... instead of after 30 minutes of no sending, for latency measurement
and keep-alive. Also, disconnect if no reply arrives within 20 minutes,
instead of 90 of inactivity (for peers supporting the 'pong' message).
f0a83fc Use Params().NetworkID() instead of TestNet() from the payment protocol (jtimon)
2871889 net.h was using std namespace through chainparams.h included in protocol.h (jtimon)
c8c52de Replace virtual methods with static attributes, chainparams.h depends on protocol.h instead of the other way around (jtimon)
a3d946e Get rid of TestNet() (jtimon)
6fc0fa6 Add RPCisTestNet chain parameter (jtimon)
cfeb823 Add RequireStandard chain parameter (jtimon)
21913a9 Add AllowMinDifficultyBlocks chain parameter (jtimon)
d754f34 Move majority constants to chainparams (jtimon)
8d26721 Get rid of RegTest() (jtimon)
cb9bd83 Add DefaultCheckMemPool chain parameter (jtimon)
2595b9a Add DefaultMinerThreads chain parameter (jtimon)
bfa9a1a Add MineBlocksOnDemand chain parameter (jtimon)
1712adb Add MiningRequiresPeers chain parameter (jtimon)
18e7216 Push cs_mains down in ProcessBlock (Pieter Wuille)
202e019 Move all post-chaintip-change notifications to ActivateBestChain (Pieter Wuille)
4e0eed8 Allow ActivateBestChain to release its lock on cs_main (Pieter Wuille)
77339e5 Get rid of the static chainMostWork (optimization) (Pieter Wuille)
171ca77 estimatefee / estimatepriority RPC methods (Gavin Andresen)
0193fb8 Allow multiple regression tests to run at once (Gavin Andresen)
c6cb21d Type-safe CFeeRate class (Gavin Andresen)
New RPC methods: return an estimate of the fee (or priority) a
transaction needs to be likely to confirm in a given number of
blocks.
Mike Hearn created the first version of this method for estimating fees.
It works as follows:
For transactions that took 1 to N (I picked N=25) blocks to confirm,
keep N buckets with at most 100 entries in each recording the
fees-per-kilobyte paid by those transactions.
(separate buckets are kept for transactions that confirmed because
they are high-priority)
The buckets are filled as blocks are found, and are saved/restored
in a new fee_estiamtes.dat file in the data directory.
A few variations on Mike's initial scheme:
To estimate the fee needed for a transaction to confirm in X buckets,
all of the samples in all of the buckets are used and a median of
all of the data is used to make the estimate. For example, imagine
25 buckets each containing the full 100 entries. Those 2,500 samples
are sorted, and the estimate of the fee needed to confirm in the very
next block is the 50'th-highest-fee-entry in that sorted list; the
estimate of the fee needed to confirm in the next two blocks is the
150'th-highest-fee-entry, etc.
That algorithm has the nice property that estimates of how much fee
you need to pay to get confirmed in block N will always be greater
than or equal to the estimate for block N+1. It would clearly be wrong
to say "pay 11 uBTC and you'll get confirmed in 3 blocks, but pay
12 uBTC and it will take LONGER".
A single block will not contribute more than 10 entries to any one
bucket, so a single miner and a large block cannot overwhelm
the estimates.
Use CFeeRate instead of an int64_t for quantities that are
fee-per-size.
Helps prevent unit-conversion mismatches between the wallet,
relaying, and mining code.
Now that the build is non-recursive, adding to AM_CPPFLAGS means adding to
_all_ cppflags.
Logical groups of includes have been added instead, and are used individually
by various targets.
- Some file generation was still noisy, silence it.
- AM_V_GEN is used rather than @ so that 'make V=1' works as intended
- Cut down on file copies and moves when using sed, use pipes instead
- Avoid the use of top_ and abs_ dirs where possible
Build logic moves from individual Makefile.am's to include files, which
the main src/Makefile.am includes. This avoids having to manage a gigantic
single Makefile.
TODO: Move the rules from the old Makefile.include to where they actually
belong and nuke the old file.
Upgrade for https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140605.txt
Just in case - there is no vulnerability that affects ecdsa signing or
verification.
The MITM attack vulnerability (CVE-2014-0224) may have some effect on
our usage of SSL/TLS.
As long as payment requests are signed (which is the common case), usage
of the payment protocol should also not be affected.
The TLS usage in RPC may be at risk for MITM attacks. If you have
`-rpcssl` enabled, be sure to update OpenSSL as soon as possible.
1411a51 doc: Update hash in release process for new windows deps intermediate (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
386e732 gitian: make linux qt intermediate deterministic (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
