8be3f3063 netaddress: Update CNetAddr for ORCHIDv2 (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new
ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not
consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason
to consider the new one to be either.
```
Would like to know if people think this kind of thing is even worth keeping the codebase updated for. Perhaps it'd be nice to write a devtool to pull the csv from [here](https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml) and generate the code.
ACKs for commit 8be3f3:
laanwj:
utACK 8be3f3063
ryanofsky:
utACK 8be3f30633. Only change since last review is rebasing after #15718 merge.
Tree-SHA512: 7c93317f597b1a6c1443e12dd690010392edb9d72a479a8201970db7d3444fbb99a80b98026caad6fbfbebb455ab4035d2dde79bc9263bfd1d0398cd218392e1
Commit fbf327b138 ("Minimal code
changes to allow msvc compilation.") was indeed minimal in terms
of lines touched. But as a result of that minimalism it changed the
logic in memory_cleanse() to first call std::memset() and then
additionally the MSVC-specific SecureZeroMemory() function, and it
also moved a comment to the wrong location.
This commit removes the superfluous call to std::memset() on MSVC
and ensures that the comment is in the right position again.
58e291cfa Add test for GCC bug 90348 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a test for GCC bug 90348 (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348), using a test case extracted from our own `sha256d64` test in crypto_tests.cpp, which was failing on some platforms.
This is based on top of #15983 to make sure the bug doesn't trigger (it does in some Travis configurations without it).
ACKs for commit 58e291:
Tree-SHA512: 4dc9084e92dd143a53930e42bb68e33d922a2a2b891406b259d3a0bed4511dcc49e7447a7a8e4eb793a26e3eacb188ca293b71e0e061f9b3230f8e7fcfd29525
7860c98bd wallet: do not encrypt wallets with disabled private keys (whythat)
Pull request description:
Fix for #15635.
Throw an `RPC_WALLET_ENCRYPTION_FAILED` error when attempting to encrypt wallet with disabled private keys. Changed `test/function/wallet_createwallet.py` to test new behavior.
ACKs for commit 7860c9:
achow101:
utACK 7860c98bd5
meshcollider:
utACK 7860c98bd5
Tree-SHA512: d0cc40efd303a00d0b4d3cb2de59d8d2d7dd35647e7f3fe9d4a8986589499c1f567c5780c83a129e1ab8dbe601279c459c6ebce3b48b1d81d47a28616ef4a369
403e677c9 refactoring: IsInitialBlockDownload -> CChainState (James O'Beirne)
3ccbc376d refactoring: FlushStateToDisk -> CChainState (James O'Beirne)
4d6688603 refactoring: introduce ChainstateActive() (James O'Beirne)
d7c97edee move-only: make the CChainState interface public (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/2019-04-proposal/proposal
---
This changeset starts moving functionality intimately related to CChainState into methods. Parameterizing these functions by a particular CChainState is necessary for the use of multiple chainstates simultaneously (e.g. for asynchronous background validation).
In this change, we
- make the CChainState interface public - since other units will start to invoke its methods directly,
- introduce `::ChainstateActive()`, the CChainState equivalent for `::ChainActive()`,
- and move `IsInitialBlockDownload()` and `FlushStateToDisk()` into methods on CChainState.
Independent of assumeutxo, these changes better encapsulate chainstate behavior and allow easier use from a testing context.
There are more methods that we'll move in the future, but they require other substantial changes (i.e. moving ownership of the `CCoinsView*` hierarchy into CChainState) so we'll save them for future PRs.
---
The first move-only commit is most easily reviewed with `git diff ... --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`.
ACKs for commit 403e67:
Empact:
utACK 403e677c9e no need to address my nits herein
Sjors:
utACK 403e677
ryanofsky:
utACK 403e677c9e. Only change since previous review is removing global state comment as suggested.
MarcoFalke:
utACK 403e677c9e, though the diff still seems a bit bloated with some unnecessary changes in the second commit.
promag:
utACK 403e677 and rebased with current [master](c7cfd20a7).
Tree-SHA512: 6fcf260bb2dc201361170c0b4547405366f5f331fcc3a2bac29b24442814b7b244ca1b58aac5af716885f9a130c343b544590dff780da0bf835c7c5b3ccb2257
If we're unable to disconnect a block during normal operation, then that is a
failure of our local system (such as disk failure) or the chain that we are on
(eg CVE-2018-17144), but cannot be due to failure of the (more work) chain that
we're trying to validate.
We should abort rather than stay on a less work chain.
6e6494b3fb qt: fix opening bitcoin.conf via Preferences on macOS; see #15409 (shannon1916)
Pull request description:
Fix#15409. The QT wallet fail to open the configuration file on Mac, when these is no default application for `*.conf` files.
Here is a feasible way to solve this bug. When `QDesktopServices::openUrl` fails to open `file:///path/bitcoin.conf` with its default application, use `QProcess::startDetached` to run `open -t /path/bitcoin.conf` command instead, so as to open the configuration file with system's default text editor.
ACKs for commit 6e6494:
hebasto:
re-ACK 6e6494b3fb
fanquake:
tACK 6e6494b3fb on macOS 10.14.x
Tree-SHA512: 60e898f4cb77cfd7b8adbc8d33fbebf46bac2a801bdcf40cae15e24b78ad56b1f32358b1879b670623d9f8651dea93961d34269358cea18f4e15b089a8ffcfbf
2d8ad2f997 gui: Enable console line edit on setClientModel (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Make console line edit disable by default, and only enable once `RPCConsole::setClientModel` is called.
Fixes#16119.
ACKs for commit 2d8ad2:
fanquake:
tACK 2d8ad2f997 on macOS.
Tree-SHA512: 1418ce3c120c08e5ec3e7a7a063572a24402ce0ec541bd4adc21f61d60c4e86b711e82e940ebf5f0445ab861f89c146c2a2e7990fb52bed2c65fc199a1981f71
54245985fb Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' changes from 0b70241850..b19c000063 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
It's been 1.5 years since our secp256k1 subtree was updated, while the upstream project has undergone a number of incremental improvements (performance, tests, build system fixes), plus gained the groundwork for batch verification.
As we're early in the 0.19 window, this seems like a good time to get these merged.
ACKs for commit 99df27:
fanquake:
utACK 99df276 the subtree merge, still need to test the actual changes.
laanwj:
utACK 99df276da
Tree-SHA512: 769a699366321635068ebfbd9d3f30f6e72401c4fcdc1fdc84e5b3fd888c3f01437748f6cd23a507ab47cf04c226cd504fd48aee654457c34bb106c9db7e5c09
fa013664ae util: Add type safe GetTime (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There are basically two ways to get the time in Bitcoin Core:
* get the system time (via `GetSystemTimeInSeconds` or `GetTime{Millis,Micros}`)
* get the mockable time (via `GetTime`)
Both return the same type (a plain int). This can lead to (test-only) bugs such as 99464bc38e.
Fix that by deprecating `GetTime` and adding a `GetTime<>` that returns the mockable time in a non-int type. The new util function is currently unused, but new code should it where possible.
ACKs for commit fa0136:
promag:
utACK fa013664.
Tree-SHA512: efab9c463f079fd8fd3030c479637c7b1e8be567a881234bd0f555c8f87e518e3b43ef2466128103db8fc40295aaf24e87ad76d91f338c631246fc703477e95c
fadbc5d895 mempool: remove unused magic number from consistency check (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
Unexplained magic numbers are no good. Since the exact number does not matter, opt for a constant that is less peculiar.
Note that this could only possibly affect mempool consistency checks which is not active by default except on regtest.
see discussion: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15080
ACKs for commit fadbc5:
practicalswift:
utACK fadbc5d895
Tree-SHA512: 80f95ebc284c5bcc5d825fab0e9f962457a411539946d68ef4c8bdea4b1f2f7f0ead88928fac0eaaa02a1175f01f5ef381613ce53b0f27c3098e90d76ecfe9af
0db94e55d wallet: Pass WalletBatch to CWallet::UnsetWalletFlag (João Barbosa)
6cb888b37 Apply the batch treatment to CWallet::SetAddressBook via ImportScriptPubKeys (Ben Woosley)
6154a09e0 Move some of ProcessImport into CWallet::Import* (Ben Woosley)
ccb26cf34 Batch writes for importmulti (Andrew Chow)
d6576e349 Have WalletBatch automatically flush every 1000 updates (Andrew Chow)
366fe0be0 Add AddWatchOnlyWithDB, AddKeyOriginWithDB, AddCScriptWithDB functions (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Instead of writing each item to the wallet database individually, do them in batches so that the import runs faster.
This was tested by importing a ranged descriptor for 10,000 keys.
