Explain GetAncestor check for m_failed_blocks in AcceptBlockHeader
This commit is contained in:
parent
f66e1c793e
commit
66e15e8f97
1 changed files with 23 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -3383,10 +3383,30 @@ bool CChainState::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState&
|
||||||
if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, chainparams, pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime()))
|
if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, chainparams, pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime()))
|
||||||
return error("%s: Consensus::ContextualCheckBlockHeader: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
|
return error("%s: Consensus::ContextualCheckBlockHeader: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// If the previous block index isn't valid, determine if it descends from any block which
|
/* Determine if this block descends from any block which has been found
|
||||||
// has been found invalid (m_failed_blocks), then mark pindexPrev and any blocks
|
* invalid (m_failed_blocks), then mark pindexPrev and any blocks between
|
||||||
// between them as failed.
|
* them as failed. For example:
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* D3
|
||||||
|
* /
|
||||||
|
* B2 - C2
|
||||||
|
* / \
|
||||||
|
* A D2 - E2 - F2
|
||||||
|
* \
|
||||||
|
* B1 - C1 - D1 - E1
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* In the case that we attempted to reorg from E1 to F2, only to find
|
||||||
|
* C2 to be invalid, we would mark D2, E2, and F2 as BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD
|
||||||
|
* but NOT D3 (it was not in any of our candidate sets at the time).
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* In any case D3 will also be marked as BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD at restart
|
||||||
|
* in LoadBlockIndex.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
if (!pindexPrev->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_SCRIPTS)) {
|
if (!pindexPrev->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_SCRIPTS)) {
|
||||||
|
// The above does not mean "invalid": it checks if the previous block
|
||||||
|
// hasn't been validated up to BLOCK_VALID_SCRIPTS. This is a performance
|
||||||
|
// optimization, in the common case of adding a new block to the tip,
|
||||||
|
// we don't need to iterate over the failed blocks list.
|
||||||
for (const CBlockIndex* failedit : m_failed_blocks) {
|
for (const CBlockIndex* failedit : m_failed_blocks) {
|
||||||
if (pindexPrev->GetAncestor(failedit->nHeight) == failedit) {
|
if (pindexPrev->GetAncestor(failedit->nHeight) == failedit) {
|
||||||
assert(failedit->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_VALID);
|
assert(failedit->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_VALID);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue