927f4ff5a GUI: Receive: Remove option to reuse a previous address (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
This was justified by the need to "resent" an invoice, but now that we have the request history, that need should be gone.
Tree-SHA512: 4ade4eb84a21bbbd8dcc3a2c9580d416e113284b5bdf350c22051c233101fe0ee31659c54a7a46e7136f9c999acb61efbbb3f97aeb2fa7b2b1e1daec02ca0837
5e0ba8f8c [wallet] getreceivedbyaddress should return error if address is not mine (John Newbery)
ea0cd24f7 [tests] Tidy up receivedby.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Two commits:
- First commit tidies up the `receivedby.py` test (and speeds it up by factor of two)
- Second commit changes getreceivedbyaddress to return error if the address is not found in wallet, and adds test to `receivedby.py`
Tree-SHA512: e41342dcbd037a6b440cbe4ecd3b8ed589e18e477333f0d866f3564e948e0f5231e497d5ffb66da4e6680eb772d9f0cf839125098bb68b92d04a5ee35c6c0a81
11413646b [trivial] (whitespace only) fix getblockchaininfo alignment (John Newbery)
bd9c18171 [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfo (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Exposing whether the node is in IBD would help for testing, and may be useful in general, particularly for developers.
First discussed in #10357 here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10357#pullrequestreview-59963870
> ... we could simplify this (and possibly other) tests by just adding a way to know if a node is in IBD. I'd like to do that, but I'm not sure it makes sense to complicate this PR with discussion over how that information should be made available. Eg it's not clear to me that the notion of being in IBD is worth exposing to the casual user, versus a hidden rpc call or something, since the definition has changed over time, and may continue to change in the future. But I still do agree that at least for testing purposes it would be far simpler to expose the field somehow...
This PR currently implements the simplest way of doing this: adding an `initialblockdownload` field to `getblockchaininfo`. Other approaches we could take:
1. add a new debug RPC method that exposes `IBD` and potentially other information.
2. add a parameter to `getblockchaininfo`, eg `debug_info`, which would cause it to return debug information including IBD
3. add a query string to the url `?debug=true` which would cause RPCs to return additional debug information.
I quite like the idea of (3). Feedback on these and other approaches very much welcomed!
@sdaftuar @laanwj
Tree-SHA512: a6dedd47f8c9bd38769cc597524466250041136feb33500644b9c48d0ffe4e3eeeb2587b5bbc6420364ebdd2667df807fbb50416f9a7913bbf11a14ea86dc0d4
Change feebumper from a stateful class into a namespace of stateless
functions.
Having the results of feebumper calls persist in an object makes process
separation between Qt and wallet awkward, because it means the feebumper object
either has to be serialized back and forth between Qt and wallet processes
between fee bump calls, or that the feebumper object needs to stay alive in the
wallet process with an object reference passed back to Qt. It's simpler just to
have fee bumper calls return their results immediately instead of storing them
in an object with an extended lifetime.
In addition to making feebumper stateless, also:
- Move LOCK calls from Qt code to feebumper
- Move TransactionCanBeBumped implementation from Qt code to feebumper
Future commit will remove the FeeBumper class. This commit simply places
everything into a feebumper namespace, and changes the enum class name
from BumpeFeeResult to feebumper::Result.
Future PRs will completely refactor this translation unit and touch all
this code so we rename the variables to follow project stlye guidelines
in this preparation commit.
Don't use m_ prefixes for member variables since we're going to remove
the class entirely in the next commits.
203a4aa31 Fix CTxMemPoolEntry::UpdateAncestorState: modifySigOps param type int -> int64_t (donaloconnor)
Pull request description:
CTxMemPoolEntry::CTxMemPoolEntry's modifySigOps parameter is int while update_ancestor_state::modifySigOpsCost is int64_t. This issue was raised in #11165. It looks like the function paramaters were not changed in commit 72abd2c
This will avoid unexpected truncation of int64_t -> int
Tree-SHA512: 314c703f217e104336456859066d18fb0d12c4f9f32835e17490a6f29eb05951184095039e4e57edacef8ad35dd75c6d97d9af656a52209dd0c3779b4ffa0914
- Fix flake8 warnings
- Remove the useless get_sub_array_from_array() function
- Reduce runtime for receivedby.py by about half by only using two nodes
5b9748f97 Small refactor of CCoinsViewCache::BatchWrite() (Dan Raviv)
Pull request description:
`std::unordered_map::erase( const_iterator pos )` returns an iterator to the element following the removed one. Use that to optimize (probably minor-performance-wise, and definitely code-structure-wise) the implementation of `CCoinsViewCache::BatchWrite()`.
Tree-SHA512: 00abc838ad91771cfcddd45688841c9414869b75289d09b483a7f0ba835614fe189e9c8aca8a80e3de78ee397ec14083ae52e2e92b7863b3b6eb0d0cb892c9dd
d052e3847 [qt] Add use available balance in send coins dialog (CryptAxe)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #11098 to handle #11033 where a new button `Use available balance` is added to each entry. When activated, the available balance is calculated by using the coin control (if any) and then it's subtracted the remaining recipient amounts. If this amount is positive then the `Subtract fee from amount` is automatically selected.
Comparing to #11098, this has the advantage to avoid the fair amount division over the recipients and allows to fine adjust the amounts in multiple iterations.
Started from @CryptAxe commit 89e9eda to credit some code.
<img width="965" alt="screen shot 2017-09-13 at 01 32 44" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3534524/30354518-e1bee31c-9824-11e7-9354-300aa63cdfd0.png">
<img width="964" alt="screen shot 2017-09-13 at 01 44 57" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3534524/30354598-5731ac9c-9825-11e7-9d5f-8781988ed219.png">
Tree-SHA512: 01d20c13fd8b6c2a0ca1d74d3a9027c6922e6dccd3b08e59d5a72636be7072ed5eca7ebc5d431299497dd3374e83753220ad4174d8bc46dadb4b2f54973036a5
748157913 [tests] Make comp test framework more debuggable (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We should remove the comparison test framework entirely (see #10603).
Until we do that, let's make it a bit more debuggable. Currently, if there's an assert in the framework, it's very difficult to track down where we are in the test generator. Make the logging a bit better to help with debugging.
Before this PR:
```
→ ./p2p-fullblocktest.py
2017-10-09 14:05:11.302000 TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/user/1000/testzdnax_yr
2017-10-09 14:05:11.557000 TestFramework.mininode (INFO): Connecting to Bitcoin Node: 127.0.0.1:11975
2017-10-09 14:05:11.712000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Test 1: PASS
2017-10-09 14:05:11.947000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Test 2: PASS
2017-10-09 14:05:12.057000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Test 3: PASS
2017-10-09 14:05:12.058000 TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 117, in main
self.run_test()
File "./p2p-fullblocktest.py", line 72, in run_test
self.test.run()
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/comptool.py", line 306, in run
assert test_number != 4
AssertionError
2017-10-09 14:05:12.059000 TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2017-10-09 14:05:14.203000 TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /tmp/user/1000/testzdnax_yr
2017-10-09 14:05:14.204000 TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /tmp/user/1000/testzdnax_yr/test_framework.log
```
With this PR:
```
→ ./p2p-fullblocktest.py
2017-10-09 14:03:54.069000 TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/user/1000/testuey7t3tf
2017-10-09 14:03:54.329000 TestFramework.mininode (INFO): Connecting to Bitcoin Node: 127.0.0.1:11783
2017-10-09 14:03:54.383000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 1: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 184
2017-10-09 14:03:54.496000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 2: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 193
2017-10-09 14:03:54.758000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 3: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 205
2017-10-09 14:03:54.867000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 4: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 208
2017-10-09 14:03:54.867000 TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 117, in main
self.run_test()
File "./p2p-fullblocktest.py", line 72, in run_test
self.test.run()
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/comptool.py", line 309, in run
assert test_number != 4
AssertionError
2017-10-09 14:03:54.868000 TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2017-10-09 14:03:56.950000 TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /tmp/user/1000/testuey7t3tf
2017-10-09 14:03:56.950000 TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /tmp/user/1000/testuey7t3tf/test_framework.log
```
Tree-SHA512: 5525958b0098d661c281bd955c92c72bf81359464376e96d44e6c88f18aea57ba08270ecd564edda4b47d674e3b27d20e5b1060544bf8dd5c6a68103d2bb35b8
Static analyzer (and humans!) will see ...
```
else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout == 0 || (state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr && ...
```
... and infer that state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header might be set to nullptr,
and thus flag `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString()`
as a potential null pointer dereference.
This commit makes the tacit assumption (m_work_header != nullptr) explicit.
Code introduced in 5a6d00 ("Permit disconnection of outbound peers on
bad/slow chains") which was merged into master four days ago.
620bae3 Require a steady clock for bench with at least micro precision (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Using a non-steady high_precision_clock by default is definitely not what we want, and in practice steady_clock has more than enough precision. Should double-check that travis passes on this one to make sure we actually have at least microsecond precision on all platforms.
Tree-SHA512: 54a4af3b6addca9897e8ab04694f9461343691b475ca3ed2368595c37520612e284969be94a8ee3d7c66d16532f7bb16b6ad80284cbc153653e8ef2d56696e9d
We should generally avoid writing to debug.log unconditionally for
inbound peers which misbehave (the peer being about to be banned
being an exception, since they cannot do this twice).
To avoid removing logs for outbound peers, a new log is added to
notify users when a new outbound peer is connected which mimics
the version print.
487aff421 Check subtree consistency in Travis (Pieter Wuille)
e1d0cc23a Improve git-subtree-check.sh (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Apparently many of our subtrees get modified by PRs in this repository, without getting noticed.
To improve upon this:
* Make git-subtree-check.sh capable of doing a weaker consistency check (that doesn't need access to external repositories), but which should be sufficient to detect unintended changes. It can be fooled by a fake subtree merge commit, but that would hopefully be obvious to reviewers.
* Make Travis invoke this subtree check for each of our subtrees.
Note that Travis is currently expected to fail on this PR, as 2 out of 4 subtrees (`src/secp156k1` and `src/univalue` have been modified directly in master).
Tree-SHA512: 465b680392d3daf38a8c1dda77d6f74b1d1c23324c378774777fb95aa673e119a8f7e3ccc124e41d97b5ac8975f3d79f3015797d2d309666582394364917ec4e
fa0025dc3 Revert "Remove unused variable in shell script" (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This partially reverts commit ab8e8b97a3 (#10771), as the variable is still used. See for example #11394.
Tree-SHA512: 1788d5471e1399d4a15d287cd8c41979833524e31b8fe61af8a7d20c9777828460d61ab87885a228ba7ca919f1d08703f4cb182d5840eb863e2154b3cf8ff4e6
a357293 Use MakeUnique<Db>(...) (practicalswift)
3e09b39 Use MakeUnique<T>(...) instead of std::unique_ptr<T>(new T(...)) (practicalswift)
8617989 Add MakeUnique (substitute for C++14 std::make_unique) (practicalswift)
d223bc9 Use unique_ptr for pcoinscatcher/pcoinsdbview/pcoinsTip/pblocktree (practicalswift)
b45c597 Use unique_ptr for pdbCopy (Db) and fix potential memory leak (practicalswift)
29ab96d Use unique_ptr for dbenv (DbEnv) (practicalswift)
f72cbf9 Use unique_ptr for pfilter (CBloomFilter) (practicalswift)
8ccf1bb Use unique_ptr for sem{Addnode,Outbound} (CSemaphore) (practicalswift)
73db063 Use unique_ptr for upnp_thread (boost::thread) (practicalswift)
0024531 Use unique_ptr for dbw (CDBWrapper) (practicalswift)
fa6d122 Use unique_ptr:s for {fee,short,long}Stats (TxConfirmStats) (practicalswift)
5a6f768 Use unique_ptr for httpRPCTimerInterface (HTTPRPCTimerInterface) (practicalswift)
860e912 Use unique_ptr for pwalletMain (CWallet) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Use `std::unique_ptr` (C++11) where possible.
Rationale:
1. Avoid resource leaks (specifically: forgetting to `delete` an object created using `new`)
2. Avoid undefined behaviour (specifically: double `delete`:s)
**Note to reviewers:** Please let me know if I've missed any obvious `std::unique_ptr` candidates. Hopefully this PR should cover all the trivial cases.
Tree-SHA512: 9fbeb47b800ab8ff4e0be9f2a22ab63c23d5c613a0c6716d9183db8d22ddbbce592fb8384a8b7874bf7375c8161efb13ca2197ad6f24b75967148037f0f7b20c
ab8e8b9 Remove unused variables in shell scripts. (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Remove unused variables in shell scripts. Use `_` where we don't care about the result.
Tree-SHA512: 35049e79ee432c805f061456c32902a92811b5214d50ce6770b22d1442cc5999ed53cfe05bb2347f6995ca33c707a0f3fe92d5829c0385c4a3e254953924cbc4
dd9bb25 Fix code style in keystore.cpp/crypter.cpp (Jonas Schnelli)
208fda6 CCrypter: move relevant implementation out of the header (Jonas Schnelli)
3155fd2 CKeystore: move relevant implementation out of the header (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Tree-SHA512: 4ce73cca5609199b74b8ff2614ee2b6af949545a1332a3a0135c6453c98665d2b0da171c1e390c9a2aec6b12b7fad931ec90084bb7c2defe243786bfc70daf60
725b79a [test] Verify node doesn't send headers that haven't been fully validated (Russell Yanofsky)
3788a84 Do not send (potentially) invalid headers in response to getheaders (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Nowhere else in the protocol do we send headers which are for
blocks we have not fully validated except in response to getheaders
messages with a null locator. On my public node I have not seen any
such request (whether for an invalid block or not) in at least two
years of debug.log output, indicating that this should have minimal
impact.
Tree-SHA512: c1f6e0cdcdfb78ea577d555f9b3ceb1b4b60eff4f6cf313bfd8b576c9562d797bea73abc23f7011f249ae36dd539c715f3d20487ac03ace60e84e1b77c0c1e1a
fb00c45c3 [tests] Explicitly disallow support for p2p versions below 60001 (John Newbery)
3858aabbd [tests] Remove support for p2p alert messages (John Newbery)
c0b127470 [tests] Remove support for bre-BIP31 ping messages (John Newbery)
2904e301c [tests] Remove dead code from mininode.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This is the first part of #11518. It removes a ~150 lines of unused code from the mininode module:
- remove unused `deliver_sleep_time` and `EarlyDisconnectError` code
- remove support for pre-BIP31 ping messages
- remove support for alert message
- explicitly don't support p2p versions lower than 60001
Should be an easy ACK for reviewers. If all extended tests pass, then this code really was dead :)
Tree-SHA512: 508e612ceb0b094250d18e75522d51e6b14cd069443050ba4af34d6f890c58721cb5653e8bc000b60635b9474d035b0dcd9c509c0dcdb3a7501df17b787f83b0
