QA: feature_filelock, interface_bitcoin_cli: Use PACKAGE_NAME in messages rather than hardcoding Bitcoin Core
This commit is contained in:
parent
c65c77c721
commit
fcc443b636
3 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
|
|||
# test/functional/test_runner.py and test/util/bitcoin-util-test.py
|
||||
|
||||
[environment]
|
||||
PACKAGE_NAME=@PACKAGE_NAME@
|
||||
SRCDIR=@abs_top_srcdir@
|
||||
BUILDDIR=@abs_top_builddir@
|
||||
EXEEXT=@EXEEXT@
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ class FilelockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|||
self.log.info("Using datadir {}".format(datadir))
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Check that we can't start a second bitcoind instance using the same datadir")
|
||||
expected_msg = "Error: Cannot obtain a lock on data directory {}. Bitcoin Core is probably already running.".format(datadir)
|
||||
expected_msg = "Error: Cannot obtain a lock on data directory {0}. {1} is probably already running.".format(datadir, self.config['environment']['PACKAGE_NAME'])
|
||||
self.nodes[1].assert_start_raises_init_error(extra_args=['-datadir={}'.format(self.nodes[0].datadir), '-noserver'], expected_msg=expected_msg)
|
||||
|
||||
if self.is_wallet_compiled():
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ class TestBitcoinCli(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|||
"""Main test logic"""
|
||||
|
||||
cli_response = self.nodes[0].cli("-version").send_cli()
|
||||
assert "Bitcoin Core RPC client version" in cli_response
|
||||
assert "{} RPC client version".format(self.config['environment']['PACKAGE_NAME']) in cli_response
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Compare responses from getwalletinfo RPC and `bitcoin-cli getwalletinfo`")
|
||||
if self.is_wallet_compiled():
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue