f506c0a7f [qt] send: Clear All also resets coin control options (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This change makes it so that a custom change address and manual input selection are removed if the user clicks Clear All in the send screen.
Tree-SHA512: 78746043a74c9c26ef476eb0df7ce95411683749d9f6b2747222eaac751e241ea7d4d7ce9e4e69ed0b19fa76754d8584e5bef5bba1ad6598f8e39c784b4264d2
b4db76c55 net: Correct addrman logging (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
These were introduced in #9037.
Found by @theuni (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9037#pullrequestreview-101704656).
Tree-SHA512: 9b5153da8a8e5d4ddf9513a5c453f9609cffd4df2924fd48c7b36c1b1055748c7077d4fc0e70be62ca36af87df7f621a744bb374a234baba271ce4982a240825
1dfb4e7d7 [Tests] Check output of parent/child tx list from getrawmempool, getmempooldescendants, getmempoolancestors, and REST interface (Conor Scott)
fc44cb108 [RPC] Add list of child transactions to verbose output of getrawmempool (Conor Scott)
Pull request description:
`bitcoin-cli getrawmempool true` only lists a transaction's parents in the `depends` field. This change adds a `spentby` field to the json response, which lists the transaction's children in the mempool.
Currently the only way to find child transactions is to use `getrawmempool` or make another call to `getmempooldescendants` and search the response for transactions that list the parent_txid in the `depends` list, which is inefficient.
This change allows direct lookup of children.
Example Output
```
"9a9b5733c0d89f207908cfa3fe17809bee71f629aa095c9f8754524e29e98ba4": {
...other geterawmempool data...
"wtxid": "9a9b5733c0d89f207908cfa3fe17809bee71f629aa095c9f8754524e29e98ba4",
"depends": [
"bdd92851d5766a42aeb62af667bb422a116cab4e032bba5e3dd6efe5b4b40aa0"
],
"spentby": [
"dc5d3ec388a9121421208738a041ac30a22163bc2e17758f2275b6c51a15ba7b"
]
},
```
Tree-SHA512: 83da7d421c9799a40ef65af3b7fdb586d6d87385f3f2ede3afd2c311725444b858f9d91cc110422a0fa31905779934fee07211ca6fe6b746792b83692c94b3ce
22b4aae02 [arith_uint256] Avoid unnecessary this-copy using prefix operator (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
I noticed while profiling a related project that `operator-()` actually calls the `base_uint` constructor, which is because the postfix operator version of `operator++` (used in `operator-()`) creates a copy of `this` and returns it.
Tree-SHA512: d9a2665caa3d93f064cdeaf1c6fada101b9943bb53d93ccac6d9a0edac20279d2e921349e30239039c71e0a9629e45c29ec9f10d8d7499e936cdba6cb7c3c3eb
b7cd08b71 Add documentation to PeerLogicValidation interface and related functions (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Adds docs for PeerLogicValidation's public interface and two related functions.
Tree-SHA512: b4c2f47e9baa9396d2b6faf3792e46b371c50cd91b9ac890f263f4d14eb24a71e7b40ceb4cbb41e254f5008eff357f417b842618e7ebece9039802ab2a5dd728
e68172ed9 Add test-before-evict discipline to addrman (Ethan Heilman)
Pull request description:
This change implement countermeasures 3 (test-before-evict) suggested in our paper: ["Eclipse Attacks on Bitcoin’s Peer-to-Peer Network"](http://cs-people.bu.edu/heilman/eclipse/).
# Design:
A collision occurs when an address, addr1, is being moved to the tried table from the new table, but maps to a position in the tried table which already contains an address (addr2). The current behavior is that addr1 would evict addr2 from the tried table.
This change ensures that during a collision, addr1 is not inserted into tried but instead inserted into a buffer (setTriedCollisions). The to-be-evicted address, addr2, is then tested by [a feeler connection](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8282). If addr2 is found to be online, we remove addr1 from the buffer and addr2 is not evicted, on the other hand if addr2 is found be offline it is replaced by addr1.
An additional small advantage of this change is that, as no more than ten addresses can be in the test buffer at once, and addresses are only cleared one at a time from the test buffer (at 2 minute intervals), thus an attacker is forced to wait at least two minutes to insert a new address into tried after filling up the test buffer. This rate limits an attacker attempting to launch an eclipse attack.
# Risk mitigation:
- To prevent this functionality from being used as a DoS vector, we limit the number of addresses which are to be tested to ten. If we have more than ten addresses to test, we drop new addresses being added to tried if they would evict an address. Since the feeler thread only creates one new connection every 2 minutes the additional network overhead is limited.
- An address in tried gains immunity from tests for 4 hours after it has been tested or successfully connected to.
# Tests:
This change includes additional addrman unittests which test this behavior.
I ran an instance of this change with a much smaller tried table (2 buckets of 64 addresses) so that collisions were much more likely and observed evictions.
```
2016-10-27 07:20:26 Swapping 208.12.64.252:8333 for 68.62.95.247:8333 in tried table
2016-10-27 07:20:26 Moving 208.12.64.252:8333 to tried
```
I documented tests we ran against similar earlier versions of this change in #6355.
# Security Benefit
This is was originally posted in PR #8282 see [this comment for full details](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8282#issuecomment-237255215).
To determine the security benefit of these larger numbers of IPs in the tried table I modeled the attack presented in [Eclipse Attacks on Bitcoin’s Peer-to-Peer Network](https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/263).
**Default node:** 595 attacker IPs for ~50% attack success.
**Default node + test-before-evict:** 620 attacker IPs for ~50% attack success.
**Feeler node:** 5540 attacker IPs for ~50% attack success.
**Feeler node + test-before-evict:** 8600 attacker IPs for ~50% attack success.
The node running feeler connections has 10 times as many online IP addresses in its tried table making an attack 10 times harder (i.e. requiring the an attacker require 10 times as many IP addresses in different /16s). Adding test-before-evict increases resistance of the node by an additional 3000 attacker IP addresses.
Below I graph the attack over even greater attacker resources (i.e. more attacker controled IP addresses). Note that test-before-evict maintains some security far longer even against an attacker with 50,000 IPs. If this node had a larger tried table test-before-evict could greatly boost a nodes resistance to eclipse attacks.
Tree-SHA512: fdad4d26aadeaad9bcdc71929b3eb4e1f855b3ee3541fbfbe25dca8d7d0a1667815402db0cb4319db6bd3fcd32d67b5bbc0e12045c4252d62d6239b7d77c4395
6fbc0986f gui: Show messages as text not html (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Currently, error messages (such as InitError) are displayed as-is, which means Qt does auto detection on the format.
This means that it's possible to inject HTML from the command line though e.g. specifying a wallet name with HTML in it. This isn't a direct security risk because fetching content from internet is
disabled (and as far as I know we never report strings received from the network this way). However, it can be confusing.
So explicitly force the format as text.
Tree-SHA512: 96c9196f20552544b862071bca61817ef03653019cc3548023d435f3a9c48b6cd501fab3246783cb0be68c8c7bb1b865913d92070a7c4e84e82c6577709f0934
cfaac2a60 Add build support for 'gprof' profiling. (murrayn)
Pull request description:
Support for profiling build: `./configure --enable-profiling`
Tree-SHA512: ea983cfce385f1893bb4ab7f94ac141b7d620951dc430da3bbc92ae1357fb05521eac689216e66dc87040171a8a57e76dd7ad98036e12a2896cfe5ab544347f0
13a399a46 depends: patch pthread_set_name_np out of zeromq (Cory Fields)
8f7922636 depends: zeromq 4.2.3 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is a followup to #9254 and #11981. Zeromq 4.2.3 was released just after #9254 was merged, and contains a years worth of improvements/bug fixes. See the release notes [here](https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/releases/tag/v4.2.3).
Todo:
- [ ] Add zeromq-4.2.3.tar.gz to /depends-sources on bitcoincore.org
- [ ] Verify gitian builds are still OK
- [ ] Check: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/2787
Tree-SHA512: 85e06f47be3e1fdedcee50ce90e3391d69df2ea1c167472ffc3126d8970d418eb75141b970e422eb2fda9a8cad00e6ba5b36afa53565171a9ebaa152a9dc9b60
937bf4335 Use std:🧵:hardware_concurrency, instead of Boost, to determine available cores (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Following discussion on IRC about replacing Boost usage for detecting available system cores, I've opened this to collect some benchmarks + further discussion.
The current method for detecting available cores was introduced in #6361.
Recap of the IRC chat:
```
21:14:08 fanquake: Since we seem to be giving Boost removal a good shot for 0.15, does anyone have suggestions for replacing GetNumCores?
21:14:26 fanquake: There is std:🧵:hardware_concurrency(), but that seems to count virtual cores, which I don't think we want.
21:14:51 BlueMatt: fanquake: I doubt we'll do boost removal for 0.15
21:14:58 BlueMatt: shit like BOOST_FOREACH, sure
21:15:07 BlueMatt: but all of boost? doubtful, there are still things we need
21:16:36 fanquake: Yea sorry, not the whole lot, but we can remove a decent chunk. Just looking into what else needs to be done to replace some of the less involved Boost usage.
21:16:43 BlueMatt: fair
21:17:14 wumpus: yes, it makes sense to plan ahead a bit, without immediately doing it
21:18:12 wumpus: right, don't count virtual cores, that used to be the case but it makes no sense for our usage
21:19:15 wumpus: it'd create a swarm of threads overwhelming any machine with hyperthreading (+accompanying thread stack overhead), for script validation, and there was no gain at all for that
21:20:03 sipa: BlueMatt: don't worry, there is no hurry
21:59:10 morcos: wumpus: i don't think that is correct
21:59:24 morcos: suppose you have 4 cores (8 virtual cores)
21:59:24 wumpus: fanquake: indeed seems that std has no equivalent to physical_concurrency, on any standard. That's annoying as it is non-trivial to implement
21:59:35 morcos: i think running par=8 (if it let you) would be notably faster
21:59:59 morcos: jeremyrubin and i discussed this at length a while back... i think i commented about it on irc at the time
22:00:21 wumpus: morcos: I think the conclusion at the time was that it made no difference, but sure would make sense to benchmark
22:00:39 morcos: perhaps historical testing on the virtual vs actual cores was polluted by concurrency issues that have now improved
22:00:47 wumpus: I think there are not more ALUs, so there is not really a point in having more threads
22:01:40 wumpus: hyperthreads are basically just a stored register state right?
22:02:23 sipa: wumpus: yes but it helps the scheduler
22:02:27 wumpus: in which case the only speedup using "number of cores" threads would give you is, possibly, excluding other software from running on the cores on the same time
22:02:37 morcos: well this is where i get out of my depth
22:02:50 sipa: if one of the threads is waiting on a read from ram, the other can use the arithmetic unit for example
22:02:54 morcos: wumpus: i'm pretty sure though that the speed up is considerably more than what you might expect from that
22:02:59 wumpus: sipa: ok, I back down, I didn't want to argue this at all
22:03:35 morcos: the reason i haven't tested it myself, is the machine i usually use has 16 cores... so not easy due to remaining concurrency issues to get much more speedup
22:03:36 wumpus: I'm fine with restoring it to number of virtual threads if that's faster
22:03:54 morcos: we should have somene with 4 cores (and  actually test it though, i agree
22:03:58 sipa: i would expect (but we should benchmark...) that if 8 scriot validation threads instead of 4 on a quadcore hyperthreading is not faster, it's due to lock contention
22:04:20 morcos: sipa: yeah thats my point, i think lock contention isn't that bad with 8 now
22:04:22 wumpus: on 64-bit systems the additional thread overhead wouldn't be important at least
22:04:23 gmaxwell: I previously benchmarked, a long time ago, it was faster.
22:04:33 gmaxwell: (to use the HT core count)
22:04:44 wumpus: why was this changed at all then?
22:04:47 wumpus: I'm confused
22:05:04 sipa: good question!
22:05:06 gmaxwell: I had no idea we changed it.
22:05:25 wumpus: sigh 
22:05:54 gmaxwell: What PR changed it?
22:06:51 gmaxwell: In any case, on 32-bit it's probably a good tradeoff... the extra ram overhead is worth avoiding.
22:07:22 wumpus: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6361
22:07:28 gmaxwell: PR 6461 btw.
22:07:37 gmaxwell: er lol at least you got it right.
22:07:45 wumpus: the complaint was that systems became unsuably slow when using that many thread
22:07:51 wumpus: so at least I got one thing right, woohoo
22:07:55 sipa: seems i even acked it!
22:07:57 BlueMatt: wumpus: there are more alus
22:08:38 BlueMatt: but we need to improve lock contention first
22:08:40 morcos: anywya, i think in the past the lock contention made 8 threads regardless of cores a bit dicey.. now that is much better (although more still to be done)
22:09:01 BlueMatt: or we can just merge #10192, thats fee
22:09:04 gribble: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10192 | Cache full script execution results in addition to signatures by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #10192 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
22:09:11 BlueMatt: s/fee/free/
22:09:21 morcos: no, we do not need to improve lock contention first. but we should probably do that before we increase the max beyond 16
22:09:26 BlueMatt: then we can toss concurrency issues out the window and get more speedup anyway
22:09:35 gmaxwell: wumpus: yea, well in QT I thought we also diminished the count by 1 or something? but yes, if the motivation was to reduce how heavily the machine was used, thats fair.
22:09:56 sipa: the benefit of using HT cores is certainly not a factor 2
22:09:58 wumpus: gmaxwell: for the default I think this makes a lot of sense, yes
22:10:10 gmaxwell: morcos: right now on my 24/28 physical core hosts going beyond 16 still reduces performance.
22:10:11 wumpus: gmaxwell: do we also restrict the maximum par using this? that'd make less sense
22:10:51 wumpus: if someone *wants* to use the virtual cores they should be able to by setting -par=
22:10:51 sipa: *flies to US*
22:10:52 BlueMatt: sipa: sure, but the shared cache helps us get more out of it than some others, as morcos points out
22:11:30 BlueMatt: (because it means our thread contention issues are less)
22:12:05 morcos: gmaxwell: yeah i've been bogged down in fee estimation as well (and the rest of life) for a while now.. otherwise i would have put more effort into jeremy's checkqueue
22:12:36 BlueMatt: morcos: heh, well now you can do other stuff while the rest of us get bogged down in understanding fee estimation enough to review it 
22:12:37 wumpus: [to answer my own question: no, the limit for par is MAX_SCRIPTCHECK_THREADS, or 16]
22:12:54 morcos: but to me optimizing for more than 16 cores is pretty valuable as miners could use beefy machines and be less concerned by block validation time
22:14:38 BlueMatt: morcos: i think you may be surprised by the number of mining pools that are on VPSes that do not have 16 cores 
22:15:34 gmaxwell: I assume right now most of the time block validation is bogged in the parts that are not as concurrent. simple because caching makes the concurrent parts so fast. (and soon to hopefully increase with bluematt's patch)
22:17:55 gmaxwell: improving sha2 speed, or transaction malloc overhead are probably bigger wins now for connection at the tip than parallelism beyond 16 (though I'd like that too).
22:18:21 BlueMatt: sha2 speed is big
22:18:27 morcos: yeah lots of things to do actually...
22:18:57 gmaxwell: BlueMatt: might be a tiny bit less big if we didn't hash the block header 8 times for every block. 
22:21:27 BlueMatt: ehh, probably, but I'm less rushed there
22:21:43 BlueMatt: my new cache thing is about to add a bunch of hashing
22:21:50 BlueMatt: 1 sha round per tx
22:22:25 BlueMatt: and sigcache is obviously a ton
```
Tree-SHA512: a594430e2a77d8cc741ea8c664a2867b1e1693e5050a4bbc8511e8d66a2bffe241a9965f6dff1e7fbb99f21dd1fdeb95b826365da8bd8f9fab2d0ffd80d5059c
6058766de Remove deprecated PyZMQ call from Python ZMQ example (Michał Zabielski)
Pull request description:
PyZMQ 17.0.0 has deprecated and removed zmq.asyncio.install() call
with advice to use asyncio native run-loop instead of zmq specific.
This caused exception when running the contrib/zmq/zmq_sub*.py examples.
This commit simply follows the advice and fixes mentioned examples.
Tree-SHA512: af357aafa5eb9506cfa3f513f06979bbc49f6132fddc1e96fbcea175da4f8e2ea298be7c7055e7d3377f0814364e13bb88b5c195f6a07898cd28c341d23a93c5
e2b2e48b6 doc: SIGNER can contains space inside now. (Ken Lee)
Pull request description:
SIGNER can contains space inside now. mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12527#issuecomment-370506416
Tree-SHA512: 8da1e8146751457c351058c0142fa3d474a338fe7304a31ebed4726202202724aaca94441806458512259238a703601b87961196abc3fdd57b5eb0f062ff0c12
Changes addrman to use the test-before-evict discipline in which an
address is to be evicted from the tried table is first tested and if
it is still online it is not evicted.
Adds tests to provide test coverage for this change.
This change was suggested as Countermeasure 3 in
Eclipse Attacks on Bitcoin’s Peer-to-Peer Network, Ethan Heilman,
Alison Kendler, Aviv Zohar, Sharon Goldberg. ePrint Archive Report
2015/263. March 2015.
Currently, error messages (such as InitError) are displayed as-is, which
means Qt does auto detection on the format.
This means that it's possible to inject HTML from the command line
though e.g. specifying a wallet name with HTML in it. This isn't
a direct security risk because fetching content from internet is
disabled (and as far as I know we never report strings received
from the network this way). However, it can be confusing.
So explicitly force the format as text.
741f0177c Add DynamicMemoryUsage() to LevelDB (Evan Klitzke)
Pull request description:
This adds a new method `CDBWrapper::DynamicMemoryUsage()` similar to Bitcoin's existing methods of the same name. It's implemented by asking LevelDB for the information, and then parsing the string response. I've also added logging to `CDBWrapper::WriteBatch()` to track this information:
```
$ tail -f ~/.bitcoin/testnet3/debug.log | grep WriteBatch
2018-03-05 19:34:55 WriteBatch memory usage: db=chainstate, before=0.0MiB, after=0.0MiB
2018-03-05 19:35:17 WriteBatch memory usage: db=index, before=0.0MiB, after=0.0MiB
2018-03-05 19:35:17 WriteBatch memory usage: db=chainstate, before=0.0MiB, after=8.0MiB
2018-03-05 19:35:22 WriteBatch memory usage: db=index, before=0.0MiB, after=0.0MiB
2018-03-05 19:35:22 WriteBatch memory usage: db=chainstate, before=8.0MiB, after=17.0MiB
2018-03-05 19:35:26 WriteBatch memory usage: db=index, before=0.0MiB, after=0.0MiB
2018-03-05 19:35:27 WriteBatch memory usage: db=chainstate, before=9.0MiB, after=18.0MiB
2018-03-05 19:35:40 WriteBatch memory usage: db=index, before=0.0MiB, after=0.0MiB
2018-03-05 19:35:41 WriteBatch memory usage: db=chainstate, before=9.0MiB, after=7.0MiB
2018-03-05 19:35:52 WriteBatch memory usage: db=index, before=0.0MiB, after=0.0MiB
2018-03-05 19:35:52 WriteBatch memory usage: db=chainstate, before=7.0MiB, after=9.0MiB
^C
```
As LevelDB doesn't seem to provide a way to get the database name, I've also added a new `m_name` field to the `CDBWrapper`. This is necessary because we have multiple LevelDB databases (two now, and possibly more later, e.g. #11857).
I am using this information in other branches where I'm experimenting with changing LevelDB buffer sizes.
Tree-SHA512: 7ea8ff5484bb07ef806af17d000c74ccca27d2e0f6c3229e12d93818f00874553335d87428482bd8acbcae81ea35aef2a243326f9fccbfac25989323d24391b4
874e81808 Allow dustrelayfee to be set to zero (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
I don't see and can't think of any rationale for forbidding this configuration.
Tree-SHA512: df09441f4aec63e79bea94838b7f8e336cebaeb0a22b5e58d27937bbeb1377f229921aeae43674e0b63fc40a39ae51a264d48aa1cdb4cbd0e3339d32856698bf
55f89da1a Don't test against the mempool min fee information in mempool_limit.py (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Because the right-hand side of this comparison can be influenced
externally, e.g. via the -maxmempool argument, the existing mempool state,
host memory usage, etc.
Called out by @MarcoFalke here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12356#discussion_r170094948
Tree-SHA512: 1644cb8046a6953fb93423a5e51af4f5c7d00a35f10389fddd6a823dae6f31ab367b53af70b3b69161adb9c48f57cf4772db7f4610fd7aadd9c0e9b3da17e9f8
2b1f79457 [Depends] Fix Qt build with Xcode 9.2 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Building Qt in depends is currently broken with versions of Xcode > 9.0 (on both 10.12.x and 10.13.x). We'll bump our Clang/Qt/SDK again soon, however this fixes building in the interim.
Fixes#11461
Related upstream issues: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-63401, https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-62266.
Tree-SHA512: b1aaa50580c5180bbae2d79f5618c145667edd824b66c20851c7346674a1700267d6df249ba559d781941def312f7867bc3950f673e9128ffd4beda2965ca639
9c5a4a6ed Stop special-casing phashBlock handling in validation for TBV (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
There is no reason to do this, really, we already have "ignore PoW" flags. Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11739#discussion_r155841721
Tree-SHA512: 37cb1ae5b11c9e8ed7a679bb07ad3b119a2a014744b26d197d67ba21beb19fe6815271df935e40f7c7bd5f2e4d7ae4dad7bd4d00fa230a8d789f37e9de31a769
0bc095efd [qt] Improved "custom fee" explanation in tooltip (Randolf Richardson)
Pull request description:
Thanks to @dooglus for asking about this tooltip in Issue 12500.
Reference: https://www.github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12500
I would also appreciate it if someone can confirm that 1 kilobyte in this field indeed represents 1,000 bytes rather than 1,024 bytes (if it's supposed to be 1,024, then I'll gladly make the necessary changes to reflect this).
Tree-SHA512: da2fe0128411b5ef6f0a26382a80601efcf823c3f3591bdd83a7fe7e25777728e7eb89e2e8b175b991566e63838aca12d204792f981031b86e7b2ba28ca50021
9360f5032 Drop extra script variable in ProduceSignature (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Was slightly confusing.
Tree-SHA512: 1d18f92c133772ffc8eb71826c8d778988839a14bcefc50f9c591111b0a5f81ebc12bca0f1ab25d5fdd02d3d50c2325c04cbfcbdcd18a7b80ca112d049c2327d
2736c9e05 Avoid unintentional unsigned integer wraparounds in tests (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Avoid unintentional unsigned integer wraparounds in tests.
This is a subset of #11535 as suggested by @MarcoFalke :-)
Tree-SHA512: 4f4ee8a08870101a3f7451aefa77ae06aaf44e3c3b2f7555faa2b8a8503f97f34e34dffcf65154278f15767dc9823955f52d1aa7b39930b390e57cdf2b65e0f3
992f56876 depends: Only use D_DARWIN_C_SOURCE when building miniupnpc on darwin (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Only use D_DARWIN_C_SOURCE when building on darwin, so we don't inadvertently introduce issues elsewhere.
cc @theuni
Tree-SHA512: e49a8456ba2b9925c06e62c73e139152b6d63cc5a4cee66944e41c863ca9103e98ac81a5718eceb3d0885a677fc53ece34062b02c304a05c3280e094965e856a
87c4320df gitian-build.sh: fix signProg being recognized as two parameters (Ken Lee)
Pull request description:
On current build script, `gpg --detach-sign` will be recognized as two parameters of gsign
This PR fix it and can build successfully
Tree-SHA512: 32e2f9e8414658ea4145bcbccd9aaa3cdf61ea648ad9328246bad67957e11a8e496afec71cbd888f8d0d49bd7eaed35c971fe2dac43b80ee6e664b90ffd997a3
18307849b Consensus: Fix bug when compiler do not support __builtin_clz* (532479301)
Pull request description:
#ifdef is not correct since defination is defined to 0 or 1. Should change to #if
Tree-SHA512: ba13a591d28f4d7d6ebaab081be4304c43766a611226f8d2994c8db415dfcf318e82217d26a8c4af290760c68eded9503b39535b0e6e079ded912e6a8fca5b36
7eb665fc8 [Trivial] link mentioned scripted-diff-commit (Felix Wolfsteller)
Pull request description:
Make it easier for people who do not operate on a cloned repository to access the example mentioned.
Tree-SHA512: 1c06e551c68cad03e6bd541bf0e0076cdf0b48ef9b8b4e4a61435367c3435e2e4ccb934112e8dc29d3d70217d8834924704aaf839e25d1133312df86848ca1a1
