chain.h does not actually depend on the methods defined in pow.h, just its
include of consensus/params.h, which is standalone and can be included instead.
Confirmed by inspection and successful build.
f08a385590 [qt]: changes sendcoinsdialog's box layout for improved readability. (marcoagner)
Pull request description:
I'm addressing two (probably duplicate) issues: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11606 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10613.
Some points worth noting:
- I've tried to balance the proposed changes on both issues without going too far and remaining a bit conservative. It will be easier to improve based on suggestions where necessary.
- I preferred to maintain a layout that doesn't ask for an address truncation because, in my view, this wallet should be conservative on this.
- I didn't follow the idea of aligning the amounts to the right for finding it more natural (and minimalist) to read the information without having to map alignments. Additionally, that approach seems to need more `<hr />`'s (or similar) in order to help the user to map information, which ended up cluttering the box too much (specially with multiple recipients). Thus, I preferred to just give some more space between recipients. Let me know if there are better ideas on this.
Visually, I went from this (current):
To this:
As a side note, while doing this, I thought about a better way to show fees and found there's already a PR on this (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12189) and thought it is
Tree-SHA512: e94b740fab6c1babd853a97be65c3b6f86ec174c975a926fde66b147f7a47e0cf0fa10f7255ba92aaba68c76a80dde8c688008179a34705a9799bf24d3c5cd46
159c32d1f1 Add assertion to guide static analyzers. Clang Static Analyzer needs this guidance. (practicalswift)
fd447a6efe Fix dead stores. Values were stored but never read. Limit scope. (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Fix Clang Static Analyzer warnings reported by @kallewoof in #12961:
* Fix dead stores. Values were stored but never read.
* Add assertion to guide static analyzers. See #12961 for details.
Tree-SHA512: 83dbec821f45217637316bee978e7543f2d2caeb7f7b0b3aec107fede0fff8baa756da8f6b761ae0d38537740839ac9752f6689109c38a4b05c0c041aaa3a1fb
2352aa9 test: Ensure that recursive -includeconf produces appropriate warnings (Karl-Johan Alm)
c5bcc7d util: warn about recursive -includeconf arguments in configuration files (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to #10267, and addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10267#issuecomment-387546144.
~~I am adding extra work for @jnewbery in #12755 here -- maybe I should just rebase on top of that, but not sure what the appropriate approach is here.~~
Tree-SHA512: 87f0c32436b70424e33616ffb88d7cb699f90d6a583a10237e224b28fc936d6a9df95536c8c52ee8546b3942da92b2a357e61bf87e00d1462bc10d46d3bee352
9e49db2 Make --enable-debug to pick better options (Evan Klitzke)
Pull request description:
Cherry-picked (and rebased) 94189645e67f364c4445d62e2b00c282d885cbbf from the "up for grabs" PR: "[build] Make --enable-debug pick better options" (#12695).
See previous review in #12695.
Tree-SHA512: a93cdadcf13e2ef8519acb1ce4f41ce95057a388347bb0a86a5c164dc7d0b0d14d4bb2a466082d5a100b8d50de65c605c40abaed555e8ea77c99e28800a34439
66b0b1b2a6 Add compile time checking for all cs_wallet runtime locking assertions (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add compile time checking for `cs_wallet` runtime locking assertions.
This PR is a subset of #12665. The PR was broken up to make reviewing easier.
The intention is that literally all `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED`/`LOCKS_EXCLUDED`:s added in this PR should follow either directly or indirectly from `AssertLockHeld(…)`/`AssertLockNotHeld(…)`:s already existing in the repo.
Consider the case where function `A(…)` contains `AssertLockHeld(cs_foo)` (without
first locking `cs_foo` in `A`), and that `B(…)` calls `A(…)` (without first locking `cs_main`):
* It _directly_ follows that: `A(…)` should have an `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_foo)` annotation.
* It _indirectly_ follows that: `B(…)` should have an `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_foo)` annotation.
Tree-SHA512: d561d89e98a823922107e56dbd493f0f82e22edac91e51e6422f17daf2b446a70c143b7b157ca618fadd33d0ec63eb7a57dde5a83bfdf1fc19d71459b43e21fd
b6f0b4d wallet: Improve logging when BerkeleyDB environment fails to close (Tim Ruffing)
264c643 wallet: Reset BerkeleyDB handle after connection fails (Tim Ruffing)
Pull request description:
According to the BerkeleyDB docs, the DbEnv handle may not be accessed
after close() has been called. This change ensures that we create a new
handle after close() is called. This avoids a segfault when the first
connection attempt fails and then a second connection attempt tries to
call open() on the already closed DbEnv handle.
Without the patch, bitcoindd reliably crashes in the second call to `set_lg_dir()` after `close()` if
there is an issue with the database:
```
2018-05-03T13:27:21Z Bitcoin Core version v0.16.99.0-a024a1841-dirty (debug build)
[...]
2018-05-03T13:27:21Z Using wallet directory /home/tim/.bitcoin
2018-05-03T13:27:21Z init message: Verifying wallet(s)...
2018-05-03T13:27:21Z Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 4.8.30: (April 9, 2010)
2018-05-03T13:27:21Z Using wallet wallet.dat
2018-05-03T13:27:21Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: LogDir=/home/tim/.bitcoin/database
2018-05-03T13:27:21Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: Error -30974 opening database environment: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
2018-05-03T13:27:21Z Moved old /home/tim/.bitcoin/database to /home/tim/.bitcoin/database.1525354041.bak. Retrying.
2018-05-03T13:27:21Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: LogDir=/home/tim/.bitcoin/database ErrorFile=/home/tim/.bitcoin/db.log
[1] 14533 segmentation fault (core dumped) ./src/bitcoind
```
After the fix:
```
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z Bitcoin Core version v0.16.99.0-cc09e3bd0-dirty (release build)
[...]
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z Using wallet directory /home/tim/.bitcoin
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z init message: Verifying wallet(s)...
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 4.8.30: (April 9, 2010)
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z Using wallet wallet.dat
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: LogDir=/home/tim/.bitcoin/database ErrorFile=/home/tim/.bitcoin/db.log
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z scheduler thread start
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: Error -30974 opening database environment: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z Moved old /home/tim/.bitcoin/database to /home/tim/.bitcoin/database.1525367972.bak. Retrying.
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: LogDir=/home/tim/.bitcoin/database ErrorFile=/home/tim/.bitcoin/db.log
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z Cache configuration:
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z * Using 2.0MiB for block index database
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z * Using 8.0MiB for chain state database
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z * Using 440.0MiB for in-memory UTXO set (plus up to 286.1MiB of unused mempool space)
2018-05-03T17:19:32Z init message: Loading block index..
[...]
```
Tree-SHA512: b809b318e5014ec47d023dc3dc40826b9706bfb211fa08bc2d29f36971b96caa10ad48d9a3f96c03933be46fa4ff7e00e952ac77bfffb6563767fb08aa4f23d6
7384a35 [tests] Remove spurious error log in p2p_segwit.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Since 265d7c44b1, when wait_until() fails,
an error message is logged to the test framework log. This means that if
wait_until() is called inside a try-except with the expectation that it
will fail, a spurious error message is logged.
wait_until() shouldn't be called with the expectation of failure. Fix
that in p2p_segwit.py.
Tree-SHA512: 0a43790b58fee7d2d6bef36e736b0b9ffdde6de5f12d33d15e8e07323597e2be4cd98f17e7fc3a135e06bdafe36613466c0a57e81134e59a251383c62b91918f
a8da482 Bump wallet version for pre split keypool (Andrew Chow)
dfcd9f3 Use a keypool of presplit keys after upgrading to hd chain split (Andrew Chow)
5c50e93 Allow -upgradewallet to upgradewallets to HD (Andrew Chow)
2bcf2b5 Test sethdseed (Andrew Chow)
b5ba01a Add 'sethdseed' RPC to initialize or replace HD seed (Chris Moore)
dd3c07a Separate HaveKey function that checks whether a key is in a keystore (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Revival/rebase of #11085
Adds a new command `sethdseed` which allows you to either set or generate a new HD seed to be used. A new keypool can be generated or the original one kept and new keys added to the keypool will come from the new HD seed.
Wallets that are not HD will be upgraded to be version FEATURE_HD_SPLIT when the `sethdseed` RPC command is used.
I have also add some tests for this.
Additionally `-upgradewallet` can now be used to upgrade a wallet from non-HD to HD. When it is used for such an upgrade, the keypool will be regenerated.
Tree-SHA512: e56c792e150590429ac4a1061e8d6f7b20cca06366e184eb9bbade4cd6ae82699a28fe84f87031eadba97ad2c1606517a105f00fb7b45779c979243020071adb
506c5785fb Enable Travis checking for two Python linting rules we are currently not violating (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Enable Travis checking for two Python linting rules we are currently not violating:
* E101: indentation contains mixed spaces and tabs
* E129: visually indented line with same indent as next logical line
Tree-SHA512: 955ea5ce4576a5bdd561f9d2bbcfaa82f66a23391c84ddb806830ed15e321e4742457ccc801f457819f626d4a66a1ffcaecee28c3b9f3f907ab8401323743485
This commit adds a boolean option `-enablebip61`, defaulting to `1`, that
can be used to disable the sending of BIP61 `reject` messages. This
functionality has been requested for various reasons:
- security (DoS): reject messages can reveal internal state that can be
used to target certain resources such as the mempool more easily.
- bandwidth: a typical node sends lots of reject messages; this counts
against upstream bandwidth. Also the reject messages tend to be larger
than the message that was rejected.
On the other hand, reject messages can be useful while developing client
software (I found them indispensable while creating bitcoin-submittx),
as well as for our own test cases, so whatever the default becomes on the
long run, IMO the functionality should be retained as option. But that's
a discussion for later.
3d8ae74657 travis: Rename the build stage "check_doc" to "lint" (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Rename the Travis build stage from `check_doc` to `lint`.
When `check_doc` was introduced back in fa1b80db88 it was used to make sure `contrib/devtools/check-doc.py` was run only once.
Nowadays `check_docs` is used to trigger various linting type jobs which makes the name `check_doc` a bit misleading.
Tree-SHA512: 39d7f3dd2ee6374e60c64fe4366df5f8752e350c4404d2d5b3dd9da64d6ac730a6b523286df4042a14360a5740e068a072ef32e04283ada719c988c7f9a1bf86
11fa6bb66e Bugfix: ensure consistency of m_failed_blocks after reconsiderblock (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This was introduced in 015a5258ad and could cause a node to crash (due to assertion failure) when using the `reconsiderblock` rpc.
Tree-SHA512: 820dcd761bf983e36f5d0f16777ed75c833daaf62a6b3a4dbd17f6caaf9287223e3a202d06540ac62f8ba72926b73b0873bb76c6273ddcb19d9408f4c1cd325e
Bump the wallet version to indicate support for the pre split keypool.
Also prevents any wallets from upgrading to versions between HD_SPLIT
and PRE_SPLIT_KEYPOOL.
After upgrading to HD chain split, we want to continue to use keys
from the old keypool. To do this, before we generate any new keys after
upgrading, we mark all of the keypool entries as being pre-chain
split and move them to a separate pre chain split keypool. Keys are
fetched from that keypool until it is emptied. Only then are the new
internal and external keypools used.
Changes the maximum upgradewallet version to the latest wallet version
number, 159900. Non-HD wallets will be upgraded to use HD derivation.
Non HD chain split wallets will be upgraded to HD chain split.
If a non-HD wallet is upgraded to HD, the keypool will be entirely
regenerated.
Since upgradewallet is effectively run during a first run, all of the
first run initial setup stuff is combined with the upgrade to HD
If multiple threads are invoking ActivateBestChain, it was possible to have
them working towards different tips, and we could arrive at a less work tip
than we should. Fix this by introducing a ChainState lock which must
be held for the entire duration of ActivateBestChain to enforce
exclusion in ABC.
Technically, some internal datastructures may be in an inconsistent
state if we do this, though there are no known bugs there. Still,
for future safety, its much better to only unlock cs_main if we've
made progress (not just tried a reorg which may make progress).
364bae5 qa: Pad scriptPubKeys to get minimum sized txs (MarcoFalke)
7485488 Policy to reject extremely small transactions (Johnson Lau)
0f8719b Add transaction tests for constant scriptCode (Johnson Lau)
9dabfe4 Add constant scriptCode policy in non-segwit scripts (Johnson Lau)
Pull request description:
This disables `OP_CODESEPARATOR` in non-segwit scripts (even in an unexecuted branch), and makes a positive `FindAndDelete` result invalid. This ensures that the `scriptCode` serialized in `SignatureHash` is always the same as the script passing to the `EvalScript`.
Tree-SHA512: a0552cb920294d130251c48053fa2ff1fbdd26332e62b52147d918837852750f0ce35ce2cd1cbdb86588943312f8154ccb4925e850dbb7c2254bc353070cd5f8
5d536619ab [tests] Remove 'account' API from wallet functional tests (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Next step in #12952. Removes all usage of the 'account' API from the wallet functional tests, except:
- rpc_deprecated.py (which specifically tests the `-deprecatedrpc=accounts` command line argument is working properly).
- `wallet_labels.py` (which tests that both the 'label' and 'account' APIs work in V0.17).
'account' API usage for both of those tests can be removed once V0.17 has been branched.
Also excluded is:
- `wallet_importprunedfunds.py` (which fails due to a bitcoind OOM error)
Tree-SHA512: 6701b32f83d2d47597ba093ded665d7aa630f7a9c759ff15e3e33a3e3bc7600e8d29cf4e72aed5f8f9f6769cc9b614c681951720eab1ed2473f5f8dec57e7a6f
12d1b77f7e [tests] Fixed intermittent failure in p2p_sendheaders.py. (lmanners)
Pull request description:
Added handling for the case where headers are announced over more than one message.
refs #12453
Tree-SHA512: 2c5b48ff019089b86e358181ba170d3aac09d4ae41ec79c2718e0ee83705860501bbcb8fd94d0f5c4f86c0d54a96781a967716621bb8c5ecc991b39af3cec506
09c6699900 [qa] Handle disconnect_node race (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Several tests call disconnect_nodes() on each node-pair in rapid
succession, resulting in a race condition if a node disconnects a peer
in-between the calculation of the nodeid's to disconnect and the
invocation of the disconnectnode rpc call. Handle this.
Tree-SHA512: 3078cea0006fcb507c812004a777c505eb1e9dda7c6df12dbbe72395a73ff6f6760f597b6492054f5487b34534417ddef5fbad30553c135c288c4b7cfce79223
Since 265d7c44b1, when wait_until() fails,
an error message is logged to the test framework log. This means that if
wait_until() is called inside a try-except with the expectation that it
will fail, a spurious error message is logged.
wait_until() shouldn't be called with the expectation of failure. Fix
that in p2p_segwit.py.
4d4185a4f0 Make gArgs aware of the arguments (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Instead of each binary generating and printing it's own help string, have gArgs know what the args are and generate the help string.
This is the first commit of #13112 pulled out.
Tree-SHA512: d794c872b834bc56c78d947549f9cf046a8174984ab0c7b4ba06bc51d36dca11a4ed88afafe76bb4f776cdba042e17e30b9c2ed7b195bef7df77a1327823f989
Several tests call disconnect_nodes() on each node-pair in rapid
succession, resulting in a race condition if a node disconnects a peer
in-between the calculation of the nodeid's to disconnect and the
invocation of the disconnectnode rpc call. Handle this.
a2f678d Bugfix: the end of a reorged chain is invalid when connect fails (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Introduced in 4e0eed88ac
When an invalid block is found during a reorg, we know the last of the blocks in the was-to-be-connected chain is invalid, but not necessarily the first. As `vpIndexToConnect` is ordered in decreasing height, the end of the reorg is the front of the vector, and not the back.
This only affected the warning system.
Tree-SHA512: ddf749f8a78083811a5a17152723f545c1463768d09dc9832ec3682e803a3c106fb768de9fa91c03aa95e644d4e41361a7e4ee791940fd7d51cdefea90de31fc
beee49b [tests] Allow stderr to be tested against specified string (John Newbery)
e503671 [Tests] Use LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_=1 in tests (John Newbery)
c22ce8a [Tests] Write stdout/stderr to datadir instead of temp file. (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
**Due to a merge conflict, this is now based on #10267. Please review that PR first!**
Subset of #12379 now that parts of that PR have been merged.
#12362 was only observed when running the functional tests locally because:
- by defatul libc logs to `/dev/tty` instead of stderr
- the functional tests only check for substring inclusion in stderr when we're expecting bitcoind to fail.
This PR tightens our checking of stderr and will cause tests to fail if there is any unexpected message in stderr:
- commit *Write stdout/stderr to datadir instead of temp file* writes stderr to a file in the datadir instead of a temporary file. This helps with debugging in the case of failure.
- commit *Use LIBC_FATAL_STDERR=1 in tests* ensures that libc failures are logged to stderr instead of the terminal.
commit *Assert that bitcoind stdout is empty on shutdown* asserts that stderr is empty on bitcoind shutdown.
Tree-SHA512: 21111030e667b3b686f2a7625c2b625ebcfb6998e1cccb4f3932e8b5d21fb514b19a73ac971595d049343430e9a63155986a7f5648cad55b8f36f3c58b1c7048
By default, libc will print fatal errors to /dev/tty instead of stderr.
Adding the LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_ to the environment variables allows
us to catch libc errors in stderr and test for them.
fac1e1f qa: Remove unused option --srcdir (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `srcdir` option was both unused and misleading; It should have been called `builddir`. So remove it.
Tree-SHA512: 2c24dcf2aa82219158b8cbbf03dd3f0f51f805f1f5f670faa1fd59e5a8d60fda120ffddadeccb058d8d3f20583b4952be7afd2df6bbefb9367d35c0f0a9fda3c
891beb0 [test] fundrawtransaction: lock watch-only shared address (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
`self.nodes[0]` creates an address which is watch-only-shared with `self.nodes[3]`. If `nodes[0]` spends the associated UTXO during any of its sends later, the watchonly test will fail, as `nodes[3]` now has insufficient funds.
I ran into this in #12257 and this commit is in that PR as well, but I figured I'd split it out (and remove from there once/if merged).
Tree-SHA512: d04a04b1ecebe82127cccd47c1b3de311bf07f4b51dff80db20ea2f142e1d5c4a85ed6180c5c0b081d550e238c742e119b953f60f487deac5a3f3536e1a8d9fe
