fa3c910bfe test: Move linters to test/lint, add readme (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This moves the checks and linters from `devtools` to a subfolder in `test`. (Motivated by my opinion that the dev tools are mostly for generating code and updating the repo whereas the linters are read-only checks.)
Also, adds a readme to clarify that checks and linters are only meant to prevent bugs and user facing issues, not merely stylistic preference or inconsistencies. (This is motivated by the diversity in developers and work flows as well as existing code styles. It would be too disruptive to change all existing code to a single style or too burdensome to force all developers to adhere to a single style. Also note that our style guide is changing, so locking in at the wrong style "too early" would only waste resources.)
Tree-SHA512: 9b10e89f2aeaf0c8a9ae248aa891d74e0abf0569f8e5dfd266446efa8bfaf19f0ea0980abf0b0b22f0d8416ee90d7435d21a9f9285b66df43f370b7979173406
87fe292d89 doc: Mention disabling BIP61 in bips.md (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
fe16dd8226 net: Add option `-enablebip61` to configure sending of BIP61 notifications (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
This commit adds a boolean option `-peersendreject`, defaulting to `1`, that can be used to disable the sending of [BIP61](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0061.mediawiki) `reject` messages. This functionality has been requested for various reasons:
- security (DoS): reject messages can reveal internal state that can be used to target certain resources such as the mempool more easily.
- bandwidth: a typical node sends lots of reject messages; this counts against upstream bandwidth. Also the reject messages tend to be larger than the message that was rejected.
On the other hand, reject messages can be useful while developing client software (I found them indispensable while creating bitcoin-submittx), as well as for our own test cases, so whatever the default becomes on the long run, IMO the functionality should be retained as option. But that's a discussion for later, for now it's simply a node operator decision.
Also adds a RPC test that checks the functionality.
Tree-SHA512: 9488cc53e13cd8e5c6f8eb472a44309572673405c1d1438c3488f627fae622c95e2198bde5ed7d29e56b948e2918bf1920239e9f865889f4c37c097c37a4d7a9
fa865efa4a qa: Fix wallet_listreceivedby race (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Generating a block on node 0 will only get node 0 out of IBD and not node 1. So the inv for the `txid` is dropped by node 1 and the call to `sync_all` fails.
Solve it by a call to `sync_blocks` after `generate`.
Tree-SHA512: e21b01a9e8c90bd6a3aad290c97cc4866ab384e22797b318eed55ae2767512203597d3a184b23ad5a3fe76bdbb8a3d5c51e097d56b160232851164434059ff23
41d0476f62 Tests: Add data file (Anthony Towns)
4cbfb6aad9 Tests: Test new getblockstats RPC (Jorge Timón)
35e77a0288 RPC: Introduce getblockstats (Jorge Timón)
cda8e36f01 Refactor: RPC: Separate GetBlockChecked() from getblock() (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
It returns per block statistics about several things. It should be easy to add more if people think of other things to add or remove some if I went too far (but once written, why not keep it? EDIT: answer: not to test or maintain them).
The currently available options are: minfee,maxfee,totalfee,minfeerate,maxfeerate,avgfee,avgfeerate,txs,ins,outs (EDIT: see updated list in the rpc call documentation)
For the x axis, one can use height or block.nTime (I guess I could add mediantime if there's interest [EDIT: nobody showed interest but I implemented mediantime nonetheless, in fact there's no distinction between x or y axis anymore, that's for the caller to judge]).
To calculate fees, -txindex is required.
Tree-SHA512: 2b2787a3c7dc4a11df1fce62c8a4c748f5347d7f7104205d5f0962ffec1e0370c825b49fd4d58ce8ce86bf39d8453f698bcd46206eea505f077541ca7d59b18c
2352aa9 test: Ensure that recursive -includeconf produces appropriate warnings (Karl-Johan Alm)
c5bcc7d util: warn about recursive -includeconf arguments in configuration files (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to #10267, and addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10267#issuecomment-387546144.
