[doc] Removing comments about dirty entries on txmempool
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b766fcdd4
commit
4f3782ed67
1 changed files with 2 additions and 17 deletions
|
@ -60,11 +60,6 @@ class CTxMemPool;
|
|||
* (nCountWithDescendants, nSizeWithDescendants, and nModFeesWithDescendants) for
|
||||
* all ancestors of the newly added transaction.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If updating the descendant state is skipped, we can mark the entry as
|
||||
* "dirty", and set nSizeWithDescendants/nModFeesWithDescendants to equal nTxSize/
|
||||
* nFee+feeDelta. (This can potentially happen during a reorg, where we limit the
|
||||
* amount of work we're willing to do to avoid consuming too much CPU.)
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
class CTxMemPoolEntry
|
||||
|
@ -83,9 +78,7 @@ private:
|
|||
|
||||
// Information about descendants of this transaction that are in the
|
||||
// mempool; if we remove this transaction we must remove all of these
|
||||
// descendants as well. if nCountWithDescendants is 0, treat this entry as
|
||||
// dirty, and nSizeWithDescendants and nModFeesWithDescendants will not be
|
||||
// correct.
|
||||
// descendants as well.
|
||||
uint64_t nCountWithDescendants; //!< number of descendant transactions
|
||||
uint64_t nSizeWithDescendants; //!< ... and size
|
||||
CAmount nModFeesWithDescendants; //!< ... and total fees (all including us)
|
||||
|
@ -116,7 +109,7 @@ public:
|
|||
size_t DynamicMemoryUsage() const { return nUsageSize; }
|
||||
const LockPoints& GetLockPoints() const { return lockPoints; }
|
||||
|
||||
// Adjusts the descendant state, if this entry is not dirty.
|
||||
// Adjusts the descendant state.
|
||||
void UpdateDescendantState(int64_t modifySize, CAmount modifyFee, int64_t modifyCount);
|
||||
// Adjusts the ancestor state
|
||||
void UpdateAncestorState(int64_t modifySize, CAmount modifyFee, int64_t modifyCount, int modifySigOps);
|
||||
|
@ -399,14 +392,6 @@ enum class MemPoolRemovalReason {
|
|||
* CalculateMemPoolAncestors() takes configurable limits that are designed to
|
||||
* prevent these calculations from being too CPU intensive.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Adding transactions from a disconnected block can be very time consuming,
|
||||
* because we don't have a way to limit the number of in-mempool descendants.
|
||||
* To bound CPU processing, we limit the amount of work we're willing to do
|
||||
* to properly update the descendant information for a tx being added from
|
||||
* a disconnected block. If we would exceed the limit, then we instead mark
|
||||
* the entry as "dirty", and set the feerate for sorting purposes to be equal
|
||||
* the feerate of the transaction without any descendants.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
class CTxMemPool
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue