added additional unit tests, optimized queries
This commit is contained in:
parent
d896099593
commit
f9cb79349b
12 changed files with 147 additions and 26 deletions
|
@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ public:
|
|||
consensus.nAllowMinDiffMinHeight = -1;
|
||||
consensus.nAllowMinDiffMaxHeight = -1;
|
||||
consensus.nNormalizedNameForkHeight = 539940; // targeting 21 March 2019
|
||||
consensus.nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight = 297706;
|
||||
consensus.nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight = 100000000;
|
||||
consensus.nWitnessForkHeight = 680770; // targeting 11 Dec 2019
|
||||
consensus.nAllClaimsInMerkleForkHeight = 658310; // targeting 30 Oct 2019
|
||||
consensus.fPowAllowMinDifficultyBlocks = false;
|
||||
|
@ -244,6 +246,8 @@ public:
|
|||
consensus.nAllowMinDiffMinHeight = 277299;
|
||||
consensus.nAllowMinDiffMaxHeight = 1100000;
|
||||
consensus.nNormalizedNameForkHeight = 993380; // targeting, 21 Feb 2019
|
||||
consensus.nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight = 99;
|
||||
consensus.nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight = 100000000;
|
||||
consensus.nWitnessForkHeight = 1198600;
|
||||
consensus.nAllClaimsInMerkleForkHeight = 1198560; // targeting 30 Sep 2019
|
||||
consensus.fPowAllowMinDifficultyBlocks = true;
|
||||
|
@ -341,6 +345,8 @@ public:
|
|||
consensus.nAllowMinDiffMinHeight = -1;
|
||||
consensus.nAllowMinDiffMaxHeight = -1;
|
||||
consensus.nNormalizedNameForkHeight = 250; // SDK depends upon this number
|
||||
consensus.nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight = -1;
|
||||
consensus.nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight = -1;
|
||||
consensus.nWitnessForkHeight = 150;
|
||||
consensus.nAllClaimsInMerkleForkHeight = 350;
|
||||
consensus.fPowAllowMinDifficultyBlocks = false;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ void applyPragmas(sqlite::database& db, std::size_t cache)
|
|||
CClaimTrie::CClaimTrie(std::size_t cacheBytes, bool fWipe, int height,
|
||||
const std::string& dataDir,
|
||||
int nNormalizedNameForkHeight,
|
||||
int nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight,
|
||||
int nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight,
|
||||
int64_t nOriginalClaimExpirationTime,
|
||||
int64_t nExtendedClaimExpirationTime,
|
||||
int64_t nExtendedClaimExpirationForkHeight,
|
||||
|
@ -59,6 +61,8 @@ CClaimTrie::CClaimTrie(std::size_t cacheBytes, bool fWipe, int height,
|
|||
dbFile(dataDir + "/claims.sqlite"), db(dbFile, sharedConfig),
|
||||
nProportionalDelayFactor(proportionalDelayFactor),
|
||||
nNormalizedNameForkHeight(nNormalizedNameForkHeight),
|
||||
nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight(nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight),
|
||||
nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight(nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight),
|
||||
nOriginalClaimExpirationTime(nOriginalClaimExpirationTime),
|
||||
nExtendedClaimExpirationTime(nExtendedClaimExpirationTime),
|
||||
nExtendedClaimExpirationForkHeight(nExtendedClaimExpirationForkHeight),
|
||||
|
@ -639,24 +643,13 @@ bool CClaimTrieCacheBase::removeClaim(const uint160& claimId, const COutPoint& o
|
|||
// when node should be deleted from cache but instead it's kept
|
||||
// because it's a parent one and should not be effectively erased
|
||||
// we had a bug in the old code where that situation would force a zero delay on re-add
|
||||
if (nNextHeight >= 297706) { // TODO: hard fork this out (which we already tried once but failed)
|
||||
// we have to jump through some hoops here to make the claim_nodeName index be used on partial blobs
|
||||
// neither LIKE nor SUBSTR will use an index on a blob (which is lame because it would be simple)
|
||||
auto end = nodeName;
|
||||
auto usingRange = false;
|
||||
if (!end.empty() && end.back() < std::numeric_limits<char>::max()) {
|
||||
++end.back(); // the fast path
|
||||
usingRange = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// else
|
||||
// end += std::string(256U, std::numeric_limits<char>::max()); // 256 is our supposed max length claim, but that's not enforced anywhere presently
|
||||
auto query = usingRange ?