~~I am adding extra work for @jnewbery in #12755 here -- maybe I should just rebase on top of that, but not sure what the appropriate approach is here.~~
Tree-SHA512: 87f0c32436b70424e33616ffb88d7cb699f90d6a583a10237e224b28fc936d6a9df95536c8c52ee8546b3942da92b2a357e61bf87e00d1462bc10d46d3bee352
7384a35 [tests] Remove spurious error log in p2p_segwit.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Since 265d7c44b1, when wait_until() fails,
an error message is logged to the test framework log. This means that if
wait_until() is called inside a try-except with the expectation that it
will fail, a spurious error message is logged.
wait_until() shouldn't be called with the expectation of failure. Fix
that in p2p_segwit.py.
Tree-SHA512: 0a43790b58fee7d2d6bef36e736b0b9ffdde6de5f12d33d15e8e07323597e2be4cd98f17e7fc3a135e06bdafe36613466c0a57e81134e59a251383c62b91918f
a8da482 Bump wallet version for pre split keypool (Andrew Chow)
dfcd9f3 Use a keypool of presplit keys after upgrading to hd chain split (Andrew Chow)
5c50e93 Allow -upgradewallet to upgradewallets to HD (Andrew Chow)
2bcf2b5 Test sethdseed (Andrew Chow)
b5ba01a Add 'sethdseed' RPC to initialize or replace HD seed (Chris Moore)
dd3c07a Separate HaveKey function that checks whether a key is in a keystore (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Revival/rebase of #11085
Adds a new command `sethdseed` which allows you to either set or generate a new HD seed to be used. A new keypool can be generated or the original one kept and new keys added to the keypool will come from the new HD seed.
Wallets that are not HD will be upgraded to be version FEATURE_HD_SPLIT when the `sethdseed` RPC command is used.
I have also add some tests for this.
Additionally `-upgradewallet` can now be used to upgrade a wallet from non-HD to HD. When it is used for such an upgrade, the keypool will be regenerated.
Tree-SHA512: e56c792e150590429ac4a1061e8d6f7b20cca06366e184eb9bbade4cd6ae82699a28fe84f87031eadba97ad2c1606517a105f00fb7b45779c979243020071adb
This commit adds a boolean option `-enablebip61`, defaulting to `1`, that
can be used to disable the sending of BIP61 `reject` messages. This
functionality has been requested for various reasons:
- security (DoS): reject messages can reveal internal state that can be
used to target certain resources such as the mempool more easily.
- bandwidth: a typical node sends lots of reject messages; this counts
against upstream bandwidth. Also the reject messages tend to be larger
than the message that was rejected.
On the other hand, reject messages can be useful while developing client
software (I found them indispensable while creating bitcoin-submittx),
as well as for our own test cases, so whatever the default becomes on the
long run, IMO the functionality should be retained as option. But that's
a discussion for later.
364bae5 qa: Pad scriptPubKeys to get minimum sized txs (MarcoFalke)
7485488 Policy to reject extremely small transactions (Johnson Lau)
0f8719b Add transaction tests for constant scriptCode (Johnson Lau)
9dabfe4 Add constant scriptCode policy in non-segwit scripts (Johnson Lau)
Pull request description:
This disables `OP_CODESEPARATOR` in non-segwit scripts (even in an unexecuted branch), and makes a positive `FindAndDelete` result invalid. This ensures that the `scriptCode` serialized in `SignatureHash` is always the same as the script passing to the `EvalScript`.
Tree-SHA512: a0552cb920294d130251c48053fa2ff1fbdd26332e62b52147d918837852750f0ce35ce2cd1cbdb86588943312f8154ccb4925e850dbb7c2254bc353070cd5f8
5d536619ab [tests] Remove 'account' API from wallet functional tests (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Next step in #12952. Removes all usage of the 'account' API from the wallet functional tests, except:
- rpc_deprecated.py (which specifically tests the `-deprecatedrpc=accounts` command line argument is working properly).
- `wallet_labels.py` (which tests that both the 'label' and 'account' APIs work in V0.17).
'account' API usage for both of those tests can be removed once V0.17 has been branched.
Also excluded is:
- `wallet_importprunedfunds.py` (which fails due to a bitcoind OOM error)
Tree-SHA512: 6701b32f83d2d47597ba093ded665d7aa630f7a9c759ff15e3e33a3e3bc7600e8d29cf4e72aed5f8f9f6769cc9b614c681951720eab1ed2473f5f8dec57e7a6f
12d1b77f7e [tests] Fixed intermittent failure in p2p_sendheaders.py. (lmanners)
Pull request description:
Added handling for the case where headers are announced over more than one message.
refs #12453
Tree-SHA512: 2c5b48ff019089b86e358181ba170d3aac09d4ae41ec79c2718e0ee83705860501bbcb8fd94d0f5c4f86c0d54a96781a967716621bb8c5ecc991b39af3cec506
09c6699900 [qa] Handle disconnect_node race (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Several tests call disconnect_nodes() on each node-pair in rapid
succession, resulting in a race condition if a node disconnects a peer
in-between the calculation of the nodeid's to disconnect and the
invocation of the disconnectnode rpc call. Handle this.
Tree-SHA512: 3078cea0006fcb507c812004a777c505eb1e9dda7c6df12dbbe72395a73ff6f6760f597b6492054f5487b34534417ddef5fbad30553c135c288c4b7cfce79223
Since 265d7c44b1, when wait_until() fails,
an error message is logged to the test framework log. This means that if
wait_until() is called inside a try-except with the expectation that it
will fail, a spurious error message is logged.
wait_until() shouldn't be called with the expectation of failure. Fix
that in p2p_segwit.py.
Several tests call disconnect_nodes() on each node-pair in rapid
succession, resulting in a race condition if a node disconnects a peer
in-between the calculation of the nodeid's to disconnect and the
invocation of the disconnectnode rpc call. Handle this.
By default, libc will print fatal errors to /dev/tty instead of stderr.
Adding the LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_ to the environment variables allows
us to catch libc errors in stderr and test for them.
fac1e1f qa: Remove unused option --srcdir (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `srcdir` option was both unused and misleading; It should have been called `builddir`. So remove it.
Tree-SHA512: 2c24dcf2aa82219158b8cbbf03dd3f0f51f805f1f5f670faa1fd59e5a8d60fda120ffddadeccb058d8d3f20583b4952be7afd2df6bbefb9367d35c0f0a9fda3c
891beb0 [test] fundrawtransaction: lock watch-only shared address (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
`self.nodes[0]` creates an address which is watch-only-shared with `self.nodes[3]`. If `nodes[0]` spends the associated UTXO during any of its sends later, the watchonly test will fail, as `nodes[3]` now has insufficient funds.
I ran into this in #12257 and this commit is in that PR as well, but I figured I'd split it out (and remove from there once/if merged).
Tree-SHA512: d04a04b1ecebe82127cccd47c1b3de311bf07f4b51dff80db20ea2f142e1d5c4a85ed6180c5c0b081d550e238c742e119b953f60f487deac5a3f3536e1a8d9fe
25b7ab9 doc: Add release notes for -includeconf (Karl-Johan Alm)
0f0badd test: Test includeconf parameter. (Karl-Johan Alm)
629ff8c -includeconf=<path> support in config handler, for including external configuration files (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #10071.
Done:
- adds `-includeconf=<path>`, where `<path>` is relative to `datadir` or to the path of the file being read, if in a file
- protects against circular includes
- updates help docs
~~~Thoughts:~~~
- ~~~I am not sure how to test this in a neat manner. Feedback on this would be nice. Will dig/think though.~~~
Tree-SHA512: cb31f1b2f69fbc0890d264948eb2e501ac05cf12f5e06a5942f9c1539eb15ea8dc3cae817f4073aecb2fcc21d0386747f14f89d990772003a76e2a6d25642553
1e46d8a Get rid of ambiguous OutputType::NONE value (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Based on suggestion by @sipa https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12119#issuecomment-357982763
After #12119, the NONE output type was overloaded to refer to either an output type that couldn't be parsed, or to an automatic change output mode. This change drops the NONE enum and uses a simple bool to indicate parse failure, and a new CHANGE_AUTO enum to refer the change output type.
This change is almost a pure refactoring except it makes RPCs reject empty string ("") address types instead of treating them like they were unset. This simplifies the parsing code a little bit and could prevent RPC usage mistakes. It's noted in the release notes.
Follows up #12408 by @MarcoFalke
Followups for future PRs:
- [ ] Add explicit support for specifying "auto" in `ParseOutputType` as suggested by promag and sipa: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#issuecomment-374799567 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#discussion_r175969481
- [ ] Add wallet `AddressChangeType` method to complement `TransactionChangeType`: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#discussion_r175969618.
Tree-SHA512: 8b08b272bcb177a0a9e556dcd965840a7fe601ef83ca97938b879c9b1a33b5b3f96939e1bceef11ba7c644ac21bfd6c1dbc6ca715cd1da4ace50475240e4ee48
d8e9a2a Remove "rpc" category from GetWarnings (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
7da3b0a rpc: Move RPC_FORBIDDEN_BY_SAFE_MODE code to reserved section (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
2ae705d Remove Safe mode (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Rebase of #10563. Safe mode was [disabled by default and deprecated in 0.16](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.16.0.md#safe-mode-disabled-by-default), so probably should be removed for 0.17.
> Rationale:
>
> Safe mode is useless. It only disables some RPC commands when large work forks are detected. Nothing else is affected by safe mode. It seems that very few people would be affected by safe mode. The people who use Core as a wallet are primarily using it through the GUI, which safe mode does not effect. In the GUI, transactions will still be made as normal; only a warning is displayed.
>
> I also don't think that we should be disabling RPC commands or any functionality in general. If we do, it should be done consistently, which safe mode is not. If we want to keep the idea of a safe mode around, I think that the current system needs to go first before a new system can be implemented.
Tree-SHA512: 067938f47ca6e879fb6c3c4e21f9946fd7c5da3cde67ef436f1666798c78d049225b9111dc97064f42b3bc549d3915229fa19ad5a634588f381e34fc65d64044
7d0f80b Use anonymous namespace instead of static functions (Pieter Wuille)
b61fb71 Mention removal of bare multisig IsMine in release notes (Pieter Wuille)
9c2a8b8 Do not treat bare multisig as IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
08f3228 Optimization: only test for witness scripts at top level (Pieter Wuille)
3619735 Track difference between scriptPubKey and P2SH execution in IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
ac6ec62 Switch to a private version of SigVersion inside IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
19fc973 Do not expose SigVersion argument to IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
fb1dfbb Remove unused IsMine overload (Pieter Wuille)
952d821 Make CScript -> CScriptID conversion explicit (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Currently our wallet code will treat bare multisig outputs (meaning scriptPubKeys with multiple public keys + `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` operator in it) as ours without the user asking for it, as long as all private keys in it are in our wallet.
This is a pointless feature. As it only works when all private keys are in one place, it's useless compared to single key outputs (P2PK, P2PKH, P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WPKH), and worse in terms of space, cost, UTXO size, and ability to test (due to lack of address format for them).
Furthermore, they are problematic in that producing a list of all `scriptPubKeys` we accept is not tractable (it involves all combinations of all public keys that are ours). In further wallet changes I'd like to move to a model where all scriptPubKeys that are treated as ours are explicit, rather than defined by whatever keys we have. The current behavior of the wallet is very hard to model in such a design, so I'd like to get rid of it.
I think there are two options:
* Remove it entirely (do not ever accept bare multisig outputs as ours, unless watched)
* Only accept bare multisig outputs in situations where the P2SH version of that output would also be acceptable
This PR implements the first option. The second option was explored in #12874.
Tree-SHA512: 917ed45b3cac864cee53e27f9a3e900390c576277fbd6751b1250becea04d692b3b426fa09065a3399931013bd579c4f3dbeeb29d51d19ed0c64da75d430ad9a
