317f2cb3f4 test: Check RPC settxfee errors (João Barbosa)
48618daf26 Add checks for settxfee reasonableness (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
When using the `settxfee` RPC, the value is silently ignored if it is less than either than minrelaytxfee or the wallet's mintxfee. This adds an error response if that's going to happen, but still allows "settxfee 0" to deliberately default to the minimum value.
Tree-SHA512: ce685584cf8d6b9ca2cc97196d494220e3892b6a804a458086e04b3a23df281da432ad0a3053106a064c90c541ddb6f6b96a27cf8376d45af1e44449baf88456
321159e53e don't report minversion wallet entry as unknown (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
It is known in WalletBatch::LoadWallet
Tree-SHA512: 82f7e12f48ae7d17317074ce5b5e27c70ba8334b04adbf7cc863f8169cc1aa460b9454571e2698aa00059c8c8f669fe19c0d40c4910dcded260ddca6ce78be9d
faaac5caaa RPCTypeCheck bip32derivs arg in walletcreatefunded (Gregory Sanders)
1f0c4282e9 QA: add basic walletcreatefunded optional arg test (Gregory Sanders)
1f18d7b591 walletcreatefundedpsbt: remove duplicate replaceable arg (Gregory Sanders)
2252ec5008 Allow ConstructTransaction to not throw error with 0-input txn (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
1) Previously an empty input argument transaction that is marked for replaceability fails to pass the `SignalsOptInRBF` check right before funding it. Explicitly check for that condition before throwing an error.
2) The rpc call had two separate `replaceable` arguments, each of which being used in mutually exclusive places. I preserved the `options` version to retain compatability with `fundtransaction`.
Tree-SHA512: 26eb0c9e2d38ea51d11f741d61100223253271a084adadeb7e78c6d4e9004636f089e4273c5bf64a41bd7e9ff795317acf30531cb36aeb0d8db9304b3c8270c3
5df6f089b5 More tests of signer checks (Andrew Chow)
7c8bffdc24 Test that a non-witness script as witness utxo is not signed (Andrew Chow)
8254e9950f Additional sanity checks in SignPSBTInput (Pieter Wuille)
c05712cb59 Only wipe wrong UTXO type data if overwritten by wallet (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The current PSBT signing code can end up producing a non-segwit signature, while only the UTXO being spent is provided in the PSBT (as opposed to the entire transaction being spent). This may be used to trick a user to incorrectly decide a transaction has the semantics he intends to sign.
Fix this by refusing to sign if there is any mismatch between the provided data and what is being signed.
Tree-SHA512: b55790d79d8166e05513fc4c603a982a33710e79dc3c045060cddac6b48a1be3a28ebf8db63f988b6567b15dd27fd09bbaf48846e323c8635376ac20178956f4
e306be7429 Use 72 byte dummy signatures when watching only inputs may be used (Andrew Chow)
48b1473c89 Use 71 byte signature for DUMMY_SIGNATURE_CREATOR (Andrew Chow)
18dfea0dd0 Always create 70 byte signatures with low R values (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When creating signatures for transactions, always make one which has a 32 byte or smaller R and 32 byte or smaller S value. This results in signatures that are always less than 71 bytes (32 byte R + 32 byte S + 6 bytes DER + 1 byte sighash) with low R values. In most cases, the signature will be 71 bytes.
Because R is not mutable in the same way that S is, a low R value can only be found by trying different nonces. RFC 6979 for deterministic nonce generation has the option to specify additional entropy, so we simply use that and add a uin32_t counter which we increment in order to try different nonces. Nonces are sill deterministically generated as the nonce used will the be the first one where the counter results in a nonce that results in a low R value. Because different nonces need to be tried, time to produce a signature does increase. On average, it takes twice as long to make a signature as two signatures need to be created, on average, to find one with a low R.
Having a fixed size signature makes size calculations easier and also saves half a byte of transaction size, on average.
DUMMY_SIGNATURE_CREATOR has been modified to produce 71 byte dummy signatures instead of 72 byte signatures.
Tree-SHA512: 3cd791505126ce92da7c631856a97ba0b59e87d9c132feff6e0eef1dc47768e81fbb38bfbe970371bedf9714b7f61a13a5fe9f30f962c81734092a4d19a4ef33
18f690ec2f wallet: shuffle coins before grouping, where warranted (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
Coins are randomly shuffled in coin selection to avoid unintentional privacy leaks regarding the user's coin set. For the case where a user has a lot of coins with the same destination, these will be grouped into groups of 10 *before* the shuffling.
