9b085f4863 Mention new descriptor RPCs in descriptors.md (Pieter Wuille)
28d78de00b Mention new PSBT RPCs in psbt.md (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The documentation in `psbt.md` and `descriptors.md` does not list new and updated RPCs (`analyzepsbt`, `utxoupdatepsbt`, `joinpsbts`, `deriveaddresses`, `getdescriptorinfo`, `listunspent`). Fix this.
It'd be good to have this in 0.18 (only documentation).
ACKs for commit 9b085f:
fanquake:
utACK 9b085f4
Tree-SHA512: ee16907e8c15351a530f11fc0a585c50835a7bf5aec997ac0e897949d9b9e41a28ddebbeaba69753fee7d2de75e518091518185085fcd1f6ada94b7231097b2e
fa49db7eac doc: Clarify sendrawtransaction::maxfeerate==0 help (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Used a lot in e.g. the tests: `git grep 'maxfeerate=0)' test`
ACKs for commit fa49db:
promag:
ACK fa49db7.
jonatack:
ACK fa49db7eac
Tree-SHA512: cb3fa10960f45606c3599b76c48666a663e5c44cfb7c29bab5d44caa7dc6cb57aaac81cb9b173e079dde01d07c5363c99416f25303a8fd41010928118474a741
faf62d9415 gui: Generate bech32 addresses by default (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Most services support bech32 addresses now, so generating legacy addresses by default seems overly cautious. bech32 addresses are more robust and user friendly in multiple ways.
ACKs for commit faf62d:
promag:
utACK faf62d9, maybe add a release note "checkbox changed, but the behavior/outcome remains the same".
laanwj:
utACK faf62d9415, don't think a release note is needed for this specifically, though a general release note on switching to bech32 by default would make sense
fanquake:
tACK faf62d9
Empact:
utACK faf62d9415
Tree-SHA512: a03e6ccf1e5476fe800941992c531664830cec0644984d8bce97c8d8f5d6d9abd528ab979892368cd195e7c8b9083d6b8dfd36a7cb172aa9dbeaa01a948e30e1
6d44c5ebf9 depends: Add commands for each package for each stage (Carl Dong)
80f0e05b70 depends: Preprocessing doesn't care about deps (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Adds make targets for each package for each stage, e.g.
```sh
make zeromq_configured
```
ACKs for commit 6d44c5:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 6d44c5ebf9 (Haven't looked at the code changes, but adding this feature makes sense)
ryanofsky:
ACK 6d44c5ebf9
Tree-SHA512: f1ac0aecfd2372aed09ca63603e2634552cb3f6ff9d610f958e2a66952d7d9e870b4c32b7d996886879e6d3016532272e8b1a10c13ed7b31009c6c96f786db9f
8f5d9431a Add regtests for HTTP status codes. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This adds explicit tests for the returned HTTP status codes to `interface_rpc.py` (for error cases) and the HTTP JSON-RPC client in general for success.
#15381 brought up discussion about the HTTP status codes in general, and the general opinion was that the current choice may not be ideal but should not be changed to preserve compatibility with existing JSON-RPC clients. Thus it makes sense to actually test the current status to ensure this desired compatibility is not broken accidentally.
ACKs for commit 8f5d94:
laanwj:
utACK 8f5d9431a3
promag:
utACK 8f5d943.
jonasschnelli:
utACK 8f5d9431a3
Tree-SHA512: 82503ccd134dd9145304e95cb6c61755f100bee27593d567cdd5c0c554d47e7b06d937456cab04107f46f4984930355db65d5e711008a0b05f2b8feec9f2950e
7813eb1db1 [qa] Overhaul p2p_compactblocks.py (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Remove tests of:
- compactblock behavior in a simulated pre-segwit version of bitcoind
This should have been removed a long time ago, as it is not generally
necessary for us to test the behavior of old nodes (except perhaps if we
want to test that upgrading from an old node to a new one behaves properly)
- compactblock behavior during segwit upgrade (ie verifying that network
behavior before and after activation was as expected)
This is unnecessary to test now that segwit activation has already happened.
ACKs for commit 7813eb:
jnewbery:
utACK 7813eb1db1
Tree-SHA512: cadf035e6f822fa8cff974ed0c2e88a1d4d7da559b341e574e785fd3d309cc2c98c63bc05479265dc00550ae7b77fc3cbe815caae7f68bcff13a04367dca9b52
892eff05f1 Add documentation of struct PSBTAnalysis et al (Glenn Willen)
ef22fe8c1f Refactor analyzepsbt for use outside RPC code (Glenn Willen)
afd20a25f2 Move PSBT decoding functions from core_io to psbt.cpp (Glenn Willen)
Pull request description:
Refactor the analyzepsbt RPC into (1) an AnalyzePSBT function, which returns
its output as a new strongly-typed PSBTAnalysis struct, and (2) a thin wrapper
which converts the struct into a UniValue for RPC use.
----
As with my previous refactoring PR, I need this because I am creating a dependency on this code from the GUI. Per discussion in #bitcoin-core-dev on IRC, since we don't want to create a dependency on UniValue in anything outside RPC, I introduced some new structs to hold the info we get when analyzing a PSBT. For the field types, I used whatever types are already used internally for this data (e.g. CAmount, CFeeRate, CKeyID), and only convert to int/string etc. in the wrapper.
@achow101, maybe take the first look? :-)
ACKs for commit 892eff:
sipa:
utACK 892eff05f1
achow101:
utACK 892eff05f1
ryanofsky:
utACK 892eff05f1. Just small cleanups since the last review: removing unneeded include, forward decl, adding const ref
Tree-SHA512: eb278b0a82717ebc3eb0c08dc5bb4eefb996a317a6a3a8ecf51cd88110ddbb188ad3482cdd9563e557995e73aca5a282c1f6e352bc598155f1203b7b46fe5dee
fa8548c5d1 net: Remove unused unsanitized user agent string CNode::strSubVer (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I fail to see a use case for this unsanitized byte array. In fact this can easily be confused with `cleanSubVer` and be displayed to the user (or logged) by a simple typo that is hard to find in review.
Further reading: https://btcinformation.org/en/developer-reference#version
ACKs for commit fa8548:
promag:
utACK fa8548c, good catch.
practicalswift:
utACK fa8548c5d1
sipa:
utACK fa8548c5d1
Tree-SHA512: 3c3ff1504d1583ad099df9a6aa761458a82ec48a58ef7aaa9b5679a5281dd1b59036ba2932ed708488951a565b669a3083ef70be5a58472ff8677b971162ae2f
fabfb79673 doc: Add release notes for 15596 (MarcoFalke)
fac1a0fe54 wallet: Remove unused GetLegacyBalance (MarcoFalke)
faa3a246e8 scripted-diff: wallet: Rename pcoin to wtx (MarcoFalke)
fae5f874d5 rpc: Document that minconf is an ignored dummy value (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Other RPCs such as `sendtoaddress` don't have this option at all and `sendmany` should by default spend from (lets say) our change.
ACKs for commit fabfb7:
jnewbery:
utACK fabfb79673
ryanofsky:
utACK fabfb79673. Nice writeup! Release notes are only change since previous review.
Tree-SHA512: 2526ead2330be7c2beb78b96bc5e55440566c4a3a809bbbd66f5c9fc517f6890affa5d14005dc102644d49679a374510f9507255e870cf88aaa63e429beef658
ac67582ff7 depends: latest rapidcheck, use INSTALL_ALL_EXTRAS (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This updates RapidCheck to the latest version available from https://github.com/emil-e/rapidcheck.
RapidCheck now uses the new `RC_INSTALL_ALL_EXTRAS` option, to install the extra `boost_test` packages, which should unblock progress in #14430.
ACKs for commit ac6758:
MarcoFalke:
utACK ac67582ff7
Tree-SHA512: a4a4ef0ec09cf61cdc0de241703f5f8e98f6fa92f4024a0fbbf4d4ef91d9d3bc8d662c55d896aced8de68aa9429728b2bc5001c91c6f92d63d60c47f5adf41a0
ea1a2d8794 [wallet] Remove ResendWalletTransactionsBefore (John Newbery)
f5162458cd [rpc] remove resendwallettransactions RPC (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Remove resendwallettransactions RPC method
This RPC was added for testing wallet rebroadcasts. Since we now have a real test for wallet rebroadcasts, it's no longer needed.
The call in wallet_basic.py can be removed because wallet_resendwallettransactions.py tests wallet rebroadcast.
ACKs for commit ea1a2d:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK ea1a2d8794
promag:
utACK ea1a2d8.
Tree-SHA512: 48245d947be1a2d2b8c30d2946105818c454a03b70b63534ecadf2144da64dafe1c9527ea670a5f4d1acd05ccdfc6c9be43ca636ee2ba58a8b7a7b2fc7bc88fd
Remove tests of:
- compactblock behavior in a simulated pre-segwit version of bitcoind
This should have been removed a long time ago, as it is not generally
necessary for us to test the behavior of old nodes (except perhaps if we
want to test that upgrading from an old node to a new one behaves properly)
- compactblock behavior during segwit upgrade (ie verifying that network
behavior before and after activation was as expected)
This is unnecessary to test now that segwit activation has already happened.
Includes changes by John Newbery.
