Fix calculation of balances and available coins.

No longer consider coins which aren't in our mempool.

Add test for regression in abandonconflict.py
This commit is contained in:
Alex Morcos 2016-03-17 12:48:05 -04:00
parent f034bced26
commit 68d4282774
2 changed files with 13 additions and 2 deletions

View file

@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# inputs are still spent, but change not received
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert(newbalance == balance - Decimal("24.9996"))
# Unconfirmed received funds that are not in mempool, also shouldn't show
# up in unconfirmed balance
unconfbalance = self.nodes[0].getunconfirmedbalance() + self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert(unconfbalance == newbalance)
# Also shouldn't show up in listunspent
assert(not txABC2 in [utxo["txid"] for utxo in self.nodes[0].listunspent(0)])
balance = newbalance
# Abandon original transaction and verify inputs are available again

View file

@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ CAmount CWallet::GetUnconfirmedBalance() const
for (map<uint256, CWalletTx>::const_iterator it = mapWallet.begin(); it != mapWallet.end(); ++it)
{
const CWalletTx* pcoin = &(*it).second;
if (!CheckFinalTx(*pcoin) || (!pcoin->IsTrusted() && pcoin->GetDepthInMainChain() == 0))
if (!pcoin->IsTrusted() && pcoin->GetDepthInMainChain() == 0 && pcoin->InMempool())
nTotal += pcoin->GetAvailableCredit();
}
}
@ -1623,7 +1623,7 @@ CAmount CWallet::GetUnconfirmedWatchOnlyBalance() const
for (map<uint256, CWalletTx>::const_iterator it = mapWallet.begin(); it != mapWallet.end(); ++it)
{
const CWalletTx* pcoin = &(*it).second;
if (!CheckFinalTx(*pcoin) || (!pcoin->IsTrusted() && pcoin->GetDepthInMainChain() == 0))
if (!pcoin->IsTrusted() && pcoin->GetDepthInMainChain() == 0 && pcoin->InMempool())
nTotal += pcoin->GetAvailableWatchOnlyCredit();
}
}
@ -1668,6 +1668,11 @@ void CWallet::AvailableCoins(vector<COutput>& vCoins, bool fOnlyConfirmed, const
if (nDepth < 0)
continue;
// We should not consider coins which aren't at least in our mempool
// It's possible for these to be conflicted via ancestors which we may never be able to detect
if (nDepth == 0 && !pcoin->InMempool())
continue;
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < pcoin->vout.size(); i++) {
isminetype mine = IsMine(pcoin->vout[i]);
if (!(IsSpent(wtxid, i)) && mine != ISMINE_NO &&