|
||||
(db << "SELECT nodeName FROM claim WHERE nodeName BETWEEN ?1 AND ?2 "
|
||||
"AND nodeName != ?2 AND activationHeight < ?3 AND expirationHeight > ?3 ORDER BY nodeName LIMIT 1"
|
||||
<< nodeName << end << nNextHeight) :
|
||||
(db << "SELECT nodeName FROM claim INDEXED BY claim_nodeName WHERE SUBSTR(nodeName, 1, ?3) = ?1 "
|
||||
"AND activationHeight < ?2 AND expirationHeight > ?2 ORDER BY nodeName LIMIT 1"
|
||||
<< nodeName << nNextHeight << nodeName.size());
|
||||
if (nNextHeight >= base->nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight
|
||||
&& nNextHeight < base->nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight) { // TODO: hard fork this out (which we already tried once but failed)
|
||||
// neither LIKE nor SUBSTR will use an index on a blob, but BETWEEN is a good, fast alternative
|
||||
auto end = nodeName + std::string( 256, std::numeric_limits<char>::max()); // 256 == MAX_CLAIM_NAME_SIZE + 1
|
||||
auto query = db << "SELECT nodeName FROM claim WHERE nodeName BETWEEN ?1 AND ?2 "
|
||||
"AND activationHeight < ?3 AND expirationHeight >= ?3 ORDER BY nodeName LIMIT 1"
|
||||
<< nodeName << end << nNextHeight;
|
||||
for (auto&& row: query) {
|
||||
std::string shortestMatch;
|
||||
row >> shortestMatch;
|
||||
|
@ -875,10 +868,15 @@ bool CClaimTrieCacheBase::getProofForName(const std::string& name, const uint160
|
|||
|
||||
bool CClaimTrieCacheBase::findNameForClaim(std::vector<unsigned char> claim, CClaimValue& value, std::string& name) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::reverse(claim.begin(), claim.end());
|
||||
if (claim.size() > 20U) // expecting RIPEMD160 -- 20 chars
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// because the data coming in here is reversed we support removing chars from the left of the claimID
|
||||
auto start = std::string(claim.rbegin(), claim.rend());
|
||||
auto end = start + std::string(21U - claim.size(), std::numeric_limits<char>::max());
|
||||
auto query = db << "SELECT nodeName, claimID, txID, txN, amount, activationHeight, blockHeight "
|
||||
"FROM claim WHERE SUBSTR(claimID, ?1) = ?2 AND activationHeight < ?3 AND expirationHeight >= ?3"
|
||||
<< -int(claim.size()) << claim << nNextHeight;
|
||||
"FROM claim WHERE claimID BETWEEN ?1 AND ?2 AND activationHeight < ?3 AND expirationHeight >= ?3 "
|
||||
"LIMIT 2"
|
||||
<< start << end << nNextHeight;
|
||||
auto hit = false;
|
||||
for (auto&& row: query) {
|
||||
if (hit) return false;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ public:
|
|||
CClaimTrie(std::size_t cacheBytes, bool fWipe, int height = 0,
|
||||
const std::string& dataDir = ".",
|
||||
int nNormalizedNameForkHeight = 1,
|
||||
int nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight = 1,
|
||||
int nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight = -1,
|
||||
int64_t nOriginalClaimExpirationTime = 1,
|
||||
int64_t nExtendedClaimExpirationTime = 1,
|
||||
int64_t nExtendedClaimExpirationForkHeight = 1,
|
||||
|
@ -50,6 +52,7 @@ protected:
|
|||
const int nProportionalDelayFactor;
|
||||
|
||||
const int nNormalizedNameForkHeight;
|
||||
const int nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight, nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight;
|
||||
const int64_t nOriginalClaimExpirationTime;
|
||||
const int64_t nExtendedClaimExpirationTime;
|
||||
const int64_t nExtendedClaimExpirationForkHeight;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ struct Params {
|
|||
int nAllowMinDiffMaxHeight;
|
||||
int nNormalizedNameForkHeight;
|
||||
|
||||
int nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight;
|
||||
int nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight;
|
||||
|
||||
int nWitnessForkHeight;
|
||||
|
||||
int64_t nPowTargetSpacing;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1546,6 +1546,8 @@ bool AppInitMain(InitInterfaces& interfaces)
|
|||
pclaimTrie = new CClaimTrie(nClaimtrieCache, fReindex || fReindexChainState, 0,
|
||||
GetDataDir().string(),
|
||||
consensus.nNormalizedNameForkHeight,
|
||||
consensus.nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight,
|
||||
