mininode now supports witness transactions/blocks, blocktools
has a helper for adding witness commitments to blocks, and script
has a function to calculate hashes for signature under sigversion
1, used by segwit.
Py3 conversion by Marco Falke
Test to make sure upgraded nodes don't ask for non-wit blocks by
Gregory Sanders.
ae357d5 [Bitcoin-Tx] Add tests for sequence number support (Jonas Schnelli)
e59336f [bitcoin-tx] allow to set nSequence number over the in= command (Jonas Schnelli)
a946bb6 [RPC] createrawtransaction: add option to set the sequence number per input (Jonas Schnelli)
Fixing formatting
Adding test case into automatically generated test case set
Clean up commits
removing extra whitespace from eol
Removing extra whitespace on macro line
Changing NOP3 op name to OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, renaming instances of OP_NOP3 in script_tests.json to CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY
Cleaning up NOP3 comment
Re-adding test cases that were accidentally deleted, removing dupicated test case, fixing formatting
Removing re-labeling of OP_NOP3 to OP_CSV
Fixing whitespace issues
They claimed to be testing P2SH scripts with non-push scriptSigs, but
1) they were not enabling P2SH
2) they have push-only scriptSigs
Fix this, and add a few more related cases.
0ecb340 test: Script_error checking in script_invalid tests (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
2317ad7 test: Re-introduce JSON pretty printing in test builder (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
b0ff857 test: Move non-generated script_invalid test to the correct place (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
- Replace NOP3 with CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112)
<nSequence> CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY -> <nSequence>
- Fails if txin.nSequence < nSequence, allowing funds of a txout to be locked for a number of blocks or a duration of time after its inclusion in a block.
- Pull most of CheckLockTime() out into VerifyLockTime(), a local function that will be reused for CheckSequence()
- Add bitwise AND operator to CScriptNum
- Enable CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY as a standard script verify flag
- Transactions that fail CSV verification will be rejected from the mempool, making it easy to test the feature. However blocks containing "invalid" CSV-using transactions will still be accepted; this is *not* the soft-fork required to actually enable CSV for production use.
Check the returned script_error. Add expected script_error
for generated as well as custom tests.
The specific error is not part of consensus, however
it could avoid unclear reporting issues such as #6862 in the future.
Fixes#7513.
Update the unittest that is meant to catch a transaction that is invalid
because it has a null input. The old test failed not because of that
but because it was considered a coinbase with too large script. This is
already checked with a different test, though.
The new test is *not* a coinbase since it has two inputs, but one of
them is null. This really checks the corresponding code path in
CheckTransaction.
c5c1edf Fix spelling mistake in -> if. (Mark Friedenbach)
e846b2a Correct a possibly intentional pun that is nevertheless hard to read: "two times of nLockTime." What is meant is that there are two kinds, or categories of nLockTime. (Mark Friedenbach)
Four cases included:
* The CLTV operand type mismatches the tx locktime. In the script it is
1 (interpreted as block height), but in the tx is 500000000
(interpreted as date)
* The stack is empty when executing OP_CLTV
* The tx is final by having only one input with MAX_INT sequence number
* The operand for CLTV is negative (after OP_0 OP_1 OP_SUB)
<nLockTime> CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY -> <nLockTime>
Fails if tx.nLockTime < nLockTime, allowing the funds in a txout to be
locked until some block height or block time in the future is reached.
Only the logic and unittests are implemented; this commit does not have
any actual soft-fork logic in it.
Thanks to Pieter Wuille for rebase.
Credit goes to Gregory Maxwell for the suggestion of comparing the
argument against the transaction nLockTime rather than the current
time/blockheight directly.
This commit adds several tests to the script_invalid.json data which
exercise some edge conditions that are not currently being tested.
These are mainly being added to cover several cases a branch coverage
analysis of btcd showed are not already being covered, but given more
tests of edge conditions are always a good thing, I'm contributing
them upstream.
The test which is intended to prove that the script engine is properly
rejecting non-minimally encoded PUSHDATA4 data is using the wrong
opcode and value. The test is using 0x4f, which is OP_1NEGATE instead
of the desired 0x4e, which is OP_PUSHDATA4. Further, the push of data
is intended to be 256 bytes, but the value the test is using is
0x00100000 (4096), instead of the desired 0x00010000 (256).
This commit fixes both issues.
This was found while examining the branch coverage in btcd against only
these tests to help find missing branch coverage.
The fix to NegateSignatureS caused a test which had been failing
in IsValidSignatureEncoding to then fail in IsLowDERSignature.
Add new test so the original check remains exercised.
