change blockchain -> block chain (spelling)
- Wiki says "block chain" is correct ;) - remove some unneeded spaces I found in the source, while fixing the spelling
This commit is contained in:
parent
d44f1ea394
commit
729b180686
6 changed files with 13 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ bool AppInit2()
|
|||
BOOST_FOREACH(string strDest, mapMultiArgs["-seednode"])
|
||||
AddOneShot(strDest);
|
||||
|
||||
// ********************************************************* Step 7: load blockchain
|
||||
// ********************************************************* Step 7: load block chain
|
||||
|
||||
if (!bitdb.Open(GetDataDir()))
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ bool CTransaction::CheckInputs(CCoinsViewCache &inputs, enum CheckSig_mode csmod
|
|||
// Helps prevent CPU exhaustion attacks.
|
||||
|
||||
// Skip ECDSA signature verification when connecting blocks
|
||||
// before the last blockchain checkpoint. This is safe because block merkle hashes are
|
||||
// before the last block chain checkpoint. This is safe because block merkle hashes are
|
||||
// still computed and checked, and any change will be caught at the next checkpoint.
|
||||
if (csmode == CS_ALWAYS ||
|
||||
(csmode == CS_AFTER_CHECKPOINT && inputs.GetBestBlock()->nHeight >= Checkpoints::GetTotalBlocksEstimate())) {
|
||||
|
@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ bool CBlock::ConnectBlock(CBlockIndex* pindex, CCoinsViewCache &view, bool fJust
|
|||
return error("ConnectBlock() : WriteBlockIndex failed");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// add this block to the view's blockchain
|
||||
// add this block to the view's block chain
|
||||
if (!view.SetBestBlock(pindex))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ public:
|
|||
// unspent transaction outputs; spent outputs are .IsNull(); spent outputs at the end of the array are dropped
|
||||
std::vector<CTxOut> vout;
|
||||
|
||||
// at which height this transaction was included in the active blockchain
|
||||
// at which height this transaction was included in the active block chain
|
||||
int nHeight;
|
||||
|
||||
// version of the CTransaction; accesses to this value should probably check for nHeight as well,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ Value signrawtransaction(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
|
|||
"signrawtransaction <hex string> [{\"txid\":txid,\"vout\":n,\"scriptPubKey\":hex},...] [<privatekey1>,...] [sighashtype=\"ALL\"]\n"
|
||||
"Sign inputs for raw transaction (serialized, hex-encoded).\n"
|
||||
"Second optional argument (may be null) is an array of previous transaction outputs that\n"
|
||||
"this transaction depends on but may not yet be in the blockchain.\n"
|
||||
"this transaction depends on but may not yet be in the block chain.\n"
|
||||
"Third optional argument (may be null) is an array of base58-encoded private\n"
|
||||
"keys that, if given, will be the only keys used to sign the transaction.\n"
|
||||
"Fourth optional argument is a string that is one of six values; ALL, NONE, SINGLE or\n"
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_checknbits)
|
|||
{
|
||||
using namespace boost::assign; // for 'map_list_of()'
|
||||
|
||||
// Timestamps,nBits from the bitcoin blockchain.
|
||||
// Timestamps,nBits from the bitcoin block chain.
|
||||
// These are the block-chain checkpoint blocks
|
||||
typedef std::map<int64, unsigned int> BlockData;
|
||||
BlockData chainData =
|
||||
|
@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_checknbits)
|
|||
|
||||
// ... but OK if enough time passed for difficulty to adjust downward:
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CheckNBits(firstcheck.second, lastcheck.first+60*60*24*365*4, lastcheck.second, lastcheck.first));
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
CTransaction RandomOrphan()
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ sign_multisig(CScript scriptPubKey, std::vector<CKey> keys, CTransaction transac
|
|||
// NOTE: CHECKMULTISIG has an unfortunate bug; it requires
|
||||
// one extra item on the stack, before the signatures.
|
||||
// Putting OP_0 on the stack is the workaround;
|
||||
// fixing the bug would mean splitting the blockchain (old
|
||||
// fixing the bug would mean splitting the block chain (old
|
||||
// clients would not accept new CHECKMULTISIG transactions,
|
||||
// and vice-versa)
|
||||
//
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue