Merge #10699: Make all script validation flags backward compatible
01013f5
Simplify tx validation tests (Pieter Wuille)2dd6f80
Add a test that all flags are softforks (Pieter Wuille)2851b77
Make all script verification flags softforks (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This change makes `SCRIPT_VERIFY_UPGRADABLE_NOPS` not apply to `OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` and `OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY`. This is a no-op as `UPGRADABLE_NOPS` is only set for mempool transactions, and those always have `SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` and `SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY` set as well. The advantage is that setting more flags now always results in a reduction in acceptable scripts (=softfork). This results in a nice and testable property for validation, for which a new test is added. This also means that the introduction of a new definition for a NOP or witness version will likely need the following procedure (example OP_NOP8 here) * Remove OP_NOP8 from being affected by `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS`. * Add a `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_NOP8`, which only applies to `OP_NOP8`. * Add a `SCRIPT_VERIFY_NOP8` which implements the new consensus logic. * Before activation, add `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_NOP8` to the mempool flags. * After activation, add `SCRIPT_VERIFY_NOP8` to both the mempool and consensus flags. Tree-SHA512: d3b4538986ecf646aac9dba13a8d89318baf9e308e258547ca3b99e7c0509747f323edac6b1fea4e87e7d3c01b71193794b41679ae4f86f6e11ed6be3fd62c72
This commit is contained in:
commit
c0902624b0
5 changed files with 33 additions and 31 deletions
|
@ -349,9 +349,6 @@ bool EvalScript(std::vector<std::vector<unsigned char> >& stack, const CScript&
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (!(flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY)) {
|
||||
// not enabled; treat as a NOP2
|
||||
if (flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS) {
|
||||
return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -391,9 +388,6 @@ bool EvalScript(std::vector<std::vector<unsigned char> >& stack, const CScript&
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (!(flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY)) {
|
||||
// not enabled; treat as a NOP3
|
||||
if (flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS) {
|
||||
return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -27,37 +27,40 @@ enum
|
|||
SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY = 0x80,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/** Script verification flags */
|
||||
/** Script verification flags.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* All flags are intended to be soft forks: the set of acceptable scripts under
|
||||
* flags (A | B) is a subset of the acceptable scripts under flag (A).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
enum
|
||||
{
|
||||
SCRIPT_VERIFY_NONE = 0,
|
||||
|
||||
// Evaluate P2SH subscripts (softfork safe, BIP16).
|
||||
// Evaluate P2SH subscripts (BIP16).
|
||||
SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH = (1U << 0),
|
||||
|
||||
// Passing a non-strict-DER signature or one with undefined hashtype to a checksig operation causes script failure.
|
||||
// Evaluating a pubkey that is not (0x04 + 64 bytes) or (0x02 or 0x03 + 32 bytes) by checksig causes script failure.
|
||||
// (softfork safe, but not used or intended as a consensus rule).
|
||||
// (not used or intended as a consensus rule).
|
||||
SCRIPT_VERIFY_STRICTENC = (1U << 1),
|
||||
|
||||
// Passing a non-strict-DER signature to a checksig operation causes script failure (softfork safe, BIP62 rule 1)
|
||||
// Passing a non-strict-DER signature to a checksig operation causes script failure (BIP62 rule 1)
|
||||
SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG = (1U << 2),
|
||||
|
||||
// Passing a non-strict-DER signature or one with S > order/2 to a checksig operation causes script failure
|
||||
// (softfork safe, BIP62 rule 5).
|
||||
// (BIP62 rule 5).
|
||||
SCRIPT_VERIFY_LOW_S = (1U << 3),
|
||||
|
||||
// verify dummy stack item consumed by CHECKMULTISIG is of zero-length (softfork safe, BIP62 rule 7).
|
||||
// verify dummy stack item consumed by CHECKMULTISIG is of zero-length (BIP62 rule 7).
|
||||
SCRIPT_VERIFY_NULLDUMMY = (1U << 4),
|
||||
|
||||
// Using a non-push operator in the scriptSig causes script failure (softfork safe, BIP62 rule 2).
|
||||
// Using a non-push operator in the scriptSig causes script failure (BIP62 rule 2).
|
||||
SCRIPT_VERIFY_SIGPUSHONLY = (1U << 5),
|
||||
|
||||
// Require minimal encodings for all push operations (OP_0... OP_16, OP_1NEGATE where possible, direct
|
||||
// pushes up to 75 bytes, OP_PUSHDATA up to 255 bytes, OP_PUSHDATA2 for anything larger). Evaluating
|
||||
// any other push causes the script to fail (BIP62 rule 3).
|
||||
// In addition, whenever a stack element is interpreted as a number, it must be of minimal length (BIP62 rule 4).
|
||||
// (softfork safe)
|
||||
SCRIPT_VERIFY_MINIMALDATA = (1U << 6),
|
||||
|
||||
// Discourage use of NOPs reserved for upgrades (NOP1-10)
|
||||
|
@ -68,12 +71,14 @@ enum
|
|||
// discouraged NOPs fails the script. This verification flag will never be
|
||||
// a mandatory flag applied to scripts in a block. NOPs that are not
|
||||
// executed, e.g. within an unexecuted IF ENDIF block, are *not* rejected.
|
||||
// NOPs that have associated forks to give them new meaning (CLTV, CSV)
|
||||
// are not subject to this rule.
|
||||
SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS = (1U << 7),
|
||||
|
||||
// Require that only a single stack element remains after evaluation. This changes the success criterion from
|
||||
// "At least one stack element must remain, and when interpreted as a boolean, it must be true" to
|
||||
// "Exactly one stack element must remain, and when interpreted as a boolean, it must be true".
