[Trivial] add comment about setting peer as HB peer.
This adds a comment to the new logic for setting HB peers based on block validation (and aligns the code below to reflect the comment). It's not obvious why we're checking mapBlocksInFlight. Add a comment to explain.
This commit is contained in:
parent
af01cd3a3d
commit
dd5b0114cf
1 changed files with 9 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -865,7 +865,15 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked(const CBlock& block, const CValidationSta
|
|||
Misbehaving(it->second.first, nDoS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (state.IsValid() && !IsInitialBlockDownload() && mapBlocksInFlight.count(hash) == mapBlocksInFlight.size()) {
|
||||
// Check that:
|
||||
// 1. The block is valid
|
||||
// 2. We're not in initial block download
|
||||
// 3. This is currently the best block we're aware of. We haven't updated
|
||||
// the tip yet so we have no way to check this directly here. Instead we
|
||||
// just check that there are currently no other blocks in flight.
|
||||
else if (state.IsValid() &&
|
||||
!IsInitialBlockDownload() &&
|
||||
mapBlocksInFlight.count(hash) == mapBlocksInFlight.size()) {
|
||||
if (it != mapBlockSource.end()) {
|
||||
MaybeSetPeerAsAnnouncingHeaderAndIDs(it->second.first, *connman);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue