fa69588537 test: Make PORT_MIN in test runner configurable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is needed when some ports in the port range are used by other processes. Note that simply assigning the ports dynamically does not work:
* We spin up several nodes per test (each node gets its own port)
* We run several tests in parallel
So to avoid nodes from different tests colliding on ports, the port assignment must be deterministic (can not be dynamic).
Fixes: #10869
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa69588537 -- diff looks correct
promag:
ACK fa69588537.
Tree-SHA512: e79adb015e7de79064e2d14336c38bc9672bd779ad6c52917721897e73f617c39d32c068a369c26670002a6c4ab95a71ef3a6878ebdd9710e02f410e2f7bcd14
333317ce6b test: Test that low difficulty chain fork is rejected (MarcoFalke)
fa31dc1bf4 test: Pass down correct chain name in tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To prevent OOM, Bitcoin Core will reject chain forks at low difficulty by default. This is the only use-case of checkpoints, so add a test for it to make sure the feature works as expected. If it didn't work, checkpoints would have no use-case and we might as well remove them
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Thanks for adding the node 1 example. Code review ACK 333317c
Tree-SHA512: 90dffa540d0904f3cffb61d2382b1a26f84fe9560b7013e4461546383add31a8757b350616a6d43217c59ef7b8b2a1b62bb3bab582c679cbb2c660a782ce7be1
e78aaf41f4 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery)
8319e738f9 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne)
0328dcdcfc [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery)
1c93b9b31c [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery)
3862e473f0 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66.
CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt.
This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK e78aaf41f4 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work
ariard:
ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected.
MarcoFalke:
ACK e78aaf41f4 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now)
Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
This combines reporting of buried (formally ISM) softfork deployments
and BIP9 versionbits softfork deployments into one JSON object in the
getblockchaininfo return object.
09c6699900 [qa] Handle disconnect_node race (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Several tests call disconnect_nodes() on each node-pair in rapid
succession, resulting in a race condition if a node disconnects a peer
in-between the calculation of the nodeid's to disconnect and the
invocation of the disconnectnode rpc call. Handle this.
Tree-SHA512: 3078cea0006fcb507c812004a777c505eb1e9dda7c6df12dbbe72395a73ff6f6760f597b6492054f5487b34534417ddef5fbad30553c135c288c4b7cfce79223
Several tests call disconnect_nodes() on each node-pair in rapid
succession, resulting in a race condition if a node disconnects a peer
in-between the calculation of the nodeid's to disconnect and the
invocation of the disconnectnode rpc call. Handle this.
891beb0 [test] fundrawtransaction: lock watch-only shared address (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
`self.nodes[0]` creates an address which is watch-only-shared with `self.nodes[3]`. If `nodes[0]` spends the associated UTXO during any of its sends later, the watchonly test will fail, as `nodes[3]` now has insufficient funds.
I ran into this in #12257 and this commit is in that PR as well, but I figured I'd split it out (and remove from there once/if merged).
Tree-SHA512: d04a04b1ecebe82127cccd47c1b3de311bf07f4b51dff80db20ea2f142e1d5c4a85ed6180c5c0b081d550e238c742e119b953f60f487deac5a3f3536e1a8d9fe
If a cookie file exists in a datadir prior to node startup, it must have
been leftover from a prior unclean shutdown. As bitcoind will overwrite
it anyway, delete it before starting up to prevent the test framework
from inadvertently trying to connect using stale credentials.
self.nodes[0] creates an address which is watch-only-shared with self.nodes[3]. If nodes[0] spends the associated UTXO during any of its sends later, the watchonly test will fail, as nodes[3] now has insufficient funds.
Note that this also adds a new find_vout_for_address function to the test framework.
265d7c4 [tests] Improve assert message when wait_until() fails (John Newbery)
ebf053a [tests] Change feature_block.py to use BitcoinTestFramework (John Newbery)
fc02c12 [tests] Add logging to feature_block.py (John Newbery)
3898c4f [tests] Tidy up feature_block.py (John Newbery)
5cd01d2 [tests] Fix flake8 warnings in feature_block.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Next step in #10603.
- first three commits tidy up feature_block.py
- fourth commit removes usage of ComparisonTestFramework
Longer term, it would be better to separate net_processing testing from validation testing, but I think this is still a useful PR, since it moves us away from the comparison test framework.
Tree-SHA512: d0bb3ad22ad0aa1222877f4212bff075f9ce358e99c69c26d9913e4b346d931b8380e744434a9f6f37812c352cdaa75791691565bfeb18afcb619c06c6ca32a3
fa23105 qa: Cache only chain and wallet for regtest datadir (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
mempool.dat should be empty and I don't see a need to copy it around when restoring from the cache.
Tree-SHA512: f11ab69732db4dee0e9a0900570464e49085532b0cebc963877057112a7b985c477da3d32eb2093daabac9ada9e73b7c49881681ec5efa6101919b0af76001cf
fa1436c42 [qa] util: Remove unused sync_chain (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The util function `sync_blocks` already checks for equal chains, so we can remove the unused `sync_chain`.
Also cleaned up the errors that are printed in case of timeout:
```
AssertionError: Block sync timed out:
'72a3a3e9dcfd0a09204c3447af0f481d19641eeadbe6a91b8e680ed614bc7712'
'5032af4ae22ae7a21afdc9d9f516877309c4dd8ef2ecadb9354be7088439b4a6'
'5032af4ae22ae7a21afdc9d9f516877309c4dd8ef2ecadb9354be7088439b4a6'
```
and
```
AssertionError: Mempool sync timed out:
{'c2af943d9b321c36e0f5a153a9d3d8b11bdd46ceb28e38f5fd2c722e3edb3563'}
set()
set()
```
Tree-SHA512: cb4ad30e3e3773072f59afa2c81cfa27bd8f389a93f02acb919990298627fcfbaa53a3d3944d827cc8a5d009871e42a47ea09e9bb93e85c22e3af6a24a574e5d
Prevents OSX firewall allow-this-application-to-accept-inbound-connections
permission popups and is generally safer.
To prevent binding to 127.0.0.1, set self.bind_to_localhost_only = False.
face7220b7 qa: Move common args to bitcoin.conf (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Beside removing duplicates of the same args in the code, this actually helps with debugging after a test failure.
For example, `bitcoin-qt` has `server` turned off, so you'd have to turn it on every time, if you wanted to debug a temporary test datadir created by the test framework.
Also, `keypool` would fill up if you forget to specify `-keypool=1`.
Tree-SHA512: 996bec8738dc0fce7297ab1fc5b4fbe3aa31b9b6241f8c4e685db728925363ccaca6145ad1edc6bee2f360e02ac4b9a53fcdff74eb79de90793393742d52b559
42e1b5d [test] Round target fee to 8 decimals in assert_fee_amount (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
The output would produce arbitrary number of decimal points, sometimes resulting in 9 decimals:
```
AssertionError: Fee of 0.00000415 BTC too low! (Should be 0.000006175 BTC)
```
The above looks like the expected fee is 6175 sats when in reality it's 618.
Tree-SHA512: ddbff2926a88890d6e34a58db36f0b15a917a80064be6e40e9bcbec3f05ae6202d02adcd7873733945b043fa121d4a56dd930446ec368078fe1935cbfff898ce
The output would produce arbitrary number of decimal points, sometimes resulting in 9 decimals:
AssertionError: Fee of 0.00000415 BTC too low! (Should be 0.000006175 BTC)
The above looks like the expected fee is 6175 sats when in reality it's 618.
