LBRYCommunity/lbrycrd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 29 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 32 Packages Wiki Activity

test: Add more thorough test for dbwrapper iterators

Browse source 
I made a silly mistake in a database wrapper where keys
were sorted by char instead of uint8_t. As x86 char is signed
the sorting for the block index database was messed up, resulting
in a segfault due to missing records.

Add a test to catch:
- Wrong sorting
- Seeking errors
- Iteration result not complete
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan 2016-04-27 11:07:43 +02:00
parent 84c13e759d
commit 6030625631
1 changed files with 35 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

36
src/test/dbwrapper_tests.cpp
View file

@ -203,5 +203,39 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(existing_data_reindex)
BOOST_CHECK(odbw.Read(key, res3));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(res3.ToString(), in2.ToString());
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(iterator_ordering)
{
path ph = temp_directory_path() / unique_path();
CDBWrapper dbw(ph, (1 << 20), true, false, false);
for (int x=0x00; x<256; ++x) {
uint8_t key = x;
uint32_t value = x*x;
BOOST_CHECK(dbw.Write(key, value));
}
boost::scoped_ptr<CDBIterator> it(const_cast<CDBWrapper*>(&dbw)->NewIterator());
for (int c=0; c<2; ++c) {
int seek_start;
if (c == 0)
seek_start = 0x00;
else
seek_start = 0x80;
it->Seek((uint8_t)seek_start);
for (int x=seek_start; x<256; ++x) {
uint8_t key;
uint32_t value;
BOOST_CHECK(it->Valid());
if (!it->Valid()) // Avoid spurious errors about invalid iterator's key and value in case of failure
break;
BOOST_CHECK(it->GetKey(key));
BOOST_CHECK(it->GetValue(value));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(key, x);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(value, x*x);
it->Next();
}
BOOST_CHECK(!it->Valid());
}
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()