It is unclear whether this has any implications at all, but this PR plugs the potential issue, if there ever is one, by shuffling the coins before they are grouped.
Issue brought up in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12257#discussion_r204554549
Tree-SHA512: fb50ed4b5fc03ab4853d45b76e1c64476ad5bcd797497179bc37b9262885c974ed6811159fd8e581f1461b6cc6d0a66146f4b70a2777c0f5e818d1322e0edb89
bb5b1c0b2d [Docs] upgrade rescan time warning from minutes to >1 hour (Mason Simon)
Pull request description:
When I rescanned just now it took well over an hour. The time warning "may take minutes" didn't prepare me for that.
```
2018-08-08T03:10:17Z [wallet] Still rescanning. At block 174747. Progress=0.008341
2018-08-08T03:11:17Z [wallet] Still rescanning. At block 204233. Progress=0.024533
2018-08-08T03:12:17Z [wallet] Still rescanning. At block 221170. Progress=0.038340
...
2018-08-08T04:16:17Z [wallet] Still rescanning. At block 524815. Progress=0.957105
2018-08-08T04:17:17Z [wallet] Still rescanning. At block 528572. Progress=0.971323
2018-08-08T04:18:17Z [wallet] Still rescanning. At block 532458. Progress=0.986824
```
This is on a 4-core 4ghz system with a 7200rpm drive.
Tree-SHA512: 722ccf566bfd6a3381fa173e08849cb676fe4c1f1cb2c4b86b07df2a5dc1ca0d54797cbe8fd606cdc2c60fef2be7c98e052460decdac2132ba759cff822132e8
With watching only inputs, we do not know how large the signatures
for those inputs will be as their signers may not have implemented
71 byte signatures. Thus we estimate their fees using the 72 byte
dummy signature to ensure that we pay enough fees.
This only effects fundrawtransaction when includeWatching is true.
3fc20632a3 qt: Set BLOCK_CHAIN_SIZE = 220 (DrahtBot)
2b6a2f4a28 Regenerate manpages (DrahtBot)
eb7daf4d60 Update copyright headers to 2018 (DrahtBot)
Pull request description:
Some trivial maintenance to avoid having to do it again after the 0.17 branch off.
(The scripts to do this are in `./contrib/`)
Tree-SHA512: 16b2af45e0351b1c691c5311d48025dc6828079e98c2aa2e600dc5910ee8aa01858ca6c356538150dc46fe14c8819ed8ec8e4ec9a0f682b9950dd41bc50518fa
23fbbb100f wallet: sum ancestors rather than taking max in output groups (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This is pointed out in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12257#discussion_r204549758.
Basically, the ancestors gives an indication as to how many ancestors the resulting transaction will have, which is more precise when summing up the values, rather than taking the maximum, since all the coins in the group will become ancestors if selected.
Tree-SHA512: 0588c4b6059669650614817e041526a2ab89dda8c07fca8e077c7669dca1fed51cd164f7df56340840ab60285d48f3b140dcee64f64bf696b2dd4ab16d556a13
93de2891fa wallet: assert to ensure accuracy of CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
According to my understanding, it should not be possible for coinbase
transactions to be conflicting, thus it should not be possible for
GetDepthInMainChain to return a negative result. If it did, this would
also result in innacurate results for GetBlocksToMaturity due to the
math therein. asserting ensures accuracy.
Tree-SHA512: 8e71c26f09fe457cfb00c362ca27066f7f018ea2af1f395090fdc7fd9f5964b76f4317c23f7a4923776f00087558511da5c1c368095be39fb1bacc614a93c32f
a1a998cf24 wallet: Fix backupwallet for multiwallets (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
`backupwallet` was broken for multiwallets in their own directories (i.e. something like `DATADIR/wallets/mywallet/wallet.dat`). In this case, the backup would use `DATADIR/wallets/wallet.dat` as source file and not take the specific wallet's directory into account.
This led to either an error during the backup (if the wrong source file was not present) or would silently back up the wrong wallet; especially the latter behaviour can be quite bad for users.
Tree-SHA512: 7efe2450ca047e40719fcc7cc211ed94699056020ac737cada7b59e8240298675960570c45079add424d0aab520437d5050d956acd695a9c2452dd4317b4d2c4
a13647b8bd [qa] Add test for too-large wallet output groups (Suhas Daftuar)
57ec1c97b2 [wallet] correctly limit output group size (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Also add a test to ensure that output groups are being limited, even if a wallet has many outputs corresponding to the same scriptPubKey (the test fails without the first commit).
Tree-SHA512: 2aaa82005b0910488f5cbf40690d4c5e2f46949e299ef70b4cb6e440713811443d411dcbc6d71b1701fd82423073125e21747787d70830cd021c841afb732d51
3fe836b78d [moveonly] Extract RescanWallet to handle a simple rescan (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Where the outcome does not depend on the result, apart from a simple
success check.
Tree-SHA512: e0d29c6fc0c7f99a730289e5a80deb586b2848aead56b5198a71ef01f65374812468dfd57be0b8b076eb9be4090d5101d28d979a1d5c3d2f1caeca77b303e90e
e3245f2e7b Removes Boost predicate.hpp dependency (251)
Pull request description:
This pull request removes the `boost/algorithm/string/predicate.hpp` dependency from the project.
To replace the the `predicate.hpp` dependency from the project the function calls to `boost::algorithm::starts_with` and `boost::algorithm::ends_with` have been replaced with respectively C++11's `std::basic_string::front` and `std::basic_string::back` function calls.
Refactors that were not required, but have been done anyways:
- The Boost function `all` was implicitly made available via the `predicate.hpp` header. Instead of including the appropriate header, function calls to `all` have been replaced with function calls to `std::all_of`.
- The `boost::algorithm::is_digit` predicate has been replaced with a custom `IsDigit` function that is locale independent and ASCII deterministic.
Tree-SHA512: 22dda6adfb4d7ac0cabac8cc33e8fb8330c899805acc1ae4ede402c4b11ea75a399414b389dfaa3650d23b47f41351b4650077af9005d598fbe48d5277bdc320
232f96f5c8 doc: Add release notes for -avoidpartialspends (Karl-Johan Alm)
e00b4699cc clean-up: Remove no longer used ivars from CInputCoin (Karl-Johan Alm)
43e04d13b1 wallet: Remove deprecated OutputEligibleForSpending (Karl-Johan Alm)
0128121101 test: Add basic testing for wallet groups (Karl-Johan Alm)
59d6f7b4e2 wallet: Switch to using output groups instead of coins in coin selection (Karl-Johan Alm)
87ebce25d6 wallet: Add output grouping (Karl-Johan Alm)
bb629cb9dc Add -avoidpartialspends and m_avoid_partial_spends (Karl-Johan Alm)
65b3eda458 wallet: Add input bytes to CInputCoin (Karl-Johan Alm)
a443d7a0ca moveonly: CoinElegibilityFilter into coinselection.h (Karl-Johan Alm)
173e18a289 utils: Add insert() convenience templates (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This PR adds an optional (off by default) `-avoidpartialspends` flag, which changes coin select to use output groups rather than outputs, where each output group corresponds to all outputs with the same destination.
It is a privacy improvement, as each time you spend some output, any other output that is publicly associated with the destination (address) will also be spent at the same time, at the cost of fee increase for cases where coin select without group restriction would find a more optimal set of coins (see example below).
For regular use without address reuse, this PR should have no effect on the user experience whatsoever; it only affects users who, for some reason, have multiple outputs with the same destination (i.e. address reuse).
Nodes with this turned off will still try to avoid partial spending, if the fee of the resulting transaction is not greater than the fee of the original transaction.
Example: a node has four outputs linked to two addresses `A` and `B`:
* 1.0 btc to `A`
* 0.5 btc to `A`
* 1.0 btc to `B`
* 0.5 btc to `B`
The node sends 0.2 btc to `C`. Without `-avoidpartialspends`, the following coin selection will occur:
* 0.5 btc to `A` or `B` is picked
* 0.2 btc is output to `C`
* 0.3 - fee is output to (unique change address)
With `-avoidpartialspends`, the following will instead happen:
* Both of (0.5, 1.0) btc to `A` or `B` is picked (one or the other pair)
* 0.2 btc is output to `C`
* 1.3 - fee is output to (unique change address)
As noted, the pro here is that, assuming nobody sends to the address after you spend from it, you will only ever use one address once. The con is that the transaction becomes slightly larger in this case, because it is overpicking outputs to adhere to the no partial spending rule.
This complements #10386, in particular it addresses @luke-jr and @gmaxwell's concerns in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10386#issuecomment-300667926 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10386#issuecomment-302361381.
Together with `-avoidreuse`, this fully addresses the concerns in #10065 I believe.
Tree-SHA512: 24687a4490ba59cf4198ed90052944ff4996653a4257833bb52ed24d058b3e924800c9b3790aeb6be6385b653b49e304453e5d7ff960e64c682fc23bfc447621
