don't force the segwit rule on people
let it go w/o segwit
This commit is contained in:
parent
76e3d8861c
commit
9a072d06d5
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -567,8 +567,6 @@ static UniValue getblocktemplate(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// NOTE: If at some point we support pre-segwit miners post-segwit-activation, this needs to take segwit support into consideration
|
// NOTE: If at some point we support pre-segwit miners post-segwit-activation, this needs to take segwit support into consideration
|
||||||
const bool fPreSegWit = (ThresholdState::ACTIVE != VersionBitsState(pindexPrev, consensusParams, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT, versionbitscache));
|
const bool fPreSegWit = (ThresholdState::ACTIVE != VersionBitsState(pindexPrev, consensusParams, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT, versionbitscache));
|
||||||
if (!fPreSegWit && !fSupportsSegwit)
|
|
||||||
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Segwit support is now required. Please include \"segwit\" in the client's rules.");
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
UniValue aCaps(UniValue::VARR); aCaps.push_back("proposal");
|
UniValue aCaps(UniValue::VARR); aCaps.push_back("proposal");
|
||||||
UniValue result(UniValue::VOBJ);
|
UniValue result(UniValue::VOBJ);
|
||||||
|
@ -587,7 +585,7 @@ static UniValue getblocktemplate(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
UniValue entry(UniValue::VOBJ);
|
UniValue entry(UniValue::VOBJ);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
entry.pushKV("data", EncodeHexTx(tx));
|
entry.pushKV("data", EncodeHexTx(tx, fSupportsSegwit ? 0 : SERIALIZE_TRANSACTION_NO_WITNESS));
|
||||||
entry.pushKV("txid", txHash.GetHex());
|
entry.pushKV("txid", txHash.GetHex());
|
||||||
entry.pushKV("hash", tx.GetWitnessHash().GetHex());
|
entry.pushKV("hash", tx.GetWitnessHash().GetHex());
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -624,8 +622,6 @@ static UniValue getblocktemplate(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
|
||||||
aMutable.push_back("transactions");
|
aMutable.push_back("transactions");
|
||||||
aMutable.push_back("prevblock");
|
aMutable.push_back("prevblock");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
result.pushKV("capabilities", aCaps);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
UniValue aRules(UniValue::VARR);
|
UniValue aRules(UniValue::VARR);
|
||||||
UniValue vbavailable(UniValue::VOBJ);
|
UniValue vbavailable(UniValue::VOBJ);
|
||||||
for (int j = 0; j < (int)Consensus::MAX_VERSION_BITS_DEPLOYMENTS; ++j) {
|
for (int j = 0; j < (int)Consensus::MAX_VERSION_BITS_DEPLOYMENTS; ++j) {
|
||||||
|
@ -656,6 +652,9 @@ static UniValue getblocktemplate(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
// Add to rules only
|
// Add to rules only
|
||||||
const struct VBDeploymentInfo& vbinfo = VersionBitsDeploymentInfo[pos];
|
const struct VBDeploymentInfo& vbinfo = VersionBitsDeploymentInfo[pos];
|
||||||
|
if (pos == Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT && !fSupportsSegwit)
|
||||||
|
aCaps.push_back(gbt_vb_name(pos));
|
||||||
|
else
|
||||||
aRules.push_back(gbt_vb_name(pos));
|
aRules.push_back(gbt_vb_name(pos));
|
||||||
if (setClientRules.find(vbinfo.name) == setClientRules.end()) {
|
if (setClientRules.find(vbinfo.name) == setClientRules.end()) {
|
||||||
// Not supported by the client; make sure it's safe to proceed
|
// Not supported by the client; make sure it's safe to proceed
|
||||||
|
@ -668,6 +667,7 @@ static UniValue getblocktemplate(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
result.pushKV("capabilities", aCaps);
|
||||||
result.pushKV("version", pblock->nVersion);
|
result.pushKV("version", pblock->nVersion);
|
||||||
result.pushKV("rules", aRules);
|
result.pushKV("rules", aRules);
|
||||||
result.pushKV("vbavailable", vbavailable);
|
result.pushKV("vbavailable", vbavailable);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue