Change ScanForWalletTransactions return value so it is possible to distinguish
scans that skip reading every block (due to the nTimeFirstKey optimization)
from scans that fail while reading the chainActive.Tip() block. Return value is
now non-null in the non-failing case.
This change doesn't affect any user-visible behavior, it is only an internal
API improvement. The only code currently using the ScanForWalletTransactions
return value is in importmulti, and importmulti always calls
ScanForWalletTransactions with a pindex pointing to the first block in
chainActive whose block time is >= (nLowestTimestamp - 7200), while
ScanForWalletTransactions would only return null without reading blocks when
pindex and every block after it had a block time < (nTimeFirstKey - 7200).
These conditions could never happen at the same time because nTimeFirstKey <=
nLowestTimestamp.
I'm planning to make a more substantial API improvement in the future (making
ScanForWalletTransactions private and exposing a higher level rescan method to
RPC code), but Matt Corallo <git@bluematt.me> pointed out this odd behavior
introduced by e2e2f4c "Return errors from importmulti if complete rescans are
not successful" yesterday, so I'm following up now to get rid of badness
introduced by that merge.
Prior to this commit pindexRescan was initialized to a chainActive.Tip().
However, the value of pindexRescan set at time of initialization was never
read before pindexRescan was being set to either chainActive.Genesis()
(case 1), FindForkInGlobalIndex(chainActive, locator) (case 2) or
chainActive.Genesis() (case 3). Thus, the initialization was redundant.
This commit a.) removes the redundant initialization and b.) simplifies
this logic so that pindexRescan is initialized to chainActive.Genesis()
(case 1 and 3), and set to FindForkInGlobalIndex(chainActive, locator)
(case 2) as needed.
83ac719 Change bitcoin address in RPC helpaddress to an invalid address, so people don't accidentally send coins there (like I did). (Marijn Stollenga)
Tree-SHA512: ca1163466a149d567b97efbfcfa8fdfe2d474245b4dd5a1a92555b4e87f8e99df5fee4cd79ef1ce6a98db2337846af78f37c2e6b31d02008b11fa0e151ce6590
This removes the option from the wallet to not pay a fee on "small"
transactions which spend "old" inputs.
This code is no longer worth keeping around, as almost all miners
prefer not to include transactions which pay no fee at all.
Warnings introduced by commit e2e2f4c "Return errors from importmulti if
complete rescans are not successful" and reported by Pavel Janík
<Pavel@Janik.cz> in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9773 and
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9827
wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp: In member function ‘void wallet_tests::rescan::test_method()’:
wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp:377:17: warning: declaration of ‘wallet’ shadows a global declaration [-Wshadow]
CWallet wallet;
Remove "nLowestTimestamp <= chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockTimeMax()" check from
importmulti, which is always true because nLowestTimestamp is set to the
minimum of the most recent block time and all the imported key timestamps,
which is necessarily lower than the maximum block time.
A new AssertLockHeld(cs_wallet) call was added in commit a58370e
"Dedup nTimeFirstKey update logic" (part of PR #9108).
The lock held assertion will fail when loading prexisting wallets files from
before the #9108 merge that have watch-only keys.
Because it is used inconsistently at least version 5.4.0 of g++ to
complains about methods that don't use override. There is two ways to go
about this: remove override from the methods having it, or add it to the
methods missing it. I chose the second.
When importing a watch-only address over importmulti with a specific timestamp,
the wallet's nTimeFirstKey is currently set to 1. After this change, the
provided timestamp will be used and stored as metadata associated with
watch-only key. This can improve wallet performance because it can avoid the
need to scan the entire blockchain for watch only addresses when timestamps are
provided.
Also adds timestamp to validateaddress return value (needed for tests).
Fixes#9034.
Additionally, accept a "now" timestamp, to allow avoiding rescans for keys
which are known never to have been used.
Note that the behavior when "now" is specified is slightly different than the
previous behavior when no timestamp was specified at all. Previously, when no
timestamp was specified, it would avoid rescanning during the importmulti call,
but set the key's nCreateTime value to 1, which would not prevent future block
reads in later ScanForWalletTransactions calls. With this change, passing a
"now" timestamp will set the key's nCreateTime to the current block time
instead of 1.
Fixes#9491
Minimum boost version was bumped to 1.47.0 in #8920, which
means the configure step won't even pass with older boost.
This version has boost filesystem v3, which means the
(crappy) fallbacks for older versions can go.
Preserve comment, order form, and account strings from the original wallet
transaction. Also set fTimeReceivedIsTxTime and fFromMe fields for consistency
with CWallet::CreateTransaction. The latter two fields don't influence current
wallet behavior, but do record that the transaction originated in the wallet
instead of coming from the network or sendrawtransaction.
More accurate than simply adding one byte per input, and properly handles the
case where the original transaction happened to have very small signatures
4b189c1 Change bumpfee result value from 'oldfee' to 'origfee'. (Alex Morcos)
0c0c63f Introduce WALLET_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE (Alex Morcos)
e8021ec Use CWallet::GetMinimumFee in bumpfee (Alex Morcos)
ae9719a Refactor GetMinimumFee to give option of providing targetFee (Alex Morcos)
fe8e8ef [rpc] Add incremental relay fee to getnetworkinfo (Alex Morcos)
6b331e6 Fix to have miner test aware of new separate block min tx fee (Alex Morcos)
de6400d Fix missing use of dustRelayFee (Alex Morcos)
5b15870 Use incrementalRelayFee for BIP 125 replacement (Alex Morcos)
The result value indicates the actual fee on the transaction that was replaced. But there is an error message which uses the description 'oldfee' to refer to the original fee rate applied to the new transaction's estimated max size. It was confusing that two different uses of 'oldfee' had two different numeric values.
