Bugfix: Use standard BTC unit in comments
This commit is contained in:
parent
814efd6f1f
commit
3c726dd3c0
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ public:
|
||||||
if (nBlockSize == 1)
|
if (nBlockSize == 1)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
// Transactions under 10K are free
|
// Transactions under 10K are free
|
||||||
// (about 4500bc if made of 50bc inputs)
|
// (about 4500 BTC if made of 50 BTC inputs)
|
||||||
if (nBytes < 10000)
|
if (nBytes < 10000)
|
||||||
nMinFee = 0;
|
nMinFee = 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -164,11 +164,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
|
||||||
add_coin( 3*COIN);
|
add_coin( 3*COIN);
|
||||||
add_coin( 4*COIN); // now we have 5+6+7+8+18+20+30+100+200+300+400 = 1094 cents
|
add_coin( 4*COIN); // now we have 5+6+7+8+18+20+30+100+200+300+400 = 1094 cents
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(95 * CENT, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(95 * CENT, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * COIN); // we should get 1 bitcoin in 1 coin
|
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * COIN); // we should get 1 BTC in 1 coin
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1);
|
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(195 * CENT, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(195 * CENT, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 2 * COIN); // we should get 2 bitcoins in 1 coin
|
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 2 * COIN); // we should get 2 BTC in 1 coin
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1);
|
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// empty the wallet and start again, now with fractions of a cent, to test sub-cent change avoidance
|
// empty the wallet and start again, now with fractions of a cent, to test sub-cent change avoidance
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue