Tests: Edit bloated varint test and add option for 'barely expensive' tests
This commit is contained in:
parent
12c5a16c4e
commit
ff2dcf274d
1 changed files with 49 additions and 41 deletions
|
@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
|
|||
self.tip = None
|
||||
self.blocks = {}
|
||||
|
||||
def add_options(self, parser):
|
||||
super().add_options(parser)
|
||||
parser.add_option("--runbarelyexpensive", dest="runbarelyexpensive", default=True)
|
||||
|
||||
def run_test(self):
|
||||
self.test = TestManager(self, self.options.tmpdir)
|
||||
self.test.add_all_connections(self.nodes)
|
||||
|
@ -875,10 +879,13 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
|
|||
yield rejected(RejectResult(16, b'bad-txns-nonfinal'))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# This checks that a block with a bloated VARINT between the block_header and the array of tx is rejected
|
||||
# (previous behavior was that it was accepted.) It also checks that if you subsequently send that block
|
||||
# with correct encoding, it should be accepted (i.e., the receiving node should not reject it on the
|
||||
# basis that it's the same as an already-rejected block, which would be a DoS vulnerability.)
|
||||
# This checks that a block with a bloated VARINT between the block_header and the array of tx such that
|
||||
# the block is > MAX_BLOCK_SIZE with the bloated varint, but <= MAX_BLOCK_SIZE without the bloated varint,
|
||||
# does not cause a subsequent, identical block with canonical encoding to be rejected. The test does not
|
||||
# care whether the bloated block is accepted or rejected; it only cares that the second block is accepted.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# What matters is that the receiving node should not reject the bloated block, and then reject the canonical
|
||||
# block on the basis that it's the same as an already-rejected block (which would be a consensus failure.)
|
||||
#
|
||||
# -> b39 (11) -> b42 (12) -> b43 (13) -> b53 (14) -> b55 (15) -> b57 (16) -> b60 (17) -> b64 (18)
|
||||
# \
|
||||
|
@ -903,7 +910,7 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
|
|||
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(b64a.vtx[1].sha256, 0)))
|
||||
b64a = update_block("64a", [tx])
|
||||
assert_equal(len(b64a.serialize()), MAX_BLOCK_SIZE + 8)
|
||||
yield rejected()
|
||||
yield TestInstance([[self.tip, None]])
|
||||
|
||||
# comptool workaround: to make sure b64 is delivered, manually erase b64a from blockstore
|
||||
self.test.block_store.erase(b64a.sha256)
|
||||
|
@ -941,7 +948,6 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
|
|||
update_block(66, [tx2, tx1])
|
||||
yield rejected(RejectResult(16, b'bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent'))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Attempt to double-spend a transaction created in a block
|
||||
#
|
||||
# -> b43 (13) -> b53 (14) -> b55 (15) -> b57 (16) -> b60 (17) -> b64 (18) -> b65 (19)
|
||||
|
@ -1239,46 +1245,48 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
|
|||
# Test re-org of a week's worth of blocks (1088 blocks)
|
||||
# This test takes a minute or two and can be accomplished in memory
|
||||
#
|
||||
tip(88)
|
||||
LARGE_REORG_SIZE = 1088
|
||||
test1 = TestInstance(sync_every_block=False)
|
||||
spend=out[32]
|
||||
for i in range(89, LARGE_REORG_SIZE + 89):
|
||||
b = block(i, spend)
|
||||
tx = CTransaction()
|
||||
script_length = MAX_BLOCK_SIZE - len(b.serialize()) - 69
|
||||
script_output = CScript([b'\x00' * script_length])
|
||||
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(0, script_output))
|
||||
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(b.vtx[1].sha256, 0)))
|
||||
b = update_block(i, [tx])
|
||||
assert_equal(len(b.serialize()), MAX_BLOCK_SIZE)
|
||||
test1.blocks_and_transactions.append([self.tip, True])
|
||||
save_spendable_output()
|
||||
spend = get_spendable_output()
|
||||
if self.options.runbarelyexpensive:
|
||||
tip(88)
|
||||
LARGE_REORG_SIZE = 1088
|
||||
test1 = TestInstance(sync_every_block=False)
|
||||
spend=out[32]
|
||||
for i in range(89, LARGE_REORG_SIZE + 89):
|
||||
b = block(i, spend)
|
||||
tx = CTransaction()
|
||||
script_length = MAX_BLOCK_SIZE - len(b.serialize()) - 69
|
||||
script_output = CScript([b'\x00' * script_length])
|
||||
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(0, script_output))
|
||||
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(b.vtx[1].sha256, 0)))
|
||||
b = update_block(i, [tx])
|
||||
assert_equal(len(b.serialize()), MAX_BLOCK_SIZE)
|
||||
test1.blocks_and_transactions.append([self.tip, True])
|
||||
save_spendable_output()
|
||||
spend = get_spendable_output()
|
||||
|
||||
yield test1
|
||||
chain1_tip = i
|
||||
yield test1
|
||||
chain1_tip = i
|
||||
|
||||
# now create alt chain of same length
|
||||
tip(88)
|
||||
test2 = TestInstance(sync_every_block=False)
|
||||
for i in range(89, LARGE_REORG_SIZE + 89):
|
||||
block("alt"+str(i))
|
||||
test2.blocks_and_transactions.append([self.tip, False])
|
||||
yield test2
|
||||
# now create alt chain of same length
|
||||
tip(88)
|
||||
test2 = TestInstance(sync_every_block=False)
|
||||
for i in range(89, LARGE_REORG_SIZE + 89):
|
||||
block("alt"+str(i))
|
||||
test2.blocks_and_transactions.append([self.tip, False])
|
||||
yield test2
|
||||
|
||||
# extend alt chain to trigger re-org
|
||||
block("alt" + str(chain1_tip + 1))
|
||||
yield accepted()
|
||||
# extend alt chain to trigger re-org
|
||||
block("alt" + str(chain1_tip + 1))
|
||||
yield accepted()
|
||||
|
||||
# ... and re-org back to the first chain
|
||||
tip(chain1_tip)
|
||||
block(chain1_tip + 1)
|
||||
yield rejected()
|
||||
block(chain1_tip + 2)
|
||||
yield accepted()
|
||||
# ... and re-org back to the first chain
|
||||
tip(chain1_tip)
|
||||
block(chain1_tip + 1)
|
||||
yield rejected()
|
||||
block(chain1_tip + 2)
|
||||
yield accepted()
|
||||
|
||||
chain1_tip += 2
|
||||
|
||||
chain1_tip += 2
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue