Check signatures before respend relay
Check that all inputs are completely valid before actually relaying a double-spend.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f04f123407
commit
88dd3598d2
1 changed files with 22 additions and 15 deletions
37
src/main.cpp
37
src/main.cpp
|
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ namespace {
|
|||
|
||||
// Forward reference functions defined here:
|
||||
static const unsigned int MAX_DOUBLESPEND_BLOOM = 1000;
|
||||
static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter);
|
||||
static bool RelayableRespend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter);
|
||||
|
||||
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
//
|
||||
|
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ struct CMainSignals {
|
|||
// transaction was first seen in a block.
|
||||
// Note: only notifies if the previous transaction is in the memory pool; if previous transction was in a block,
|
||||
// then the double-spend simply fails when we try to lookup the inputs in the current UTXO set.
|
||||
boost::signals2::signal<void (const COutPoint&, const CTransaction&, bool)> DetectedDoubleSpend;
|
||||
boost::signals2::signal<bool (const COutPoint&, const CTransaction&, bool)> DetectedDoubleSpend;
|
||||
} g_signals;
|
||||
|
||||
} // anon namespace
|
||||
|
@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ void RegisterInternalSignals() {
|
|||
seed_insecure_rand();
|
||||
doubleSpendFilter = CBloomFilter(MAX_DOUBLESPEND_BLOOM, 0.01, insecure_rand(), BLOOM_UPDATE_NONE);
|
||||
|
||||
g_signals.DetectedDoubleSpend.connect(boost::bind(RelayDoubleSpend, _1, _2, _3, doubleSpendFilter));
|
||||
g_signals.DetectedDoubleSpend.connect(boost::bind(RelayableRespend, _1, _2, _3, doubleSpendFilter));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -936,6 +936,7 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for conflicts with in-memory transactions
|
||||
bool relayableRespend = false;
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK(pool.cs); // protect pool.mapNextTx
|
||||
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < tx.vin.size(); i++)
|
||||
|
@ -944,8 +945,9 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa
|
|||
// Does tx conflict with a member of the pool, and is it not equivalent to that member?
|
||||
if (pool.mapNextTx.count(outpoint) && !tx.IsEquivalentTo(*pool.mapNextTx[outpoint].ptx))
|
||||
{
|
||||
g_signals.DetectedDoubleSpend(outpoint, tx, false);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
relayableRespend = g_signals.DetectedDoubleSpend(outpoint, tx, false);
|
||||
if (!relayableRespend)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1038,16 +1040,24 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa
|
|||
{
|
||||
return error("AcceptToMemoryPool: : ConnectInputs failed %s", hash.ToString());
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Store transaction in memory
|
||||
pool.addUnchecked(hash, entry);
|
||||
|
||||
if (relayableRespend)
|
||||
{
|
||||
RelayTransaction(tx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Store transaction in memory
|
||||
pool.addUnchecked(hash, entry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
g_signals.SyncTransaction(tx, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return !relayableRespend;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter)
|
||||
static bool RelayableRespend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Relaying double-spend attempts to our peers lets them detect when
|
||||
// somebody might be trying to cheat them. However, blindly relaying
|
||||
|
@ -1060,7 +1070,7 @@ static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doub
|
|||
// from us they are very likely to hear about it from another peer, since
|
||||
// each peer uses a different, randomized bloom filter.
|
||||
|
||||
if (fInBlock || filter.contains(outPoint)) return;
|
||||
if (fInBlock || filter.contains(outPoint)) return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Apply an independent rate limit to double-spend relays
|
||||
static double dRespendCount;
|
||||
|
@ -1071,7 +1081,7 @@ static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doub
|
|||
if (RateLimitExceeded(dRespendCount, nLastRespendTime, nRespendLimit, nSize))
|
||||
{
|
||||
LogPrint("mempool", "Double-spend relay rejected by rate limiter\n");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LogPrint("mempool", "Rate limit dRespendCount: %g => %g\n", dRespendCount, dRespendCount+nSize);
|
||||
|
@ -1083,10 +1093,7 @@ static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doub
|
|||
|
||||
filter.insert(outPoint);
|
||||
|
||||
RelayTransaction(doubleSpend);
|
||||
|
||||
// Share conflict with wallet
|
||||
g_signals.SyncTransaction(doubleSpend, NULL);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue