checking for the inflation bug.
# Create a block that spends the output of a tx in a previous block.
block4 = create_block(tip, create_coinbase(height), block_time)
tx3 = create_tx_with_script(tx2, 0, script_sig=b'\x51', amount=50 * COIN)
# Duplicates input
tx3.vin.append(tx3.vin[0])
tx3.rehash()
block4.vtx.append(tx3)
block4.hashMerkleRoot = block4.calc_merkle_root()
block4.rehash()
block4.solve()
self.log.info("Test inflation by duplicating input")
node.p2p.send_blocks_and_test([block4], node, success=False, reject_reason='bad-txns-inputs-duplicate')
if __name__ == '__main__':
InvalidBlockRequestTest().main()