consensus.nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight,
|
||||
consensus.nOriginalClaimExpirationTime,
|
||||
consensus.nExtendedClaimExpirationTime,
|
||||
consensus.nExtendedClaimExpirationForkHeight,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ UniValue getclaimbyid(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
|
|||
std::string claimId;
|
||||
ParseClaimtrieId(request.params[0], claimId, T_CLAIMID " (parameter 1)");
|
||||
|
||||
if (claimId.length() < 3)
|
||||
if (claimId.length() < 6)
|
||||
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, T_CLAIMID " (parameter 1) should be at least 3 chars");
|
||||
|
||||
std::string foundName;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -56,7 +56,40 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(unaffected_children_get_new_parents_test) {
|
|||
auto n2 = fixture.getNodeChildren("longest1");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(n1[0], "longest1");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(n2[0], "longest123");
|
||||
// TODO: this test at present fails to cover the split node case of the same thing (which occurs on block 202577)
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(4, fixture.nodeCount());
|
||||
|
||||
// now test the split node case of the same thing (which occurs on block 202577)
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx5 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), "longing", "5", 5);
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx6 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), "longing1234", "5", 5);
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(7, fixture.nodeCount());
|
||||
auto n3 = fixture.getNodeChildren("long");
|
||||
auto n4 = fixture.getNodeChildren("longing");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(n4[0], "longing1234");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(2U, n3.size());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(gen2_update_wins) {
|
||||
ClaimTrieChainFixture fixture;
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx1 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), "a", "1", 1);
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(2);
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx2 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), "a", "2", 2);
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(2);
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx3 = fixture.MakeUpdate(tx1, "a", "3", ClaimIdHash(tx1.GetHash(), 0), 3);
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(fixture.is_best_claim("a",tx3));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(gen3_update_wins) {
|
||||
ClaimTrieChainFixture fixture;
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx1 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), "a", "1", 1);
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx2 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), "a", "2", 4);
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx3 = fixture.MakeUpdate(tx1, "a", "3", ClaimIdHash(tx1.GetHash(), 0), 3);
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx4 = fixture.MakeUpdate(tx3, "a", "3", ClaimIdHash(tx1.GetHash(), 0), 5);
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(3);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(fixture.is_best_claim("a",tx4));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ BlockAssembler AssemblerForTest()
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ClaimTrieChainFixture::ClaimTrieChainFixture() : CClaimTrieCache(pclaimTrie),
|
||||
unique_block_counter(0), normalization_original(-1), expirationForkHeight(-1), forkhash_original(-1)
|
||||
unique_block_counter(0), normalization_original(-1), expirationForkHeight(-1), forkhash_original(-1),
|
||||
minRemovalWorkaroundHeight(-1), maxRemovalWorkaroundHeight(-1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
fRequireStandard = false;
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nNextHeight, chainActive.Height() + 1);
|
||||
|
@ -114,6 +115,25 @@ ClaimTrieChainFixture::~ClaimTrieChainFixture()
|
|||
consensus.nAllClaimsInMerkleForkHeight = forkhash_original;
|
||||
const_cast<int64_t&>(base->nAllClaimsInMerkleForkHeight) = forkhash_original;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (minRemovalWorkaroundHeight >= 0) {
|
||||
consensus.nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight = minRemovalWorkaroundHeight;
|
||||
consensus.nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight = maxRemovalWorkaroundHeight;
|
||||
const_cast<int&>(base->nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight) = minRemovalWorkaroundHeight;
|
||||
const_cast<int&>(base->nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight) = maxRemovalWorkaroundHeight;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void ClaimTrieChainFixture::setRemovalWorkaroundHeight(int targetMinusCurrent, int blocks = 1000) {
|
||||
int target = chainActive.Height() + targetMinusCurrent;
|
||||
auto& consensus = const_cast<Consensus::Params&>(Params().GetConsensus());
|
||||
if (minRemovalWorkaroundHeight < 0) {
|
||||
minRemovalWorkaroundHeight = consensus.nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight;
|
||||
maxRemovalWorkaroundHeight = consensus.nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight;
|
||||
}
|
||||
consensus.nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight = target;
|
||||
consensus.nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight = target + blocks;
|
||||
const_cast<int&>(base->nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight) = target;
|
||||
const_cast<int&>(base->nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight) = target + blocks;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void ClaimTrieChainFixture::setExpirationForkHeight(int targetMinusCurrent, int64_t preForkExpirationTime, int64_t postForkExpirationTime)
|
||||
|
@ -263,6 +283,11 @@ CMutableTransaction ClaimTrieChainFixture::MakeSupport(const CTransaction &prev,
|
|||
CMutableTransaction ClaimTrieChainFixture::MakeUpdate(const CTransaction &prev, const std::string& name, const std::string& value, const uint160& claimId, CAmount quantity)
|
||||
{
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx = BuildTransaction(prev, 0);
|
||||
if (prev.vout[0].nValue < quantity) {
|
||||
auto coverIt = GetCoinbase();
|
||||
tx.vin.push_back(CTxIn(coverIt.GetHash(), 0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = UpdateClaimScript(name, claimId, value);
|
||||
tx.vout[0].nValue = quantity;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -418,6 +443,12 @@ bool ClaimTrieChainFixture::getClaimById(const uint160 &claimId, std::string &na
|
|||
return hit;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int64_t ClaimTrieChainFixture::nodeCount() const {
|
||||
int64_t ret = 0;
|
||||
db << "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM node" >> ret;
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<std::string> ClaimTrieChainFixture::getNodeChildren(const std::string &name)
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::vector<std::string> ret;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct ClaimTrieChainFixture: public CClaimTrieCache
|
|||
int64_t originalExpiration;
|
||||
int64_t extendedExpiration;
|
||||
int64_t forkhash_original;
|
||||
int minRemovalWorkaroundHeight, maxRemovalWorkaroundHeight;
|
||||
|
||||
using CClaimTrieCache::getSupportsForName;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -62,6 +63,8 @@ struct ClaimTrieChainFixture: public CClaimTrieCache
|
|||
|
||||
void setHashForkHeight(int targetMinusCurrent);
|
||||
|
||||
void setRemovalWorkaroundHeight(int targetMinusCurrent, int blocks);
|
||||
|
||||
bool CreateBlock(const std::unique_ptr<CBlockTemplate>& pblocktemplate);
|
||||
|
||||
bool CreateCoinbases(unsigned int num_coinbases, std::vector<CTransaction>& coinbases);
|
||||
|
@ -105,6 +108,8 @@ struct ClaimTrieChainFixture: public CClaimTrieCache
|
|||
|
||||
bool getClaimById(const uint160& claimId, std::string& name, CClaimValue& value);
|
||||
|
||||
int64_t nodeCount() const;
|
||||
|
||||
// is a claim in queue
|
||||
boost::test_tools::predicate_result is_claim_in_queue(const std::string& name, const CTransaction &tx);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -375,6 +375,44 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(normalization_does_not_fail_on_spend)
|
|||
BOOST_CHECK(fixture.is_best_claim(sName1, tx1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(unnormalized_expires_before_fork)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ClaimTrieChainFixture fixture;
|
||||
fixture.setNormalizationForkHeight(4);
|
||||
fixture.setExpirationForkHeight(1, 3, 3);
|
||||
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx1 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), "A", "1", 1);
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(3);
|
||||
CMutableTransaction sp1 = fixture.MakeSupport(fixture.GetCoinbase(), tx1, "A", 1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(fixture.is_best_claim("A", tx1));
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!fixture.is_best_claim("A", tx1));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!fixture.is_best_claim("a", tx1));
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!fixture.is_best_claim("A", tx1));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!fixture.is_best_claim("a", tx1));
|
||||
fixture.DecrementBlocks(2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(fixture.is_best_claim("A", tx1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(unnormalized_activates_on_fork)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// this was an unfortunate bug; the normalization fork should not have activated anything
|
||||
// alas, it's now part of our history; we hereby test it to keep it that way
|
||||
ClaimTrieChainFixture fixture;
|
||||
fixture.setNormalizationForkHeight(4);
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx1 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), "A", "1", 1);
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(3);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(fixture.is_best_claim("A", tx1));
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx2 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), "A", "2", 2);
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(fixture.is_best_claim("a", tx2));
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(fixture.is_best_claim("a", tx2));
|
||||
fixture.DecrementBlocks(3);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(fixture.is_best_claim("A", tx1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(normalization_does_not_kill_sort_order)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ClaimTrieChainFixture fixture;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(hash_bid_seq_claim_changes_test)
|
|||
|
||||
// check by partial id (at least 3 chars)
|
||||
req.params = UniValue(UniValue::VARR);
|
||||
req.params.push_back(UniValue(claimId3.GetHex().substr(0, 3)));
|
||||
req.params.push_back(UniValue(claimId3.GetHex().substr(34)));
|
||||
|
||||
result = getclaimbyid(req);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(result[T_LASTTAKEOVERHEIGHT].get_int(), height);
|
||||
|
@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(hash_bid_seq_claim_changes_test)
|
|||
req.params = UniValue(UniValue::VARR);
|
||||
req.params.push_back(UniValue(name));
|
||||
req.params.push_back(UniValue(blockhash.GetHex()));
|
||||
req.params.push_back(UniValue(claimId2.GetHex().substr(0, 2)));
|
||||
req.params.push_back(UniValue(claimId2.GetHex().substr(14)));
|
||||
|
||||
result = getnameproof(req);
|
||||
claimHash = getValueHash(COutPoint(tx2.GetHash(), 0), result[T_LASTTAKEOVERHEIGHT].get_int());
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ TestingSetup::TestingSetup(const std::string& chainName) : BasicTestingSetup(cha
|
|||
auto &consensus = chainparams.GetConsensus();
|
||||
pclaimTrie = new CClaimTrie(20000000U, true, 0, GetDataDir().string(),
|
||||
consensus.nNormalizedNameForkHeight,
|
||||
consensus.nMinRemovalWorkaroundHeight,
|
||||
consensus.nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight,
|
||||
consensus.nOriginalClaimExpirationTime,
|
||||
consensus.nExtendedClaimExpirationTime,
|
||||
consensus.nExtendedClaimExpirationForkHeight,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue