LBRYCommunity/lbrycrd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 29 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 32 Packages Wiki Activity

Merge #10099: Slightly Improve Unit Tests for Checkqueue

Browse source 
8c2f4b888 Expose more parallelism with relaxed atomics (suggested in #9938). Fix a test to check the exclusive or of two properties rather than just or. (Jeremy Rubin)

Pull request description:

  This PR is in response to #10026 and some feedback on #9938.

  ~Locally, all the checkqueue tests ran 3.2X faster on my machine. The worst offender, `test_CheckQueue_Correct_Random` ran 3.4X faster.~

  1. ~Removes `GetRand()` and replaces it with a single deterministic FastRandomContext instance.~ #10321 replicated this

  1. Exposes more parallelism with relaxed atomics, increasing chance of catching a bug. This does not change performance on my machine.

  1. Makes one test case more restrictive (xor instead of or, see #9938).

Tree-SHA512: a59dfbee0273c713525a130dfedc1c7ff26f50c2aaca1e94ef5d759b1d6ea6338ffbd97f863b9f6209750d8a788a15fa8ae1bf26774ed2473c520811337e6b00
This commit is contained in:
Pieter Wuille 2017-10-12 15:28:22 -07:00
commit 424be03305
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: A636E97631F767E0
1 changed files with 18 additions and 15 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

31
src/test/checkqueue_tests.cpp
View file

@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct FakeCheckCheckCompletion {
static std::atomic<size_t> n_calls;
bool operator()()
{
++n_calls;
n_calls.fetch_add(1, std::memory_order_relaxed);
return true;
}
void swap(FakeCheckCheckCompletion& x){};
@ -88,15 +88,15 @@ struct MemoryCheck {
//
// Really, copy constructor should be deletable, but CCheckQueue breaks
// if it is deleted because of internal push_back.
fake_allocated_memory += b;
fake_allocated_memory.fetch_add(b, std::memory_order_relaxed);
};
MemoryCheck(bool b_) : b(b_)
{
fake_allocated_memory += b;
fake_allocated_memory.fetch_add(b, std::memory_order_relaxed);
};
~MemoryCheck(){
fake_allocated_memory -= b;
~MemoryCheck()
{
fake_allocated_memory.fetch_sub(b, std::memory_order_relaxed);
};
void swap(MemoryCheck& x) { std::swap(b, x.b); };
};
@ -117,9 +117,9 @@ struct FrozenCleanupCheck {
{
if (should_freeze) {
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> l(m);
nFrozen = 1;
nFrozen.store(1, std::memory_order_relaxed);
cv.notify_one();
cv.wait(l, []{ return nFrozen == 0;});
cv.wait(l, []{ return nFrozen.load(std::memory_order_relaxed) == 0;});
}
}
void swap(FrozenCleanupCheck& x){std::swap(should_freeze, x.should_freeze);};
@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_CheckQueue_Recovers_From_Failure)
control.Add(vChecks);
}
bool r =control.Wait();
BOOST_REQUIRE(r || end_fails);
BOOST_REQUIRE(r != end_fails);
}
}
tg.interrupt_all();
@ -361,11 +361,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_CheckQueue_FrozenCleanup)
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> l(FrozenCleanupCheck::m);
// Wait until the queue has finished all jobs and frozen
FrozenCleanupCheck::cv.wait(l, [](){return FrozenCleanupCheck::nFrozen == 1;});
// Try to get control of the queue a bunch of times
for (auto x = 0; x < 100 && !fails; ++x) {
fails = queue->ControlMutex.try_lock();
}
// Unfreeze
}
// Try to get control of the queue a bunch of times
for (auto x = 0; x < 100 && !fails; ++x) {
fails = queue->ControlMutex.try_lock();
}
{
// Unfreeze (we need lock n case of spurious wakeup)
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> l(FrozenCleanupCheck::m);
FrozenCleanupCheck::nFrozen = 0;
}
// Awaken frozen destructor