LBRYCommunity/lbrycrd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 29 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 32 Packages Wiki Activity

Merge #16471: [mempool] log correct messages when CPFP fails

Browse source 
42a5e912ee [mempool] log correct messages when CPFP fails (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  Fixes a logging issue introduced in #15681

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK 42a5e912ee (+utACK from bluematt that isn't registered because it has no commit id)

Tree-SHA512: ff5f423cc4d22838eea00c5b1d39ceda89cd61474c72f256a97c698eb0ec3f2156a97139f537669376132902c1e3943bf84c356a4b98a9a306b4ec57302c2761
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan 2019-07-29 18:55:12 +02:00
commit 68da54987d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E4AED62986CD25D
2 changed files with 8 additions and 6 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/validation.cpp
View file

@ -618,6 +618,8 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
std::string errString; std::string errString;
if (!pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, setAncestors, nLimitAncestors, nLimitAncestorSize, nLimitDescendants, nLimitDescendantSize, errString)) { if (!pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, setAncestors, nLimitAncestors, nLimitAncestorSize, nLimitDescendants, nLimitDescendantSize, errString)) {
setAncestors.clear(); setAncestors.clear();
// If CalculateMemPoolAncestors fails second time, we want the original error string.
std::string dummy_err_string;
// If the new transaction is relatively small (up to 40k weight) // If the new transaction is relatively small (up to 40k weight)
// and has at most one ancestor (ie ancestor limit of 2, including // and has at most one ancestor (ie ancestor limit of 2, including
// the new transaction), allow it if its parent has exactly the // the new transaction), allow it if its parent has exactly the
@ -629,7 +631,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
// outputs - one for each counterparty. For more info on the uses for // outputs - one for each counterparty. For more info on the uses for
// this, see https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-November/016518.html // this, see https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-November/016518.html
if (nSize > EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT || if (nSize > EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT ||
!pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, setAncestors, 2, nLimitAncestorSize, nLimitDescendants + 1, nLimitDescendantSize + EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT, errString)) { !pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, setAncestors, 2, nLimitAncestorSize, nLimitDescendants + 1, nLimitDescendantSize + EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT, dummy_err_string)) {
return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too-long-mempool-chain", errString); return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too-long-mempool-chain", errString);
} }
} }

10
test/functional/mempool_package_onemore.py
View file

@ -66,14 +66,14 @@ class MempoolPackagesTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool(True)), MAX_ANCESTORS + 1) assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool(True)), MAX_ANCESTORS + 1)
# Adding one more transaction on to the chain should fail. # Adding one more transaction on to the chain should fail.
assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "too-long-mempool-chain", self.chain_transaction, self.nodes[0], [txid], [0], value, fee, 1) assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "too-long-mempool-chain, too many unconfirmed ancestors [limit: 25]", self.chain_transaction, self.nodes[0], [txid], [0], value, fee, 1)
# ...even if it chains on from some point in the middle of the chain. # ...even if it chains on from some point in the middle of the chain.
assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "too-long-mempool-chain", self.chain_transaction, self.nodes[0], [chain[2][0]], [1], chain[2][1], fee, 1) assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "too-long-mempool-chain, too many descendants", self.chain_transaction, self.nodes[0], [chain[2][0]], [1], chain[2][1], fee, 1)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "too-long-mempool-chain", self.chain_transaction, self.nodes[0], [chain[1][0]], [1], chain[1][1], fee, 1) assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "too-long-mempool-chain, too many descendants", self.chain_transaction, self.nodes[0], [chain[1][0]], [1], chain[1][1], fee, 1)
# ...even if it chains on to two parent transactions with one in the chain. # ...even if it chains on to two parent transactions with one in the chain.
assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "too-long-mempool-chain", self.chain_transaction, self.nodes[0], [chain[0][0], second_chain], [1, 0], chain[0][1] + second_chain_value, fee, 1) assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "too-long-mempool-chain, too many descendants", self.chain_transaction, self.nodes[0], [chain[0][0], second_chain], [1, 0], chain[0][1] + second_chain_value, fee, 1)
# ...especially if its > 40k weight # ...especially if its > 40k weight
assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "too-long-mempool-chain", self.chain_transaction, self.nodes[0], [chain[0][0]], [1], chain[0][1], fee, 350) assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "too-long-mempool-chain, too many descendants", self.chain_transaction, self.nodes[0], [chain[0][0]], [1], chain[0][1], fee, 350)
# But not if it chains directly off the first transaction # But not if it chains directly off the first transaction
self.chain_transaction(self.nodes[0], [chain[0][0]], [1], chain[0][1], fee, 1) self.chain_transaction(self.nodes[0], [chain[0][0]], [1], chain[0][1], fee, 1)
# and the second chain should work just fine # and the second chain should work just fine