Merge #11655: net: Assert state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header in ConsiderEviction
63c2d83
Explicitly state assumption that state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr in ConsiderEviction (practicalswift) Pull request description: Explicitly state assumption that `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr` in `ConsiderEviction(…)`. Static analyzer (and humans!) will see the null-check in ... ``` else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout == 0 || (state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr && ... ``` ... and infer that `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header` might be set to `nullptr` when reaching `else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout > 0 && time_in_seconds > state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout)` and thus flag `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString()` as a potential null pointer dereference. This commit makes the tacit assumption of `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr` explicit. Code introduced in5a6d00c6de
("Permit disconnection of outbound peers on bad/slow chains") which was merged into master four days ago. Friendly ping @sdaftuar :-) Tree-SHA512: 32e5631025b7ba7556a02c89d040fbe339c482a03f28d0dbc9871c699e1f8ac867619b89c5fd41fdcfcf0dc4d7c859295b26ccd988572145cc244261aec18ce9
This commit is contained in:
commit
aca77a4d58
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -3006,6 +3006,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ConsiderEviction(CNode *pto, int64_t time_in_seconds)
|
||||||
LogPrintf("Disconnecting outbound peer %d for old chain, best known block = %s\n", pto->GetId(), state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr ? state.pindexBestKnownBlock->GetBlockHash().ToString() : "<none>");
|
LogPrintf("Disconnecting outbound peer %d for old chain, best known block = %s\n", pto->GetId(), state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr ? state.pindexBestKnownBlock->GetBlockHash().ToString() : "<none>");
|
||||||
pto->fDisconnect = true;
|
pto->fDisconnect = true;
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
assert(state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header);
|
||||||
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "sending getheaders to outbound peer=%d to verify chain work (current best known block:%s, benchmark blockhash: %s)\n", pto->GetId(), state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr ? state.pindexBestKnownBlock->GetBlockHash().ToString() : "<none>", state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString());
|
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "sending getheaders to outbound peer=%d to verify chain work (current best known block:%s, benchmark blockhash: %s)\n", pto->GetId(), state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr ? state.pindexBestKnownBlock->GetBlockHash().ToString() : "<none>", state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString());
|
||||||
connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, chainActive.GetLocator(state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->pprev), uint256()));
|
connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, chainActive.GetLocator(state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->pprev), uint256()));
|
||||||
state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders = true;
|
state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders = true;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue