This combines reporting of buried (formally ISM) softfork deployments
and BIP9 versionbits softfork deployments into one JSON object in the
getblockchaininfo return object.
0481fa2584 util: refactor upper/lowercase functions (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This includes renaming Downcase() to ToLower() and make it return a string rather than modify referenced arg.
Also adds ToUpper() string version.
Additionally, it clarifies that the locale independency of the case functions is a *feature* and not a limitation. I interpreted it as the latter and rewrote code to be locale-aware before realizing this.
This is done in preparation for #11413 and as a general refactor. I don't think the optimization that the pre-refactor state gave warrants the unwieldy usage.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0481fa2584 from me
practicalswift:
ACK 0481fa2584 -- diff looks correct
l2a5b1:
ACK 0481fa2 - Although, I think @luke-jr's [feedback](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16566#issuecomment-519580760) is spot on; `Downcase` is just an artifact of `ParseNetwork`, which has been happily downcasing `net` via a string argument for over 7 years; and I do recommend to add `ToLower` *when* somebody actually needs it in new work, there is no point in keeping a trivial utility function if it is not appreciated.
promag:
ACK 0481fa2584.
Tree-SHA512: 9b834ecc1b97db043e261bcbc59e42372e11e2fb9a6943688f18a835bf5c9205f68e4614f58e90ba260d1b8f0e060c6f67b390b62436c21b56891db23bc41628
6285a318d7 Remove redundant WalletController::addWallet slot (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
~~Fix #15453.~~ It is fixed by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16348#issuecomment-509308347
The _only_ reason of these lines on master (8c69fae944)
2679bb8919/src/qt/walletcontroller.cpp (L121-L128)
is to `Q_EMIT walletAdded(wallet_model);` in a thread-safe manner;
This PR makes this in a line of code:
1b83875006/src/qt/walletcontroller.cpp (L121)
EDITED:
To establish the ownership of a new `WalletModel` object is not necessary on the master (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16349#discussion_r301679192 by **promag**).
But:
> it's good habit to set ownership
And I agree. It is a safe practice.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 6285a318d7.
jonasschnelli:
utACK 6285a318d7
ryanofsky:
utACK 6285a318d7. Only change since last review is rebasing and restoring a deleted comment. I do think the comments I suggested last review would be better than this one, but this is at least better than before.
Tree-SHA512: 90370cb1fe853b84dd16c3781ba4f97f3f4deca56bba0203e457f37b3220fd13228cf8495fd882ff18b7c782c27544cc2e7a88aaec5b69b9ef6d8626bdaaf332
1f26328c1b doc: Update Markdown syntax for bdb packages (Emil Engler)
Pull request description:
This pull requests adds single back quotes to libdb-dev and libdb++-dev.
The reason for this is that I (and probably others) overlook them too often and they look like normal text because they have no style.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 1f26328c1b
Tree-SHA512: cd52e34f5b063f9d4337e1fcb04459d2c40be47afe5118c27d949a521980413aefe3ecb862b7b427e576c7690b999f7abdd53193e1b110c3f64a4cd1c3a41cbc
QApplication takes the command line arguments and parses them itself
for some built in command line arguments that it has. We don't want
any of those built in arguments, so instead give it dummy arguments.
bf72b8a555 build: disable libsecp256k1 benchmarks (fanquake)
Pull request description:
These were previously disabled, but upstream changed to having benchmarks enabled by default
in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/480 and we pulled that change in as part of #15703.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK bf72b8a555
real-or-random:
ACK bf72b8a555 I only looked at the diff
practicalswift:
ACK bf72b8a555 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: f4c99c774c8bfd37f98fa200667530988ef8da61920fafdff7e929d9dc5dd8304981b625611f6c3fbc525172d269a2a1d33e592297bd8ff418dff11b05b5e204
Restores the confirmed/conflicted tx check removed in
8753f5652b. There should be no external
behaviour change (these txs would not get accepted to the mempool
anyway), but not having the check in the wallet causes log spam.
Also adds a comment to ResentWalletTransactions() that
confirmed/conflicted tx check is done in SubmitMemoryPoolAndRelay().
b7b9f6e4ce Remove p2pEnabled from Chain interface (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
RPC server starts in warmup mode, it can't process yet calls, then follows connection manager initialization and finally RPC server get out of warmup mode. RPC calls shouldn't be able to get P2P disabled errors because once we initialize g_connman it's not unset until shutdown, after RPC server has been stopped.
@mzumsande comment in #15713 let me thought that `p2pEnabled` was maybe useless, `g_connman` is always initialized before RPC server is getting out of warmup. These checks against P2P state were introduced in 5b446dd5b1.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK b7b9f6e4ce
jnewbery:
ACK b7b9f6e4ce
Tree-SHA512: 4de2b9fc496bf8347ff5cc645848a5a44c8ca7596cd134f17f3088f5f8262d1d88b8e2a052df93e309ec9a81956a808df17a9eb9f10d4f4d693c95d607fe3561
61c5c64b31 doc: Add historical release notes for 0.18.1 (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 61c5c64b31
Tree-SHA512: d98011ee79ae9fb69bd4c0d408b87fd05c640e35683b44bacbb49dbc7e66ebb754f46edd268af611b3fd1c171c2a723d516a21099bd6fd015491f0f4119ca33e
RPC server starts in warmup mode, it can't
process yet calls, then follows connection manager
initialization and finally RPC server get out of
warmup mode. RPC calls shouldn't be able to get
P2P disabled errors because once we initialize
g_connman it's not unset until shutdown, after
RPC server has been stopped.
2f37163caf test: only include and init openSSL where it's actually used (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This should save initializing OpenSSL during tests if compiled with `--disable-bip70`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
straightforward ACK 2f37163caf
Tree-SHA512: 513e867718c79b014b4d470404c891d83c21df92eed07abaccd89b88a32f8b801e402e7d0d400c49c1b964f4b76409ca17fb90bde2e2c45dcf8a1897b452683f
fa76285fdd test: Explain why -whitelist is used in feature_fee_estimation (MarcoFalke)
faff85a69a test: Format feature_fee_estimation with pep8 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa76285fdd -- diff looks correct
Sjors:
ACK fa76285, every bit of clarification helps. It's clear that without `-whitelist` the test becomes extremely slow (it does pass).
Tree-SHA512: 13ec7e4cd0409e7bb76cbcd344e31c0f612c8ce4a1f1ec6ceaedf345f634bc09786ed38d38920c3469b2862c856ee3e5e42534ef90f531bd8dc83c3db3c06417
Because we pass -qt-xcb to Qt, it will compile in a set of xcb helper libraries and extensions.
So skip building all of the libxcb extensions when we build libcxb in depends.
More info is available here: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5.9/linux-requirements.html
b2ea20d330 doc: Fix grammar and punctuation in developer notes (Kristian Kramer)
Pull request description:
This pull request is regarding minor grammar and punctuation errors in the developer notes. There were no modifications to the existing code, only alterations to fix the grammar and punctuation in the text to make the developer notes more understandable and easier to read.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK b2ea20d330
Tree-SHA512: eef990b7e7645b44a1ab0b057f4df35894c307fd23cc861a10d3cc80e7fe7fe8f5b94467f8224cc8a7aaa226f82be3a1f0460a45f3e25e5dab1e1d333c9edbc0
fa8489a155 test: Add test for BIP30 duplicate tx (MarcoFalke)
77770d95e2 test: Properly serialize BIP34 coinbase height (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This adds a test for BIP30 to check that duplicate txs can exist in the blockchain given the first one was completely spent when the second one is added. (Requested by ajtowns in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16333#issuecomment-508604071)
We can not add a test that a later duplicate tx overwrites a previous one, because BIP30 is always enforced on regtest. If someone feels strongly about such a test, some Bitcoin Core code would have to be modified, which can be done in a follow up pull request.
Also, add a commit to fix the BIP34 test failures reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14633#issue-227712540
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa8489a155
Tree-SHA512: c707d0bdc93937263876b603425b53322a2a9f9ec3f50716ae2fa9de8ddc644beb22b26c1bfde7f4aab102633e096b354ef380db919176bd2cb44a2828f884aa
faf36838bd test: Avoid hardcoding the chain name in combine_logs (MarcoFalke)
fa8a1d7ba3 test: Adapt test framework for chains other than "regtest" (MarcoFalke)
68f546635d test: Fix “local variable 'e' is assigned to but never used” (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
This is required for various work in progress:
* testchains #8994
* signet #16411
* some of my locally written tests
While it will be unused in the master branch as of now, it will make all of those pull requests shorter. Thus review for non-regtest tests can focus on the actual changes and not some test framework changes.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK faf36838bd, ran tests and reviewed the code.
Tree-SHA512: 35add66c12cab68f2fac8f7c7d47c604d3f24eae9336ff78f83e2c92b3dc08a25e7f4217199bac5393dd3fb72f945bba9c001d6fbb8efd298c88858075fcb3d6
fab3658356 [qa] Test that getdata requests work as expected (Suhas Daftuar)
fa883ab35a net: Use mockable time for tx download (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Two commits:
* First commit changes to mockable time for tx download (refactoring, should only have an effect on regtest)
* Second commit adds a test that uses mocktime to test tx download
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 16197/commits/fab365835639a3da03f8ad9a58a0db6c6c4c2314
jamesob:
ACK fab3658356
Tree-SHA512: 3a64a3e283ec4bab1f6e506404b11f0a564a5b61d2a7508ae738a61f035e57220484c66e0ae47d847fe9f7e3ff5cc834909d7b34a9bbcea6abe01f8742806908
05fdb97df4 [doc] Update and extend benchmarking.md (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Trying to make benchmarking docs a bit more friendly.
If you have any more ideas, specially on the Notes section, which component need more benchmarks.
(oh isn't a write-up somewhere to generate flame graphs for core ?)
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 05fdb97df4
fanquake:
ACK 05fdb97df4 - with the single nit.
Tree-SHA512: 1d31438065cab12b43b0227c1c774b412ac3d9d46d4cbe69cfe753424a81e51839777e815c70880da8ae6c8fb95221dc7559334eeb550221e8a76fb20a370f75
fa566b2601 test: Add missing sync_blocks to feature_pruning (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes#16537Fixes#16520
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK fa566b2601.
jonatack:
ACK fa566b2601. These past few months I have been seeing intermittent failures with this test on master. Ran `(for i in {1..40}; do test/functional/feature_pruning.py -l=debug; done)` overnight with this change; no failures.
Tree-SHA512: 5181d5ea525f43ad09e1c8b9ae72e32219f483948854c6dc07dda24b790cbdf4012e586253a0e158a71a980d1ca9f5fdf06aafbe95b8ea3d9154ef2c8687395b
0a4e4a05ea [build] .gitignore add Qt Creator Makefile.am.user (Peter Bushnell)
Pull request description:
Opening Bitcoin with Qt Creator via the Makefile.am generates a Makefile.am.user. Would be handy to have this file ignored. Looking around I can see this file has snuck into a few downstream projects. I do personally find myself editing commits to remove this file when I've not been paying attention. There's got to have been a few PRs with this file accidentally attached.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 0a4e4a05ea.
practicalswift:
ACK 0a4e4a05ea -- diff looks correct
fanquake:
ACK 0a4e4a05ea - Something like this might be better in your local .gitignore_global, but we do have a section on Qt Creator in the docs, so I guess this is fine.
Tree-SHA512: 282fd37ec6b313bf86ebe85a42e7f05b14969c683d32f01d2561f4e15d90a2e89f4d0e3c227cb3350684bcae21d178ea343edb32c4c1d33f4849246222c9b8d5
This pull request is regarding minor grammar and punctuation errors in the developer notes. There were no modifications to the existing code, only alterations to fix the grammar and punctuation in the text.
Update developer-notes.md
Update developer-notes.md
Revert "Update developer-notes.md"
This reverts commit dfeb0bacb054ed24766f8af7bae0c0166b0cb4cb.
