Fix that CWallet::AbandonTransaction would only traverse one level

Prior to this change, it would mark only the first layer of
child transactions abandoned, due to always following the input hashTx
rather than the current now tx.
This commit is contained in:
Ben Woosley 2018-07-12 17:19:00 -04:00
parent dcb154e5aa
commit 89e70f9d7f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 6EE5F3785F78B345
2 changed files with 11 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ bool CWallet::AbandonTransaction(const uint256& hashTx)
batch.WriteTx(wtx);
NotifyTransactionChanged(this, wtx.GetHash(), CT_UPDATED);
// Iterate over all its outputs, and mark transactions in the wallet that spend them abandoned too
TxSpends::const_iterator iter = mapTxSpends.lower_bound(COutPoint(hashTx, 0));
TxSpends::const_iterator iter = mapTxSpends.lower_bound(COutPoint(now, 0));
while (iter != mapTxSpends.end() && iter->first.hash == now) {
if (!done.count(iter->second)) {
todo.insert(iter->second);

View file

@ -70,9 +70,17 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
signed2 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
txABC2 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
# Create a child tx spending ABC2
signed3_change = Decimal("24.999")
inputs = [ {"txid":txABC2, "vout":0} ]
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): signed3_change }
signed3 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
# note tx is never directly referenced, only abandoned as a child of the above
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed3["hex"])
# In mempool txs from self should increase balance from change
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("30") + Decimal("24.9996"))
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("30") + signed3_change)
balance = newbalance
# Restart the node with a higher min relay fee so the parent tx is no longer in mempool
@ -87,7 +95,7 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# Not in mempool txs from self should only reduce balance
# inputs are still spent, but change not received
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996"))
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - signed3_change)
# Unconfirmed received funds that are not in mempool, also shouldn't show
# up in unconfirmed balance
unconfbalance = self.nodes[0].getunconfirmedbalance() + self.nodes[0].getbalance()