LBRYCommunity/lbrycrd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 29 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 32 Packages Wiki Activity

Add test case for CBigNum::setint64().

Browse source 
One of the test cases currently aborts when using gcc's flag -ftrapv, due to
negating an INT64_MIN int64 variable, which is an undefined operation.

This will be fixed in a subsequent commit.
This commit is contained in:
Ricardo M. Correia 2012-05-14 21:15:27 +02:00
parent fe78c9ae8b
commit 62e0453ce0
1 changed files with 110 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

110
src/test/bignum_tests.cpp Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
#include <climits>
#include "bignum.h"
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(bignum_tests)
// For the following test case, it is useful to use additional tools.
//
// The simplest one to use is the compiler flag -ftrapv, which detects integer
// overflows and similar errors. However, due to optimizations and compilers
// taking advantage of undefined behavior sometimes it may not actually detect
// anything.
//
// You can also use compiler-based stack protection to possibly detect possible
// stack buffer overruns.
//
// For more accurate diagnostics, you can use an undefined arithmetic operation
// detector such as the clang-based tool:
//
// "IOC: An Integer Overflow Checker for C/C++"
//
// Available at: http://embed.cs.utah.edu/ioc/
//
// It might also be useful to use Google's AddressSanitizer to detect
// stack buffer overruns, which valgrind can't currently detect.
// Let's force this code not to be inlined, in order to actually
// test a generic version of the function. This increases the chance
// that -ftrapv will detect overflows.
void mysetint64(CBigNum& num, int64 n) __attribute__((noinline));
void mysetint64(CBigNum& num, int64 n)
{
num.setint64(n);
}
// For each number, we do 2 tests: one with inline code, then we reset the
// value to 0, then the second one with a non-inlined function.
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64)
{
int64 n;
{
n = 0;
CBigNum num(n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
}
{
n = 1;
CBigNum num(n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "1");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "1");
}
{
n = -1;
CBigNum num(n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-1");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-1");
}
{
n = 5;
CBigNum num(n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "5");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "5");
}
{
n = -5;
CBigNum num(n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-5");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-5");
}
{
n = LLONG_MIN;
CBigNum num(n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-9223372036854775808");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-9223372036854775808");
}
{
n = LLONG_MAX;
CBigNum num(n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "9223372036854775807");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "9223372036854775807");
}
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()