f455a24 [net] add seed.testnet.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl to testnet DNS seeds (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
I tested it myself by:
* `dig seed.testnet.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl` (should have propagated by now, but if you only see two records with `A 66.111... ` try again later)
* deleting the other seeds and all data in `.../testnet3`, recompiling and then starting the node. Log shows `21 addresses found from DNS seeds`.
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/dnsseed-policy.md
I'm willing to keep it up and running at least throughout 2018, unless something bad happens.
About my setup:
* Amazon EC2 instance in Europe, running Ubuntu 16.04; I use this instance for some other chores, but only port 53 is world reachable (for mainnet I'd probably run a dedicated instance, and perhaps a location I have physical control over)
* running [sipa/bitcoin-seeder](https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin-seeder) with default settings (and the non-root port redirect)
* feedback about my domain / DNS setup is welcome, I can provide more details via private email
I can use guidance on _Any hosting services contracted by the operator are equally expected to uphold these expectations_. Although I assume the requirements for testnet are less strict than for mainnet, in case I want to pursue the latter in the future: what unpleasant things can Amazon, my domain registrar and other intermediaries do? How would I mitigate that?
Also note that The Netherlands passed some pretty onerous legislation creating uncertainty over what the secret service can compel people like myself to do. However these laws won't take effect before mid 2018, there's probably more interesting targets than myself to go after, and it's easier for them to just monitor all unencrypted P2P traffic everywhere, or monitor some intermediary I depend on.
Any good tools for monitoring uptime?
Tree-SHA512: 386fe688e5006ab8352d93ab3954fc07dc566876ae002891baa51acfaa5bb113f51b1f5ca08c7394a530b10a2f5008c56d57153af3ed07544a305586dda06b97
2862b56 [tests] remove redundant univalue_tests.cpp (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
univalue unit tests were added in #4730 , and exist at `/src/test/univalue_tests.cpp` (outside the univalue tree). That test was brought into the univalue repository in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/univalue/pull/4 , which was pulled into the github repository in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11420.
That means that the univalue test exists in two places:
1. `/src/test/univalue_tests.cpp`
2. `/src/univalue/test/object.cpp`
(2) is a strict superset of (1). It adds some macros to work around boost not being a univalue dependency, and adds a few extra lines of test.
Therefore remove `/src/test/univalue_tests.cpp`
Tree-SHA512: 3747b10bbf62e9f12363905488b29945ad559ddca68c5c03d8a362de612a51f408f41a04d3712c6889bfc1632fb1a5fa0d7df0fbf02c322b3981a6d698f501b0
88411e9 Squashed 'src/univalue/' changes from fe805ea74f..07947ff2da (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Pulls in the test changes to the univalue subtree.
Beside looking at the code, reviewers should refer to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/devtools/README.md#git-subtree-checksh on how to verify the subtree pull.
Tree-SHA512: 09493625a573dca1140570326ee90c1bb84e4893e1dab2cdd51bc23ae1fba1e33c43ed771ca9e112ac71b0242e8a8d058071334562c738d502587eadd5a0f114
Unfortunately, FreeBSD uses yet another syntax for `sha256`.
Support FreeBSD's syntax too. Using `uname` is a bit of a hack but it
works and I found no way to distinguish the two.
62e7c04 Remove dead feeest-file read code for old versions (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
0.15.0 introduced a new feeest file format, and support for parsing
old versions was never fully added. We now simply fail to read the
old format, so remove the dead partial-implementation.
Follow up to #11273.
Tree-SHA512: c291ce51b7cb0c93479c18a1885dd646cbe03e4c7d12df03c0e99c0634e1bf9f9e41facf54a645227154bab58b9988f21b928cf3fc0520087c4eede4258c8861
be9a13c Add configuration/argument testing (MeshCollider)
Pull request description:
Adds a new functional test for testing various command line and configuration file argument interactions, that aren't specific enough to other functionality to be placed in other tests.
Currently this tests the error messages for non-existent datadir, which would have caught the bug fixed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11829. It also tests that command line arguments override the ones in the config file.
I plan on working on a fix for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11819 / https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1044 and then expanding this test with cases for that.
Tree-SHA512: 97aea18c67d331db3ca3d0c99c79267cf012df67fddafc9fac63d392f5c3a6469aa14d93b5865c3bbe561461648d2485367978a77446483b8df53d1916f1c8e8
ee5efad6cf [tests] refactor node_network_limited (John Newbery)
b425131f5a [tests] remove redundant duplicate tests from node_network_limited (John Newbery)
2e02984591 [tests] node_network_limited - remove race condition (John Newbery)
dbfe294805 [tests] define NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED in test framework (John Newbery)
1285312048 [tests] fix flake8 warnings in node_network_limited.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Fixes race condition in the node_network_limited test case introduced in #11740. Also tidies up the test and removes redundant duplicate tests.
Tree-SHA512: a5240fe35509d81a47c3d3b141a956378675926093e658d24be43027b20d3b5f0ba7c6017c8208487a1849d4fdfb911a361911d571423db7c50711250aba3011
node_network_limited had a race condition, since wait_for_block()
doesn't do what you might expect. It only checks the most recent block
received over the P2P interface (perhaps we should rename the method
wait_for_most_recent_block() to avoid future confusion). The test can
fail if the node sends us invs for other blocks, we respond with a
getdata, and the node sends us one of those blocks in the 0.05 second
wait_until loop window.
Fix this by not responding to inv messages with getdata messages.
0.15.0 introduced a new feeest file format, and support for parsing
old versions was never fully added. We now simply fail to read the
old format, so remove the dead partial-implementation.
3a3a9f9 Ignore old format estimation file (Murch)
Pull request description:
The fee estimation data format changed from 0.14.x to 0.15.0, so we should no longer read the old data. H/T @jnewbery, @morcos
Pending testing.
Tree-SHA512: c8e3824dbdd8f6730133d5ad20b00995e9a63ab54431158a91e2f4d2aba5763b8aa698bce1fffca2713ba3a162e23d8fcd6e3efb9847b015c2e1e8725398150b
ecf9b25 remove unused fNoncriticalErrors variable from CWalletDB::FindWalletTx (Pierre Rochard)
Pull request description:
The `CWalletDB::FindWalletTx` method was patterned after `CWalletDB::LoadWallet`, where `fNoncriticalErrors` is used when a tx check fails in `ReadKeyValue`.
Since `FindWalletTx` is only used by methods which are zapping txs, it makes sense that `ReadKeyValue` is not called and the tx is not checked, so I think that deleting the unused `fNoncriticalErrors` boolean variable and its conditional statement is appropriate.
Tree-SHA512: 0976eae97522719fdaeca1fb3f4a080561e46c06d0b8dc75e14262c6bc242998db3f7057183a230a1d7e4ac5fc348e9059f545b7d718ebbcdf6dcdfc63bcc286
4508519250 test: Fix rawtransactions test (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Looks like another `assert_raises_jsonrpc` snuck in with #11178. Change it to `assert_raises_rpc_error`.
Tree-SHA512: c2c2fb78be5dcc490981896cf60be1fba0b41c385a4f18de084b2e0a042c5b06bf6da617d3bf3b7e585b728554f5c8e1814b85045ba542cca9dfb7b826fda75a
12781db [Tests] check specific validation error in miner tests (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
## Problem
`BOOST_CHECK_THROW` merely checks that some `std::runtime_error` is
thrown, but not which one.
Here's an example of how this can cause a test to pass when a developer
introduces a consensus bug. The test for the sigops limit assumes
that `CreateNewBlock` fails with `bad-blk-sigops`. However it can
also fail with bad-txns-vout-negative, if a naive developer lowers
`BLOCKSUBSIDY` to `1*COIN`.
## Solution
`BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION` allows an additional predicate function. This
commit uses this for all exceptions that are checked for in
`miner_tets.cpp`:
* `bad-blk-sigops`
* `bad-cb-multiple`
* `bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent`
* `block-validation-failed`
If the function throws a different error, the test will fail. Although the message produced by Boost is a bit [confusing](http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Test-BOOST-CHECK-EXCEPTION-error-message-still-vague-tt4683257.html#a4683554), it does show which error was actually thrown. Here's what the above `1*COIN` bug would result in:
<img width="1134" alt="schermafbeelding 2017-09-02 om 23 42 29" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/29998976-815cabce-9038-11e7-9c46-f5f6cfb0ca7d.png">
## Other considerations
A more elegant solution in my opinion would be to subclass `std::runtime_error` for each `INVALID_TRANSACTION` type, but this would involve touching consensus code.
I put the predicates in `test_bitcoin.h` because I assume they can be reused in other test files. However [serialize_tests.cpp](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v0.15.0rc3/src/test/serialize_tests.cpp#L245) also uses `BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION` and it defines the predicate in the test file itself.
Instead of four `IsRejectInvalidReasonX(std::runtime_error const& e)` functions, I'd prefer something reusable like `bool IsRejectInvalidReason(String reason)(std::runtime_error const& e)`, which would be used like `BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION(functionThatThrows(), std::runtime_error, IsRejectInvalidReason("bad-blk-sigops")`. I couldn't figure out how to do that in C++.
Tree-SHA512: e364f19b4ac19f910f6e8d6533357f57ccddcbd9d53dcfaf923d424d2b9711446d6f36da193208b35788ca21863eadaa7becd9ad890334d334bccf8c2e63dee1
Trailing X=Y arguments are supposed to be passed through unchanged
to bdb's configure. This was not the case, at least with OpenBSD
6.2's shell.
Fix this by not storing the arguments in a temporary variable but
passing "$@" through directly.
Replace the clang patch with a new and improved version that also fixes
the build issues with OpenBSD and FreeBSD's clang, and apply it
unconditionally.
This needs testing on OSX.
ce552b6 contrib: fix typo in install_db4.sh help message (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
It installs db4, not db5.
Tree-SHA512: c503819bd46da1fc5bd386fbf7cab1702ed8a9f0532a5f9e81f8737dfc1c7883eddf54d7de78418f327e60627ed344f94b1c2819101971e0f170b2c4c0ba4efe
6f39ac0 Add test for decoderawtransaction bool (MeshCollider)
bbdbe80 Add iswitness parameter to decode- and fundrawtransaction RPCs (MeshCollider)
Pull request description:
Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10481#issuecomment-325244946, this adds the option to explicitly choose whether a serialized transaction should be decoded as a witness or non-witness transaction rather than relying on the heuristic checks in #10481. The parameter defaults to relying on #10481 if not included, but it overrides that if included.
Tree-SHA512: d4846a5bb7d64dc19c516445488b00af329fc1f4181d9dfdf9f2382a086568edc98250a4ac7594e24a1bc231dfdee53c699b12c8380c355b920a67cc6770b7a9
3eb4d45 [build] Warn that only libconsensus can be built without boost (Varunram)
Pull request description:
This replaces the "configure: error: Could not find a version of the boost_system library!" message you receive when trying to build without Boost, with "only libbitcoinconsensus can be built without boost".
`./configure --with-utils=no --disable-bench --disable-gui-tests --disable-tests --with-daemon=no --without-gui --disable-wallet --with-boost=no` builds libconsensus.
`./configure --with-boost=no` should always fail with:
```
checking whether to build Bitcoin Core GUI... yes (Qt5)
configure: error: only libbitcoinconsensus can be built without boost
```
For anyone wondering why the check comes after the AX_BOOST_BASE check, see this [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11806#discussion_r155359394). "the AX_BOOST_BASE macro that does the --with-boost handling (along with the actual checks), and sets "want_boost". "
Fixes#10826, replaces #11806.
@theuni if you re-ACK we can get this merged.
Tree-SHA512: f0b8f483586465187ca6689e731b24ff77da41a06fb5c9d6390c82990719911dd54ebcccaf6d4fcea2be92986cc7fa88ed979e6cb9d77917920181e5e5188067
c79d73d Clarify getbalance meaning a tiny bit in response to questions. (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Someone was asking why getbalance "*" was more "correct" than getbalance, which should rarely be true...spendzeroconfchange was the issue.
Tree-SHA512: 90201cad1acec5161aee469fb4c6d737a0eb90f8380ac93abf0e41e0f02d120afcc3e2e873e5096d3655bb63bbd16fe99e72452f308d72e69139c7f6bb2d745e
57ac471 Call BannedListChanged outside of cs_setBanned lock (Jonas Schnelli)
c853812 Update ban-state in case of dirty-state during periodic sweep (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
We do currently not update the UI during periodic ban list sweeps (via dump banlist).
Fixes#11612
Tree-SHA512: bffbdcc03c63042177bdd511b0a9187c211c2b5011178481e8ee3e43a71eef1e4cd6b72f73672babab142b644f62f8b56f0aac1d26d3f19372b1f8644fec9395
