Merge #7592: mempool: Re-remove ERROR logging for mempool rejects
8fc81e0
mempool: Reduce ERROR logging for mempool rejects (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
This commit is contained in:
commit
26a2a7214f
1 changed files with 30 additions and 27 deletions
57
src/main.cpp
57
src/main.cpp
|
@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
|
|||
*pfMissingInputs = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!CheckTransaction(tx, state))
|
||||
return error("%s: CheckTransaction: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
|
||||
return false; // state filled in by CheckTransaction
|
||||
|
||||
// Coinbase is only valid in a block, not as a loose transaction
|
||||
if (tx.IsCoinBase())
|
||||
|
@ -1160,10 +1160,11 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
|
|||
const uint256 &hashAncestor = ancestorIt->GetTx().GetHash();
|
||||
if (setConflicts.count(hashAncestor))
|
||||
{
|
||||
return state.DoS(10, error("AcceptToMemoryPool: %s spends conflicting transaction %s",
|
||||
return state.DoS(10, false,
|
||||
REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx", false,
|
||||
strprintf("%s spends conflicting transaction %s",
|
||||
hash.ToString(),
|
||||
hashAncestor.ToString()),
|
||||
REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx");
|
||||
hashAncestor.ToString()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1200,11 +1201,11 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
|
|||
// that we don't spend too much time walking descendants.
|
||||
// This should be rare.
|
||||
if (mi->IsDirty()) {
|
||||
return state.DoS(0,
|
||||
error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s; cannot replace tx %s with untracked descendants",
|
||||
return state.DoS(0, false,
|
||||
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements", false,
|
||||
strprintf("too many potential replacements: rejecting replacement %s; cannot replace tx %s with untracked descendants",
|
||||
hash.ToString(),
|
||||
mi->GetTx().GetHash().ToString()),
|
||||
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements");
|
||||
mi->GetTx().GetHash().ToString()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Don't allow the replacement to reduce the feerate of the
|
||||
|
@ -1226,12 +1227,12 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
|
|||
CFeeRate oldFeeRate(mi->GetModifiedFee(), mi->GetTxSize());
|
||||
if (newFeeRate <= oldFeeRate)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return state.DoS(0,
|
||||
error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s",
|
||||
return state.DoS(0, false,
|
||||
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
|
||||
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s",
|
||||
hash.ToString(),
|
||||
newFeeRate.ToString(),
|
||||
oldFeeRate.ToString()),
|
||||
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee");
|
||||
oldFeeRate.ToString()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_FOREACH(const CTxIn &txin, mi->GetTx().vin)
|
||||
|
@ -1255,12 +1256,12 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
|
|||
nConflictingSize += it->GetTxSize();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return state.DoS(0,
|
||||
error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n",
|
||||
return state.DoS(0, false,
|
||||
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements", false,
|
||||
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n",
|
||||
hash.ToString(),
|
||||
nConflictingCount,
|
||||
maxDescendantsToVisit),
|
||||
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements");
|
||||
maxDescendantsToVisit));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (unsigned int j = 0; j < tx.vin.size(); j++)
|
||||
|
@ -1275,9 +1276,10 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
|
|||
// it's cheaper to just check if the new input refers to a
|
||||
// tx that's in the mempool.
|
||||
if (pool.mapTx.find(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash) != pool.mapTx.end())
|
||||
return state.DoS(0, error("AcceptToMemoryPool: replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d",
|
||||
hash.ToString(), j),
|
||||
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed");
|
||||
return state.DoS(0, false,
|
||||
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed", false,
|
||||
strprintf("replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d",
|
||||
hash.ToString(), j));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1286,9 +1288,10 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
|
|||
// transactions would not be paid for.
|
||||
if (nModifiedFees < nConflictingFees)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return state.DoS(0, error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s",
|
||||
hash.ToString(), FormatMoney(nModifiedFees), FormatMoney(nConflictingFees)),
|
||||
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee");
|
||||
return state.DoS(0, false,
|
||||
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
|
||||
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s",
|
||||
hash.ToString(), FormatMoney(nModifiedFees), FormatMoney(nConflictingFees)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Finally in addition to paying more fees than the conflicts the
|
||||
|
@ -1296,19 +1299,19 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
|
|||
CAmount nDeltaFees = nModifiedFees - nConflictingFees;
|
||||
if (nDeltaFees < ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize))
|
||||
{
|
||||
return state.DoS(0,
|
||||
error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s",
|
||||
return state.DoS(0, false,
|
||||
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
|
||||
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s",
|
||||
hash.ToString(),
|
||||
FormatMoney(nDeltaFees),
|
||||
FormatMoney(::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize))),
|
||||
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee");
|
||||
FormatMoney(::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize))));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check against previous transactions
|
||||
// This is done last to help prevent CPU exhaustion denial-of-service attacks.
|
||||
if (!CheckInputs(tx, state, view, true, STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS, true))
|
||||
return error("%s: CheckInputs: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
|
||||
return false; // state filled in by CheckInputs
|
||||
|
||||
// Check again against just the consensus-critical mandatory script
|
||||
// verification flags, in case of bugs in the standard flags that cause
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue