The RPC was removed in a previous version, but a warning was
left for users to use the estimatesmartfee RPC. Remove that warning now
that estimatefee has been gone for over one version.
fa910e4301 init: Remove deprecated args from hidden args (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The args have been deprecated since 0.17 (maybe longer) and since we reject unknown args, there is no need to add deprecated args to the list of hidden args and then hand-craft an error message if a user provides them.
Tree-SHA512: 3a3191439ab0d7969fb72801d097bd86998524f84b3819380224f746cbe4b0f57beec1ad34744424f6587038035b0ddf418ad13171a8d9c3b97b4f3b7b3222a3
52beb9ed88 Add autogen.sh in ARM Cross-compilation (Walter)
Pull request description:
autogen for the config files was missing.
Tree-SHA512: 90e5fdc3392b64ff239b8f359a94a39a3e992640a67ad7ed80a1a5d765aabf95e4dc2f3f4af5ee2aefbe1d3effd7cef35a57b0fad0eaaef8346a07e460538e62
b6718e373e tests: Use MakeUnique to construct objects owned by unique_ptrs (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
A subset of #14211 ("Use MakeUnique to construct objects owned by unique_ptrs") as suggested by @MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14211#issuecomment-423324019.
Use `MakeUnique` to construct objects owned by `unique_ptr`s.
Rationale:
* `MakeUnique` ensures exception safety in complex expressions.
* `MakeUnique` gives a more concise statement of the construction.
Tree-SHA512: 1228ae6ce7beb178d79142c4e936b728178ccaa8aa35c6d8feeb33d1a667abfdd010c59996a9d833594611e913877ce5794e75953d11d9b1fdbac04aa491d9cf
3ccfa34b32 convert C-style (void) parameter lists to C++ style () (Arvid Norberg)
Pull request description:
In C, an empty parameter list, `()`, means the function takes any arguments, and `(void)` means the function does not take any parameters.
In C++, an empty parameter list means the function does not take any parameters.
So, C++ still supports `(void)` parameter lists with the same semantics, why change to `()`?
1. removing the redundant `void` improves signal-to-noise ratio of the code
2. using `(void)` exposes a rare inconsistency in that a template taking a template `(T)` parameter list, cannot be instantiated with `T=void`
Tree-SHA512: be2897b6c5e474873aa878ed6bac098382cd21866aec33752fe40b089a6331aa6263cae749aba1b4a41e8467f1a47086d32eb74abaf09927fd5a2f44a4b2109a
a2eb6f5405 [rpc] Add getnodeaddresses RPC command (chris-belcher)
Pull request description:
Implements issue https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9463
New getnodeaddresses call gives access via RPC to the peers known by the node. It may be useful for bitcoin wallets to broadcast their transactions over tor for improved privacy without using the centralized DNS seeds. getnodeaddresses is very similar to the getaddr p2p method.
Please advise me on the best approach for writing an automated test. By my reading the getaddr p2p method also isn't really tested.
Tree-SHA512: ad03abf518847476495b76a2f5394b8030aa86654429167fa618e21460abb505c10ef9817ec1b80472320d41d0aff5dc94a8efce023aaaaf5e81386aa92b852b
fd5c95cc4e doc: Add historical release notes for 0.16.3 (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Release notes for 0.16.3 have been kind of rushed, feel free to make suggestions here.
Tree-SHA512: 9e6abb6cdd152595c9264f347b88adb1404dee4fad9b7e8e540948dbe9438ec0fc68f8cd4f6dbed1837897662277d96ff570c04e0d7de5d59d45bf965019387f
9b4a36effc [qa] Test for duplicate inputs within a transaction (Suhas Daftuar)
b8f801964f Fix crash bug with duplicate inputs within a transaction (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Tree-SHA512: 8c7ea34c7fa44188d86c04a690a7cbf8e9deda71ab1f7ca6d11de1f2abb3dd7222627071f86d0d39689a8b302ba9af142f0202466a67e30cd54aed3a08d4eb14
New getnodeaddresses call gives access via RPC to the peers known by
the node. It may be useful for bitcoin wallets to broadcast their
transactions over tor for improved privacy without using the
centralized DNS seeds. getnodeaddresses is very similar to the getaddr
p2p method.
Tests the new rpc call by feeding IP address to a test node via the p2p
protocol, then obtaining someone of those addresses with
getnodeaddresses and checking that they are a subset.
0ca4c8b3c6 Changed functional tests which do not require wallets to run without (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Addresses #14216 . Changed Changed `get_deterministic_priv_key()` to return named tuple`(address, key)`
I have tried to be exhaustive as possible in maximum coverage for non-wallet mode without affecting any coverage for wallet mode.
However, I could not check the tests in wallet mode because of timeout issues. Hopefully, travis job checks those.
Tests `feature_block.py`, `feature_logging.py` and `feature_reindex.py` were skipping despite having no direct dependency on any wallet functions. So, I have also disabled the `skip_test_no_wallet()` for those files too.
Tree-SHA512: 8f84bd8400a732d4266c7518d5cbcf1eb761f623a64a74849e0470142c8ef22cb75364474ddae75d9213c3d16659a52917b5ed979a313695da6abd16c4fd7445
f1bd03eb01 [depends, zmq, doc] upgrade zeromq to 4.2.5 and avoid deprecated zeromq api functions (mruddy)
Pull request description:
Upgrade the ZeroMQ dependency from version 4.2.3 to the latest stable version 4.2.5.
This PR Follows the lead of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11986.
I upgraded both patch files to correspond to the version `4.2.5` libzmq files.
I assume doing so is still necessary and correct.
Without updating the patch line numbers, things appear to work, but you get extra log messages while building `depends` because things don't exactly match, e.g.:
```
/bitcoin/depends> make zeromq
Extracting zeromq...
/bitcoin/depends/sources/zeromq-4.2.5.tar.gz: OK
Preprocessing zeromq...
patching file src/windows.hpp
Hunk #1 succeeded at 58 (offset 3 lines).
patching file src/thread.cpp
Hunk #1 succeeded at 307 with fuzz 2 (offset 87 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 323 with fuzz 2 (offset 90 lines).
```
Updating the patches seemed cleaner, so I did it. Note that libzmq had some whitespace changes, so that's why the updated patches do too.
More info: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/releases/tag/v4.2.5
tags: libzmq, zmq, 0mq
Tree-SHA512: 78659dd276b5311e40634b1bbebb802ddd6b69662ba3c84995ef1e3795c49a78b1635112c7fd72a405ea36e2cc3bdeb84e6d00d4e491a349bba1dafff50e2fa5
be54f42e5f use integer division instead of double conversion and multiplication for computing amounts (Arvid Norberg)
Pull request description:
use integer division instead of double conversion and multiplication for computing amounts. This will most likely generate identical code.
My main argument in favour of this change is one of purity, that we should not rely on implicit conversion from `CAmount` -> `double` and back again. Today this implicit conversion can happen because `CAmount` is just a typedef to `int64_t`. However, I envision a future where `CAmount` is a proper type that does not allow suspicious implicit conversions like these.
Tree-SHA512: a70966623ac6e82410ac94d26cf44e2b7b7a4dbaa514d68ae1f0369aaee1bc2851d05a5e365291b005fe0941428e6139dc62bcfdd0b2f66720706fefe0eb92f1
d641c29a5a travis: Run feature_dbcrash functional tests in cron job (Chun Kuan Lee)
c0d947d725 tests: Reorder tests and move most of extended tests up to normal tests (Chun Kuan Lee)
Pull request description:
The travis should run almost all jobs unless it takes really long time, however it does not take too long for now. So it's time for moving it to normal job.
(The test sort is to see how many conflict will this cause, will drop it if there are too many)
The first commit can be reviewed by `git diff --color-moved=plain`
Tree-SHA512: db6bd5b1f19de2f729012adda6ed00ca989071fd40a20710c0ff2579b5bd008edcf7421c1ad56d5f0752354e7df408f58351129d35a1ab7f4a6caa9d315df2ec
cccc362d62 build: Remove libssl from LDADD unless gui (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
libssl is only used by the gui, so no need to LDADD it to the other tools and binaries
Follow up of the commit which removed rpcssl: 40b556d374
Tree-SHA512: 9dbdf4faf40699cea3a37349ac83dbcacdaa062f5338416ff4ba77924c47d9e148b27218165c5aa3584a1ef4899e0fa237ff571208aa0b98803761e802d1e5dc
8e1c13e6da doc: Document -checklevel levels (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Document the various possible check levels for the command-line argument. The numbers say nothing on their own.
Tree-SHA512: 8a526c53222b55304dde1d9350dd15a50f1dd62bf452a32dc886a4521e3ab49d5f0a86a4c5cbb0d52fb76b60222101045100f93fee5e1a5d5e3ab8e79b64cbe0
c1dde3a949 No longer shutdown after encrypting the wallet (Andrew Chow)
d7637c5a3f After encrypting the wallet, reload the database environment (Andrew Chow)
5d296ac810 Add function to close all Db's and reload the databae environment (Andrew Chow)
a769461d5e Move BerkeleyEnvironment deletion from internal method to callsite (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This is the replacement for #11678 which implements @ryanofsky's [suggestion](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11678#pullrequestreview-76464511).
Shutting down the software was to prevent the BDB environment from writing unencrypted private keys to disk in the database log files, as was noted [here](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51474.msg616068#msg616068). This PR replaces the shutdown behavior with a CDBEnv flush, close, and reopen which achieves the same effect: everything is cleanly flushed and closed, the log files are removed, and then the environment reopened to continue normal operation.
To ensure that no unencrypted private keys are in the log files after encrypting the wallet, I wrote [this script](https://gist.github.com/achow101/7f7143e6c3d3fdc034d3470e72823e9d) to pull private keys from the original wallet file and searches for these keys in the log files (note that you will have to change your file paths to make it work on your own machine).
As for concerns about private keys being written to slack space or being kept in memory, these behaviors no longer exist after the original wallet encryption PR and the shutting down solution from 2011.
cc @ryanofsky
Tree-SHA512: 34b894283b0677a873d06dee46dff8424dec85a2973009ac9b84bcf3d22d05f227c494168c395219d9aee3178e420cf70d4b3eeacc9785aa86b6015d25758e75
9dcb6763fb [qa] Use correct python index slices in example test (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
There's an off-by-one in the list indices used in example_test.py.
Tree-SHA512: d75b77c1e0b3931d02dfa043da4cb6fe8e62864a73717ce5c184d9dbeb25579342c6365cc7bbcc7c4382d76a320a528bf3c69107854dfc6fa704133d0ba11012
fa8433e379 qa: Remove unneded import_deterministic_coinbase_privkeys overwrite, add comments (MarcoFalke)
e413c2ddd1 qa: Fix codespell error and have lint-spelling error instead of warn (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the functional tests require the wallet module to be compiled into the Bitcoin Core executable. For example the premine (or datadir cache) to speed up tests when run in parallel would mine a bunch of blocks and store the private keys to sign the coinbase tx outputs in a wallet. There is no need to have the overhead of the whole wallet module by using keys that are deterministic for all runs.
Note that this change most likely requires the `./test/cache/` to be cleared.
Tree-SHA512: 9ce26036b0e10f0f888f66a1e50be6a357343f9ffb302ae24a7bb3df2f083a31702ef308b738a03b08a1b623aeddac5d6563dc1b15078c0357b7dafad7808ec3
14b29a77ac Fix reference to lint-locale-dependence.sh (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The wrong reference sneaked through #13041 and #13281.
Tree-SHA512: 39cc74297d00141206ce68b84575288a20e39e20ef717fa8b8c09076b5fb46d8281320b144a596094365f2a0704e5dd6bf960e35980ae4730546a72957403d69
Removes the final #ifdef ENABLE_WALLET from libbitcoin_server by calling
g_wallet_init_interface.HasWalletSupport(), and redifining GetWallets()
and MakeWallet() in dummywallet.cpp.
fa6ab8ada1 rpc: Return more specific reject reason for submitblock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The second commit in #13439 made the `TODO` in the first commit impossible to solve.
The meaning of `fNewBlock` changed from "This is the first time we process this block" to "We are about to write the new *valid* block".
So whenever `fNewBlock` is true, the block was valid. And whenever the `fNewBlock` is false, the block is either valid or invalid. If it was valid and not new, we know it is a `"duplicate"`. In all other cases, the `BIP22ValidationResult()` will return the reason why it is invalid.
Tree-SHA512: 4b6edf7a912339c3acb0fccfabbdd6d812a0321fb1639c244c2714e58dc119aa2b8c6bf8f7d61ea609a1b861bbc23f920370fcf989c48452721e259a8ce93d24