Current master
```
$ time src/bitcoin-cli -regtest -rpcwallet=importbig importmulti '[{"desc": "sh(wpkh([73111820/44h/1h/0h]tpubDDoT2SgEjaU5rerQpfcRDWPAcwyZ5g7xxHgVAfPwidgPDKVjm89d6jJ8AQotp35Np3m6VaysfUY1C2g68wFqUmraGbzhSsMF9YBuTGxpBaW/1/*))#3w7php47", "range": [0, 10000], "timestamp": "now", "internal": true, "keypool": false, "watchonly": true}]'
...
real 7m45.29s
```
This PR:
```
$ time src/bitcoin-cli -regtest -rpcwallet=importbig4 importmulti '[{"desc": "pkh([73111820/44h/1h/0h]tpubDDoT2SgEjaU5rerQpfcRDWPAcwyZ5g7xxHgVAfPwidgPDKVjm89d6jJ8AQotp35Np3m6VaysfUY1C2g68wFqUmraGbzhSsMF9YBuTGxpBaW/1/*)#v65yjgmc", "range": [0, 10000], "timestamp": "now", "internal": true, "keypool": false, "watchonly": true}]'
...
real 3.93s
```
Fixes#15739
ACKs for commit 0db94e:
jb55:
utACK 0db94e5
ariard:
Tested ACK 0db94e5
Empact:
re-utACK 0db94e55dc only change is re the privacy of `UnsetWalletFlagWithDB` and `AddCScriptWithDB`.
Tree-SHA512: 3481308a64c99b6129f7bd328113dc291fe58743464628931feaebdef0e6ec770ddd5c19e4f9fbc1249a200acb04aaf62a8d914d53b0a29ac1e557576659c0cc
If a transaction is already in-flight when a peer announces a new tx to us, we
schedule a time in the future to reconsider whether to download. At that future
time, there was a bug that would prevent transactions from being rescheduled
for potential download again (ie if the transaction was still in-flight at the
time of reconsideration, such as from some other peer). Fix this.
If a peer hasn't responded to a getdata request, eventually time out the request
and remove it from the in-flight data structures. This is to prevent any bugs in
our handling of those in-flight data structures from filling up the in-flight
map and preventing us from requesting more transactions (such as the NOTFOUND
bug, fixed in a previous commit).
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
9f85e9cb3d scripted-diff: Rename LockAnnotation to LockAssertion (practicalswift)
de9b5dbca3 Make sure the compile-time locking promises given via LockAnnotation:s hold also in practice at runtime (ifdef DEBUG_LOCKORDER) (practicalswift)
3a809446b3 Move LockAnnotation to make it reflect the truth (practicalswift)
cc2588579c Move LockAnnotation from threadsafety.h (imported code) to sync.h (our code) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
`LockAnnotation lock(mutex);` is a guarantee to the compiler thread-analysis that `mutex` is locked (when it couldn't be determined otherwise).
Before this PR it was possible to make the mistake of adding a `LockAnnotation` where the correct mutex is _not_ held. This in turn makes the thread-analysis reasoning being based on incorrect premises.
This PR adds an assertion in the `LockAnnotation` ctor which checks that the guarantees given by us at compile-time are held also in practice (`ifdef DEBUG_LOCKORDER`).
Issues like the one described in #16028 will be discovered immediately with this PR merged.
Changes in this PR:
* Move `LockAnnotation` from `threadsafety.h` (imported code) to `sync.h` (our code)
* Move `LockAnnotation` in `wallet_tests` to make it reflect the truth
* Make sure the compile-time locking promises given via `LockAnnotation`:s hold also in practice at runtime (`ifdef DEBUG_LOCKORDER`)
* Rename `LockAnnotation` to `LockAssertion`
ACKs for commit 9f85e9:
ryanofsky:
utACK 9f85e9cb3d. No changes at all since last review except clean rebase after base PR #16033 was merged
Tree-SHA512: fb80e78fe362adfd6ea8405bcb142c09b99f834fe8be4397282b223ca2c3a2bb9719a074a47a043b44757f840b239a6fcd2f98d14771f8729204834ecf608c3a
e23809a05b [rpc] deriveaddresses: Correct descriptor checksum in RPCExamples (Chris Capobianco)
Pull request description:
Trvial: This fixes the descriptor checksum found the in the deriveaddresses RPC example.
The current checksum value does work, but only if the "h" used for the hardened derivation key origin are replaced with "'".
Given the discussion to switch from "'" to "h" [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15740), I thought it made more sense to update the checksum rather then changing all the "h" to "'" in this example.
ACKs for commit e23809:
instagibbs:
tACK e23809a05b
Tree-SHA512: 06a2b9f3e714ecde9b9a80b3b7a4082eb072e71d8abcc455ff5387e470d48839f22a70b78bbae1cf9122cb133fee46830819b6f39d67aec8c3c8d5889ae94e04
