Fix issue with conflicted mempool tx in listsinceblock

listsinceblock now checks that returned transactions are not
conflicting with any transactions that are filtered out by
the given blockhash

Co-Authored-By: Michael Chrostowski <michael.chrostowski@gmail.com>

Github-Pull: #17258
Rebased-From: 436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73
This commit is contained in:
Adam Jonas 2019-10-21 15:42:06 -04:00 committed by João Barbosa
parent eafcea7a0a
commit 88729d804e
2 changed files with 50 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ static UniValue listsinceblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
for (const std::pair<const uint256, CWalletTx>& pairWtx : pwallet->mapWallet) {
CWalletTx tx = pairWtx.second;
if (depth == -1 || tx.GetDepthInMainChain(*locked_chain) < depth) {
if (depth == -1 || abs(tx.GetDepthInMainChain(*locked_chain)) < depth) {
ListTransactions(*locked_chain, pwallet, tx, 0, true, transactions, filter, nullptr /* filter_label */);
}
}

View file

@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
"""Test the listsincelast RPC."""
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.messages import BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER
from test_framework.util import (
assert_array_result,
assert_equal,
@ -12,6 +13,7 @@ from test_framework.util import (
connect_nodes,
)
from decimal import Decimal
class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.test_reorg()
self.test_double_spend()
self.test_double_send()
self.double_spends_filtered()
def test_no_blockhash(self):
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 1)
@ -291,5 +294,51 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
if tx['txid'] == txid1:
assert_equal(tx['confirmations'], 2)
def double_spends_filtered(self):
'''
`listsinceblock` was returning conflicted transactions even if they
occurred before the specified cutoff blockhash
'''
spending_node = self.nodes[2]
dest_address = spending_node.getnewaddress()
tx_input = dict(
sequence=BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER, **next(u for u in spending_node.listunspent()))
rawtx = spending_node.createrawtransaction(
[tx_input], {dest_address: tx_input["amount"] - Decimal("0.00051000"),
spending_node.getrawchangeaddress(): Decimal("0.00050000")})
signedtx = spending_node.signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx)
orig_tx_id = spending_node.sendrawtransaction(signedtx["hex"])
original_tx = spending_node.gettransaction(orig_tx_id)
double_tx = spending_node.bumpfee(orig_tx_id)
# check that both transactions exist
block_hash = spending_node.listsinceblock(
spending_node.getblockhash(spending_node.getblockcount()))
original_found = False
double_found = False
for tx in block_hash['transactions']:
if tx['txid'] == original_tx['txid']:
original_found = True
if tx['txid'] == double_tx['txid']:
double_found = True
assert_equal(original_found, True)
assert_equal(double_found, True)
lastblockhash = spending_node.generate(1)[0]
# check that neither transaction exists
block_hash = spending_node.listsinceblock(lastblockhash)
original_found = False
double_found = False
for tx in block_hash['transactions']:
if tx['txid'] == original_tx['txid']:
original_found = True
if tx['txid'] == double_tx['txid']:
double_found = True
assert_equal(original_found, False)
assert_equal(double_found, False)
if __name__ == '__main__':
ListSinceBlockTest().main()