|
||||
// (softfork safe, BIP62 rule 6)
|
||||
// (BIP62 rule 6)
|
||||
// Note: CLEANSTACK should never be used without P2SH or WITNESS.
|
||||
SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK = (1U << 8),
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -862,8 +862,6 @@
|
|||
|
||||
["Ensure 100% coverage of discouraged NOPS"],
|
||||
["1", "NOP1", "P2SH,DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS", "DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS"],
|
||||
["1", "CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY", "P2SH,DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS", "DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS"],
|
||||
["1", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY", "P2SH,DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS", "DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS"],
|
||||
["1", "NOP4", "P2SH,DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS", "DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS"],
|
||||
["1", "NOP5", "P2SH,DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS", "DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS"],
|
||||
["1", "NOP6", "P2SH,DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS", "DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS"],
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -166,6 +166,17 @@ void DoTest(const CScript& scriptPubKey, const CScript& scriptSig, const CScript
|
|||
CMutableTransaction tx2 = tx;
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(VerifyScript(scriptSig, scriptPubKey, &scriptWitness, flags, MutableTransactionSignatureChecker(&tx, 0, txCredit.vout[0].nValue), &err) == expect, message);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(err == scriptError, std::string(FormatScriptError(err)) + " where " + std::string(FormatScriptError((ScriptError_t)scriptError)) + " expected: " + message);
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify that removing flags from a passing test or adding flags to a failing test does not change the result.
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
|
||||
int extra_flags = InsecureRandBits(16);
|
||||
int combined_flags = expect ? (flags & ~extra_flags) : (flags | extra_flags);
|
||||
// Weed out some invalid flag combinations.
|
||||
if (combined_flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK && ~combined_flags & (SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS)) continue;
|
||||
if (combined_flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS && ~combined_flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH) continue;
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(VerifyScript(scriptSig, scriptPubKey, &scriptWitness, combined_flags, MutableTransactionSignatureChecker(&tx, 0, txCredit.vout[0].nValue), &err) == expect, message + strprintf(" (with flags %x)", combined_flags));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(HAVE_CONSENSUS_LIB)
|
||||
CDataStream stream(SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
|
||||
stream << tx2;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
// should fail.
|
||||
// Capture this interaction with the upgraded_nop argument: set it when evaluating
|
||||
// any script flag that is implemented as an upgraded NOP code.
|
||||
void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CMutableTransaction &tx, uint32_t failing_flags, bool add_to_cache, bool upgraded_nop)
|
||||
void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CMutableTransaction &tx, uint32_t failing_flags, bool add_to_cache)
|
||||
{
|
||||
PrecomputedTransactionData txdata(tx);
|
||||
// If we add many more flags, this loop can get too expensive, but we can
|
||||
|
@ -124,12 +124,6 @@ void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CMutableTransaction &tx, uint32_t failing_fl
|
|||
// CheckInputs should succeed iff test_flags doesn't intersect with
|
||||
// failing_flags
|
||||
bool expected_return_value = !(test_flags & failing_flags);
|
||||
if (expected_return_value && upgraded_nop) {
|
||||
// If the script flag being tested corresponds to an upgraded NOP,
|
||||
// then script execution should fail if DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS
|
||||
// is set.
|
||||
expected_return_value = !(test_flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, expected_return_value);
|
||||
|
||||
// Test the caching
|
||||
|
@ -218,7 +212,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
// not present. Don't add these checks to the cache, so that we can
|
||||
// test later that block validation works fine in the absence of cached
|
||||
// successes.
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(spend_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG | SCRIPT_VERIFY_LOW_S | SCRIPT_VERIFY_STRICTENC, false, false);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(spend_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG | SCRIPT_VERIFY_LOW_S | SCRIPT_VERIFY_STRICTENC, false);
|
||||
|
||||
// And if we produce a block with this tx, it should be valid (DERSIG not
|
||||
// enabled yet), even though there's no cache entry.
|
||||
|
@ -243,7 +237,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
std::vector<unsigned char> vchSig2(p2pk_scriptPubKey.begin(), p2pk_scriptPubKey.end());
|
||||
invalid_under_p2sh_tx.vin[0].scriptSig << vchSig2;
|
||||
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_under_p2sh_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH, true, false);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_under_p2sh_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Test CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY
|
||||
|
@ -266,7 +260,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
|
||||
invalid_with_cltv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 101;
|
||||
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_with_cltv_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, true);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_with_cltv_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make it valid, and check again
|
||||
invalid_with_cltv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 100;
|
||||
|
@ -294,7 +288,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
|
||||
invalid_with_csv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 101;
|
||||
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_with_csv_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, true);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_with_csv_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make it valid, and check again
|
||||
invalid_with_csv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 100;
|
||||
|
@ -323,11 +317,11 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
UpdateTransaction(valid_with_witness_tx, 0, sigdata);
|
||||
|
||||
// This should be valid under all script flags.
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(valid_with_witness_tx, 0, true, false);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(valid_with_witness_tx, 0, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Remove the witness, and check that it is now invalid.
|
||||
valid_with_witness_tx.vin[0].scriptWitness.SetNull();
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(valid_with_witness_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, false);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(valid_with_witness_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -352,7 +346,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// This should be valid under all script flags
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(tx, 0, true, false);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(tx, 0, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Check that if the second input is invalid, but the first input is
|
||||
// valid, the transaction is not cached.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue